Einstein-conspiracy

 

Home

CONSPIRACY  
www.conspiracee.com 

Health v medicine  
www.cellsalts.net
  
www.soiltheory.com


Science 

Weather

Einstein-conspiracy 

Free energy  

Scientific dictatorship  

Scalar energy  

What is scalar electromagnetics? 

12 things about about scalar weapons  

Brave new world of scalar electromagnetics 

Universal Seduction extracts 
Pine Gap 

Hurricane Andrew  

Forbidden Archaeology   

Geo science 

Origins of oil 
The fake oil crisis 
Oil con job 
Nuclear energy myths 

True geology 

Education

 

Hidden technology 
Hollow earth theory 

The truth about hemp 
UFOs  
Chemtrails
 
Ether - scalar technology 
Radionics 
Time travel 
Crop circles  
Mars & moon  
Breatharianism 
Coverups uncovered 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Up ] [ Einstein-conspiracy ] Scalar energy ] Universal Seduction ] Morgan / Bearden ] Scientific Dictatorship ] Bright skies ] Free energy ] Geo science ] Suppressed archaeology ] Origins of oil ] True geology ] Education ]

 

"The restrictions placed on public sector science prevents that sector from knowing what is the true theory of physics. As Professors Hawking and Penrose have described it, the fact that General relativity and Quantum Mechanics cannot be combined into a single theory, is a scandal. [22] The reason why it cannot be joined, is because the public science sector is refused permission to do experiments that would lead to such a theory."

 

Science is unable to be reconciled into one unified theory -- which hasn't always been the case. Somewhere along the way, some theories became misinterpreted leading to corruption. Roger Anderton explains how this happened.

The Einstein Conspiracy 
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/
EinsteinConspiracy.pdf

Supplementary information at www.einsteinconspiracy.co.uk 


    Einstein Conspiracy  -- Page 2 -- Page 3 -- Page 4 -- Page 5     

The Einstein Conspiracy
by Roger Anderton 
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/EinsteinConspiracy.pdf 

I have researched Relativity theory and written a book called The Relationship between light and gravity volume 1 available from Amazon. The book deals with my maths investigation of orthodox physics, this website goes beyond the book. There is now no need to look at the maths of orthodox physics to show it to be wrong, because its history can be show to be a myth. Also please note if you get the book, I have had troubles with publishers and different prints have different minor typographical errors.

1. Overall Introduction   [ec1.htm]
1.2 So, who was Roger Boscovich?
2.1 Suppressed Science : Introduction 
2.2 Indications of Conspiracy against Einstein
2.3 Climate of hatred at the time in Germany against Jews especially against Einstein 
2.4 Einstein’s lost theory 
2.5 The general public recognised Einstein as a great man, but physicists ridiculed him after 1925 
2.6 Light Speed
2.7 Aether
2.8 Unified Physics Theory
2.9 Conclusions on Einstein 
2.10 Temporocentric Delusion 
2.11 Chomsky 
2.12 Einstein subjected to anti Semitism from 1919 
2.13 Boscovich

2.14 Tesla   [ec2.htm]
2.15 References and Notes 
3. 1 The Revised Einstein versus the Original Einstein 
3.2 Einstein’s theories misunderstood 
4. Newton - Boscovich Research programme 
5.1 The Split between Classical (Newtonian) and Modern (QM) Physics 
5.2 Max Born on the Ether 
5.3 Ether as metaphor 
5.4 Maxwell supports Ether 
5.5 Occam’s Razor and the Ether 
5.6 Waves 
5.7 Quantum Tunnelling and Resonance 
6. Boscovich’s Theory the foundation of Quantum Theorising 


7. Musical Appreciation of the Universe     [ec3.htm]
8. The Founders of Modern Physics were working from a Unified Physics 
9. Logical Positivism and Scientism
 
10.Feynman on the Corruption of Physics 
11.1 MOBILE PHONES CAUSE CANCER DUE TO ETHER 
11.2 How the Ether - Cancer Effect of Mobile Phones will be covered up in Experiments 
12. The Gravity Conspiracy 
13. Compartmentalisation methodology arising from Atom Bomb Development 
14. Hidden Science from Operation PAPERCLIP 
15.1 Modern Science as derived from an Ancient Wisdom, that was subsequently forgotten. 
15.2 Copernicus 
15.3 Galileo 
16. Serpents of Wisdom: Religious reasons behind the Suppression of Science 
17. Suppression of Ancient History

18. Conspiracy against Daniken   [ec4.htm]
19. Conspiracy against Spinoza 
20.1 Pole Shift 
20.2 Pole Shift and the Ether 
20.3 Einstein - Hapgood Conspiracy 
21.1 CHALLENGER EXPLOSION - EXAMPLE OF THE UFO CONSPIRACY IN OPERATION 
21.2 Introduction 
21.3 The Challenger Explosion 
21.4 Conclusion 
21.5 Footnote

22.1 The Temporocentric Delusion : The influence of Hoaxing in history   [ec5.htm]
22.2 Introduction 
22.3 The Ancient Greeks 
22.4 Columbus 
22.5 Ancient Greek maps 
22.6 The Ptolemy hoax 
22.7 What were the Medieval Science beliefs?
 
22.8 Mandeville’s book 
22.9 Mandeville’s hoaxed life 
22.10 Mandeville’s Stories 
22.11 The Prester John Hoax 
22.12 Mandeville’s Message 
22.13 Mandeville’s evidence that the world can be circumnavigated 
22.14 The Mystery of Mandeville
22.15 Mounds in America 
22.16 Conclusion 
22.17 Further information 
22.18 References

 

1.1 Overall Introduction

Modern physics has been corrupted. The reasons for this are very complicated. This web site is devoted to some of the reasons for that corruption. History is a collection of people doing lots of strange things, forming into groups and trying to impose their will. There was a conspiracy set up against Einstein, by anti-Semites, and there was a corruption of science turning it into a religion by a strange philosophical movement. 

Physics was unified into one complete theory by a genius called Roger Boscovich (which is the Unified Theory that Einstein was looking for, and said to have never found). 
In the beginning of the 20th century, Modern Physics was based upon Boscovich, but the complete theory was rejected, leaving a disunited physics, with Boscovich and many other scientists such as Tesla deleted from mainstream physics history. 

It is not unusual for History to get distorted, In section 22, I give an example of where history (as presented to the general public) around Columbus, is also distorted. Denis Alexander in 'Rebuilding the Matrix' tells us:

"It is a well-known story that the sailors who sailed with Columbus on his epic voyages westward across the Atlantic were afraid to sail due to the possibility that they might fall off the edge of the flat earth. I have to admit that I believed this paradigmatic account concerning the convictions of medieval people until quite recently. The paradigm was enforced by occasional jocular allusions to ‘flat-earth societies’ in press, and by the use of the term ‘flat-earther’ as a form of abuse..... The problem with the ‘flat-earth’ paradigm is that it is certainly false. Historians have been telling us for some time that the commonly held belief that people in medieval times thought the earth was flat is without historical foundation..."

Despite the ‘true’ history being repeatedly told to us by scholars (in their books that are unread), the media persists in giving the delusion that medieval people were ‘flat-earthers’. The Media likes giving a distorted version of history. So, Mainstream Physics History (as presented by the media) being wrong along with everything else, should not be too surprising. The unfortunate thing is that this version of history is taught to science students. Many physicists in the 20th century have spent their time looking for a unified theory and failing, when such a theory was discovered in the 18th century and then promptly hidden by the distorted account of history, that they are taught. 

All these and other events lead to the modern world being a ‘mess’, with reality being very different from what we have been deceived into believing, creating the UFO Mystery. Clues to the real history of mankind gets covered up by the distorted accounts that are presented for such people as Columbus and Einstein. And when we look at the ‘proper physics’ as given to us by Boscovich, then things that were once thought impossible, suddenly become possible.

 

1.2 So, who was Roger Boscovich? 

Well see this article from New Scientist in 1958: 

New Scientist 6 March 1958

Roger Boscovich: a 20th century mind in the 18th century by Dr A L MacKay

Blurb: This year has brought the two hundredth anniversary of publication of his chief work. Some of his ideas were so advanced that it has been possible to appreciate them properly only in the past two decades.

On the rising ground behind the city of Zagreb in Yugoslavia, just where the trees begin, one can see a modern glass and concrete building in which research in physics and chemistry is carried on by the energetic post war generation of Yugoslavs. A notice board announces that this is the Boscovich Institute and in the garden in front there is a bronze statue, by Yugoslavia’s most celebrated sculptor Mestrovic, of a figure wearing priest's robes and deep in thought with his elbow on a globe. The inscription reads "Rugjer Josip Boskovic, 1711 - 87."

Most younger scientists have never met the name of Boscovich and only a few of the older school remember having heard of Boscovichian atoms. Yet, 60 years ago and for 150 years before that, Boscovich had been widely known as a natural philosopher and astronomer. Serious estimates by some historians of science put Boscovich among the dozen greatest scientists, the equal of Newton, Leibniz, Euler and Franklin. Certainly he was the greatest scientist of Yugoslav origin.

Boscovich’s principal work, his Theory of Natural Philosophy, was published 200 years ago last month. Unfortunately Branimir Truhelka, who had begun a definitive biography of Boscovich and was editing the collected works, died prematurely, but his sister has just published a short life from her brother’s notes.

What did Boscovich do, how did he come to be forgotten and how should his work be estimated today?

Born on 18 May, 1711, the son of a Serbian trader [ME - error in article S/B Croatian], in Dubrovnik, the then independent state of Ragusa (whose merchant adventurers gave us the word "argosy"). Boscovich went to Rome at the age of 14 to study mathematics, astronomy and theology at the Collegium Romanum. It was at this college that Matteo Ricci had in 1571 - 77 learnt the astronomy with which he tried to convert all China to the Jesuits.

In 1728 Boscovich finished his novitiate and became a Jesuit and in 1740 he succeeded his teacher Borgondio as professor of mathematics. From his first dissertation on sun spots, in 1736, until he left Rome in 1760, he published about 50 papers on astronomy, optics, mathematics, geodesy and the philosophy of science. He became the principal adviser on technical matters to the Holy See. He set up an observatory, advised on the draining of the Pontine marshes, saw to the repair of St Peter’s when the dome cracked, went on diplomatic missions, visited the site of Troy, made archaeological studies in Italy and measured the length of the 2 degrees of latitude along the meridian between Rome and Rimini.

As this is now the International Geophysical Year, Boscovich should be especially remembered for the latter task. He worked particularly for the production of accurate maps and surveying and was active in three directions, the invention of instruments (he invented a circular eye piece micrometer), the theory of instruments and observations and, most important, the international organisation of scientific enterprises.

He agitated for the accurate measurement of the length of a degree of latitude in various places and to this end approached the Royal Society, Maria Teresa and other authorities and intended to go to Brazil himself, but was persuaded to work in the Papal States instead.

The Royal Society later urged him to go to Pennsylvania but an arc there was measured by Mason and Dixon (of the line). The Royal Society then wished to send Boscovich to California to observe the transit of Venus in 1761, but he eventually went to Constantinople for the same purpose, although he arrived too late and became ill for some months.

The principal Academies of Science in Europe competed to make Boscovich a member, and in 1760 he visited England for several months, where he was made a Fellow of the Royal Society on 26 June. He dedicated a long Latin poem "On the defects of the Sun and Moon" to the Royal Society and this was printed in London by Andrew Millar. His supporters called it "Newton in the mouth of Virgil" but others said it was "uninstructive to an astronomer and unintelligible to anyone else."

Boscovich met many of the leading figures of the day, besides just scientists. He disputed with Dr Johnson. Boswell reports: "In a Latin conversation with Pere Boscovich at the house of Mrs Cholmondely, I heard him (Dr Johnson) maintain the superiority of Sir Isaac Newton over all foreign philosophers with a dignity and eloquence that surprised that learned foreigner." Boscovich was in Cambridge on Guy Fawkes night 1760 and was very displeased by the anti-Catholic nature of the festivities.

After working temporarily in Pavia and Milan there was a dispute with Lagrange, and trouble with the Austrian government, and on top of that the Jesuit Order was disbanded. Following this, in 1773 Boscovich obtained the Directorship of the "Optique Marine" in Paris and became a French citizen. He continued to write prolifically on astronomy and optics, making bitter enemies (D’Alembert and Laplace) and equally enthusiastic friends (Lalande), but in 1785 he retired to Bassano in Italy to see his works through the printers; but his health was broken and he died two years later in Milan at the age of 75. He is buried in the cemetery of Santa Maria Podone in Milan.

All the works mentioned were of solid, lasting value and contributed greatly to the science of the day, establishing Boscovich as a leading figure, but it is his general Theory of Natural Philosophy, published in Vienna in 1758, which is of greatest importance.

Important papers by L L Whyte have recently explained how Boscovich’s theory was 200 years ahead of its time and could not be properly appreciated until modern ideas on relativity and quantum theory had replaced the billiard-balls and elastic jellies of the last century.

Boscovich’s explanation is unusually clear and he says that it "does not go beyond the capacity ... of classes even far below the level of mediocrity." But he claims to "have advanced, in his kind of investigation, much further than Newton himself even thought open to his desires." Basically, Newton said in his Optics, that "to derive from the phenomena of Nature two or three general principles, and then to explain how the properties and actions of all corporate things follow from those principles, this would indeed be a mighty advance in philosophy, even if the causes of those principles had not at the time been discovered."

[NB Philosophy in those days meant what we call Physics. Philosophy has science split away from Physics, to mean something else in the modern context.]

Boscovich claimed to have done better than this by postulating one single law of forces. Boscovich did not consider masses and forces - his description was purely kinematic and related to the mutual accelerations of particles. His atoms were rather like what are now called nucleons (protons or neutrons) and the mass of any particle of matter was simply the number of these atoms in it.

Two atoms had a mutual acceleration given by the curve in the figure shown here (which comes from Boscovich’s book). "A" represents the centre of one atom and the ordinates show the acceleration of another atom with respect to the first at different distances. For very close approach the atoms experience a very strong repulsion so that matter cannot have an infinite density although the atoms occupy no space. 

The law of continuity prohibiting the occurrence of infinite accelerations is one of the foundations of the theory. At large distances the curve approximates to the inverse square law of Newtonian gravitation, but at the intermediate distances there are a number of stable inter - atomic distances (at F, K, O and S) which make the system remarkably like the quantum view of the atom held today.
From this model the basic properties of matter - density, volume, mass, mechanical strength, thermal properties (attributed to agitation of the particles) and gravitation are explained. Optical properties (due to the very rapid motion of particles) are also accounted for in terms of Newton’s showers of particles with alternate fits of reflexion and transmission. These follow plausibly from the wave packet nature of the Boscovichian atoms.

Unfortunately Boscovich seems to have few disciples to publicise his work. His thought was last influential when Maxwell and Kelvin were formulating their ideas of the atom before atoms and electrons were experimentally demonstrated (see "Atom" by Maxwell in the 9th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica), but since the rise of experimental nuclear physics older theories constructed on very slender evidence have been hardly more than historical interest.

The death of Boscovich’s biographer is a double lost because Boscovich’s life would provide a microcosm of European science at its most active period and because his work and thought are of importance in themselves.

[I am unable to copy the picture for:] Diagram of Boscovich’s "Theory of Natural Philosophy reduced to a single law of forces" showing the type of interaction between point atoms. There is a very large repulsion for close approach and approximation to the inverse square law at large distances with several stable inter - atomic distances in between.

[ It looks like a damped sine wave: a wave of large amplitude petering out to smaller amplitude.]

[Note along with everything else mentioned above that: Boscovich’s particles have a wave nature. So, much for the wave/duality problem of Quantum Theory, if you follow Boscovich’s theory.]

So, who was Boscovich? He was the greatest theoretical physicist of ALL TIME. And you never heard of him? Well now read some of the reasons why!

2.1 Suppressed Science : Introduction

The physics that was taught in the 20th century was supposedly based on Einstein. In fact this is not the case, there was a conspiracy against Einstein and his theory was replaced by the physics establishment in 1925/ 1926 by a false theory that is still called Einstein’s theory. The conspiracy started before World War II, and was maintained after the war because of Cold War tensions of wanting to keep atomic secrets from the Russians, and after that it evolved into a doctrine that prevents certain experimental research being carried out that can prove the 1925 theory as being wrong.

Changes in science are supposed to come about when an experiment shows a theory to be wrong. My investigation into the theoretical structure of 20th century physics reveals to me that it is wrong. I then looked for the experimental evidence to support my views, and I found that research into the experiments that would reveal 20th century physics to be wrong, have been suppressed.

Robert O Becker MD pioneering researcher in the field of biological electricity, twice nominated for Nobel Prize, has pointed out the harmful effects of the misuse of electromagnetism. He explains in his book Cross Currents that research into this is suppressed by a Conspiracy in science [1] :

The military organism was designed on the 10 mW standard and, once in place, it had to be defended against the possibility of non thermal bioeffects. The recognition and validation of these effects would mean the collapse of the total organism and the death of [the US defence doctrine] "command, control, communications, and intelligence". My work on electrical control systems and the bioeffects of electromagnetic fields involved me in this controversy early in the 1970s. It quickly became apparent to me that evidence for non thermal effects was viewed as a threat to national security. Safety was not a consideration, because the military mind-set of the time held that despite the lack of actual hostilities, we were in a state of war with the Soviet Union. It was believed that our ability to prevail in that conflict required the virtually unlimited use of electromagnetic energy for all four facets of the "command, control, communications, intelligence" doctrine. This led to the policy of denying any non thermal effects from any electromagnetic usage, whether military or civilian.

Becker then goes on to explain that researchers are not allowed funding for certain topics. This is very interesting, it is within this area of physics that my theorising has led me to become interested.

We have been greatly deceived. We have been led to believe that modern theory is supported by experiments, but we have not been told that the experiments that can disprove modern theory have been denied from being conducted.

This now requires a complete change in our mind-sets. What we have been led to believe about science has been a delusion. We are denied the experiments to prove modern theory wrong. It requires a complete break with the myths that we have been led to believe in the 20th century as regards Einstein and the development of modern physics theory. Bear in mind that having been denied experimental evidence in my theorising, by what has turned out to be a conspiracy, I have had to abandon theorising, and instead play the role of a detective in piecing together the clues left from history as to the real events at a scene of a crime. The relevant events start from 1925 which resulted in the physics community rejecting the physics that Einstein was advocating, in favour of another theory.


Consider the possibility that when Einstein in 1925/1926 said that Quantum Mechanics was wrong, that Einstein was correct. The physics community at the time did not believe him. The events leading from 1925/1926 left Einstein practically alone in his physics beliefs, and the rest of the physics community believing something else. Modern physics is based on the perspective that Einstein was wrong from 1925/1926, either implicitly or explicitly. To every side of an argument there are two sides. We have not been told Einstein’s side of events. I now reconstruct them:

History records sorry fates for heretics such as Socrates, Bruno and Galileo. These heretics upset the majority of people by telling them that their belief system is totally in error. Socrates was forced to drink poison. [2] Bruno was put on a bonfire [3] and Galileo was threaten with torture to recant. [4]

Whether people talk about science or religion, they are still talking about belief systems. When Einstein popped up, on the surface it appears that he was treated much more leniently than the heretics of the past. But when you care to look deeper into the subject, below the superficial surface presented to science students, you find a much more different picture.

On the surface it appears to be just democracy in operation, as the physicists take a vote as to which path theoretical physics should take, with Einstein’s approach losing the vote. It is presented to physics students as such. But when you care to really look. There is a completely different picture that emerges, which has all the hallmarks of a conspiracy.

What appears [to be] democracy can easily turn into conspiracy. Both activities involve groups of people -- if people engage in fair and open debate and reach a majority agreement without prejudice then it is called democracy. But if a group of people gang up and decide to persecute one individual because of prejudices, then it is conspiracy.

The political climate in Germany at that time, was a great deal of hatred being stirred up against Jews, by Hitler in particular, against Einstein. In 1925 it does not seem a very favourable time or environment to be voting on the direction in which to take physics. There was so much hatred being stirred up against Einstein, by so many prominent scientists wanting a different theory than Einstein, it is highly suggestive that may be the vote was not conducted fairly.

Well surely physics is a self correcting process, and if physics had become corrupted before World War II then after the war it would be corrected? You might naively think that, but consider the situation after World War II, it was the start of the Cold War, the fear of the Atomic Bomb. The conspiracy that corrupted physics before the war, became the reason for continuing the conspiracy after the war: America wanted Russia to have as few atomic physics secrets as possible. This then ties into the conspiracy of science that Dr. Becker is talking about. A pre-World War II conspiracy in physics becomes a self perpetuating conspiracy for other reasons after that war.

In 1925/1926 the science community rejected the path of physics that Einstein was advocating. Based on their beliefs from these events, the science community have put their interpretation onto history. Thus the history of 20th century science is itself a lie.

Scientists believe they follow Einstein’s physics, when really their understanding of Einstein’s physics is now all wrong, because of the events around 1925/ 1926. Through schooling and college and university, scientists are being trained in an incorrect interpretation of physics. They are being taught to think in an erroneous way, effectively conditioned to think in this way, to believe in it and be unable to think in other ways. It is near impossible for them after all this training to then abandon practically everything they have been taught and believe. Any perspective presented to them that conflicts with their conditioned beliefs, now seem nonsense to their false way of thinking.

In order to find that the Physics Establishment is into revising history of physics, you have to dig back to older texts on physics to find out what they are really doing.

In more modern revised versions of physics, you don't get any mention of revision to Einstein. Instead you get some fiction about them still following Einstein's 'original General Relativity.' But if you look at old books such as Britannica printed 1971 you find an account where it states that Einstein's General Relativity has been revised: -

... For, according to the Heisenberg relations [of Quantum theory], it is not possible to measure the position and momentum of a particle simultaneously and precisely. On the other hand, if the gravitational field of the body can be measured, the General Theory permits just that. Thus, the General Theory must be modified to make it consistent with quantum theory...... [5] 

The physics conspiracy works by being a battle over beliefs, where only one belief is allowed to be the physics establishment's belief system and the other is suppressed. Modern science can be demonstrated to be wrong, merely by looking at the relevant literature regarding its development.

However, Modern Physicists in general, do not believe that ‘they’ need to pay any attention to their history. For instance top Theoretician David Deutsch in his book The Fabric of Reality says:

...The reverence that philosophers show for the historical sources of ideas is very perverse, you know. In science we do not consider the discoverer of a theory to have any special insight into it. On the contrary, we hardly ever consult original sources. They invariably become obsolete, as the problem - situations that prompted them are transformed by the discoveries themselves. For example, most relativity theorists today understand Einstein’s theory better than he did. The founders of quantum theory made a complete mess of understanding their own theory. Such shaky beginnings are to be expected...... [6] 

Deutsch is telling us that he does not care about the history of his subject, and does not care what theory Einstein originally had because he believes Theorists now know better than Einstein. It is interesting to note that he also believes that the founders of Quantum theory did not understand their subject properly. Einstein said that Quantum Mechanics was wrong, and Deutsch saying this about Quantum Mechanics is in close agreement with Einstein upon that matter. Now if he looked at what Einstein was really saying, before it was altered to fit in with Quantum Mechanics, then he might deduce that the original theory was correct. But he does not pay attention to history, and Historians know that those who do not pay attention to history are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past. 

A similar situation occurred after Newton. There was a fight between believers in the wave theory of light and the particle theory of light. The wave theory of light was suppressed for over a century. The reason given by Electromagnetic: History and Applications by Robert S Elliott :

... Although neither theory [wave and particle theories of light] were adequate, the esteem in which Newton was held by his contemporaries and followers was so great that the wave theory was rejected and allowed to remain unnourished for over a century. If the fact that Newton found the corpuscular hypothesis more acceptable retarded the growth of the theory of light, as some have claimed, the fault lay with those who blindly espoused all his views... [7]

 

Up ] einstein2 ] einstein3 ] einstein4 ] einstein5 ]

 

http://wbabin. net/anderton. htm#Anderton

Added Jan. 26, 2011: Frank Tipler Physics II
Added Jan. 26, 2011: On: Orwellian Nightmare
Added Jan. 26, 2011: Einstein's Gravitation and Newton's Gravitation
Added Jan. 21, 2011: Frank Tipler's Version of Physics
Added Jan. 21, 2011: On 20 Things You Didn't Know about Relativity
Added Jan. 16, 2011: Galileo Relativity Corrupted by Einstein
Added Jan. 11, 2011: On: Einstein Shifts Allegiance 1952-1954
Added Jan. 10, 2011: Einstein: Sacred Cow
Added Dec. 27, 2010: Poincare Versus Einstein
Added Dec. 27, 2010: Typical Type of Nonsense by Einstein Believers with their Misuse of 0
Added Dec. 27, 2010: The Bad Math of Einstein
Added Dec. 27, 2010: Pythagoras Tradition of Atoms
Added Dec. 5, 2010: Pinocchio’s nose paradox: the Failure of Lie Detectors and the Failure of Science
Updated Dec. 27, 2008: Light and Projectiles
Added Dec. 5, 2010: Conjuring Trick. There is no Einstein's Relativity
Added Dec. 5, 2010: Cheerleaders Science Question
Added Nov. 23, 2010: Einstein and the Devil's Advocate
Added Oct. 18, 2010: On the Misconceptions About Einstein
Added Sep. 30, 2010: Accelerating Expansion Model for the Universe
Added Sep. 22, 2010: Subjective Interpretations of Einstein
Added Sep. 22, 2010: The Myth of Dirac Supposedly Combining SR with QM
Added Sep. 8, 2010: The Reaction to Einstein was World War II
Added Sep. 7, 2010: Deutsche Physics was Newtonian Physics
Added Sep. 6, 2010: Einstein's Redefinition of Theory
Added Aug. 12, 2010: On Einstein's Irrational Ontology of Redundancy
Added Aug. 12, 2010: Relativity does Not Require Spacetime Curvature II
Added Jul. 18, 2010: Relativity does Not Require Spacetime Curvature
Added Jul. 18, 2010: The Second Version of Relativity Theory
Added Jun. 7, 2010: On Einstein and the Axiom of Special Relativity
Added Jun. 6, 2010: The Non-Sequitur of Einstein
Added Jun. 6, 2010: Television Interference: Supplement to Extraterrestrial Communication through Radio Signals Based on Newtonian Physics
Added Jun. 6, 2010: Speed/Velocity Addition in Einstein’s relativity and the Principles of Logic
Added Jun. 6, 2010: Let Us Not Forget General Relativity has Changed
Added Apr. 6, 2010: Aether Quantum Theory According to Eddington
Added Mar. 22, 2010: Boscovich's Theory and the Philosophic Tolerance of Entertaining a Thought
Added Mar. 11, 2010: Eddington on the Greatest Scientific Revolution of the 20th Century
Added Feb. 14, 2010: Newton's Mistake
Added Feb. 3, 2010: Electromagnetic and Kinematic Light Speed: Analysis of the Real Einstein
Added Dec. 29, 2009: Summary of the Problem with Special Relativity
Added Oct. 13, 2009: Einstein's Simple Derivation of Lorentz Transformation: A Critique
Added Sep. 16, 2009: One-Way and Two-Way Speed of Light
Added Sep. 16, 2009: On Advanced Triple-Think in Einsteiniana
Added Sep. 5, 2009: Special Relativity: System of Mistakes
Added Aug. 12, 2009: Connections: General Relativity, Special Relativity, Galilean Relativity and Newtonian Physics
Added Aug. 10, 2009: Einstein and the Michelson Morley Experiment
Updated Aug. 9, 2009: General Relativity Shown to be Newtonian Gravitational Theory
Added Jul. 26, 2009: From Galileo to Einstein
Updated Jul. 12, 2009: The Errors in the Derivation of the Lorentz Transform: Part II
Updated Jul. 12, 2009: The Errors in the Derivation of the Lorentz Transform
Added Jun. 30, 2009: The Confusion Caused by Different Types of Points in Relativity Theory
Added Jun. 8, 2009: Galilean Physics Restored
Added May 31, 2009: Einstein Clock Synchronization Error
Added May 18, 2009: The Relativity Transformation Issue
Added May 3, 2009: Example of Subtext of Relativity
Updated May 3, 2009: Newtonian Time Dependent Equation: Synthesis of Relativity and Quantum Physics
Added Apr. 25, 2009: Newtonian Physics Recovered from General Relativity
Added Apr. 15, 2009: Einstein's 1905 Speed/Velocity of Light Errors Part II
Added Apr. 15, 2009: Illustrations of the Faulty Maths of Relativity Part II
Updated Apr. 15, 2009: Nahhas' Newtonian Derivation of Planet Mercury's Advance of Perihelion
Added Apr. 8, 2009: Illustrations of the Faulty Maths of Relativity
Added Apr. 6, 2009: Newtonian Wave-Particle Theory of Light
Added Apr. 2, 2009: Einstein's 1905 Speed/Velocity of Light Errors
Added Mar. 26, 2009: Lorentz Force Law Checked by Lorentz Transform and "Correct" Lorentz Transform
Updated Mar. 26, 2009: Einstein's Revision to Relativity
Updated Feb. 25, 2009: Corrected Galilean Transformation Equations are the Same as Corrected Lorentz Transformation Equations
Added Feb. 1, 2009: Max Born's Relativistic Mistake
Added Jan. 25, 2009: The Derivation of SR: Made from Maths Mistakes
Updated Jan. 18, 2009: Special Relativity is Galilean Relativity
Added Jan. 15, 2009: Relativistic Velocity Addition Analysis
Added Jan. 9, 2009: Einstein's Relativistic Error
Added Dec. 29, 2008: Feynman's Relativistic Mistake
Added Dec. 19, 2008: Contradictions in Special Relativity
Added Dec. 7, 2008: A Critique of Time Dilation
Added Nov. 26, 2008: Newtonian Light Bending
Added Nov. 22, 2008: Boscovich's Principle: Foundation of Relativity
Added Nov. 22, 2008: Boscovich's Theory: Strict Newtonian Physics
Added Nov. 21, 2008: An Attempt to Revive Interest in Boscovich's Theory
Added Nov. 2, 2008: Light Waves and Special Relativity
Added Oct. 23, 2008: Cosmology as Christian Theology
Added Sep. 30, 2008: The Speed of Light "Is" C or the Speed of Light "Seems" C
Added Feb. 5, 2008: Einstein's Unified Field Theory is Newtonian Relativity Theory
Added Jan. 29, 2008: Maxwell-Tombe's Unified Force Equation
Added Jan. 21, 2008: Unified Field Theory: Basics
Added Mar. 12, 2007: An Analysis of Special Relativity from a Boscovichian Perspective
Added Jan. 2, 2007: Einstein, Ether and Unified Field
Added Oct. 10, 2006: Boscovich's Theory and Newton's Third Law
Added May 25, 2006: A Re-Examination of the Concept of Ether in Relativity Theory
Added Apr. 11, 2006: Unified Field Theory Coverup
http://wbabin. net/anderton. htm#Anderton
May. 07, 2011: Poincare’s theory is and is not Einstein’s Special Relativity

May. 04, 2011: Minkowski’s theory is and is not Einstein’s theory of Special Relativity

Apr. 23, 2011: Development of Einstein's Unfied Field theory
http://www.wbabin.net/left_search.php

May. 25, 2011: Physics students taught to have Einstein\'s mental disorder

May. 13, 2011: Stipulation versus Postulate: The difference between Einstein and Poincare

May. 13, 2011: The Mental Block that some people have with the Third Age of Physics

 

 

at: http://www.wbabin.net/left_search.php

Dec. 27, 2010: Pythagoras Tradition of Atoms

Dec. 27, 2010: The Bad Math of Einstein

Dec. 27, 2010: Typical Type of Nonsense by Einstein Believers with their Misuse of 0

Dec. 01, 2010: Light and Projectiles

Nov. 23, 2010: Einstein and the Devil's Advocate

Oct. 18, 2010: On the Misconceptions About Einstein

Sep. 30, 2010: Accelerating Expansion Model for the Universe

Sep. 22, 2010: The Myth of Dirac Supposedly Combining SR with QM

Sep. 22, 2010: Subjective Interpretations of Einstein

Sep. 08, 2010: The Reaction to Einstein was World War II

Sep. 07, 2010: Deutsche Physics was Newtonian Physics

Sep. 06, 2010: Einstein's Redefinition of Theory

Aug. 12, 2010: On Einstein's Irrational Ontology of Redundancy

Aug. 12, 2010: Relativity does Not Require Spacetime Curvature II

Jul. 18, 2010: The Second Version of Relativity Theory

Jul. 18, 2010: Relativity does Not Require Spacetime Curvature

Jun. 07, 2010: On Einstein and the Axiom of Special Relativity

Jun. 06, 2010: Let Us Not Forget General Relativity has Changed

Jun. 06, 2010: Speed/Velocity Addition in Einstein's Relativity and the Principles of Logic

Jun. 06, 2010: Television Interference: Supplement to Extraterrestrial Communication through Radio Signals Based on Newtonian Physics

Jun. 06, 2010: The Non-Sequitur of Einstein

Apr. 06, 2010: Aether Quantum Theory According to Eddington

Mar. 22, 2010: Boscovich's Theory and the Philosophic Tolerance of Entertaining a Thought

Mar. 11, 2010: Eddington on the Greatest Scientific Revolution of the 20th Century

Feb. 14, 2010: Newton's Mistake

Feb. 03, 2010: Electromagnetic and Kinematic Light Speed: Analysis of the Real Einstein

Dec. 29, 2009: Summary of the Problem with Special Relativity

Oct. 13, 2009: Einstein's Simple Derivation of Lorentz Transformation: A Critique

Sep. 16, 2009: On Advanced Triple-Think in Einsteiniana

Sep. 16, 2009: One-Way and Two-Way Speed of Light

Sep. 05, 2009: Special Relativity: System of Mistakes

Aug. 12, 2009: Connections: General Relativity Special Relativity Galilean Relativity and Newtonian Physics

Aug. 10, 2009: Einstein and the Michelson Morley Experiment

Aug. 09, 2009: General Relativity Shown to be Newtonian Gravitational Theory

Jul. 26, 2009: From Galileo to Einstein

Jul. 12, 2009: The Errors in the Derivation of the Lorentz Transform

Jul. 12, 2009: The Errors in the Derivation of the Lorentz Transform: Part II

Jun. 30, 2009: The Confusion Caused by Different Types of Points in Relativity Theory

Jun. 08, 2009: Galilean Physics Restored

May. 31, 2009: Einstein Clock Synchronization Error

May. 18, 2009: The Relativity Transformation Issue

May. 03, 2009: Newtonian Time Dependent Equation: Synthesis of Relativity and Quantum Physics

May. 03, 2009: Example of Subtext of Relativity

Apr. 25, 2009: Newtonian Physics Recovered from General Relativity

Apr. 15, 2009: Nahhas' Newtonian Derivation of Planet Mercury's Advance of Perihelion

Apr. 15, 2009: Illustrations of the Faulty Maths of Relativity Part II

Apr. 15, 2009: Einstein's 1905 Speed/Velocity of Light Errors Part II

Apr. 08, 2009: Illustrations of the Faulty Maths of Relativity

Apr. 06, 2009: Newtonian Wave-Particle Theory of Light

Apr. 02, 2009: Einstein's 1905 Speed/Velocity of Light Errors

Mar. 26, 2009: Einstein's Revision to Relativity

Mar. 26, 2009: Lorentz Force Law Checked by Lorentz Transform and "Correct

Feb. 25, 2009: Corrected Galilean Transformation Equations are the Same as Corrected Lorentz Transformation Equations

Feb. 01, 2009: Max Born's Relativistic Mistake

Jan. 25, 2009: The Derivation of SR: Made from Maths Mistakes

Jan. 18, 2009: Special Relativity is Galilean Relativity

Jan. 15, 2009: Relativistic Velocity Addition Analysis

Jan. 09, 2009: Einstein's Relativistic Error

Dec. 29, 2008: Feynman's Relativistic Mistake

Dec. 19, 2008: Contradictions in Special Relativity

Dec. 07, 2008: A Critique of Time Dilation

Nov. 26, 2008: Newtonian Light Bending

Nov. 22, 2008: Boscovich's Theory: Strict Newtonian Physics

Nov. 22, 2008: Boscovich's Principle: Foundation of Relativity

Nov. 21, 2008: An Attempt to Revive Interest in Boscovich's Theory

Nov. 02, 2008: Light Waves and Special Relativity

Oct. 23, 2008: Cosmology as Christian Theology

Feb. 05, 2008: Einstein's Unified Field Theory is Newtonian Relativity Theory

Jan. 29, 2008: Maxwell-Tombe's Unified Force Equation

Jan. 21, 2008: Unified Field Theory: Basics

Mar. 12, 2007: An Analysis of Special Relativity from a Boscovichian Perspective

Jan. 02, 2007: Einstein Ether and Unified Field

Oct. 10, 2006: Boscovich's Theory and Newton's Third Law

May. 25, 2006: A Re-Examination of the Concept of Ether in Relativity Theory

Apr. 11, 2006: Unified Field Theory Coverup




Sep. 05, 2011: Einstein did not derive E=mc^2 from Special Relativity

Aug. 12, 2011: Science Café Lecture: Modern Physics – based upon misunderstandings surrounding Einstein?

Aug. 01, 2011: Dissident at Oxford Relativity course 5: Leading up to the Ether

Aug. 01, 2011: Dissident at Oxford Relativity course 6: Ether Exists

Jul. 25, 2011: Dissident at Oxford Relativity course 4: Brainwashing by Bad Physics Education

Jul. 22, 2011: Dissident at Oxford Relativity course 3: Space, Time and the Universe

Jul. 18, 2011: Dissident at Oxford Relativity course 2: Open debate on Einstein’s relativity between critics and supporters is required

Jul. 18, 2011: An Introduction to Andertonian Relativity

Jul. 17, 2011: Dissident at Oxford Relativity course I: Review of Einstein\'s book “Relativity: The Special and General Theory”

Jul. 05, 2011: Heart of the Contradiction of Special Relativity

Jun. 26, 2011: Dingle\'s criticism of Special relativity

Apr. 23, 2011: Development of Einstein's Unfied Field theory

Apr. 03, 2011: Einstein Mystique Effect II: A Life Blighted by Einstein

Apr. 03, 2011: Einstein Mystique Effect I: Hawking bows to Einstein Mystique Effect

Apr. 03, 2011: The Postulate of Constancy of Light Speed in Two Forms

Apr. 03, 2011: Wilczek’s Unified Field Theory: Ether Back again

Mar. 30, 2011: Seven Scientific Revolutions and Proposal to Return to the Sixth

Mar. 26, 2011: Mysterious Revision of Einstein’s theory

Mar. 02, 2011: Is The Einstein Fans' Acceptance of Mathematical Nonsense

Feb. 21, 2011: Give Scientists the Freedom to be Wrong

Feb. 21, 2011: Is Good Joke - Einstein

Feb. 21, 2011: Re-Definition of Light Speed in a Vacuum

Feb. 21, 2011: The Misnomer - An Absolute Reference Frame

Feb. 21, 2011: Einstein's Theory as his Misunderstanding of Poincare's Theory

Feb. 18, 2011: Wikipedia Unable to Deal with Relativity

Feb. 10, 2011: Is Faster-Than-Light Travel or Communication Possible?

Feb. 10, 2011: Is the Speed of Light Constant?

Jan. 31, 2011: Commentary on Boskovich in Britannica

Jan. 31, 2011: Old Einstein versus Young Einstein

Jan. 31, 2011: Time Travel Revision

Jan. 26, 2011: Frank Tipler Physics II

Jan. 26, 2011: On: Orwellian Nightmare

Jan. 26, 2011: Einstein's Gravitation and Newton's Gravitation

Jan. 21, 2011: Frank Tipler's Version of Physics

Jan. 21, 2011: On 20 Things You Didn't Know about Relativity

Jan. 16, 2011: Galileo Relativity Corrupted by Einstein

Jan. 11, 2011: On: Einstein Shifts Allegiance 1952-1954

Jan. 10, 2011: Einstein: Sacred Cow

Dec. 27, 2010: Poincare Versus Einstein

Dec. 05, 2010: Pinocchio's Nose Paradox: the Failure of Lie Detectors and the Failure of Science

Dec. 05, 2010: Cheerleaders Science Question

Dec. 05, 2010: Conjuring Trick. There is no Einstein's Relativity

Sep. 30, 2008: The Speed of Light "Is