Disappearance of Harold Holt - a new inquiry!
By Carl Thompson
http://www.harold-holt.net/its_time.htm
"I saw Holt murdered" -
Simmons
The disappearance of Harold Holt, Prime Minister of Australia, has
mystified everyone for years. The official story was that he drowned while
swimming at Cheviot Beach on 17 December 1967. Mr Holt was a very strong
swimmer and the official story has always been held to be dubious.
Mr Gary D. Simmons, 55, once a Navy clearance diver with a high security
rating, in an affidavit (file No. BS 1127/04) to the Brisbane Supreme Court,
claims he was involved in the "disappearance".
Evidence ignored!
He also claims that he has submitted evidence on two previous occasions
which was ignored. The evidence he submitted in Affidavits, files BS9`66/03
and BS1127/04, stated that as part of his duties he was engaged in clandestine
operations, one of which was the removal of the body of the then Prime
Minister of Australia, Harold Holt, from his home to a fishing boat the night
before it was reported he disappeared.
Manchurian candidate!
He further claims that he was surgically operated on during his navy
service, without his knowledge and objects placed in his neck which left him
unable to write, spell or converse with clarity for almost 30 years. To
further enhance his evidence he has tendered a Cat-Scan which clearly shows
the strange objects lodged in his throat. Gary feels the implanted objects
made him like a "Manchurian candidate" complete with trigger words
which left him with memory gaps, but in the past 12 months his mind has become
clear and lucid and that he must use this time to bring out all that he
remembers. He has massed a great deal of evidence and wishes to place it at
the disposal of the authorities.
A coronal inquiry into Mr Holt's disappearance is being scheduled soon in
Victoria and it would be criminal of them to ignore Mr Simmons' evidence which
has been forwarded to them. Prime Minister Harold Holt was murdered in an intelligence service black
operation, a former Royal Australian Navy diver has alleged.
Brisbane man Gary Simmons claims to have towed the body of Harold Holt out
to a fishing boat and then anchored the body to the sea floor, the day before
the Prime Minister was reported missing on 17 December, 1967. Mr Simmons served in the Royal Australian Navy between 9 July 1965 and 5
November 1971, most of which time he spent as a clearance diver. He was
discharged after medical problems rendered him unfit to serve as a diver.
Inquest announced
Mr Simmons has presented his evidence to the Victorian State Coroner, who
on 15 November began an inquest into sevral unsolved disappearances off the
Victorian coast. A spokesman for the coroner's office said that the inquest was not
specifically into the disappearance of Mr Holt. Rather, it was an
administrative move to clear up a large number of open files.
Duty to tell the truth
Mr Simmons told this paper that he had decided to speak openly about his
role in the murder of Harold Holt because he believed that he had a duty to
God to tell the truth before he died. He said of the five people who were on the fishing boat that day only
himself and one other man were still alive.
Mind control
Simmons described drug and mind control techniques similar to those
depicted in the movie 'The Manchurian Candidate' and a surgical operation
which placed mysterious objects in his neck. An operation of which he has no
memory but x-rays show the objects clearly inside him.
He recollected being on the deck of a fishing boat, then going over the
side about three kilometres off shore and swimming to the shore near the then
Prime Minister's beach house. He said that he was met at the shore and given a
body bag, which he towed back out to the fishing boat. The marathon swim with
the body bag was made possible by favourable tide and currents. Simmons said
that he was an exceptional swimmer, probably the best among the Navy's divers
at that time, which would have been why he was chosen for the mission.
Still alive?
When he got back to the fishing boat, the body bag was opened and he saw
Harold Holt inside it.
"I think that they'd drugged him, because I think that he was still
alive when I picked him up," Mr Simmons said.
"I remember his hair. I remember thinking how strange it was that a
man in a body bag would have such neatly combed hair."
Mr Simmons said that he then put on SCUBA gear and took Harold Holt down to
a point on the sea floor, where he anchored the Prime Minister's body to a
weight.
Too deep
The body was attached by a tether that was supposed to come apart after a
couple of days, so that Mr Holt's body could float to the surface and be
found.
"That part of the plan failed, for some reason," he said. "I
think that I took him too deep. Its been my experience that bodies down 70
feet or more don't come back up."
Cover-ups in high places?
There have been a few people who have questioned our story about the murder
of Harold Holt and the veracity of Gary Simmons' charges. If people doubt the
story maybe they could explain to me how the devices placed in Mr Simmons'
throat got there and what they are for. Mr Simmons himself does not know,
neither can he remember ever having undergone any operation to place them
there. He is, even now, ignorant of their purpose, but suspects that they have
a nefarious origin.
It seems incongruous that allegations of such import can be ignored by the
powers that be, but that appears to be the case, so far. The charges are clear and concise and published widely for everyone to
read. The websites: www.harold-holt.net
and www.shootersnews.addr.com
being just two of the websites dealing with Prime Minister Holt's murder.
Murder is not affected by the statues of limitations, so you would think
that police would be happy to have such a raft of evidence to prosecute an
investigation, but sadly, and not surprisingly, they don't manifest any great
enthusiasm.
The police are very active fining Mum, Dad and the kids for travelling a
little too fast on their way home from the beach, on behalf of Tenix Australia
Pty Ltd, but are very reticent to pursue matters of much greater interest to
the Australian pubic. Once we had a police force skilled in the law,
administered locally, and an asset to any community. Now we are burdened by a
force, ignorant of law but skilled in forcing regulations on us, administered
by a power no longer part of the community, but remote and answering to no one
but their political masters. Someone once said, "Power corrupts and
absolute power corrupts absolutely". We should remember that quotation
when they are handing out extra powers to police.
It is now obvious to everyone who cares to read that Lee Harvey Oswald was
not a lone assassin but part of a much greater plot. Those facts were known at
the time by various authority figures, but a cover-up ensued.
Harold Holt falls into the same category and Gary Simmons is ready to tell
all he knows if anyone will listen. The Australian public must ask loudly why
no one in authority is taking notice. Their reticence can only be construed as
complicity, much as the evidence regarding the Port Arthur evidence regarding
the massacre being locked up for 50 years, a move unprecedented in Australian
criminal history, manifests the complicity of the Tasmanian authorities and
also the federal authorities. It is time that the public began to demand
answers to these questions. That is, providing we really do want to maintain
our freedom!
Sacrifice is the price of freedom and sadly Australia has lost the ability
to see the benefit in sacrifice. Let us hope that the national character ha
snot been permanently damaged. --Ray Smyth

Vol.4, edition 11
Murder - Former navy diver reveals role in
Harold Holt mystery
By Carl D. Thompson
http://www.harold-holt.net/Extracts_Nation_News.htm
"Mr Simmons said that he could recall being involved in
14 black operations, for which he was drugged and subjected to mind
control."
* Next month in The Nation, a retired Brisbane engineer
reveals why Harold Holt was murdered and who was behind the conspiracy.

Oil big money murdered Holt
Atomic plan engineer reveals conspiracy
By Carl D. Thompson
Prime Minister Harold Holt was murdered to prevent the
establishment of an Australian atomic energy industry, said a retired
engineer who was deeply involved in the still-born project.
Brisbane man Colin Law, who was involved in the purchase and
importation of equipment that was vital to the project, said Harold Holt was
murdered on the orders international capital, in particular the Rockefeller
Foundation.
In last month's edition of The Nation, former Royal
Australian Navy diver Gary Simmons confessed to taking Harold Holt's body
down to the sea floor and anchoring it to a weight, on 16 December 1967 as
part of an intelligence service black operation. The then Prime Minister was reported missing the following
day.
Mr Law said that on 18 December 1967 Harold Holt had been
due to announce the establishment of a major Australian nuclear energy
industry, which would have made Australia the Saudi Arabia of atomic energy.
He said that Australia would have gained dominance of the
world's atomic energy industry quickly and that the entire nation would have
boomed.
This was something that could not be allowed to happen
because it threatened Rockefeller control of the world's governments and
economies through control of the energy supply, as well as the international
banking system. Mr Law said that he was briefed on the matter by the late
Sir Philip Baxter, who was the head of the Australian Atomic Energy
Commission.
"I was warned that we were being opposed by extremely
dangerous people," Mr Law said.
"Sir Philip warned me that there were no limits to what
they would do to achieve their goals ... and that included murdering a Prime
Minister of Australia. The disappearance of Prime Minister Harold Holt was no
accident. Sir Philip Baxter was well brief on this."
Mr Law said that Harold Holt had been due to announce the
construction of a nuclear power station at Jervis Bay. This power station
would have provided cheap energy to a planned steel mill, which would have
broken BHP's monopoly of the Australian steel industry.
It would also have allowed Australia to produce some of the
cheapest steel in the world.
"The project had the full backing of the Holt
Government and was due to proceed," Mr Law said. According to Sir Philip, drastic action had to be
taken to stop the project. Sir Philip Baxter knew all the details and all those
who were involved.
Holt murdered by oil barons
"Naturally, with all the turmoil that followed the
disappearance of Harold Holt and the change to a Prime Minister who could be
bought, the project was shelved."
Mr Law said that the plan to establish an Australian atomic
energy industry lingered in the background until the Hawke Labor Government
was elected. That government sold off all the equipment that had been bought
and dismantled the infrastructure that had been created since the 1960s.
Mr Law said atomic energy was safe, cheap, clean and the
Holt plan would have placed Australian in a position of global economic
dominance.
The Holt plan would have created an economic boom for
Australia, the likes of which had not been seen since the industrial
revolution, or the discovery of oil in the Middle East.
He said that the so-called environmentalist movement had
been telling lies about atomic energy since the 1960s, funded by the same
international capitalists who controlled the fossil fuel energy supply. The
same people who murdered Harold Holt.
"The headquarters is the Transnational Institute in
Amsterdam, with funding coming from the tax-exempt Rockefeller Rubin Ford
Foundation in the United States," Mr Law said.
"The list of recipients of this funding includes
organisations such as Greenpeace, Friends of the Earth, The World Council of
Churches, the Uniting Church, the Communist Party of Australia and the
Teachers' Federation. They have also created and funded the Aboriginal
industry, which they use as a means to lock away Australia's resources and
prevent the development of an atomic energy industry."
Mr Law said the Rockefeller agenda was about political and
economic control.
"Rockefeller controls the world's major energy
resources, especially oil," Mr Law said.
"In the Northern Hemisphere, especially North America,
the average working man spends one third of his income on energy, mainly on
oil to keep warm during the winters. The Rockefeller wealth and power comes from
controlling the price of world energy and money.
"The philosophy is to keep the working man poor, by
controlling his income through the price of energy. When cheap alternatives occur the panic button is
pressed. Setting up the Rockefeller foundation and the
investment of billions of dollars a year to fund all the anti groups may
seem a lot, but it is peanuts to them compared with what is at stake."

http://www.harold-holt.net/JHoward_2003.htm
Excerpted from
Letter to John Howard, dated
15 Sept. '03
advising of denial of Civil and Human Rights.
Also you will find some
information in this letter about ASIS (Australian Secret Intelligence
Service).
"... Here is some added information for your Holt
inquiry: Why was everyone sent on leave from the Navy Diving Team One except
for myself before Holt's disappearance? Why weren't the 12 divers from Team
One recalled for the Holt search? Why did Team One, before being sent on
leave got all the search and diving gear together for this search? (I spent
14 months on this team and was there three months before the Holts event,
which demonstrates that I have knowledge of how this Diving Team operates
and works.)
For the past 32 years, a top few at ASIS have been allowed
to act like GODS where "they" answer to no one and have stop
people from inquiring about me. The abuse of "their authority"
where in the past, it has interfered in the Due Process of law was done to
conceal my issues and to stop any disclosure or acknowledgement of me. This
was done to conceal "their" own criminal act of fraud, where for
years "they" have fraudulently withheld payments and entitlements
that belong to others and me. These entitlements were to compensate and
reward us for the losses; we will suffer through our High Security.
It should be noted that "their" inference in the
due process of law, is against the High Court ruling of 1984 of A versus
Hayden 56 ALR 82. This ruling was against "them" and the Federal
Government, where it stated no one can break the laws of the land and no one
can interfere in the due process of law. The High Court ruling also states
any contract or engagement having a tendency, however slight, to affect the
administration of justice is illegal and void.
The way you, your Government and the media have ignored my
issues in the past is nothing but contemptible where you choose silence over
law or fair play. You can't have it both ways with my High Security where:
you deny me law yet you apply law against me, and where you deny me of my
rights, and then you ignore me of my entitlements. It should also be
remembered that for nearly 30 years I was unable to write, spell or speak
with clarity after the operation to my throat and these are years I can
never get back.

Letter to John Howard, dated
29 Jan '05
requesting an ex-gratia payment, or face legal action. --- The purpose of
these letters is to show how these elected members of Parliament would
fail in their elected duty by ignoring the seriousness of the evidence
placed before them.
http://www.harold-holt.net/JHoward29Jan05.htm
The following letter, is Gary's explanation why
this web site exists and without interference. --- It was faxed to the
Prime Minister, the Federal Attorney General and the American Consulate
(Sydney) on the morning of the 28th February 2005.
|
26 February 2005
G. D. Simmons
15 Ludgate Street
BANYO QLD 4014
Ph: (97) 3267 5964
Mr John Winston Howard
Prime Minister of Australia
3-5 National Circuit
Canberra ACT 2600
Attention: Mr John Howard Prime Minister
You are aware by all my previous correspondence, that I
have always stated that the operation to my throat was illegal and
because I gave no consent for it nor did I ever give consent to
having foreign objects placed in my throat, as shown in my
CT-Scan.
I now inform you that I have involved my website www.harold-holt.net
under the Second Law of the
Universe because I have withdrawn my consent to their deliberate
intent, where I was used for evil purposes.
The Laws of the Universe are
immutable and cannot be changed or distorted. They work without question
as to whom is applying them and dire consequences for those who
interfere with them.
Note; This means there can be no interference with my
website or any person involved with it or involved with me.
If you are unable to comprehend the above, I suggest you
get in touch with your "CONTROLLER" who knows precisely what I
am saying, and who is held accountable for any interference with the
position I have taken under the
Second Law of the Universe.
Gary David Simmons
The
Creator is the only one, and will show us how to save our Planet.
Remember their GOD, your GOD, will be answerable to the Creator." |

http://www.libertarian.org.au/
The Australian Libertarian Society (ALS) is an organisation dedicated to the
principles of individual liberty, free markets and small government.
http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=203475
PM me if you want a free copy of The Nation
The Nation, is on a
circulation drive.
If you have not seen The Nation recently and would like a complimentary
copy, PM me with a snail mail address and I will mail one to you
immediately.
If you want something faster than snail mail, PM me your email address and I
will send a copy to you as an Adobe PDF. I need your ISP email address, not
one of the free web-based email services (such as Yahoo, Hotmail and
Nightmail) because they do not accept attachments.
The Nation is published every month and is the official voice of the One
Nation political party.
It is a tabloid and is currently four pages. Soon it will go up to eight
pages.
An annual subscription costs $18.
http://www.stormfront.org/archive/t-173471What_are_you_making_for_Yule/
t-203475PM_me_if_you_want_a_free_copy_of_The_Nation.html
The Nation is published every month and is the official voice of the One Nation
political party.
Doesn't seem to quite correct. This is the email I got.
Hello ......,
The Nation Newspaper is not the "Official newsletter" as it claims
to be, but is put out be the Beenleigh Branch of the Queensland Division.
Contacts are:
Ph. (07) 3287 4440
Fax: (07) 3287 4448
Email: onenation@gil.com.au
Website: www.onenation.com.au
Regards,
Jim Casidy
President One Nation NSW.
National Archives of Australia
http://www.aa.gov.au/publications/fact_sheets/FS144.html
Other conspiracy theories regarding Holt's
disappearance
By Ross Coulthart
http://sunday.ninemsn.com.au/sunday/investigative/
case5.asp?MSID=a3cfd0fb2adf4feba4e30e01cb95491d

http://www.smh.com.au/cgi-bin/common/printArticle.pl?path=/articles/
2002/08/16/1029114012911.html
How a scared little country became a nuclear wannabe
By Tony Stephens
August 17 2002
As the Howard Government revs up the rhetoric about a war against Iraq and
weapons of mass destruction, a new documentary reveals how Australian
governments pushed for two decades to have their own nuclear weapons.
The documentary claims the proposed nuclear power station at Jervis Bay was
not designed primarily to produce energy for domestic consumption, but as the
centrepiece in a secret plan to fortress Australia with a nuclear arsenal.
A co-producer of the documentary, Peter Butt, said yesterday that Fortress
Australia was a "story of a country fearful of its enemies and mistrustful
of its allies that set out to buy, and ultimately construct, its own nuclear
weapons".
He said: "With war against Iraq now likely, it's timely to confront our
own sordid past, when we were once a frightened little country heading down
exactly the same path, without considering the consequences."
Andrew Ross, a military analyst with the Australian Defence Studies Centre at
the University of NSW, said that the notion of Fortress Australia should be put
in the context of the Cold War, instability in Asia and Australia acting as part
of the old British Empire. But it was true that "Australian military
strategists were planning to be able to fight a nuclear war in South-East Asia
in the 1960s".
The former United Nations weapons inspector Richard Butler drew another
parallel: "Prime Minister Menzies had lied to Australia about the Vietnam
War, but we had asked to be invited to join, just as the Howard Government is
asking to be in a war against Iraq. Then Sir John Gorton, pushed by Sir Philip
Baxter, Australia's Dr Strangelove, sought a nuclear option. Now the Howard
Government wants to spend billions on new strike aircraft."
Sir Philip, head of the Atomic Energy Commission, predicted 30 years ago that
Australia would be a lifeboat after a nuclear war around the turn of the
century. Most of the northern hemisphere would be uninhabitable and Australians
would have to fight off an invasion by armed refugees. He urged that "the
most sophisticated and effective weapons that man could devise" be adopted.
Fortress Australia, to be screened on ABC on Thursday, draws on previously
secret documents and rare film, including some bizarre footage taken in 1963 of
a simulated nuclear test in North Queensland.
Wayne Reynolds, of Newcastle University, wrote last year in Australia's Bid
for the Atom Bomb that Australia had hoped to secure nuclear weapons through the
United States or Britain, but the big powers agreed to limit their
proliferation. Dr Reynolds said "Australia's Manhattan Program" would
have resulted in an Australian reactor producing weapons-grade plutonium.
The documentary reveals Baxter wanted Britain to fund a nuclear reactor close
to the Mary Kathleen uranium mine, in north-west Queensland. In 1965, Menzies
asked the Atomic Energy Commission to advise on the cost of producing
nuclear weapons. Baxter thought 30 could be produced in a year.
In 1966, the prime minister, Harold Holt, thought Australia should be as
nuclear self-sufficient as possible. In 1967, Baxter sought to restrict uranium
sales to Britain so that Australia could produce its own bombs.
Gorton was sworn in as Britain was withdrawing from Asia. He refused to sign
the Nuclear Non-proliferation Treaty in 1968 and pushed for the power station at
Jervis Bay.
Dr Ross, an assistant to cabinet secretary Sir John Bunting in 1971, said:
"We couldn't work out why the government wanted a power station in Jervis
Bay. It didn't make sense as an energy source."
After succeeding Gorton as prime minister, Billy McMahon scrapped the
station. Australia signed the treaty. By the mid-1980s, it was a leader in the
nuclear
disarmament campaign.

"Conspirators' Hierarchy: The Story of the Committee of 300",
by
Dr. John Coleman,
Let us talk about actual case histories, the attempt to communize and
de-industrialize Italy. The Committee of 300 long ago decreed that there shall
be a smaller - much smaller - and better world, that is, their idea of what
constitutes a better world. The myriad's of useless eaters consuming scarce
natural-resources were to be culled (killed). Industrial progress supports
population-growth. Therefore the command to multiply and subdue the earth found
in Genesis had to be subverted.
This called for an attack upon Christianity; the slow but sure disintegration
of industrial nation states; the destruction of hundreds of millions of people,
referred to by the Committee of 300 as "surplus population," and the
removal of any leader who dared to stand in the way of the Committee's global
planning to reach the foregoing objectives.
Two of the Committee's earliest targets were Italy and Pakistan. The late
Aldo Moro, Prime Minister of Italy, was one leader who opposed "zero
growth" and population-reductions planned for his country, thereby
incurring the wrath of the Club of Rome commissioned by the
"Olympians" to carry-out its policies in this regard. In a Rome
courtroom on November 10th, 1982, a close friend of Moro's testified that the
former prime-minister was threatened by an agent of the Royal Institute for
International Affairs (RIIA), who is also a Committee of 300 member, while he
was still the U.S. Secretary of State. The meteoric rise of the man the witness
named as Kissinger will be dealt with later.
It will be recalled that Prime Minister Moro was kidnapped by the Red
Brigades in 1978 and subsequently brutally shot to death. It was at the trial of
members of the Red Brigades that several of them testified to the fact that they
knew of high-level U.S. involvement in the plot to kill Moro. When threatening
Moro, Kissinger was obviously not carrying out U.S. foreign-policy, but rather
acting according to instructions received from the Club of Rome, the
foreign-policy arm of the Committee of 300. The witness who delivered the
bombshell in open court was a close associate of Moro's, Gorrado Guerzoni.
His explosive testimony was broadcast over Italian television and radio on
November l0th, 1982, and printed in several Italian newspapers yet this vital
information was suppressed in the U.S. Those famous bastions of freedom with a
compelling right-to-know, the Washington Post and the New York Times, did not
think it important to even print a single line of Guerzoni's testimony.
Nor was the news carried by any of the wire-services or television-stations.
The fact that Italy's Aldo Moro had been a leading politician for decades, and
who was kidnapped in broad daylight in the Spring of 1978, all of his bodyguards
butchered in cold blood, was not deemed newsworthy, even though Kissinger stood
accused as an accomplice to these crimes? Or was the silence BECAUSE of
Kissinger's involvement?
In my 1982 exposé of this heinous crime, I demonstrated that Aldo Moro, a
loyal member of the Christian Democrat Party, was murdered by assassins
controlled by P2 Masonry with the object of bringing Italy into line with Club
of Rome orders to de-industrialize the country and considerably reduce its
population. Moro's plans to stabilize Italy through full employment and
industrial and political peace would have strengthened Catholic opposition to
Communism and made the destabilization of the Middle East - a prime goal - that
much harder.
From the foregoing it becomes clear just how far ahead the conspirators plan.
They do not think in terms of a Five Year Plan. One needs to go back to
Weishaupt's statements about the early Catholic Church to understand what was
involved in the murder of Aldo Moro. Moro's death removed the roadblocks to the
plans to destabilize Italy, and as we now know, enabled conspiracy-plans for the
Middle East to be carried out in the Gulf War 14 years later.
......
IMF AND THE THIRD WORLD COUNTRIES.
Revealing the real motive behind the so-called foreign aid Dr Coleman tells us:
“One needs to have a clear understanding of just why the
fake ‘environmentalist movement’, established and financially supported by
the Club of Rome’, was called upon to wage a war against nuclear energy—with
nuclear energy generating electricity at cheap rates and in abundant supplies,
third world countries would gradually become independent of US and IMF aid and
begin to assert their sovereignty. Dependence on foreign aid actually keeps
other countries in servitude of the Council of Foreign Relations (CFR)”.

Oil from natural gas
The Nation, the official newspaper of One Nation, Vol5, Ed.9
Adelaide University in 1976 financed by Mobil Oil (Rockefeller)
invented a process to convert natural gas to synthetic fuels. As they did not
patent it, Mobil used the process to build the Motunui Synthetic fuel plant.
Opened in 1986 this plant takes natural gas from both the offshore Maui and
offshore Kapuni gas fields and converts the combined gas feed first to methanol
and then to synthetic gasoline via the Mobile Methanol-to-gasoline (MTG)
process.
Located 20km north of New Plymouth, New Zealand, the plant
produces a premium unleaded gasoline blendstock suitable for use directly in the
transport fuel market. The total annual production from the plant is equivalent
to about one third of the New Zealand gasline market. When combined with the
production of condensates associated with the off-take of Maui and Kapuni gas,
plus the use of CNG and LPG as a fuel, this has enabled New Zealand to achieve
almost 50% self sufficiency in petroleum products, a significant shift from the
situation in the early 1980s when the country was 85% dependent on foreign oil.
Australia also has vast natural gas fields and gas from the
is sold as 'Autogas' (LPG) which is either refined from natural gas or blended
with the propane, the by-product of oil refining which is normally burnt off
into the atmosphere. Rather than using the MTG process, it is converted to a
liquid by pressuring it to 150 psi and stored in a separate tank. A converter
returns it to a gas, which is injected into the engine.
This way it costs only about three cents per litre, however
this must be compared with the cost of producing oil which provides about 280
litres of fuel per barrel, Bass Strait oil costs less than $3 a barrel to
produce.

Fuel reprocessing
The Nation, the official newspaper of One Nation, Vol5, Ed.9
Monday 15th August 05: The ABC 'Four Corners' programme on
the electricity generation industry was the usual well-orchestrated litany of
lies and half-truths which the CFR's influenced Peter Garret circulates on this
topic. The programme was in fact a beat up to promote the Kyoto scam, and the
lie about harmless carbon dioxide that is essential for plant life. The real
deadly by-product is sulphur dioxide, which kills plant life (forests) and does
not decay.
The ABC showed only the older side of the industry,
highlighting the by-product storage from it, maybe this was intentional or maybe
its because the industry no longer makes it latest technology public. The truth
is, with new reactor technology and re-processing, what little is left is
encapsulated in the small slug shown above with final decay life now being
reduced to a minimum.
What is not clearly understood is that the CFR through their
foundations, fund Greenpeace and other anti-nuclear power as the biggest threat
to their control over the price of energy (oil),. Over 40% of household income
in North America is spent on oil just to keep warm in the winter. Their control
of the media is used to promote the lie of shortages to justify their greed for
price increases, this is apparent when you go to fill up at the fuel pump.
Through their control of the IMF it has now been revealed
that a 10% slush fund is available to control our two party system of
government. This has resulted in the dismantling of the National Energy Research
Development Corporation and the sell out of the control of our vast energy
resources to foreign control. OPEC pricing, excise taxes and GST give us the
highest domestic fuel prices of all of the fuel exporting countries.
Unlike he Arab OPEC countries where fuel is only a few cents a litre, our
government exploits us to further CFR globalist greed.
Lets examine the lies about the prospect of a nuclear waste
dump in Australia. To start with there is o such thing as waste in the nuclear
industry, spent fuel is in storage waiting reprocessing. With the older reactors
it was not possible to fully recycle all the fuel, tis resulted in this minute
amount needing to be disposed.
To this end the Australian National University developed the Synroc process that
encapsulates this material into a small disc that can be held in your hand. For
safety it is normally buried in an area of safe stable earth structure where it
can be left to decay back to a harmless state.
here has been many lies circulated about decay life, however
from confidential information I had before retiring, this decay life had been
reduced from years down to weeks and maybe now hours.
The latest reactors coming into service are far more
efficient than the older ones, especially those operating in the old eastern
block communist countries. The Fast Breeder types recycle spent fuel and are the
closest thing to a complete renewable energy cycle.
The reprocessing of nuclear fuel is worth $ billions, however
control over the complete fuel cycle is worth $ trillions. Australia has over
40% of the world's known supplies of uranium. By mining and enriching it then
producing fuel rods for lease to the world's nuclear power stations on condition
the spent fuel is returned to us for reprocessing, not only gives us control
over the complete nuclear cycle, it is also worth more than all the Arab oil
combined. There are now over 441 nuclear power stations operating around the
world in about 37 countries with another 72 on the way. Nuclear power drives
most modern navies and space vehicles. It will eventually power most shipping
and supply water via desalination plants.
Australia has the resources, the knowledge and even the equipment to undertake
such a project, this I can assure you of as I did play a part in obtaining it.
Australia should export more uranium according to the
resources Minister Ian MacFarlane in responding to news that the Labor Party
backed the idea of increasing sales to Communist China.
However what he failed to mention was that uranium should not be exported as
yellow cake, it should be processed here to fuel rods and then leased on
condition that the spent rods are returned for reprocessing.
This then provides us with complete control. Currently there
is only the useless non-proliferation agreement that was drawn up by the
Rockefellers to protect their oil interest from competition.
The choice is simple, we can go forward and become one of the wealthy countries
and at the same time play our part in defusing explosive world situation which
are all caused by perceived shortages of energy. The other alternative is to
believe all the lies and propaganda of the CFR and keep giving away our
resources and jobs, increasing our debt until we eventually lose control of our
country. Remember, it is all about the struggle for power, organisations that
are powerful enough to dispose of a prime minister and use their slush funds to
buy others, will do all in their power to retain control of Australia.
Write to your local Federal and State Member of Parliament.
Ask them to bring back 'Energy and Oil Cost price regulation'.
Recently the editor wrote to the Australian Competition and
Consumer Commission asking for an explanation of how pricing for petrol and
other fuel products was determined, given that it seemed logical that some
Australian agency should be overseeing the maximum retail amount that could be
charged to customers.
The answer I received pointed out that (quote) "Prior to
1 August 1998 the ACCC endorsed the maximum wholesale prices for petrol and
diesel of the major and established freight differentials. On that day petrol
and diesel prices were deregulated and wholesalers are now free to set their own
prices based on market conditions." (end quote)
The reply went on to say that - Petrol and diesel are
internationally traded commodities. As such, if prices in Australia were lower
than international prices, domestic producers would have an incentive to export
them overseas, which could lead to shortages in Australia. Australia currently
imports around 15% of total petrol consumed in Australia, for which refiners
would have to pay the international price.
Therefore, I believe we should ask, how much do refiners pay
for locally sources oil? And it becomes obvious that we are being ripped off by
petrol companies who gain the extra profit by buying cheaper local product and
selling at international retail prices. Of course, the federal government also
benefits from the higher taxes gained from artificially inflated retail prices.
The letter closed with (quote), "The issue of regulation
of prices is one for the Australian Government to determine. You should address
your question to the Australian Treasury." (end)
One Nation asks all readers to do just that, write to the
Treasury and ask them to set a local retail maximum price for petrol and
diesel based on actual local wholesale prices paid by refiners, and legislate
to control the price of exported product at international prices to avoid
chicanery from the industry.
I suggest the answer you get will confirm who controls the
Australian Government and its ministers.

The Nation, the official newspaper of One Nation, Vol5, Ed.9
Synfuel
Synfuel or synthetic fuel is a process of converting
hydrocarbons into petrol. Feedstock to efficiently do this is either coal or
natural gas. Of the many other various processes of producing synthetic fuels,
most fail as the cost of the feedstock is greater than the output and thus
require $ billions in government subsidies.
First we take a look at 'Oil from coal', as Australia has huge resources of
coal. The question is, can it be converted to a liquid fuel at an economical
price?
Oil from coal
One of the prime causes of Germany's defeat in WWI was its lack of petroleum.
German leaders resolved never again to be dependent upon outside world for
gasoline. Germany may not have had oil deposits within its territory, but it did
have abundant reserves of coal. One of the first goals of the German chemists
after the war therefore, was to find a way to convert coal into gasoline.
By 1920 Dr Bergius had discovered ways to make large quantities of hydrogen and
force it, under great pressure, high temperatures and in the presence of
specific catalysts, into liquid coal products. The final steps into refined
gasoline were then assured. It was only a matter of perfecting the hydrogenation
process - IG suddenly was in the oil business.
Farben used its vitally important new discovery to open doors that led to the
creation of a worldwide cartel, "Frank Howard of Standard Oil was invited
to visit the great Baldische plant at Ludwigshafen in March of 19266. What he
saw was astounding - gasoline from coal! In a near state of shock, he wrote to
Walter Teagle, president of Standard Oil:
"Based upon my observations and discussions today, I
think that this matter is the most important which has ever faced the company.
"The Baldische can make high-grade motor oil fuel from lignite and other
low quality coals, in amounts up to half the weight of the coal. This means
absolutely the independence of Europe on the matter of gasoline supply. Straight
price competition is all that is left ..." I shall not attempt to cover any
details, but I think this will be evidence of my state of mind."
During the three years that followed, intense negotiations
took place between Farben and Standard Oil. These resulted in the 'marriage' of
the two industrial giants on November 9, 1929. Under the agreement, Standard Oil
was given a one-half share of all rights to the hydrogenation process in all
countries except Germany. Standard gave Farben 546,000 shares of its stock
valued t more than $30,000,000. Both parties agreed never to compete with each
other in the fields of chemistry and petroleum production. The goal was to
remove competition and to guarantee a surge in profits.
The Nation newspaper (8 pages) - PO Box 1199, Beenleigh 4207,
email onenation@gil.com.au, Ph. (07)
3287 4440