|
[ The CODEX conspiracy ] [ CODEX by Eve Hillary ] [ Pan Debacle ] [ Pharmaceutical ripoffs ] [ Vaccinations ] [ Rockefeller ] [ Harmful ] [ Spanish flu ] [ Bird flu hoax ] [ AIDS/Graves ]
THE 1918 INFLUENZA EPIDEMIC WAS A VACCINE-CAUSED DISEASE
http://www.drcarley.com/
E. McBean (Vaccination The Silent Killer p28)
Very few people realize that the
worst epidemic ever to hit America, the Spanish Influenza of 1918 was the after
effect of the massive nation-wide vaccine campaign. The doctors told the
people that the disease was caused by germs. Viruses were not known at that time
or they would have been blamed. Germs. bacteria and viruses, along with bacilli
and a few other invisible organisms are the scapegoats which the doctors like to
blame for the things they do not understand. If the doctor makes a wrong
diagnosis and treatment, and kills the patient, he can always blame it on the
germs, and say the patient didnt get an early diagnosis and come to him in time.
If we check back in history to that 1918 flu period, we will see that it suddenly
struck just after the end of World War I when our soldiers were returning home
from overseas. That was the first war in which all the known vaccines were
forced on all the servicemen. This mish-mash of poison drugs and putrid protein
of which the vaccines were composed, caused such widespread disease and death
among the soldiers that it was the common talk of the day, that more of our men
were being killed by medical shots than by enemy shots from guns. Thousands were
invalided home or to military hospitals, as hopeless wrecks, before they ever
saw a day of battle. The death and disease rate among the vaccinated soldiers
was four times higher than among the unvaccinated civilians. But this did
not stop the vaccine promoters. Vaccine has always been big business, and so it
was continued doggedly.
It was a shorter war than the vaccine-makers had planned on, only about a year
for us, so the vaccine promoters had a
lot of unused, spoiling vaccines left over which they wanted to sell at a good
profit. So they did what they usually do, they called a meeting behind closed
doors, and plotted the whole sordid program, a nationwide (worldwide)
vaccination drive using all their vaccines, and telling the people that the
soldiers were coming home with many dread diseases contracted in foreign
countries and that it was the patriotic duty of every man, woman and child to
get "protected" by rushing down to the vaccination centers and having
all the shots.
Most people believe their doctors and government officials, and do what they
say. The result was, that almost the entire population submitted to the shots
without question, and it was only a matter of hours until people began dropping
dead in agony, while many others collapsed with a disease of such virulence that
no one had ever seen anything like it before. They had all the characteristics
of the diseases they had been vaccinated against, the high fever, chills, pain,
cramps, diarrhea, etc. of typhoid, and the pneumonia like lung and throat
congestion of diphtheria and the vomiting, headache, weakness and misery of
hepatitis from the jungle fever shots, and the outbreak of sores on the skin
from the smallpox shots, along with paralysis from all the shots, etc.
The doctors were baffled, and claimed
they didnt know what caused the strange and deadly disease, and they certainly
had no cure. They should have known the underlying cause was the vaccinations,
because the same thing happened to the soldiers after they had their shots at
camp. The typhoid fever shots caused a worse form of the disease which they
called para-typhoid. Then they tried to suppress the symptoms of that one with a
stronger vaccine which caused a still more serious disease which killed and
disabled a great many men. The combination of all the poison vaccines
fermenting together in the body, caused such violent reactions that they could
not cope with the situation. Disaster ran rampant in the camps. Some of the
military hospitals were filled with nothing but paralyzed soldiers,
and they were called war casualties, even before they left American soil. I
talked to some of the survivors of that vaccine onslaught when they returned
home after the war, and they told of the horrors, not of the war itself, and
battles, but of the sickness at camp.
The doctors didnt want this massive
vaccine disease to reflect on them, so they, agreed among themselves to call it
Spanish Influenza. Spain was a far away place and some of the soldiers had been
there, so the idea of calling it Spanish Influenza seemed to be a good way to
lay the blame on someone else. The Spanish resented having us name the
world scourge on them. They knew the flu didnt originate in their country.
20,000,000 died of that flu epidemic,
worldwide, and it seemed to be almost universal or as far away as the
vaccinations reached. Greece and a few other countries which did not accept the
vaccines were the only ones which were not hit by the flu. Doesn't that
prove something?
At home (in the U.S.) the situation was
the same; the only ones who escaped the influenza were those who had refused the
vaccinations. My family and 1 were among the few who persisted in
refusing the high pressure sales propaganda ,and none of us had the flu not even
a sniffle, in spite of the fact that it was all around us, and in the bitter
cold of winter.
Everyone seemed to have it. The whole town was down sick and dying. The
hospitals were closed because the doctors and nurses were down with the flu.
Everything was closed, schools, businesses, post office everything. No one was
on the streets. It was like a ghost town. There were no doctors to care for the
sick, so my parents went from house to house doing what they could to help the
stricken in any way they could. They spent all day and part of the night for
weeks, in the sick rooms, and came home only to eat and sleep. If germs or
viruses, bacteria, or any other little organisms were the cause of that disease,
they had plenty of opportunity to latch onto my parents and "lay them
low" with the disease which had prostrated the world.
But germs were not the cause of that or any other disease, so
they didnt "catch" it. I have talked to a few other people since that
time, who said they escaped the 1918 flu, so I asked if they had the shots, and
in every case, they said they had never believed in shots and had never had any
of them. Common sense tells us that all those toxic vaccines all mixed up
together in people, could not help but cause extreme
body-poisoning and poisoning of some kind or another is usually the cause of
disease.
Whenever a person coughs or sneezes, most people cringe, thinking that the germs
are being spread around in the au and will attack people. There is no need to
fear those germs any more, because that is not the way colds are developed.
Germs cant live apart from the cells (host) and cant do harm anyway, even if
they wanted to. They have no teeth to bite anyone, no poison pouches like
snakes, mosquitoes or bees, and do not multiply, except
in decomposed substances, so they are helpless to harm. As stated before, their
purpose is useful, not destructive.
The 1918 flu was the most devastating disease we ever had, and it brought forth
all the medical bag of tricks to quell it, but those added drugs, all of which
are poisons, only intensified the over-poisoned condition of the people, so the
treatments actually killed more than the vaccines did.

WHO SMALLPOX ERADICATION SUCCESS RECONSIDERED
--Raymond Obosawin MD
http://www.whale.to/vaccines/obomsawin2.html
Although smallpox is apparently now accorded to the history books, it
will be necessary to re-examine the issue of this disease having been
universally eradicated, with particular reference to the WHO eradication
campaign. An honest look at this question is of considerable importance, as the
current worldwide UCI-EPI program gains much of its legitimacy and inspiration
from this widely acclaimed success story.
A strong challenge to this now popular view, is reflected in the post-campaign
findings of medical researchers like Buttram and Hoffman:
Most people probably credit the smallpox vaccine with playing the major
role in recent eradication of smallpox throughout the world, but let us
examine the facts. In the article 'Vaccines a Future in Question,' statistics
showed that less than 10 percent of children in developing countries have
received vaccines.
They went on to comment that with this level of coverage, the WHO
campaign was not a real factor in the eradication. Data obtained in their broad
based research also led them to conclude that "mass smallpox vaccination
was not necessary for the eradication of smallpox.110
In further examining this question from a longer historical perspective, it
became readily apparent that the WHO claim did not at all square with the
earlier data, i.e., historical smallpox eradication efforts. If we go back as
far as the last century, we discover that Creighton's independent research
findings as published in the Ninth Edition of the Encyclopedia Britannica,
strongly contradict the effectiveness of mass smallpox immunization programs. A
few revealing excerpts follow:
 | . . . in Bavaria in 1871 of 30,742 cases 29,429 were in vaccinated persons,
or 95.7 percent.
 | Notwithstanding the fact that Prussia was the best re-vaccinated country in
Europe, its mortality from smallpox in the epidemic of 1871 was higher
(69,839) than any other Northern state.
 | According to a competent statistician (A. Vogt), the death-rate from
smallpox in the German army, in which all recruits are re-vaccinated, was 60
percent more than among the civil population of the same age . . . although
re-vaccination is not obligatory among the latter.
 | It is often alleged that the unvaccinated are so much inflammable material
in the midst of the community, and that smallpox begins among them and gathers
force so that it sweeps even the vaccinated before it. Inquiry into the facts
has shown that at Cologne in 1870 the first unvaccinated person attacked by
smallpox was the 174th in order of time, at Bonn the same year the
42d, and at Liegnitz in 1871 the 225th.111 |
| | |
As we move on into the earlier part of this century we find the same dismal
picture of increased susceptibility correlated with increased vaccination
coverage. Dettman and Kalokerinos describe a visit they paid to the Philippines
about 15 years ago:
. . . We were fortunate enough to address their own medical (and) health
officials where we reminded them of the incidence of smallpox in formerly
"immunized" Filipinos. We invited them to consult their own medical
records and asked them to correct us if our own facts and figures disagreed.
No such correction has been forthcoming, and we can only conclude that between
1918-1919 there were 112,549 cases of smallpox notified, with 60,855 deaths.
Systematic (mass) vaccination started in 1905, and since its introduction case
mortality increased alarmingly. Their own records comment that "The
mortality is hardly explainable." 112
Speaking at a 1973 environmental conference in Brussels, Professor George
Dick admitted that in recent decades, 75 percent of those that have contracted
smallpox in Britain, have had prior a history of vaccination. In that "only
40%" of children were vaccinated (and at most 10 percent of adults), such
figures clearly indicate that the vaccinated--as in the much earlier historical
record--continue to show a higher tendency to contract the disease. Dick also
admitted that smallpox had been eradicated in certain tropical countries without
mass vaccination.113 (Table VIII reveals that in the 16 year period
preceding the year the WHO eradication campaign was launched--38 additional
countries had ceased to report any smallpox cases.)114
A. Hutchison writing in the Journal of the Royal Society in 1974,
referred to the smallpox vaccines "lack of potency" and the
inadequacies of other measures for containment, in his words, "I have given
details of the various outbreaks of smallpox in Britain and where they were
diagnosed. These clearly indicate that the (preventive) measures are most
ineffective.115
An article in the New Scientist indicates that "The smallpox family
of viruses is genetically unstable," and that new viral strains which
threaten the "WHO smallpox eradication programme, could emerge anywhere.116
It is thus of interest that in a 1980 article in the Australasian
Nurses Journal, Dettman and Kalokerinos pointed out that electron-microscopy
cannot distinguish between the various "poxviruses.117
(According to D, de Saving of IDRC, as of 1990 DNA sequencing can make the
distinquishingment. What is not known though, is whether this has any beating on
the reporting of the various "pox" diseases worldwide.) This fact led
them to raise a vitally significant question "as to whether smallpox may be
declared conquered, (it's estimated that only 10 percent of the world population
actually received the vaccine) with the possibility of it masquerading under the
guise of a similar pox." Their line of evidence and reasoning is summarily
stated:
. . . we claim that if the evidence is honestly evaluated that smallpox has
actually been prolonged and that the so called protective vaccinations
actually put the recipient at risk from . . . the disease itself. Authorities
now realize this and the 'top world' countries are making vociferous protests
about third world countries continuing use of smallpox vaccination because (a)
suddenly it has become recognized that it is an extremely dangerous procedure,
(To give some idea of the vaccine's dangers, it was reported--in the late
sixties--that annually, roughly 3,000 children were experiencing varying
degrees of brain damage due to the smallpox vaccine; and according to G.
Kiftel in 1967, smallpox vaccination damaged the hearing of 3,296 children in
West Germany, of which 71 became totally deaf.117) and
(b) it has now been conquered. The ultimate in ingenuity. . . .118
In turning to recognized textbooks on human virology and vertebrate viruses
we find that attention has been given since 1970 to a disease called "monkeypox,"
which is said to be "clinically indistinguishable from smallpox."
Cases of this disease have been found in Zaire, Cameroon, Nigeria, Ivory Coast,
Liberia, and Sierra Leone (by May 1983, 101 cases have been reported). It is
observed that " . . . the existence of a virus that can cause clinical
smallpox is disturbing, and the situation is being closely monitored."119
(For a highly detailed account of the history of this disease and efforts to
eradicate it, which further corroborates these observations, see, Razzell P., The
Conquest of Smallpox, Caliban Books, United Kingdom, 1977.)
Source: http://www.soilandhealth.org/02healthlibrary/0201hygienlib&127;cat/020115immun/020115immun.toc.html
http://www.soilandhealth.org/02healthlibrary/0201hygienlibcat/020115immun/020115immun.toc.html

Links
History of spanish flu
http://www.spartacus.schoolnet.co.uk/FWWinfluenzia.htm
Chapter 1 Swine
Flu--Another Medically-made Epidemic
Chapter 2 The Spanish
Influenza Epidemic of 1918 was caused by vaccinations
http://www.whale.to/vaccine/sf.html
Vaccine, not virus, responsible for Spanish flu
http://archives.tcm.ie/irishexaminer/2003/05/08/story265526733.asp
|