One Nation




Health v medicine


US History  

Guggenheim Foundation  

US is a corporation  

American Union  



Australian government  - legally invalid 

Constitution defunct 

What next? The issues  

United People Power  

  The Lima Declaration  

PM's powers 

Government tyranny 

"National security" 

Trial by jury 

One Nation 

Harold Holt's murder [external link] 

Port Arthur massacre  

  Port Arthur (v2) 

  Why not gun control? 


  Manchurian candidate

  Dr Peters / Dr Mullins 

Save Australia Alliance - Tony Pitt 


Foreign debt 

Bracket creep 

Stamp duty on houses  

Fascism in Australia (CEC)  

Illegal taxation  

The Hilton bombing - a case of political terrorism? 

Jean-Paul Turcaud / Telfer 

Andrew Wilkie  

Principality of Camside 

Principality of Rangeview  

Fortress Australia 









Australian govt ] Australian constitution ] United People Power ] Tyranny of government ] Trial by jury ] Port Arthur massacre ] Gunlaws ] Harold Holt ] [ One Nation ] PM's powers ] Save Australia Alliance ] Hilton bombing ] CEC ] Taxation ] Bracket creep ] Foreign debt ] Jean-Paul Turcaud ] Andrew Wilke ] Rangeview ] Fortress Australia ] Omega ]


Pauline Hanson's maiden speech 
One Nation news archives link 


The political assassination of Pauline Hanson

Kerry Packer, Rupert Murdoch, Terry Sharples, Tony Abbott and Patsy Wolfe – these names will forever live in infamy in Australian politics as Pauline Hanson’s assassins.  

From the time Ms Hanson broke the journalists' taboo on discussing Aboriginal welfare and Asian immigration the Packer and Murdoch journalists have attacked her with a savage, unrelenting fury (see side panel).

When the Liberal Party realised Ms Hanson threatened the comfortable duopoly of the major parties it despatched chief head-kicker, Tony Abbott to dig up the dirt on Pauline Hanson. Abbott found a co-conspirator in human termite, Terry Sharples. The Queensland establishment did the rest.

Threats to democracy  

There is clear evidence that there have been two serious attacks on Australia’s democratic process in relation to the Pauline Hanson saga.

The left-leaning, politically correct journalists of Packer, Murdoch, the ABC and SBS have quite clearly attacked and compromised the democratic process. Their vicious attacks on her character and her policies frightened all political parties into placing her party last on every how-to-vote card in the 1998 federal election, thus disenfranchising one million voters at the 1998 federal election. Not one member of One Nation was elected to the Lower House. Only one Senator was elected.  

The Democrats with a similar level of vote have five Senators in the federal parliament.  

According to a report in The Australian of 23 August, 2003 , Federal Liberal Party heavyweight, Tony Abbott, offered money and support to former One Nation member Terry Sharples to help destroy Pauline Hanson. Their conspiracy resulted in the fraud charges and the eventual jailing of Pauline Hanson.  

This  was a conspiracy to defraud one million voters of a legitimate voice and to destroy a new political force before it challenged the Liberal-Labor duopoly.

These are far more serious matters than the technical “fraud” committed by Pauline Hanson.  

The Fraud  

How did Pauline Hanson come to commit the “fraud” for which she was convicted?  

The Liberal and Labor parties have been accepting payments for years from their supporters in return for favours. Many of Australia’s largest corporate players pour millions into the Liberal and Labor coffers.

A few years ago the major parties worked out another nice little rort. As well as accepting millions from their favourites, they would also collect “donations” from the taxpayer mugs. They brought in a new Act of parliament to give themselves about $2 for every vote received at an election, payable after each election. Labor and the Liberal-National parties raked off more than $32 million in taxpayer monies from the 2001 election. The stipulation was that such “donations” would only be paid to registered political parties.  

One Nation’s registration was accepted by the Commonwealth electoral office. The Beattie Labor government in Queensland decided to discriminate against smaller parties by requiring a political party to have a minimum of 500 members before it could be registered. The Queensland Electoral Commission when examining One Nation’s application for registration wrote to 273 randomly selected persons on the membership list asking if they were members. 237 responded stating they were members. The Electoral Commission then registered One Nation as a political party in Queensland and later paid out around $500,000 after the state election. These funds were then disbursed to the candidates to help offset the costs of their election campaigns.  

Enter Tony Abbott. He contacted disgruntled former One Nation members and together they set out to destroy One Nation by claiming that One Nation did not have 500 members and therefore the $500,000 was obtained fraudulently.  

Never mind that the Labor and Liberal parties routinely engage in branch stacking and electoral breaches. Thousands of “members” have been falsely enrolled in both parties over the years. The Labor Party was even found to have enrolled number of dead people as members.  

Ettridge and Oldfield had set up One Nation as a company with only three shareholders. The members were found by the court to be “supporters” rather than members even though they had paid a fee and considered themselves members.  

At most this was only a technical “fraud”. Political parties are entitled to these funds. Pauline Hanson repaid the amount in full to the Queensland Electoral commission.


Warning to Pauline Hanson: Murdoch's assassins are re-grouping

One only has to read The Australian newspaper during the time of Pauline Hanson's rise to political prominence to see who was really behind the vicious attacks upon her and her fledgling political party. In a disgraceful abuse of media power, The Australian relentlessly vilified Hanson.

Following the national backlash against the recent jailing of Pauline Hanson and David Ettridge, the Murdoch media were taken aback and adopted a low profile for a few days. However, detecting a rise in Hanson's popularity they began the attack again.

The Australian's editorial of August 28, 2003 gave the cue to its attack dogs. It set up Tony Abbott as some kind of national saviour for destroying Pauline Hanson. The editorial pontificated that "..there is a danger that Hanson's phoney reputation as a downtrodden battler, as well as what she actually stood for - xenophobia and discord- will get a fresh lease of life".

Writing an opinion piece next day, Dennis Shanahan took the cue by declaring that "One Nation is a potent threat to Australia's reputation". Never mind that the former Press Council head, Professor David Flint, said that it was people like Shanahan who were the threat to Australia's reputation.

Editor-at-Large Paul Kelly was wheeled out the next day to continue the sanctification of Tony Abbott and the concomitant Hanson vilification. Kelly has the hide to say "One Nation's fraudulent registration changed the result of that (Queensland) 1998 election, a serious situation for a serious democracy." This is pretty rich coming from a senior representative of the media juggernaut largely responsible for disenfranchising one million voters.

While opinion polls record that a majority of people regard Abbott as a grubby political muckraker Kelly sets out to refurbish his tarnished reputation by declaring "He made some blunders along the way , but his strategic judgement was correct and validated.... Abbott is more hero than villain".

On September 2, 2003 The Australian promoted Australia's most egregious politically correct, left-wing elitist bigot, Phillip Adams to the features page to continue the attack. In two columns of pompous, arty-farty drivel and what he believes are clever interplays with lines from Macbeth, the smarmy, supercilious Adams continues the Hanson defamation with sneering references to the "Witch of Ipswich".

Foreign editor Greg Sheridan follows battle plan in an amazing opinion piece on September 4, 2003. The Australian is showing its true colours as Sheridan declares; "Costello has an honourable record in battling the prejudice, xenophobia, and inchoate rage rage that were always at the heart of of One Nation". Sheridan has the audacity to berate the media for showing some sympathy towards Hanson's jailing. He believes the rest of the media should follow The Australian's lead in its scurrilous attacks.

In a quite incredible tirade Sheridan says "Abbott has shown the kind of grit, determination and equanimity and, above all, concern for a purpose larger than himself, that marks out a future prime minister."

The trend is obvious. Although Pauline Hanson is mortally wounded, Murdoch's assassins will stand on her neck until she breathes no more.



The speech that struck at the heart of political correctness and challenged the authority of the ruling elites

Pauline Hanson's maiden speech  in federal parliament 
Tuesday, 10th September 1996.

5.15pm : Mister Acting Speaker, in making my first speech in this place, I congratulate you on your election and wish to say how proud I am to be here as the Independent member for Oxley. I come here not as a polished politician but as a woman who has had her fair share of life's knocks.

My view on issues is based on commonsense, and my experience as a mother of four children, as a sole parent, and as a businesswoman running a fish and chip shop. I won the seat of Oxley largely on an issue that has resulted in me being called a racist. That issue related to my comment that Aboriginals received more benefits than non-Aboriginals.

We now have a situation where a type of reverse racism is applied to mainstream Australians by those who promote political correctness and those who control the various taxpayer funded "industries" that flourish in our society servicing Aboriginals, multiculturalists and a host of other minority groups. In response to my call for equality for all Australians, the most noisy criticism came from the fat cats, bureaucrats and the do-gooders. They screamed the loudest because they stand to lose the most - their power, money and position, all funded by ordinary Australian taxpayers.

Present governments are encouraging separatism in Australia by providing opportunities, land, moneys and facilities available only to Aboriginals. Along with millions of Australians, I am fed up to the back teeth with the inequalities that are being promoted by the government and paid for by the taxpayer under the assumption that Aboriginals are the most disadvantaged people in Australia. I do not believe that the colour of one's skin determines whether you are disadvantaged. As Paul Hasluck said in parliament in October 1955 when he was Minister for Territories:

The distinction I make is this. A social problem is one that concerns the way in which people live together in one society. A racial problem is a problem which confronts two different races who live in two separate societies, even if those societies are side by side. We do not want a society in Australia in which one group enjoy one set of privileges and another group enjoy another set of privileges.

Hasluck's vision was of a single society in which racial emphases were rejected and social issues addressed. I totally agree with him, and so would the majority of Australians.

But, remember, when he gave his speech he was talking about the privileges that white Australians were seen to be enjoying over Aboriginals. Today, 41 years later, I talk about the exact opposite - the privileges Aboriginals enjoy over other Australians. I have done research on benefits available only to Aboriginals and challenge anyone to tell me how Aboriginals are disadvantaged when they can obtain 3 and 5 % housing loans denied to non-Aboriginals.

This nation is being divided into black and white, and the present system encourages this. I am fed up with being told, "This is our land." Well, where the hell do I go? I was born here, and so were my parents and children. I will work beside anyone and they will be my equal but I draw the line when told I must pay and continue paying for something that happened over 200 years ago. Like most Australians, I worked for my land; no-one gave it to me.

Apart from the $40 million spent so far since Mabo on native title claims, the government has made available $1 billion for Aboriginals and Torres Strait Islanders as compensation for land they cannot claim under native title. Bear in mind that the $40 million spent so far in native title has gone into the pockets of grateful lawyers and consultants. Not one native title has been granted as I speak.

The majority of Aboriginals do not want handouts because they realise that welfare is killing them. This quote says it all "If you give a man a fish you feed him for a day. If you teach him how to fish you feed him for a lifetime."

Those who feed off the Aboriginal industry do not want to see things changed. Look at the Council for Aboriginal Reconciliation. Members receive $290 a day sitting allowance and $320 a day travelling allowance, and most of these people also hold other very well paid positions. No wonder they did not want to resign recently!

Reconciliation is everyone recognising and treating each other as equals, and everyone must be responsible for their own actions. This is why I am calling for ATSIC to be abolished. It is a failed, hypocritical and discriminatory organisation that has failed dismally the people it was meant to serve. It will take more than Senator Herron's surgical skills to correct the terminal mess it is in. Anyone with a criminal record can, and does, hold a position with ATSIC. I cannot hold my position as a politician if I have a criminal record - once again, two sets of rules.

If politicians continue to promote separatism in Australia, they should not continue to hold their seats in this parliament. They are not truly representing all Australians, and I call on the people to throw them out. To survive in peace and harmony, united and strong, we must have one people, one nation, one flag.

The greatest cause of family breakdown is unemployment. This country of ours has the richest mineral deposits in the world and vast rich lands for agriculture and is surrounded by oceans that provide a wealth of seafood, and yet we are $190 billion in debt with an interest bill that is strangling us.

Youth unemployment between the ages of 15 to 24 runs at 25 % and is even higher in my electorate of Oxley. Statistics, by cooking the books, say that Australia's unemployment is at 8.6 %, or just under one million people. If we disregard that one hour's work a week classifies a person as employed, then the figure is really between 1.5 million and 1.9 million unemployed. This is a crisis that recent governments have ignored because of a lack of will. We are regarded as a Third World country with First World living conditions. We have one of the highest interest rates in the world, and we owe more money per capita than any other country. All we need is a nail hole in the bottom of the boat and we're sunk.

In real dollar terms, our standard of living has dropped over the past 10 years. In the 1960s, our wages increase ran at 3 % and unemployment at 2 %. Today, not only is there no wage increase, we have gone backwards and unemployment is officially 8.6 %. The real figure must be close to 12 to 13 %.

I wish to comment briefly on some social and legal problems encountered by many of my constituents - problems not restricted to just my electorate of Oxley. I refer to the social and family upheaval created by the Family Law Act and the ramifications of that act embodied in the child support scheme. The Family Law Act, which was the child of the disgraceful Senator Lionel Murphy, should be repealed. It has brought death, misery and heartache to countless thousands of Australians. Children are treated like pawns in some crazy game of chess.

The child support scheme has become unworkable, very unfair and one sided. Custodial parents can often profit handsomely at the expense of a parent paying child support, and in many cases the non-custodial parent simply gives up employment to escape the, in many cases, heavy and punitive financial demands. Governments must give to all those who have hit life's hurdles the chance to rebuild and have a future.

We have lost all our big Australian industries and icons, including Qantas when it sold 25 % of its shares and a controlling interest to British Airways. Now this government wants to sell Telstra, a company that made a $1.2 billion profit last year and will make a $2 billion profit this year. But, first, they want to sack 54,000 employees to show better profits and share prices. Anyone with business sense knows that you do not sell off your assets especially when they are making money. I may be only "a fish and chip shop lady", but some of these economists need to get their heads out of the textbooks and get a job in the real world. I would not even let one of them handle my grocery shopping.

Immigration and multiculturalism are issues that this government is trying to address, but for far too long ordinary Australians have been kept out of any debate by the major parties. I and most Australians want our immigration policy radically reviewed and that of multiculturalism abolished. I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asians. Between 1984 and 1995, 40 % of all migrants coming into this country were of Asian origin. They have their own culture and religion, form ghettos and do not assimilate. Of course, I will be called racist but, if I can invite whom I want into my home, then I should have the right to have a say in who comes into my country. A truly multicultural country can never be strong or united. The world is full of failed and tragic examples, ranging from Ireland to Bosnia to Africa and, closer to home, Papua New Guinea. America and Great Britain are currently paying the price.

Arthur Calwell was a great Australian and Labor leader, and it is a pity that there are not men of his stature sitting on the opposition benches today. Arthur Calwell said "Japan, India, Burma, Ceylon and every new African nation are fiercely anti-white and anti-one another. Do we want or need any of these people here? I am one red-blooded Australian who says no and who speaks for 90 % of Australians."  I have no hesitation in echoing the words of Arthur Calwell.

There is light at the end of the tunnel and there are solutions. If this government wants to be fair dinkum, then it must stop kowtowing to financial markets, international organisations, world bankers, investment companies and big business people. The Howard government must become visionary and be prepared to act, even at the risk of making mistakes.

In this financial year we will be spending at least $1.5 billion on foreign aid and we cannot be sure that this money will be properly spent, as corruption and mismanagement in many of the recipient countries are legend. Australia must review its membership and funding of the UN, as it is a little like ATSIC on a grander scale, with huge tax-free American dollar salaries, duty-free luxury cars and diplomatic status.

The World Health Organisation has a lot of its medical experts sitting in Geneva while hospitals in Africa have no drugs and desperate patients are forced to seek medication on the black market. I am going to find out how many treaties we have signed with the UN, have them exposed and then call for their repudiation. The government should cease all foreign aid immediately and apply the savings to generate employment here at home.

Abolishing the policy of multiculturalism will save billions of dollars and allow those from ethnic backgrounds to join mainstream Australia, paving the way to a strong, united country. Immigration must be halted in the short-term so that our dole queues are not added to by, in many cases, unskilled migrants not fluent in the English language. This would be one positive step to rescue many young and older Australians from a predicament which has become a national disgrace and crisis. I must stress at this stage that I do not consider those people from ethnic backgrounds currently living in Australia anything but first-class citizens, provided of course that they give this country their full, undivided loyalty.

The government must be imaginative enough to become involved, in the short-term at least, in job creating projects that will help establish the foundation for a resurgence of national development and enterprise. Such schemes would be the building of the Alice Springs to Darwin railway line, new roads and ports, water conservation, reforestation and other sensible and practical environmental projects.

Therefore I call for the introduction of national service for a period of 12 months, compulsory for males and females upon finishing year 12 or reaching 18 years of age. This could be a civil service with a touch of military training, because I do not feel we can go on living in a dream world forever and a day believing that war will never touch our lives again.

The government must do all it can to help reduce interest rates for business. How can we compete with Japan, Germany and Singapore, who enjoy rates of two %, 5.5 % and 3.5 % respectively? Reduced tariffs on foreign goods that compete with local products seem only to cost Australians their jobs. We must look after our own before lining the pockets of overseas countries and investors at the expense of our living standards and future.

Mister Acting Speaker, time is running out. We may have only 10 to 15 years left to turn things around. Because of our resources and our position in the world, we will not have a say because neighbouring countries such as Japan, with 125 million people; China, with 1.2 billion people; India, with 846 million people; Indonesia, with 178 million people; and Malaysia, with 20 million people are well aware of our resources and potential. Wake up, Australia, before it is too late. Australians need and want leaders who can inspire and give hope in difficult times. Now is the time for the Howard government to accept the challenge.

Mister Acting Speaker, everything I have said is relevant to my electorate of Oxley, which is typical of mainstream Australia. I do have concerns for my country and I am going to do my best to speak my mind and stand up for what I believe in. As an independent I am confident that I can look after the needs of the people of Oxley and I will always be guided by their advice. It is refreshing to be able to express my views without having to toe a party line. It has got me into trouble on the odd occasion, but I am not going to stop saying what I think. I consider myself just an ordinary Australian who wants to keep this great country strong and independent, and my greatest desire is to see all Australians treat each other as equals as we travel together towards the new century.

I will fight hard to keep my seat in this place, but that will depend on the people who sent me here. Mister Acting Speaker, I thank you for your attention and trust that you will not think me presumptuous if I dedicate this speech to the people of Oxley and those Australians who have supported me. I salute them all.


Analysis of the Hanson speech
Martin Lehmann - 8 September, 2003

This is the speech that drove the ruling elites and left-wing media into paroxysms of self-righteous  fury. The Murdoch and Packer journalists seized on these words, twisted them into a parody of lies, deceit and slander to launch one of the most defamatory, vicious and scurrilous attacks on the character of a person ever seen in Australia. The journalists spewed out venomous propaganda reminiscent of Nazi Germany. And they followed the Nazi principle that no matter how big the lie, if you tell it often enough it will be believed.

The lies they told were:

1) Hansom is anti-Aboriginal
2) Hanson is racist
3) Hanson is xenophobic
4) Hanson is a threat to Australia and to Australia's reputation.

Other journalists, in typical lazy journalistic fashion, uncritically repeated the lies until all journalists were quoting each other and the lies had become "fact".

What followed next is a shameful stain on Australia's proud tradition of democracy and fair-go.

The journalists whipped each other into a frenzy of loathing and hatred of Pauline Hanson, her One Nation party and her followers.

Journalists denigrated Pauline Hanson's character by dubbing her "the fish and chip lady", made fun of her limited education and attempted repeatedly to ambush and humiliate her on national television. Although our voting is by secret ballot, the journalists created the myth that One Nation voters were from the lowest levels of society.

The journalists feeding frenzy spread to the academics, the elites, left-wing students, the taxpayer-funded ethnic councils and assorted thugs. Hanson received death threats, people attending public meetings were abused, spat upon and violently assaulted. 

At Hanson press conferences we were treated to the unedifying spectacle of hordes of jostling, squalling journalists trying to outdo each other in screaming loaded questions and abuse at at the object of their fury.

The Australian democratic process was threatened. Public political meeting were cancelled. Political parties were stampeded into placing One Nation last on their how-to-vote cards, effectively disenfranchising one million voters in the 1998 federal election. 

What did Hanson actually say?

Nowhere in the speech is Hanson disparaging of Aboriginal people. She is however, critical of the handouts available only to Aboriginals. She attacked the Aboriginal "industry" and ATSIC.

It is interesting to note that editor Michael Stutchbury and his band of politically correct, lefty-trendies at  The Australian have recently run numerous articles exposing the corruption, in-fighting and abuses of power at ATSIC. Hanson called for ATSIC to be abolished. Seven years later the Howard government is attempting to do just that. Nobody is labelling Stutchbury or Howard as racist.

Most people have come to realise that  the billions of taxpayer dollars poured into ATSIC and other Aboriginal bureaucracies have created a black aristocracy together with a group of wealthy white leeches while the majority of Aboriginals see little improvement in their lifestyle.

Aboriginal leader Noel Pearson recently claimed that welfare was poisoning his people.

In fact the removal of Aborigines to remote settlements, the destruction of their initiative and motivation through the corrosive influence of welfare and the feeling of hopelessness engendered by being denied access to the rapidly evolving, modern competitive society is probably doing more to promote Aboriginal genocide than any past actions.

Hanson's basic theme is that all Australians should receive equal treatment. This implies cutting back on special Aboriginal welfare and encouraging Aborigines to seek a fulfilling life learning job skills and battling to get ahead like the rest of us. That's racist?

"I believe we are in danger of being swamped by Asians" - this is the statement that really fired up the elites and the left-wing media. It is  a harmless enough statement. But the fury it provoked exposes the hypocrisy and double standards of the ruling elites. Most Asian countries would be in fear of being swamped by Westerners. Malaysia's loopy Mahatir regularly makes disparaging remarks about Western culture. A recent 60 Minutes feature revealed that a large number of Indonesian students (Indonesia's future leaders) are hostile to Australia and its cultural values. 

In his revealing book, The Year The Dragon Came, Chinese author, Sang Ye says: "China is a country with a strong xenophobic, isolationist tradition; a place where deeply racist sentiments are not uncommon."

Sang Ye based the book on interviews with  over one hundred Chinese immigrants living in Australia.  It is instructive to hear what the immigrants think of Australians. Sang Ye says, "Nearly all of the interviewees here referred to Australians as "devils" (guizi) or "foreign devils" (yang guizi) or the slightly more polite "foreigners" (laowai), apparently oblivious to the fact that in Australia, its they who are the foreigners."

None of this evokes any response from the elites and the journalists.

When Hanson made the "swamped by Asians" statement, politicians and bureaucrats scrambled to publish misleading immigration statistics disputing her figures.

A report in The West Australian in August 2003 exposed the lie of the fabricated statistics when it revealed that  over 400,000 Perth residents, more than a third of the population, were born overseas. The report stated, "About 14 per cent of Perth residents were born in South-East Asia." It went on to say that over half of the population of inner city suburbs such as Highgate and East Perth (well-known Vietnamese enclaves) were born outside Australia.

Hanson was making the point that multiculturalism was dividing the nation and posed future problems for Australia. Most mainstream Australians would agree.

Is this the voice of Satan or a person expressing the views of mainstream Australians? Judge for yourself.

The Australian National News of the Day
and One Nation archives

The oldest Australian daily newspaper (1995-2000) on the Internet.
Truly independent, truly Australian.

There are over 5,000 links to the page links shown below... this is the page the mainstream media have tried to suppress because it exposes their lies and unethical reporting methods.

One Nation archives - over 100 links 


Pauline Hanson's website

Untamed & Unashamed - The Autobiography
By Pauline Hanson (available from website)
The idea to write my book is one that I have had since those dark, ugly days in August 2003, when I was sentenced to prison after a case based on lies, perjury and political assassination. 

Following my release from prison after three appeals, the thought of a book was still constantly on my mind, but my intuition told me that if I wrote a book at that stage it would be written with less objectivity and aimed more at justifying why I was put through such a dehumanising and humiliating experience-not a good way to tell my story.

Most Australians would be shocked if they knew the truth about what went on behind the scenes since I entered politics, and it is in this book that I hope to reveal those facts and set the record straight.

Another reason why I wrote this book was the frustration of being castigated as a racist by the media and major political parties after my inaugural speech. Yet the very same policies I advocated back then are now almost populist policy, being advocated today by the federal government.

I wrote my book to set the record straight. I hope it will explain a lot of questions that have gone unanswered. You be the judge.

Consider your verdict, 
by David Ettridge, ex-One Nation, 
"Australia operates under a democratic dictatorship". 
This book examines and reveals many of the frightening abuses of power committed during this protracted attempt to interfere with the democratic and legal rights of two innocent Australian Citizens - untouchable rights which are enshrined in law and the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act of 1900. Read all about allegations of political interference, abuses of law, denial of due process and improper treatment in the courts of Queensland.