[ Australian govt ] [ Australian constitution ] [ United People Power ] [ Tyranny of government ] [ Trial by jury ] [ Port Arthur massacre ] [ Gunlaws ] [ Harold Holt ] [ One Nation ] [ PM's powers ] [ Save Australia Alliance ] [ Hilton bombing ] [ CEC ] [ Taxation ] [ Bracket creep ] [ Foreign debt ] [ Jean-Paul Turcaud ] [ Andrew Wilke ] [ Rangeview ] [ Fortress Australia ] [ Omega ]
The Principality of Rangeview
Location: via Gratton, Queensland Australia 4343
International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights 1966
International Convention on the Elimination of all Forms of Racial
British High Court judgement 25 July 04
There is no 'Queen of Australia'
<< Charter of the United
<< Immigration and Asylum Act
<< Statute of Monopolies 1623
<< Petition of Rights 1628
<< Habeous Corpus Act 1640
The Magna Carta
Purported Australian Constitution
the UK at Westminster
Australia became a nation in 1919
From the purported government's own web site
<< Diplomatic immunity
is radical title?
government and rates illegal
Local gov. illegal - refer gov. web site
being circulated in Gatton Shire
Supreme Court coverup of illegal local government
letter from illegal Brisbane City Council, dated 16 Aug 04
ATO is not a legal entity
the Taxpayers' Charter
claims it does not receive payment ??
Trespass - 'Plenty v Dillon'
Typical example of how the legal fraternity hide the facts from the people
of Commons Hansard Vol 1900
P 46, 14 May 1900, Constitution Bill
British High Commission
interest - where is Comm. of Aust. going
A number of people wrongly believe that Australia became a
nation in 1901.
It is unfortunate that some 'experts' on law go around spreading this
One such person, who is without excuse, is the Chief Justice of the purported
High Court of Australia, Mr Anthony Murray Gleeson. (Gleeson was appointed
Chief Justice of the High Court of Australia in May 1998. He graduated in Arts
and Law from the University of Sydney)
In one of Gleeson's 'Boyer Lecture series' ‘The Rule of Law and the
Constitution’ he stated the following:
“The Australian nation came into existence on 1st January 1901 when the
Constitution came into legal effect.”
As mentioned further above, Clause 8 of the [63 & 64 VICT] Constitution of
Australia [CH 12] Constitution Act reads,
“After the passing of this Act
the Colonial Boundaries Act, 1895, shall not apply to any colony which becomes
a State of the Commonwealth; but the Commonwealth shall be a self-governing
colony for the purposes of the Act.”
And Clause 2 of the Act reads:“The provisions of this Act referring to the
Queen shall extend to Her Majesty’s heirs and successors in the
sovereignty of the United Kingdom”.
Now refer to the book 'The Annotated Constitution of the Commonwealth of
Australia', by Quick and Garran. See on web at http://setis.library.usyd.edu.au/ozlit/pdf/fed0014.pdf
(Quick and Garran were involved in the creation of the Constitution Act. Their
book is one which students and practitioners of law know as the 'bible' of
SIGNIFICANCE OF THE TERM - The term "Commonwealth," to designate the
Australian colonies, united in a Federal Constitution, was first proposed by
the Constitutional Committee of the Federal Convention held in Sydney in 1891.
.... In both Conventions other names were submitted for consideration, such as
"United Australia", "Federated Australia", "The
Australian Dominion", "The Federated States of Australia",
&c., but the Comonwealth was generally accepted, .......
.... In this Act the word is used to describe the new political community
created by the union of people and of the colonies of Australia. Although
it is capable of conveying the idea of a nation like the American
Commonwealth, it does not, in its application to Australia, aspire to
convey that meaning except in a restricted and potential sense. At the same
time it is distinctly intended to signify that the newly-organised political
society, forming a conspicuously integral part of the British empire,
is entitled to a more dignified status and recognition in the international
arena than that assigned to the most distinguished of the colonies or the most
powerful of the provinces out of which it has been construed.
You can also view a 'snapshot' of the purported government's own web site
where it states that Australia became a nation in 1919.
Regarding land tenure (tenure = the
right to hold property; part of an ancient hierarchical system of holding
Under International, and purported Australian law, the Crown in
the right of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland no longer has any jurisdiction within Australia. ........ There
is no 'Queen of Australia'.
In 1971 the United Kingdom Parliament passed the 'Immigration and Asylum Act
(amended in 1972 and 1973) which deprived Australians of British citizenship
thereby making them 'aliens'.
The Crown, in the name of the Queen of the United Kingdom of Great Britain and
Northern Ireland cannot rule over 'alien' Australians.
Since the Crown in the right of the Government of the United Kingdom of Great
Britain and Northern Ireland no longer has any jurisdiction within the
territories of Australia, I, Lyall Lindsay SempfÓ own my land under fee
simple title under no tenure to any crown. Radical title in Australia by
the Crown does not exist.
explanation of radical title.
Quick & Garran's Commentary - Constitution
Embassy/Consulate for the Principality of
Acworth, the Principality of Argyll,
and the Principality of Snake Hill
Argyll, Cochrane and Woodlands
On the left is a Public Notice taken
from the Star Newspaper, dated 1st September 2004, which serves the Gatton,
Lockyer and Brisbane Valley areas.
AUSTEO SECRET document from the Department of Territories regarding Hutt River
The late Professor G. Clements (an eminent UK QC and emeritus Professor in law
at Cambridge) summed up the legal situation in Australia like this:
"The continued usage of the Australian
Constitution Act (UK) by the Australian Governments and the judiciary is a
confidence trick of monstrous proportions played upon the Australian people
with the intent of maintaining power. It remains an Act of the United Kingdom.
After joining the League of Nations in 1919 Australia became a sovereign
nation. It had no further legal power to use, alter or otherwise tamper with
another nation’s legislation. Authority over the Australian Constitution Act
lies not with the Australian government nor with the Australian people, it
rests solely with the UK. Only they have the authority to repeal this
& 64 VICT] Constitution of Australia [CH 12] Constitution Act is
British Domestic Law,
"After the passing of this Act the
Colonial Boundaries Act, 1895, shall not apply to any colony which becomes a
State of the Commonwealth; but the Commonwealth shall be taken to be a
self-governing colony for the purposes of that Act".
The Constitution was never altered to allow for Australia as a nation, and so
As such, Australia is operating under Britich domestic law, and all
governments are therefore invalid.
Principalities, over which the invalid governmennts of the Commonwealth of
Australia have no jurisdiction, are 'springing up' everywhere.
Did you know that Local Government and rates are illegal
- In a 'nut shell'-
It can be argued that the [63 & 64 VICT] Constitution of Australia
[CH 12] Constitution Act could not relate to Australia since 1919, however
this will not be discussed here.
The Constitution was created to combine the Australian colonies into a
Commonwealth, and to set the rules by which the Commonwealth would be governed
by the people as a self-governing federated colony ( not a nation as Australia
became in 1919 ).
The Constitution can only be altered by a referendum. There are no other means
by which our system of self-government can be altered.
Clause 9, S1 states: "The legislative power of the Commonwealth shall be
vested in a Federal Parliament, which shall consist of the Queen, a Senate,
and a House of Representatives, and which is herein-after called "The
Parliament or, The Parliament of the Commonwealth."
Clause 9, S 106 states: "The Constitution of each State of the
Commonwealth shall, subject to this Constitution, continue as at the
establishment of the Commonwealth, or as at the admission or establishment of
the State, as the case may be, until altered in accordance with the
Constitution of the State."
Clause 9, S 107 states: "Every power of the Parliament of a Colony which
has become or becomes a State, shall, unless it is by this Constitution
exclusively vested in the parliament of the Commonwealth or withdrawn from the
Parliament of the State, continue as at the establishment of the Commonwealth,
or as at the admission or establishment of the State, as the case may
Clause 9, S 108 states: "Every law in force in a Colony which has become
or becomes a State, and relating to any matter within the powers of the
Parliament of the Commonwealth, shall, subject to this Constitution, continue
in force in the State; and, until provision is made in that behalf by the
Parliament of the Commonwealth, the Parliament of the State shall have such
powers of alteration and of repeal in respect of any such law as the
Parliament of the Colony had until the Colony became a State."
The entity known as Local Government did not exist at the time of the creation
of the Commonwealth, therefore there can be no continuance of Local Government
In no section within the Australian Constitution is there provision for the
Federal or State Parliaments to establish a third level of government without
the permission of the people via a Federal Referendum. Entities known as
'local government' did not exist at the time of Federation and are therefore
illegal, no matter how they were created. Councils at various times have been
unable to prove their Head of Power and legality to numerous citizens.
Notwithstanding that rates are then illegal because Local Government is
illegal, it can also be shown that rates are illegal under Australia's
The Courts of Australia have long held that council rates are a tax.
The High Court ruled that State Governments couldn't raise any tax.
Local Government is subordinate to State Government.
Furthermore, John Howard, Peter Costello and Michael Carmody all stated before
the introduction of the GST (Goods and Services Tax) "Local government
Council Rates will attract no GST because Council Rates are a tax and we can't
tax a tax." Under Australia's Constitution, the Parliaments of the States
do not have the power of taxation. Under Australia's Constitution, rates,
being a tax, are illegal as only the Federal Government can enforce taxation.
Fee Simple title?
Webster's Legal Dictionary, 1889, defines Fee Simple Title: "Fee Simple
is a Contractual Agreement between the present owner and the previous owner,
involving neither a third nor other parties. Fee Simple permits an owner to do
with his property as he might wish. It is the highest form of land ownership
available. Third party interference is prohibited to a property held in Fee
Simple Title." The Fee Simple (freehold) Title is a contract with a
Government seal, subject only to the conditions therein, meaning that any
other charges arising from other acts including Local Government acts etc,
that are area or title based, if challenged, can not be enforced as compulsory
Since private property is held in Fee
Simple Title, and no third party can become involved, and citizens have
never entered into an agreement with Councils for services provided in lieu of
annual rate tax payments, then citizens cannot involuntarily incur a debt
against their property.
government and rates are illegal. for more information.
Also check out
Queensland Supreme Court coverup of illegal local governments
Did you know that the
Australian Taxation Office is not a legal entity.
The Australian Taxation Office is not a legal entity for more information.
Also check out <<
About the Taxpayers' Charter
Click Action to be
taken by Len Clampett in British Courts against an Australian Police Officer.
Please support this action. 2 Dec '04.
Our Rights / Freedoms
happened in Versailles, was, a group of people who were called Synarchist
International—which is actually a group of bankers, some of whom still exist
today, as private banking interests—decided on a scheme for destroying Europe,
and eliminating the factor of the United States in the time to come. What they
did at Versailles—the bankers did—is, they created a system called the