[ Al-Qaeda ] [ 9/11 ] [ 911 drills ] [ 911 Commission Report ] [ War Propaganda ] [ Bird flu ] [ Osama bin Laden ] [ Indonesia's war on terror ] [ School of Americas ]
[ 9/11 Links ]


Former MI5 Agent Says 9/11 An Inside Job
Attack Was 'Coup de'tat,' Buildings Were Demolished By Controlled
Demolitions
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/june2005/
270605insidejob.htm
Prison Planet | June 27 2005
Former MI5 agent David Shayler, who previously blew the whistle on the British
government paying Al Qaeda $200,000 to carry out political assassinations, has
gone on the record with his conviction that 9/11 was an inside job meant to
bring about a permanent state of emergency in America and pave the way for the
invasions of Afghanistan, Iraq and ultimately Iran and Syria.
David Shayler joined MI5 in October 1991 and worked there for five years. He
started at F Branch (counter-subversion) in January 1992, and worked in T
Branch (Irish terrorism) from August 1992 until October 1994. He left the
organization in 1996.
Shayler appeared on The Alex Jones Show to kick off what will be a wider
public campaign to educate the public on 9/11 issues and government
corruption.
Shayler again risked jail by speaking out. The British government has a legal
gag preventing him from speaking about his work during his MI5 tenure. Since
what Shayler discussed was already on the public record (a consequence of
which was his imprisonment on two separate occasions), he now feels safer in
stepping back out into the limelight.
Shayler delved into his past investigations and the evidence that led some
within MI5 to conclude that the Israelis bombed their own London embassy in
July 1994. Shayler said that the Israelis framed two Palestinians who remain
in jail to this day.
"The same thing has happened with two Palestinians who
were convicted of conspiracy to cause the attack on the Israeli Embassy in
Britain in 1994 but MI5 didn't disclose two documents which indicated their
innocence. One document indicated another group had carried out the attack and
the other document was the belief of an MI5 officer that the Israelis had
actually bombed their own embassy and allowed a controlled explosion to try
and get
better security and these documents were never shown to the trial judge let
alone the defense."
Shayler said that his suspicions were first aroused about 9/11
when the usual route of crime scene investigation was impeded when the debris
was immediately seized and shipped off to China.
"It is in fact a criminal offence to interfere with a crime scene and yet
in the case of 9/11 all the metal from the buildings is shipped out to China,
there are no forensications done on that metal. Now that to me suggests they
never wanted anybody to look at that metal because it was not going to provide
the evidence they wanted to show people that it was Al-Qaeda."
Shayler then went on to dismiss the incompetence theory.
"The more I look at it, you realize that it's not incompetence. There
were FBI officers all over the country, Colleen Rowley is obviously the one
who managed to get a congressional hearing, but there was plenty of evidence
certainly."
"There are so many questions that need to be answered, protocols being
overridden within national defense, people actively being stopped from
carrying out investigations. This wasn't an accident, they were aware there
was intelligence indicating those kind of attacks, there were FBI intercepts
saying it in the days before the attacks. When you look at it all, that is a
big big intelligence picture and yet these people were crucially stopped from
doing their jobs, stopped from trying to protect the American
people."
Shayler elaborated by saying the evidence suggests the attack was originally
meant to be much wider in scope and was an attempt at a violent coup intended
to decapitate the entire government as a pretext for martial law.
"So you're looking at a situation in which you almost have a coup de'tat
because you've got to bear in mind that there were weapons discovered on
planes that didn't take off on 9/11. Now people have obviously postulated that
they were going perhaps to attack the White House, Capitol Hill. That looks to
me like an attempt to destroy American government and declare a
state of emergency, in fact a coup de'tat, a violent coup de'tat."
"There are so very many questions about this and you realize again that
none of the enquiries ever get to the bottom of any of these things, they
don't take all the evidence, they don't often take any evidence under oath
when they should be taking it under oath."
Shayler was forthright in his assertion that the attack was planned and
executed within the jurisdiction of the military-industrial complex.
"They let it happen, they made it happen to create a trigger to be able
to allow the invasion of Afghanistan, the invasion of Iraq and of course what
they're trying to do now is the same thing with the invasion of Iran and
Syria."
Shayler ended by questioning the highly suspicious nature of the collapse of
the twin towers and Building 7, the first buildings in history, all in the
same day, to collapse from so-called fire damage alone.
"I've seen the results of terroristic explosions and so on and no
terrorist explosion has ever brought down a building. When the IRA put
something like a thousands tonnes of home-made explosives in front of the
Baltic Exchange building in Bishopsgate and let off the bomb, all the glass
came out, the building shook a bit but there was no question about the
building falling
down and it doesn't obey the laws of physics for buildings to fall down in the
way the World Trade Center came down. So you have the comparison of the two,
Building 7 compared with the north and south towers coming down and those two
things are exactly the same, they were demolished."
David Shayler joins a spate of recent credible whistleblowers who share the
same sentiments about the real story behind 9/11. Former Chief Economist for
the Department of Labor during President George W. Bush's first term Morgan
Reynolds publicly questioned the unexplained collapse of WTC Building 7
earlier this month. In addition, a former Assistant Secretary of the
Treasury under President Reagan, Paul Craig Roberts, shared his concerns last
week when he said the Bush Administration were making the same mistakes as the
Nazis when they invaded Russia in the dead of Winter. Roberts seriously doubts
the official explanation behind 9/11.
Click here for a clip in which Shayler discusses 9/11. Prison
Planet.tv subscribers can listen to the whole hour long interview by clicking
here. Shayler also discusses his investigations of Irish Republican terrorism
which led back to the British government and the murder of Princess Diana.
If you are not yet a member, click here to subscribe for as little as 15 cents
a day and get a library of books, videos and audios to read, watch, listen to
and download

Explosive Testimony: Revelations about the Twin Towers in
the 9/11 Oral Histories
David Ray Griffin
http://www.911truth.org/article.php?story=20060118104223192
“[T]here was just an explosion [in the south tower]. It seemed like on
television [when] they blow up these buildings. It seemed like it was going all
the way around like a belt, all these explosions.”--Firefighter Richard
Banaciski
“I saw a flash flash flash [at] the lower level of the building. You know
like when they demolish a building?”--Assistant Fire Commissioner Stephen
Gregory
“[I]t was [like a] professional demolition where they set the charges on
certain floors and then you hear 'Pop, pop, pop, pop, pop'."--Paramedic
Daniel Rivera
As immense as that game is, there is a bigger one: Control through
fear
http://www.disclosureproject.org/cosmicdeception.htm
The world is kept in a
state or rolling wars, endless poverty for most of Earth's denizens and
global environmental ruin, just to prop up this evil world order.
|
911 coverup
Official story a coverup
http://www.larouchepub.com/other/2002/2903reject_osama.html
There is only one problem with the Osama explanation: No matter
how uniformly media and governments repeat it, swear to it, and add more and
more tertiary details to it, it nonetheless couldn't have happened that way.
The
security, intelligence, and military-air command services of the United States
could not have slept innocently while an assortment of Islamic militants — of
the type monitored intensively in the United States by security services for a
decade — carried out a much-warned of, precision airborne attack on critical
American sites, which the Soviet special services, in their heyday, could not
have attempted.

False flag operations not new
http://www.infowars.com/resources.html#hegel
From Nero burning Rome to Hitler burning
the Reichstag, power-mad leaders across the decades have manufactured
crises in order to present the public with situations where their Police
State solutions "make sense". "Give up your rights -- it's
for your safety..."
Encyclopedia Britanica: Hitler's Reichstag
Click Here
THE RISE OF THE FOURTH REICH
The Reichstag
Way Back in 1962 the Pentagon Was Planning on Blowing up Airlines,
Sinking Ships and Bombing Washington. The Joint Chiefs of Staff in
Documents Stated That Casualty Lists, Dead Americans, Would Be Helpful in
Newspapers for a Wave of Indignation. Problem, Reaction, Solution.
Baltimore
Sun: US terror plan called Cuba invasion pretext
Friendly Fire
Book:
US Military Drafted Plans to Terrorize US Cities to Provoke War With Cuba
Click HERE
for an excerpt from James Bamford's book, "Body Of Secrets" in
which declassified documents reveal US Government plans for staged
terrorist attacks on Americans, with the intention of blaming Cuba.
Here Is the Actual Northwoods Document Showing How the Government Was
Planning on Creating Mayhem by Killing Americans as a Pretext for War
PDF File
Time for government to reveal truth about Pearl Harbor
The
Baltimore Sun
Do Freedom of Information Act Files Prove FDR Had Foreknowledge of
Pearl Harbor?
An
Interview with Robert B. Stinnett
Diocletian's Problem-Reaction-Solution
A further
example of how elites throughout history commit acts of terrorism as a
pretext to create enemies and corral populations behind a tyrannical
agenda

AIR FORCE INTEL SOURCE: PRO-BUSH
GOVERNMENT FACTIONS ABSOLUTELY BEHIND TUESDAY'S MASS DEVASTATION
SEPTEMBER 13, 2001 [two days after 9/11 attacks]
Please send as far and wide as possible. Thanks,
Robert Sterling, Editor, The Konformist http://www.konformist.com
** URGENT ** PLEASE FORWARD AS FAR AND WIDE AS POSSIBLE 9.13.01
AF Intel source: pro-Bush gov't factions 'absolutely' behind Tuesday's
mass devastation! "The enemy is very much within"
http://www.konformist.com/911/newshawk2.htm
TOP_VIEW has just conducted a brief yet immeasurably important phone
interview -- set up by a trusted and totally reliable intermediary already
known to us -- with an Air Force Reserve intelligence specialist. The
interview was carried out this evening, over two days after the incredible
death and devastation that took place in New York City and Washington D.C.
Our Air Force source told us his superiors had activated him at about 10
AM Tuesday morning.
He absolutely refused to permit us to record the
conversation, even though he was speaking into some kind of electronic
gizmo that substantially altered the sound of his voice; making him sound
like Darth Vader with a serious chest cold. Some portions of his
statements were unintelligible, and he refused to repeat several of these.
Although this source was somewhat taciturn and close-lipped, for the most
part he was cooperative in terms of giving us enough time to transcribe
what he was saying. Overall what is stated plainly and unequivocally is of
absolutely paramount importance for every single person in this nation and
the world: certainly among those of us who value our inalienable human
rights and liberties and want them to remain un-imperiled, un-abrogated
and unabridged.
TOP_VIEW: We'd like to hear what you have to say about the events on
Tuesday. First of all, I assume you have knowledge of the events that goes
above and beyond what the public is being told by the media and the
government?
INTEL SOURCE: That's quite correct.
TOP_VIEW: Can you -- are you able and willing to relay this information to
us?
INTEL SOURCE: Well, that depends. Some of it. You're going to publish
this?
TOP_VIEW: On the Internet.
INTEL SOURCE: It's essential that nothing which could possibly be used to
identify myself or " ** " (our intermediary) is made public.
TOP_VIEW: We totally understand. Completely. That's exactly how it will
be, and -
INTEL SOURCE: You've known " ** " a long time?
TOP_VIEW: For about 6 years, sir.
INTEL SOURCE: So... he'll vouch for you? (Chuckles) Fire away.
TOP_VIEW: Well... it's becoming increasingly clear that certain federal
government sectors had prior knowledge of the destruction carried out on
Tuesday. Would you concur with this?
INTEL SOURCE: (unintelligible)
TOP_VIEW: Excuse me? I didn't understand you.
INTEL SOURCE: Never mind.
TOP_VIEW: Is it true that our government knew what was going to happen?
INTEL SOURCE: You could say that. Actually there are certain (pause)
groups in our government who PRETTY MUCH RAN THE WHOLE SHOW.
TOP_VIEW: Are you saying that there was cooperation and collaboration
between elements of our government and the perpetrators?
INTEL SOURCE: No. What I'm saying is that these groups (within the federal
government - TV) were the perpetrators of the action, right down the line
from top to bottom.
TOP_VIEW: This is really incredibly shocking, what you're saying here. Did
I understand correctly, that you say elements of the federal government
were the prime force behind these so-called terrorist attacks Tuesday?
INTEL SOURCE: That's correct. Absolutely.
TOP_VIEW: God, what a horrifying thing to come to grips with! What is your
feeling about this sir, and exactly why are you even talking to us about
this? Are you positive about what you're saying?
INTEL SOURCE: (laughs) What should I answer first? I would never make this
kind of statement without being fully certain it was factual. My own
feeling is that it's completely sickening. It's repugnant and unacceptable
and I'm completely opposed to what was done. But it's true and we all have
to deal with it. There are forces within our government who are completely
determined to change the structure of our society at the most basic level,
and these are the kind of things they're going to be doing to make sure
that (fundamental changes in our society) happens.
TOP_VIEW: What's going on in the military right now with regard to what's
occurred? Do many military higher-ups know this, and if so what's their
position?
INTEL SOURCE: (unintelligible)
TOP_VIEW: Excuse me?
INTEL SOURCE: I said some do know and some don't. Some wouldn't believe
it, just like many citizens wouldn't believe it. There are certainly lots
of CONFLICT going on AT the UPPER LEVELS of the MILITARY right now between
people aware of the true facts.
TOP_VIEW: What about yourself?
INTEL SOURCE: I consider myself to be a patriotic American who believes
strongly in the Constitution. I'll do whatever is in my power to uphold
and defend those principles, and so will many others.
TOP_VIEW: Well that's something I wanted to get to. The primary motivation
for an atrocity of this magnitude would seem to be to soften up the
country for some serious curtailment of civil liberties, in the name of
protecting us from such "terrorist" attacks. I've likened it to
Hitler's
burning of the Reichstag in Germany.
INTEL SOURCE: That's a good comparison. (Unintelligible)... one of the
main reasons the action was carried out Tuesday. There's also other
agendas having to do with control of the MIDDLE EAST OIL FIELDS, and
things related to that (issue).
TOP_VIEW: Well, are people such as yourself in any way prepared to, or
able to, oppose these forces?
INTEL SOURCE: Speaking for myself, I'd say there's a lot I'm prepared to
do and will do. Speaking to you is one of those things. And there are many
more like me.
TOP_VIEW: Now, how does the attack on the Pentagon figure into this whole thing?
INTEL SOURCE: I can't discuss that at all.
TOP_VIEW: Can you some time in the future?
INTEL SOURCE: Maybe. I think I'll need to sign off here soon.
TOP_VIEW: Is there anything else in particular you'd care to say, any
advice or whatever?
INTEL SOURCE: I'd say that our way of life is facing the biggest threat in
our history, and the enemy is very much within. VERY MUCH WITHIN.
TOP_VIEW: So it boils down to: what happened on Tuesday was an inside job?
INTEL SOURCE: Absolutely. All the way down the line and to a much higher
level than most of you could ever imagine. There's a VERY INTENSE STRUGGLE
GOING ON WITHIN OUR GOVERNMENT like I said.
TOP_VIEW: It's a struggle we're all involved in, sir.
INTEL SOURCE: That's quite true.
TOP_VIEW: It seems very clear to me that the Bush administration was way
involved in the attacks. Would that be correct? They obviously want to
bring about the exact kind of fundamental social restructuring that you
mentioned.
INTEL SOURCE: It's a good bet. Right now, it's best we cut this short.
TOP_VIEW: Good night and thank you very much for speaking with us.
---- http://www.konformist.com/911/newshawk2.htm
-----
This concluded our short but vastly significant interview with a patriotic
Air Force intelligence officer. Folks, we've heard it from the proverbial
horse's mouth. Americans are in the most critical struggle in our entire
history, and the enemy is a deceptive, malevolent and indeed demonic force
deeply ensconced within the very fabric and structure of our federal
government, and which also infests even our news and information sources,
our entertainment, our schools and workplaces and many other aspects of
our life and our society.
As our source stated: "THE ENEMY IS VERY MUCH WITHIN"

9/11 was a hoax
March 26, 2003
http://www.london-daily.co.uk/art/9-11hoax.htm
By John Kaminski, skylax@comcast.net
Opposed by everyone in the world who was not
bought off, the illegal invasion of Iraq was undertaken for many reasons - the
imminent replacement of the dollar by the euro as the world's primary currency,
the tempting lure of untapped oil reserves, the desire to consolidate
U.S./Israeli military hegemony over a strategically vital region - but the most
important reason was to further obscure questions about the awesome deception
staged by the American government that has come to be known as 9/11.
9/11 was a hoax. This is no longer a wild
conspiracy assertion; it is a fact, supported by thousands of other verifiable
facts, foremost of which are:
*
The attacks of 9/11 COULD NOT HAVE HAPPENED without the wilful failure of the
American defense system. In Washington, Air Force pilots demanded to fly but
were ordered to stand down. Yet instead of prosecuting the
president and military leaders for this unprecedented dereliction of duty,
military leaders were promoted and the president was praised for presiding over
a defense system that suspiciously failed the most crucial test in its
history. None of the deaths would have
happened without the deliberate unplugging of America's air defenses. Planes that lose contact with control towers are
usually intercepted by fighter jets inside of ten minutes, as the incident with
the golfer's plane a few months earlier so clearly demonstrated. Yet on 9/11, the jetliners that struck New York
were allowed to
proceed unmolested for more than a half-hour, and the plane that supposedly
crashed in Washington was not intercepted for more than an hour and forty
minutes after it was widely known that four planes had been hijacked.
*
The twin towers could not have collapsed as a result of burning jet fuel. Most
of that fuel was consumed on impact. In the south tower, most of the fuel was
spilled outside the building. Heat caused by burning jet fuel does not reach
temperatures needed to melt steel. What does stand out as particularly suspicious
and still unexplained is that fires raged out of control beneath THREE of the
collapsed towers for ONE HUNDRED DAYS, clearly indicating the presence of some
kind of substance utilized in the demolition of the structures. The Twin Towers did not fall because of plane
impacts or fires. Most likely explosives were placed on structural supports in
the towers (as was done in Oklahoma City), and these controlled implosions
snuffed out the lives of three thousand people.
*
FBI Director Robert Mueller insisted officials had no idea this kind of attack
could happen when in fact the FBI had been investigating the possibility of
EXACTLY this kind of attack for almost TEN YEARS. Numerous previous attempts at
using planes as weapons, intimate knowledge of terror plans called Project
Bojinka, and knowledge of suspicious characters attending flight schools who
were being monitored by the FBI make his utterance a clear lie on its face. In the weeks before 9/11, the U.S. received
warnings from all over the world that an event just like this was about to
happen, but FBI investigations into suspected terrorists were suppressed and
those warnings were deliberately disregarded.
* The names of the alleged hijackers, all ostensibly Muslims, were released to the
public only hours after the attacks, despite Mueller saying we had no knowledge
this would happen. This is an impossible twist of logic. If he didn't know of a
plan to strike buildings with planes, how would he know the names of the
hijackers? Various artifacts were discovered in strategic
places to try to confirm the government's story, but these have all been
dismissed as suspicious planting of evidence. Since that time several [Arab
suicide hijackers'] names on that list have turned up alive and well, living in
Arab countries. Yet no attempt has ever been made to update the
list. And why were none of these names on the airlines' passenger lists?
*
Much like the invasion of Iraq, the anthrax attacks were designed to deflect
attention from unanswered 9/11 questions in the patriotic pandemonium that
followed the tragedy. In addition to making large amounts of money for
the president's father and his friends from the hasty sale of inefficient drugs
to a panicked populace, the investigation into these killings was abruptly
halted when the trail of evidence led straight to the government's door, and has
not been reopened. The anthrax attacks also amped up the climate of
fear and deflected attention from the passage of the government's repressive
Patriot Act.
*
The Patriot Act was presented in the days after the tragedy supposedly as
a response to it, yet it was clear that this heinous act, drafted to nullify
provisions for freedom in the U.S. Constitution, was put together long before
9/11. In addition, testimony by Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) revealed that most
members of Congress were compelled to vote for the bill without even reading it.
This was a vote to eliminate the Constitutional
Bill of Rights, which has defined American freedom for 200 years, and it was
accomplished when legislators voted for the bill without even reading it.
* The invasion of Afghanistan was presented as an attempt to pursue the alleged
perpetrators of 9/11, yet it had been discussed for years prior to the tragedy
and actually planned in the months before the attacks on New York and
Washington.
Statements by Zbigniew Brzezinski and the
Republican-written Project for a New American Century have stressed that America
needed a formidable enemy to accomplish its aggressive geopolitical aims. The supposed enemy we attacked in Afghanistan was
a diverse group of men from all over the world who were initially recruited,
encouraged and supported by the American CIA.
* The hole in the Pentagon was not made by a jumbo jet. Damage to the building was
simply not consistent with the size of the hole nor the absence of debris. At
the supposed point of impact, a whole bank of windows remained unbroken and
there were no marks on the lawn. No airplane debris (except what was planted on
the lawn) nor remains of passengers were ever found.
*
The president has admitted that he continued to read a story to schoolchildren
in a Florida school for 30 minutes after being informed that two planes had
struck New York and that the nation was under attack. He has never explained
this puzzling behavior, nor how he saw the first plane hit. It was never televised, only recorded by a French
crew filming firemen in New York. In that film, the plane in question does not
appear to be a passenger airliner.
* The plane in Pennsylvania was shot down and broke apart in midair. No other
explanation can account for the wreckage, which was spread over a six-mile
area, or the eyewitness accounts that describe debris falling from the sky.
*
Cellphone calls cannot be made from airliners in flight that are not close to
the ground. As research by Professor A. K. Dewdney has shown, the emotional
conversations between hijacked passengers and others would not have been
possible under conditions that existed at that moment. These calls were cynical FABRICATIONS, exploiting
the distraught emotions of those who lost loved ones.
*
Radio communications from firefighters on the upper floors of the Trade Center
towers clearly indicate that fires were under control and the structure was in
no danger of collapsing. These are merely a few of the deliberately false
statements made by U.S. officials about 9/11. They provide crystal clear
evidence that our president, his staff, and many legislators should be indicted
on charges of treason, obstruction of justice and mass murder. Above all, these evil men should be removed from
their positions of authority before they implement more of their
moneymaking murder schemes like the one they are now perpetrating on the
innocent people of Iraq. Otherwise, we face a future of endless war abroad
and merciless repression at home. Consider just a few more of the other unanswered
questions from among the thousands of unexplained loose ends that all point to
9/11 being an inside job.
*
Who benefited from the suspiciously high numbers of put options purchased prior
to September 11 for shares in companies whose stock prices subsequently
plummeted, on the supposition that whoever was behind the hijacking was also
behind most of the purchases of these put options? And what was the role of the new executive
director of the CIA, Buzzy Krongard, who handled these transactions?
*
Why was the debris from the collapsed Twin Towers removed from the site with no
forensic examination? Why was almost all of it sold to scrap merchants
and shipped abroad where it would not be available for scientific examination?
*
Why does the government refuse to release any transcripts of communications or
any records at all relating to signals of any form transmitted by those jets?
*
Why did so many people, from San Francisco Mayor Willie Brown to many employees
of companies in the World Trade Center who failed to come to work that day, know
in advance that something bad was going to happen on Sept. 11, 2001?
*
Why do all the major U.S. media continue to act as if none of these questions is
legitimate or relevant? Today, millions of people around the world are
protesting the criminal destruction of the nation of Iraq. But these protests won't change
the number of minds necessary to stop America's criminal madmen from continuing
with their genocidal aim of enslaving the entire world.
What WILL stop them is spreading
the realization that President George W. Bush and his billionaire accomplices in
the oil industry perpetrated 9/11 as an excuse to begin the militarization of
America for the purpose of world conquest.
History has shown all too clearly the deceived
American people WILL support the destruction of faraway countries on phony
pretexts of defending so-called freedom. Thus the needless wars continue. Right now we
watch high-tech weapons slaughter the defenseless people of Iraq. Soon it will be Iran, Syria, Colombia, Venezuela,
North Korea, Egypt, Libya, Nigeria, North Korea, Pakistan, Saudi Arabia, and who
knows where else. All these misguided atrocities will be possible because of the
hoax known as 9/11. But the American people will not - and cannot -
tolerate leaders who kill our own people merely to invent a pretext - the war on
terror - to go around killing anyone they like. If the American people DO tolerate such an insane
strategy, then they clearly do not deserve to survive as a nation or a people.
___________________________________________________________
25 Reasons Why 'White Collar Terrorists' Are
To Blame For 911
Compiled by Dr. Len Horowitz
http://www.americanreddoublecross.com
1. The "terrorist" attacks were completely predictable
and, in fact, predicted. Forewarnings were issued by many patriotic
and heroic individuals to government and military officials well in
advance of Sept. 11, 2001. For instance, in August, Drs. Garth
Nicolson, Ph.D., and his wife Nancy Nicolson, Ph.D., among the
world's most esteemed Mycoplasma researchers and Gulf War Syndrome
investigators, reported to Pentagon officials that they had
confirmed intelligence that on Sept. 11, 2001 a terrorist strike
against the Pentagon would be made. Their sources included
individuals in key intelligence positions, the mob, and one high
level African diplomat.
Their "information was passed on to the
Director of Policy of the Department of Defense, the Inspector
General of the US Army Medical Corps and the National Security
Council," Dr. Nicolson wrote. "Unfortunately, it was
ignored." Likewise, Dr. Leonard Horowitz, the award-winning
author of the prophetically titled book, Death in the Air: Globalism,
Terrorism and Toxic Warfare, (http://www.tetrahedron.org; http://www.prophecyandpreparedness.com)
released three months before the attacks on Washington and New York,
correctly predicted such a first strike on New York. For three
years, based on government documents and intelligence reports, he
had been warning "Metropolis" residents, "It's time
to move."
2. On Friday, September 7, Florida Governor, Jeb Bush, brother to
the President, issued an Executive Order in which members of the
Florida National Guard were activated, "for the purpose of
training to support law-enforcement personnel and
emergency-management personnel in the event of civil disturbances or
natural disaster." Perhaps the president and his brother
received Dr. Nicolson's warnings or were the source of the warnings?
3. Numerous reports have surfaced alleging that Bush
administration, military, and intelligence officials' close
associates had, suddenly and inexplicably, sold all their airline
stock just days before the terrorist attacks. The F.B.I. is
reportedly investigating these reports and such "inside
traders."
4. Osama bin Laden and his band of "Terrorists"
could not have pulled off the "sophisticated" operation of
four simultaneous air hijackings, and precision directed attacks,
without the support of one or more "intelligence
organizations." This was the expert testimony provided by past
CIA Afghanistan operations director and bin Laden's American
intelligence aficionado, Milt Bearden, interviewed by Dan Rather on
September 12, 2001. In fact, when pressed by Dan Rather to endorse
the theory of bin Laden's culpability, Mr. Bearden stated, "if
they didn't have an Osama bin Laden, they would invent one."
5. On October 31, 2001, the French daily Le Figaro reported
that Osama bin Laden had met with a high-level CIA official in July
2000. At that time, bin Laden was already being sought for trial for
his involvement in two U.S. embassy bombings and the U.S.S. Cole
attack. The meeting was held in bin Laden's private suite in a Dubai
hospital. Though he was eligible for extermination, according to
President Bill Clinton's intelligence findings, on July 14th he was
let go and left Dubai on his private jet.
6. Every expert in the field of terrorism, up until Sept.
11, 2001, routinely explained the fact that certified terrorist
organizations operate in an effort to garner worldwide attention and
support for their political cause(s). In the case of pro-Palestinian
terrorist organizations, their attacks had been traditionally
against American military facilities and personnel. This was
obviously neither the intent nor outcome of the attacks on the World
Trade Center.
7. For weeks preceding September 11, 2001 international
opinion regarding Israel and the United States had plummeted to an
all-time low. Alternatively, pro-Palestinian attitudes had rapidly
increased to an all-time high, particularly following the United
Nations Conference on Racism wherein the U.S. and Israel had been
chastised for their racist policies. Any intelligent pro-Palestinian
terrorist group, such as Osama bin Laden's legions, or intelligence
organization(s) supportive to the Palestinian cause, would not have
jeopardized the significant gains achieved at that time.
8. Osama bin Laden took his direction and money from the CIA
for ten years. During this time, approximately $5 billion was
funnelled to his organization through black op budgets into CIA
operation known as Maktab al-Khidamar-the MAK. It is clear, as a MAK
mercenary army leader, bin Laden's fortune vastly increased during
that time. It is said that, "Once in the CIA, always in the
CIA." Could this be one of the intelligence organizations about
which Milt Bearden was speaking? (See #5 above.)
9. Also on Tuesday evening September 12, 2001 previous Secretary
of Defense for the Clinton administration, William S. Cohen,
explained to CBS News anchorman Dan Rather, that the terrorist
attacks on New York and Washington were an aberration. He fully
expected there to be a full-scale deployment of biological and
chemical "weapons of mass destruction" very soon. This
reinforced his earlier statements as Defense Secretary that a
five-pound bag of anthrax bacteria in the hands of terrorists would
likely cause the deaths of hundreds of thousands of Americans. We
were particularly vulnerable to this "immanent" threat, he
said. Many critical military observers considered these statements
treasonous. Reason? At no time in American military history has a
top level official broadcast internationally the country's greatest
attack vulnerability. In effect, his statements were akin to giving
anti-Americans their marching orders.
10. A sincere U.S. Government, truly concerned about the
health and safety of American citizens, would be doing everything in
its power to advance public health and educational policies for
biological and chemical attack preparedness. Instead, such critical
policy and advice has been left entirely to independent, often
ill-trained, "experts," at best, and special interests and
media producers at worst. The mainstream media has completely
neglected the simple things people can do to guard loved-ones, such
as natural medicines (e.g.,garlic) to ward off infections such as
anthrax.
11. In July 2000, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
endorsed one single largely untested and highly risky antibiotic,
Bayer Corporation's Cipro, for anthrax prophylaxis and treatment.
Following September 11, 2001 demand for this drug skyrocketed 1,000
percent, according to Peter Jennings in an ABC News report broadcast
September 27. Pharmacies charged $700 per person for a mere
two-month supply of Cipro. It is well established that far less
expensive antibiotics, including the penicillins and tetracyclines,
are highly effective against Anthrax. The Bayer Corporation during
and following World War II had been blacklisted by the U.S.
Government for being the principle profiteer, in partnership with
the Rockefeller Standard Oil Company, for funding the Third Reich,
their terrorist organizations, and Germany's war machine.
12. During the first week of October, the media heralded a bizarre
anthrax outbreak at the National Enquirer near Ft. Lauderdale,
Florida. By October 11, three cases of reported "criminal"
anthrax infections had occurred. This form of anthrax--a classic
biological weapon strain--is not easily acquired. It is distributed
mainly by the American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) of Rockville,
Maryland. The curator there is Dr. Joshua Lederberg, who is also the
president of Rockefeller University. Preceding the Gulf War, the
U.S. Congressional Record (May 25, 1994, commonly called the
"Don Riegle Report") exposed the ATCC for shipping to
Sadam Hussein's Ministry of Higher Education and the Ministry of
Trade, nineteen shipments of various strains of Bacillus Anthraces
from 1978 to 1988.
13. According to investigators at the FBI, the Enquirer anthrax
attack was not likely done by typical "terrorists," but
rather one or more "criminals." For what motive?
Obviously, whoever did this had a motive, and had access to weapons
grade anthrax. That virtually leaves typical blue-collar
"criminals" out entirely since skill in handling and
shipping live anthrax would be required for this crime. The fact
that, of all places, America's bestselling tabloid was first
attacked, then other mainstream media outlets, speaks volumes about
the criminal motive. Since no one has claimed responsibility for
this act, they obviously did not do it for personal publicity.
Obviously, then, the attack was a white collar crime by one or more
"white collar bioterrorist(s)." At least one
Rockefeller-linked U.S. biological weapons official, Dr. Lederberg,
and Rockefeller-partnered Corporation, Bayer (aspirin) that largely
financed the Third Reich, and Hitler's rise to power, had obvious
white-collar (financial) motives for these contemporary
"terrorist" attacks. This deserves critical consideration
and further investigation.
14. On October 1, 2001, Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz sent the FBI, as
well as half the members of the U.S. Congress, an urgent request to
investigate this matter. (See: http://www.tetrahedron.org
"Apocalypse Prevention Project") Included in this letter
was the following statement concerning the links between
contemporary terrorist organizations, the global neo-Nazi movement,
and possible Bayer Corporation involvement:
The Bayer Company [also linked to AID-virus contaminated blood
products during 1980 investigations] evaded U.S. Government controls
during and following the holocaust in which millions of mostly
Jewish people were used as experimental subjects in medical
atrocities overseen by I.G. Farben's president Hermann Schmitz, who
also directed the German-multinational Bayer A.G.
Of urgent pertinence to the FBI's current investigation into
terrorism's money trail, a recent investigation into terrorist group
funding, issued by The Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee (OBIC)
directed by Representative Charles Key, found "Neo-Nazi figures
have actually been implicated in Middle Eastern special weapons
procurement and terrorist activity." For example, the group
reported, "since the 1960s, an old Swiss Nazi named Francois
Genaud has reportedly masterminded several airplane hijackings for
the PLO." The now defunct "Odessa" organization, the
post-war successor to Hitler's S.S., according to OBIC, "had
numerous documented meetings with representatives of various Arab
organizations; and, during the early 1980s, a Neo-Nazi named Odfried
Hepp attacked several U.S. military installations in Germany with
bombs. Hepp was later found to have been financed by Al Fatah."
Hepp, OBIC reported, did his Ph.D. on "Neo-Nazi/PLO bombings of
U.S. housing, cars and military facilities in Germany." Given
these facts alone, an FBI investigation into this matter is
critical.
I am also contacting congressional leaders at this time urging an
immediate U.S. General Accounting Office (GAO) investigation into
the FDA's "advisory committee" that sponsored the
unprecedented sole endorsement of Bayer's Cipro for anthrax. Nowhere
in the Physician's Desk Reference (2000) is it claimed that Cipro is
especially indicated for anthrax. In fact, Bacillus anthracis is not
even mentioned. What is mentioned is that, "although effective
in clinical trials, ciprofloxacin is not a drug of first choice in
the treatment of presumed or confirmed pneumonia secondary to
Streptococcus pneumoniae." This organism, like anthrax, is an
aerobic gram-positive microbe. (Likewise, Bacillus anthracis causes
pneumonia in the form of commonly terminal hemorrhagic
bronchopneumonia.) Furthermore the PDR states: "WARNINGS-THE
SAFETY AND EFFECTIVENESS OF CIPROFLOXACIN IN PEDIATRIC PATIENTS AND
ADOLESCENTS (LESS THAN 18 YEARS OF AGE), PREGNANT WOMEN, AND
LACTATING WOMEN HAVE NOT BEEN ESTABLISHED." Alternatively,
numerous bioweapons experts have consistently recommended far less
costly and time-tested antibiotics to fight anthrax, including the
natural and synthetic penicillins, erythromycin, cephalosporins, and
the tetracyclines.
As with Dr. Nicolson's forewarning to military leaders
concerning the Sept 11 Pentagon attack, the above urgent request by
Dr. Horowitz for FBI investigation into this matter, to date (Nov.
5, 2001) has gone ignored. This strongly suggests, if not evidences,
a conspiracy within our own government-a conspiracy of silence at
minimum.
15. Aaron Swirski, one of the architects of the World Trade
Center, said they designed the towers to withstand airplane
collisions. "I designed it for a 707 hit, he said." The
collapse of the buildings came as a complete "shock" to
him and his colleagues. Van Romero, a demolition expert, former
director of the Energetic Materials Research and Testing Center, and
current vice present for research at New Mexico Institute of Mining
and Technology said that the manner in which the twin towers
collapsed, resembled those of controlled implosions used in planned
demolition. "My opinion is, based on the videotapes, that after
the airplanes hit the World Trade Center there were some explosive
devices inside the buildings that caused the towers to
collapse," Romero said. ABC News interviewed people who had
escaped "ground zero" on September 11, 2001. One
unidentified man said: "We were stuck on the stairs for a
while. I came down from the 85th floor. When we were just about to
leave the building, there was a blast." A woman's testimony
followed: "I got stuck on the stairs. When we got to the lobby
there was a blast," she said.
16. On September 11, 2001 President Bush was is Sarasota, Florida,
"In Sarasota, Fla. "reading to children in a classroom at
9:05 a.m. when his chief of staff, Andrew Card, whispered into his
ear, according to the Associated Press (Sept. 12). The president
briefly turned somber before he resumed reading. . . .[Next]
President Bush listened to 18 Booker Elementary School
second-graders read a story about a girl's pet goat . . . before he
spoke briefly and somberly about the terrorist attacks." Many
are curious as to why the "Commander-in-Chief" of the U.S.
took about a half-hour before he responded to the national security
urgency, or even addressed the tragedies.
17. The New York Times reported on September 15, 2001 that
Pentagon officials had been tracking the second two hijacked planes
for almost an hour following the WTC attacks because they simply
"didn't know what to do." Regarding the plane that crashed
into Pennsylvania "Paul Wolfowitz, the deputy defense
secretary, said . . . that the Pentagon had been tracking that plane
and could have shot it down if necessary; it crashed about 35
minutes after the Pentagon crash." Many are wondering why, if
they could have shot that plane down, did they not shoot the plane
down that flew into the Pentagon?
18. Vice President Dick Cheney was interviewed on Sept. 12, 2001.
When asked where he was when he learned of the attacks, many were
surprised to learn that he was alerted by his secretary who was
"watching television" in his Washington, D.C. office. In
essence, though the FAA had known at least four planes were veering
far off their course, while the Pentagon, too, had been tracking at
least two of the hijacked planes, Mr. Cheney received his initial
intelligence report by way of television through his clerical
secretary.
19. "Drugs and terrorism go hand in hand," wrote
investigative journalist and retired LAPD officer Michael C. Ruppert
( http://www.copvcia.com ) "Conveniently ignored in all of the
press coverage since the tragic events of Sept. 11," Mr.
Ruppert wrote, "is the fact that on May 17 Secretary of State
Colin Powell announced a gift of $43 million to the Taliban as a
purported reward for its eradication of Afghanistan's opium crop
this February. That, in effect, made the U.S. the Taliban's largest
financial benefactor according to syndicated columnist Robert Scheer
writing in The Los Angeles Times on May 22."
20. "Now as US military action will replace the Taliban
government and fresh crops will be planted in Afghanistan," Mr.
Ruppert continued, "the slack in cash flow will assuredly be
replaced by dramatically increased opium production in Colombia; the
revenues from that effort being needed to maintain the revenue
streams into Wall Street. Prior to the WTC attacks, credible
sources, including the U.S. government, the IMF, Le Monde and the
U.S. Senate placed the amount of drug cash flowing into Wall Street
and U.S. banks at around $250-$300 billion a year."
21. Mr. Ruppert also revealed that an Executive Director at the
CIA named A. "Buzzy" Krongard is suspected of Wall Street
profiteering from foreknowledge of the Sept 11 attacks. Formerly
with Bankers Trust catering to the world's wealthiest clients of the
Deutsch Bank. (The Deutsche Bank is heavily implicated in Dr. Len
Horowitz's book Death in the Air: Globalism, Terrorism, and Toxic
Warfare released in June, 2001) In 1999, Mr. Krongard left Deutsch
Bank for his present high-level job in the CIA. Enormous quantities
of "Put" options were handled through the Deutsche Bank,
which allowed the options buyers to earn profits in the event the
value of airline stocks went down. The appearance of advance
knowledge of Sept. 11 is so strong that to date $2.5 Million of the $20 Million in profits earned on those unusual
trades, remains unclaimed, possibly by Mr. Krongard, or other
affiliates of the CIA.
22. Many journalists have reported that the bombing of
Afghanistan, allegedly intended to punish the Taliban for
affiliations with Bin Laden, is simply a cover for that government's
reneging of support for an oil pipeline through Afghanistan from the
vast Caspian Sea oil fields. Sept. 11, provided a great excuse to
pursue this petrochemical, economic, and "national
security" objective.
23. On December 20, 1997, the national newspaper CONTACT: The
Phoenix Project, published an interview on anthrax biowarfare
threats and vaccinations in which Dr. Leonard Horowitz was asked
"about the government's pressure to vaccinate [using the
anthrax vaccine] and the bioweapons scare tactics, etc." He
responded: "Look at the motive behind the persuasion, and what
is it? They're preparing to blame it on the Muslims, Christian
patriots, and militia groups. The militia groups are already
dysfunctional because they're penetrated by agitators."
This is precisely what followed in the wake of the 9-11 attacks.
Muslim groups were blamed for the 9-11 attacks. Christian patriots
were blamed for the anthrax mailings. Militia groups were entirely
silenced and even implicated. And false patriotism in which
Americans welcome the destruction of basic constitutional liberties
with CIA command over the entire U.S. military and Government has
come to pass.
24. On October 31, 2001 the American people and U.S.
Constitutional freedoms were attacked, not by the Taliban government
or Muslim terrorists, but by CDC officials who advanced the
"Model State Emergency Health Powers Act" that will force
masses of people suspected of exposure to broadly-defined
"infectious diseases" and biological weapons into
concentration camp-like holding facilities for drugging,
vaccination, and quarantine, without any viable legal recourse.
25. The entire 9-11 tragedy and subsequent threats to U.S.
national and global securities fits far too perfectly with standard
Machiavellian theory to be overlooked. This ongoing practice - the
"problem/ reaction/ solution" agenda of precisely
"managed chaos" - appears to be standard operating
procedures for oligarchs historically bent on developing a "New
World Order."
Sadly now for the American people, as it has been
for the Third World, this effort includes killing approximately half
of the world's current population.
www.tetrahedron.org
www.prophecyandpreparedness.com
http://www.copvcia.com
http://www.davidicke.com/icke/index1a.html
http://globalresearch.ca/articles/CHO109C.html
- Courtesy of Dr. Leonard G. Horowitz and Tetrahedron, LLC
- 206 North 4th Avenue, Suite 147
- Sandpoint, Idaho 83864
- http://www.tetrahedron.org
-
- Toll free order line: 888-508-4787;
- Office telephone: 208-265-2575;
- FAX: 208-265-2775
- E-mail: tetra@tetrahedron.org
- © Copyright 2001-2003 Tetrahedron.org
-

922
interesting facts and stats
|