|
[ CFR ] [ CFR ] [ Global strategy ] [ Three world wars ] [ Illuminati2 ] [ Illuminati3 ] [ Illuminati4 ] [ EU exposed ] [ UN ] [ Communism ] [ Secret societies ]
WHY NOT WORLD GOVERNMENT?
by William F. Jasper
http://www.mt.net/~watcher/nwowhynot.html
World peace through world government and world law. It is an ancient idea that
has fastened itself mightily on the minds of men in many ages. Never before,
however, has our human race been so close to inaugurating this utopian
"ideal", to establishing and empowering government on a planetary
scale.
But our planet and our age have had more than passing acquaintance with utopias
empowered. And without exception, the promises of the utopian dream have yielded
to dystopian nightmares. The tens of millions of victims of Lenin, Fidel, Pol
Pot, Amin, Lumumba, Qhadaffi, Khomeini, and dozens of other utopic despots cry
out to us. They warn us against the utopian siren call. They warn us of the
fundamental truth embodied in George Washington's definition of government:
Government is not reason; it is not eloquence; it is force! Like fire, it is a
dangerous servant and a fearful master.
World government, of course, would necessitate WORLDWIDE force --- unprecedented
power on a global scale. Make no mistake about it, that is what the advocates of
"an empowered United Nations" are really after. And what is most
disturbing is that they have very nearly succeeded in grasping hold of this
power, without most inhabitants of this planet having the slightest idea of what
is being planned for them.
CALL FOR WORLD GOVERNMENT
Since World War II, calls for world government and an end to national
sovereignty have proliferated, usually emanating from individuals associated
with organizations such as the Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) and the World
Federalist Association (WFA). Below are but a few of many examples that could be
cited.
* In 1950, a "Preliminary Draft of a World Constitution" authored by
CFR globalists Robert M. Hutchins, Rexford G. Tugwell, and others was
introduced in Congress by Senator Glen Taylor (D-ID). The submitted World
Constitution declared that "iniquity and war inseparably spring from the
competitive anarchy of the national states; that therefore the age of nations
must end." It held as well that nations must "surrender their
arms" to the proposed "Federal Republic of the World."
* In 1960, Rhodes Scholar Walt Whitman Rostow (CFR) claimed that urgent
imperatives "argue strongly for movement in the direction of federalized
world organization under effective international law" and for
"effective international control of military power." The real world
problem, said Rostow, is "national sovereignty", and "it is
therefore an American interest to see an end to nationhood as it has been
historically defined." Incredibly, Rostow was given a top spot in the
Kennedy State Department.
* In 1961, the Kennedy State Department brought forth an official policy
entitled "Freedom from War: The United States Program for General and
Complete Disarmament in a Peaceful World (Department of State Publication
7277)". This amazing document proposed a plan of "progressive
controlled disarmament" in which all national armaments, including those
of the United States, would be transferred to the United Nations". This
disarmament "would proceed to a point where no state would have the
military power to challenge the progressively strengthened U.N. Peace
Force."
* On Earth Day, April 22, 1970, Norman Cousins (CFR), the long-time president
of the United World Federalists (now the World Federalist Association),
proclaimed, "Humanity needs world order. The fully sovereign nation is
incapable of dealing with the poisoning of the environment... The management
of the planet...requires a world government."
FAST FORWARD 25 YEARS
The appeals for world government multiplied with the approach of the UN's 50th
anniversary in 1995.
* In a June 22, 1993 letter on White House stationery to the World Federalist
Association, President Bill Clinton congratulated the WFA on awarding the
Norman Cousins Global Governance Award to the president's longtime friend and
No. 2 State Department appointee, Strobe Talbot (CFR). Clinton's letter
boasted, "Norman Cousins (CFR) worked for world peace and world
government... Best wishes... for future success."
* In the World Bank's 1994 Human Development Report, an essay by Nobel
Prize-winning economist Jan Tinbergen, entitled "Global Governance for
the 21st Century," declares: "Mankind's problems can no longer be
solved by national governments. What is needed is a World Government."
And this government, says he, should be empowered with a "World
Police" and a program for "the redistribution of world income."
UNLIMITED POWER KILLS
The real problem we face, however, is that these appeals and proposals are now
being implemented through United Nations treaties and conventions which are
establishing "supranational institutions" with REAL power and force.
Lord Acton's famous dictum that "Power tends to corrupt and absolute power
corrupts absolutely" is a sobering truism acknowledged by all intelligent
people. To this maxim should be added what we might call the Rummel Corollary:
"Power kills and absolute Power kills absolutely." R.J. Rummel, a
professor of political science at the University of Hawaii, has spent the past
eight years of his life in an intensive study of a very grim but important
phenomenon of our century: genocide and government mass murder, or what he calls
"democide". He has thus far produced four powerful and harrowing
books, the latest volume being, "Death by Government" (Transaction,
1994). "The more power a government has," notes Dr. Rummel, "the
more it can act arbitrarily according to the whims and desires of the elite and
murder its foreign and domestic subjects. The more constrained the power of
governments, the more power is diffused, checked and balanced, the less it will
aggress on others and commit democide."
One graph in his newest book lists the top 15 of "this century's
megamurderers -- those states killing in cold blood, aside from warfare, 1
million or more men, women and children." The bloodiest of those criminal
regimes -- the USSR and Red China -- were not only invited into the United
Nations, but were given special status on the UN Security Council!
The UN could (and does) accommodate these megamurderers because "the rule
of law," in UN terms, is radically, fundamentally different from the
"rule of law" as understood by the American Founding Fathers and as
embodied in our Constitution. Whereas the U.S. Constitution is rooted in the
traditional Western and Judeo-Christian legal concepts of divine law and natural
law which circumscribe the limits of government power and posit individual
God-given rights which it is government's duty to protect, the United Nations
Charter is based in the framework of positivist legal theory which virtually
guarantees unrestrained, despotic government.
All of its empty platitudes
about "peace," "justice," "law," and "human
rights" notwithstanding, the UN is a lawless organization made up largely
of criminal regimes pursuing a malevolent, tyrannical agenda. A global,
regimented police state under the UN would mean a grim existence -- if, that is,
you are one of the "lucky" ones ALLOWED TO EXIST. One sure thing Dr.
Rummel's research points up with unmistakable clarity is this: "Power will
achieve its murderous potential." Ponder for a moment then this
mind-numbing summary of already "realized" potential:
In total, during the first eighty-eight years of this century, almost 170
million men, women, and children have been shot, beaten, tortured, knifed,
burned, starved, frozen, crushed, or worked to death; buried alive, drowned,
hung, bombed, or killed in any other of the myriad ways governments have
inflicted death on unarmed, helpless citizens and foreigners. The dead could
conceivably be nearly 360 million people. It is as though our species has been
devastated by a modern Black Plague. And indeed it has, but a plague of Power,
not of germs.
Surely the human mind cannot even begin to conceive the enormity of the global
slaughter that would certainly accompany the "Plague of Power" issuing
from a world government under any entity other than God Himself.
~~~Tell me not, in mournful numbers,
Life is but an empty dream!
For the soul is dead that slumbers,
And things are not what they seem.~~~
____________________________________________________
Americans Have a Right to Know About The Council on Foreign Relations
by John F. McManus
http://www.gooff.com/news/read.asp?ID=1525
There exists in our nation today a
privately-run organization with only 3,000 members, several hundred of whom are
U.S. government officials. But even though this organization possesses enormous
influence over the actions of our national government, most Americans have never
heard of it.
This same organization's members dominate our nation's mass media, multinational
corporations, the banking industry, colleges and universities, even the
military. Yet its domination is unknown to the average citizen.
The members of this small but extremely influential group are responsible for a
parade of foreign policy disasters in China, Korea, Vietnam, Nicaragua, Panama,
Cuba, and Africa. The group itself has always sought to lead the United States
into a one-world socialistic system led by its members and their like-minded
associates in other nations. Shouldn't you know about this organization and what
its members are planning for the l990s?
This article will introduce you to the Council on Foreign Relations, the
little-known New York City-based organization that is both the seat of the
liberal establishment and the main force pushing the United States into the new
world order.
CFR Wants One-World Socialism
It was a disappointed but determined group of diplomats from the United States
and England who gathered at the Majestic Hotel in Paris on June 17, 1919. Their
disappointment stemmed from the U.S. Senate's rejection of America's proposed
entry into world government via the League of Nations. But they remained
determined to scrap the sovereignty of each of their nations, and of all
nations.
The leader of the U.S. contingent at this 1919 conference was President Woodrow
Wilson's top advisor, Edward Mandell House. In his 1912 book, 'Philip Dru:
Administrator', House laid out a plan for radically altering the American system
via what he termed a "conspiracy." The book revealed his ultimate
goal: "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx."
The Paris gathering led to the formation of the British Royal Institute for
International Affairs and the American Council on Foreign Relations (CFR). With
Rockefeller and Carnegie money backing it, the CFR quickly attracted influential
Americans who used their
influence to labor for the one-world socialist goal. In 1939, the organization
accepted a formal invitation to establish a relationship with the U.S. State
Department. That relationship soon grew into CFR domination of the foreign
policy of our nation. Practically every Secretary of State for the past 50
years, serving both Democratic and Republican Administrations, has held CFR
membership.
Explicitly Stated Goal
As early as 1922, the CFR's prestigious journal, Foreign Affairs, brazenly
called for "world government" at the expense of our nation's
independence. Repeatedly airing this subversive goal over subsequent
years,
Foreign Affairs published its most explicit call for the termination of U.S.
sovereignty in Richard N. Gardner's 1974 article entitled "The Hard Road to
World Order."
Admitting that "instant world government" was unfortunately
unattainable, the Columbia University professor and former State Department
official proceeded to champion "an end run around national sovereignty,
eroding it piece by piece." He also pointed to numerous international
groups and causes, each of which he claimed "can produce some remarkable
concessions of sovereignty that could not be achieved on an across-the-board
basis."
At the time this article appeared, hundreds of CFR members were holding high
government posts. Those who were required to swear an oath to support the
Constitution of the United States should have immediately resigned from the CFR.
None did. Nor were any asked to do so by superiors in government. Instead, the
erosion of national independence and the undermining of the Constitution
continued.
CFR members like Gardner have historically helped similarly determined
world-government advocates achieve power in other nations. It didn't matter to
them whether foreign leaders were professed socialists, communists, or whatever,
as long as they shared Edward Mandell House' s goal of "Socialism as
dreamed of by Karl Marx." Marxism was the goal, and that has always meant
economic control of the people and world government.
Over the years, therefore, CFR members have carried out the Marxist goals of
their organization's founder when they helped one communist thug after another
take control of once-free nations. Now that communism is no longer the favored
route to socialist world government, CFR members have thrown the weight of their
considerable influence behind socialists and "former" communists in
Europe, Africa, and elsewhere. But they deserve condemnation for the deaths of
hundreds of millions killed by communist rulers, and for the horror of life
under communist dictatorships still endured by more than a billion human beings.
Past Treachery
CFR members Owen Lattimore and Dean Acheson engineered the betrayal of Chiang
Kai-shek's government and the domination of the Chinese people by the bloodiest
murderers the world has ever known.
CFR members Dean Acheson and Dean Rusk arranged for the no-win undeclared war in
Korea, the removal from command of General MacArthur who sought victory, and the
establishment of Communist Red China as the primary military power in Asia.
CFR members John Foster Dulles and Allen Dulles, filling top posts in the
Administration of CFR member Dwight Eisenhower, betrayed the Hungarian Freedom
Fighters in 1956 and knowingly aided communist Fidel Castro in his successful
seizure of Cuba in 1958-59.
CFR members McGeorge Bundy, Adlai Stevenson, and John J. McCloy saw to it that
the 1961 Bay of Pigs invasion was a miserable failure, a huge boost for Castro,
and a stunning embarrassment for the United States.
CFR members Dean Rusk, Robert McNamara, and Henry Cabot Lodge pushed the United
States into Vietnam and drew up the rules of engagement for our forces that made
victory completely unattainable.
CFR members Richard Nixon and Henry Kissinger continued those policies, presided
over America's total defeat in 1973, and allowed South Vietnam, Laos, and
Cambodia to be delivered to communist rulers.
CFR stalwarts Henry Kissinger, Ellsworth Bunker, and Sol Linowitz arranged (with
Senate approval) in 1978 to give away the U.S. canal in Panama to a Marxist
dictatorship and to sweeten the incredible deal with a gift of $400 million to
take it.
CFR leaders Zbigniew Brzezinski, Cyrus Vance, and Warren Christopher undermined
strong U.S. allies in Nicaragua and Iran during the 1970's and helped
anti-American and Marxist leaders to power.
CFR members George Shultz, William J. Casey, and Malcolm Baldrige, during the
1980's, continued the policy of supplying U.S. aid which kept communists in
power in Poland, Romania, China, and the Soviet Union. These same individuals
did all they could to assist and dignify the Marxists in El Salvador, Nicaragua,
and South Africa. Wherever communist regimes failed, they sent more U.S. aid to
the socialists and one-worlders who came to power.
CFR leaders in the Administration of CFR veteran George Bush continued to
undermine the government of South Africa until it fell into the hands of Marxist
Nelson Mandela.
George Bush deliberately avoided the U.S. Congress and went to the United
Nations for authorization to unleash American military forces against Iraq in
1991. He pointedly stated that his goal was a "new world order ... a United
Nations that performs as envisioned by its
founders." The UN's founders, however, included 43 current or future
members of the CFR. A leader of the U.S. delegation and the secretary general of
the UN's founding conference in 1945 was future CFR member and secret communist
Alger Hiss.
CFR member Bill Clinton has followed the Marxist game plan called for by Edward
Mandell House by crusading for socialized medicine, an end to private ownership
of fire arms, and economic unions preceding world government through NAFTA and
GATT. President Clinton has also embarked on a deliberate program, most notably
via his April l994 Presidential Decision Directive 25, which urges turning over
control of U.S. military forces to the United Nations.
Destroying Checks and Balances
Americans have always been assured that tyranny cannot be established in our
nation because of our Constitution's brilliant system of checks and balances. In
a round robin way, each of the three branches of government has the power to
check and limit the activities of the other two. This feature of the
Constitution did not materialize by chance. In the Federalist Papers, James
Madison wrote: "The accumulation of all powers, legislative, executive and
judiciary, in the same hand, whether of one, a few, or many, or whether
hereditary, self appointed or elected, may justly be pronounced the very
definition of tyranny." But through its members, the CFR is amassing
exactly the kind of tyrannical power Madison feared.
The Executive branch is led by CFR member Bill Clinton. His top appointees
include CFR members Warren Christopher, W. Anthony Lake, Bruce Babbitt, Henry
Cisneros, Lloyd Bentsen, Donna Shalala, R. James Woolsey, Madeleine Albright,
Alice Rivlin, Strobe Talbott, and a host of others.
The Legislative branch's Senate has been led by CFR members George Mitchell (the
Majority Leader until he retired), Patrick Moynihan, John D. Rockefeller IV,
John Chafee, Harris Wofford, Christopher Dodd, Larry Pressler, Bob Graham,
William Cohen, Claiborne Pell, and others. The most important officers of the
House of Representatives are CFR members: Richard Gephardt and Majority leader
Newt Gingrich. In addition, there are more than a dozen other members of the CFR
serving in the House.
The Judicial branch consists of the Supreme Court and all federal district and
appeals courts. Of the nine justices of the nation's highest court, three are
CFR members: Sandra Day O'Connor, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, and Stephen G. Breyer.
Checks and balances? The CFR doesn't worry about them at all. But every American
should carefully consider James Madison's warning.
Grip on the Mass Media
Why are Americans unaware of the enormous clout possessed by the CFR? How can it
be that an organization formed to undo the American dream and lead this nation
into a one-world Marxist nightmare can achieve such a controlling influence
without the people knowing about it? Why hasn't the supposedly tough and
courageous mass media informed the people about this subversive takeover?
The answer, very simply, is that the CFR dominates the mass
media, which only
rarely reports anything about the organization. The names of hundreds of media
executives and journalists can be found on the CFR membership roster. On October
30, 1993, Washington Post columnist Richard Harwood detailed the CFR's
domination of his own profession in his column entitled "Ruling Class
Journalists." While never condemning what he was reporting and likely
steering ambitious individuals toward the Council, Harwood characterized CFR
members as "the nearest thing we have to a ruling establishment in the
United States."
He wrote: "In the past 15 years, council directors have included Hedley
Donovan of Time Inc., Elizabeth Drew of the New Yorker, Philip Geyelin of The
Washington Post, Karen Elliott House of the Wall Street Journal, and Strobe
Talbott of Time magazine, who is now President Clinton's (Deputy Secretary of
State).
The editorial page editor, deputy editorial page editor, executive editor,
managing editor, foreign editor, national affairs editor, business and financial
editor and various writers as well as Katharine Graham, the paper's principal
owner, represent The Washington Post in the council's membership.
The executive editor, managing editor and foreign editor of the New York Times
are members, along with the executives of such other large newspapers as the
Wall Street Journal and Los Angeles Times, the weekly news magazines, network
television executives and celebrities, Dan Rather, Tom Brokaw and Jim Lehrer,
for example, and various columnists, among them Charles Krauthammer, William
Buckley, George Will and Jim Hoagland."
The Council repeatedly denies that it sets policy for our nation. Yet, while
discussing our nation's changing foreign policy, CFR Chairman Peter G. Peterson
stated in the organization's 1989 Annual Report that "the Board of
Directors and the staff of the Council have decided that this institution should
play a leadership role in defining these new foreign policy agenda."
Our question is simply: How can an organization define an agenda for the nation
without taking a stand or advocating a policy? The answer is that it can't. Any
claim from the CFR that it is merely a debating forum open to all ideas is
absurd. Even Richard Harwood knows this. In his Washington Post article
mentioned previously, he wrote that the CFR journalists he listed "do not
merely analyze and interpret foreign policy; they help make it."
The actual content of meetings held at the group's headquarters and elsewhere
remains a closely guarded secret. According to CFR bylaws, it is an
"express condition of membership" that members refrain from disclosing
in any way what goes on at Council meetings. Any action contravening this rule
"may be regarded by the Board of Directors in its sole discretion as ground
for termination or suspension of membership."
Yet, cabinet officials, members of Congress, high-ranking military officers,
and other government officials repeatedly participate at CFR functions. Such
"confidential" gatherings under the aegis of a private organization
(especially one founded by an individual whose goal was "Socialism as
dreamed of by Karl Marx") are totally inconsistent with proper conduct in a
free country.
No CFR member is ever directly instructed to hold any particular view. Instead,
government officials and media personalities supply important respectability for
favored positions, and render varying degrees of disdain or contempt for the
opposite view. Ambitious politicians, journalists, corporate executives,
professors, and others dutifully follow the lead set for them, frequently
without ever knowing whose attitude they are parroting. In this way, an agenda
is indeed set and policies are established. As a rule, slight variations on most
topics are tolerated, even welcomed. But advocacy of any position outside
carefully drawn limits earns scorn and ridicule. For example, discussion about
increasing or decreasing U.S. funding for either the United Nations or a variety
of foreign aid projects is tolerated, even welcomed. But anyone who calls for
U.S. withdrawal from the world body, or who recommends that all foreign aid be
terminated, jeopardizes his or her reputation with the nation's most prestigious
power brokers.
Those who read CFR publications and study the editorial stance of CFR-controlled
media organs know exactly which are the favored attitudes. The CFR and several
like-minded groups can be expected to support the following: more pacts,
treaties, and agreements that compromise U.S. sovereignty; continued praise for
and reliance on the United Nations; piecemeal transfer of U.S military forces to
UN supervision and command; more and newer forms of foreign aid; undermining and
isolation of any national leader who does not favor socialism and world
government under a "new world order"; and submission to the radical
demands of environmental extremists, population planners, and human rights
crusaders who will never be satisfied until the United States no longer exists
as a free and
independent nation.
Some who follow the lead of the Establishment are undoubtedly committed to the
world government and socialism advocated by Marx and the CFR's founders. But
most who toe this line are self-promoters who are interested only in re-election, advancement, and recognition. They care little or nothing about the
Constitution, their fellow citizens, and freedom in general.
The Shadows of Power
A thoroughly revealing history of the Council on Foreign Relations and its
responsibility for America's decline is available in researcher James Perloff's
superb book, The Shadows of Power. Unlike others who have sought to warn the
American people about the pervasive power of the CFR, Mr. Perloff studied the
organization's publications from its inception in 1921. The evidence he supplies
to support his condemnation is taken from the CFR itself. His important book
concludes that the CFR is a major participant in an ongoing conspiratorial drive
to use the U.S. government and the wealth of the American people to create power
over mankind for a few diabolically driven individuals.
Mr. Perloff is careful to point out that only some of the CFR's members are
completely committed to the sinister goals he exposes. He believes that many CFR
members, and many others who follow the group's lead, would readily switch their
allegiance should widespread awareness be created about this powerful
organization's history and designs
______________________________________________________________________
Council on Foreign Relations
http://www.jeremiahproject.com/prophecy/nworder06.html
The CFR began on July 29, 1921, in New York
City in 1921 by Col. Edward Mandell House, chief adviser to President Woodrow
Wilson in league with the same stockholders of The Federal Reserve.
House, a
socialist, wrote in his book, Philip Dru: Administrator, that he was
working for "Socialism as dreamed of by Karl Marx." He told of a
"conspiracy" which would gain control of both political parties, and
use them as instruments in the creation of a socialist world government. (John
McManus, The Insiders, pg. 7.)
The CFR is a serpentine network of
international revolutionaries and fascist ideologues whose goal is to end
American sovereignty and bring about a global, Marxist paradise. The founders
included many of those who had been at the signing of the Treaty of Versailles
after World War I, including Colonel Edward House and Walter Lippmann. Finances
for the CFR came from: J.P. Morgan; John D. Rockefeller; Bernard Baruch; Paul
Warburg; Otto Kahn; and Jacob Schiff.
Harper's Magazine called this the most
powerful organization in the United States. From CFR comes 90% of the people in
the State Department and key positions in the Executive Branch.
The roster of CFR members is thoroughly
impressive - so are the power groups who have representatives in it. Its current
membership, all 2905 of them, is like reading a "who's who" of the
elite politicians, media, financiers, businessmen, and educators.
President Bill Clinton has been a long
standing member of the CFR and was in 1992 the only State Governor listed in the
membership role of the Trilateral Commission. Clinton, also a member of David
Rockefeller's Bilderberger group, has surrounded himself, either by personal
choice or the design of those who are pulling his strings, with the most elite,
leftist cabinet that one could image.
Make no mistake. Bill Clinton and his team
are extreme far-left, socialist, New Age and as globally minded in orientation
as anyone could imagine. When Clinton was told by members of the press that his
top appointees didn't look like "change," he replied that he wanted
"continuity" as well. He has achieved that ...
* Madeleine Albright: A former
Georgetown University professor, United Nations Ambassador, and now
Secretary of State. She is also a member of the Trilateral
Commission.
*
Warren Christopher: former Secetary
of State; CFR Vice Chairman
* Robert Reich: former Secretary of
Labor (also TC and Rhodes scholar)
* George
Stephanopoulous: former
Clinton Communications Director (also Rhodes scholar)
* Clifton Wharton: Deputy Secretary of
State
* Peter
Tarnoff: Under Secretary for
Political Affairs (Current President of CFR - also TC)
* Winston Lord: Assistant Secretary of
State for East Asian and Pacific Affairs; (past President of CFR - also TC)
* Vernon Jordan: Clinton transition
boss (also TC)
* Lloyd
Bentsen: former Secretary of
Treasury
* Admiral William Crow, Jr.: Head of
the Foreign Intelligence Advisory Board (also TC)
* Anthony Lake: National Security
Advisor
* Samuel Berger: Deputy National
Security Advisor
* Les
Aspin: Secretary of Defense
* Donna
Shalala: Secretary of Health
and Human Services. An influential member of the CFR and the Trilateral
Commission, Shalala chaired the CFR committee which set the New World Order
agenda for Africa.
* Strobe
Talbott: Aid Coordinator to
the commonwealth of Indepenent States (also TC)
* Bruce Babbitt: Secretary of Interior
(also TC)
* Ron Brown: Secretary of Commerce
* James
Woolsey: CIA Director (also
Rhodes scholar)
* Roger Altman: Deputy Secretary of
Treasury
* Henry Cisneros: Secretary of Housing
and Urban Development (also TC)
* Robert Rubin: National Economic
Council; Soviet Investment Expert
* Dr. Jocelyn Elders: former Surgeon
General
* John Gibbons: White House Science
Advisor
* Alice
Rivlin: Deputy Budget Director.
She is also a member of both the CFR and Trilateral Commission.
* Laura Tyson - Chairman of the Council
of Economic Advisors is a former Berkeley professor and is a fan of Stalin's
communist economy.
* Johnnetta Cole - Clinton transition
coordinator for education, arts, labor and humanities.
* W. Bowman Cutter: National Economic
Council Deputy Assistant (also Rhodes scholar).
* Nancy
Soderberg: National Security
Council Staff Director.
* Ira
Magaziner: Senior Adviser for
Policy Development (also Rhodes scholar).
* Bruce Reed: Domestic Policy Council
Deputy Assistant (also Rhodes scholar).
* Mike Espy: Agriculture Secretary
(also served on the Rhodes Scholarship Selection Committee).
* Representative Thomas Foley: Former
Speaker of the House of Representatives (also TC)
International banking organizations that
currently have men in the CFR include Kuhn, Loeb & Co; Lazard Freres
(directly affiliated with Rothschild); Dillon Read; Lehman Bros.; Goldman,
Sachs; Chase Manhattan Bank; Morgan Guaranty Bank; Brown Bors. Harriman; First
National City Bank; Chemical Bank & Trust; and Manufacturers Hanover Trust
Bank. The CFR is totally interlocked with the major foundations (Rockefeller,
Ford, Carnegie) and the so-called think tanks (Rand, Hudson Institute, Brookings
Institute). The left has been systematically infiltrating wealthy and powerful
tax-free foundations and government agencies where taxpayers' funds would begin
to pour out to support the liberal agenda at home and abroad.
The CFR's Study No. 7, published November 25, 1959, openly declared its true
purpose: "...building a New International Order [which] must be responsive
to world aspirations for peace, [and] for social and economic change...an
international order [code for world government]...including states labelling
themselves as 'Socialist.'" One could safely say that a nutshell descriptor
of the CFR is "to bring about a New World Order through the manipulation of
U.S. foreign policy and relations and through international economic
interdependence."
The CFR's Annual Report in 1974 says the project for the CFR in the '80's will
be "The management of the International economy, global poverty,
environment and the new "common"... the oceans, the seabeds, and
space, and interstate violence, including arms control. What they are saying is
"The management of your money, your land, your groceries, and your
guns."
In 1975, the Rockefeller Foundation Report discusses the "Interdependece"
of the countries of the world on each other. That we are of one world and shall
become a nation state world under one government. They also say, we must reach a
zero state population growth. The Rockefeller Foundation stated that they have
in excess of 747 million dollars to achieve this with.
Recommended Reading
The Antichrist
by Arthur Walkington Pink
New
World Order : The Ancient Plan of Secret Societies
by William T. Still
This book makes charges that a military takeover of the U.S. was
considered by some in the administration of one our recent presidents and that
the forces behind it remain in secret positions of power, maneuvering for
another opportunity.
The
Secret Life of Bill Clinton : The Unreported Stories
by Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
- When it
comes to Clinton scandals, Ambrose Evans-Pritchard consistently gets the biggest
stories first.
- "For the past
decade one of the greatest journalists covering America has been Ambrose
Evans-Pritchard. No one has developed wider contacts regarding the botches and
scandals of American government. No one has written more elegantly and
intelligently." R. Emmett Tyrrell, Jr., Editor-In-Chief, The American
Spectator
- Now Evans-Pritchard is
breaking the biggest scoop of all: an assiduously documented expose of the
crimes that have made the Clinton presidency easily the most corrupt in history.
- Was the Oklahoma City bombing a government sting operation that flew
out of control when the stingers were outstung? Evans-Pritchard tells the story
that the FBI and Justice Department don't want you to know.
- Eyewitnesses to corruption in Clinton's Arkansas - many have met with
brutal harassment, physical intimidation, and, in some cases, even suspicious
death. Those who survived tell Evans-Pritchard their story.
- Bill Clinton's involvement in the drug underworld of Arkansas.
Evans-Pritchard talks to the smugglers, the Arkansas state troopers, the federal
agents and prosecutors, and the young girls who were the victims of "the
good times."
- The true story of Vince Foster's death - what the official report won't
tell you, but what eyewitnesses saw, and why the government is being sued for
falsifying sworn testimony.
- Evans-Pritchard discovers the missing evidence about Mena Airport.
The Shadows of Power : The Council on Foreign Relations and
the American Decline
by James Perloff
http://www.jeremiahproject.com/directory.html
The
Coming New World Order [6/9/02]
Philosophical
Roots of Change [10/19/96]
The
Clinton Legacy [8/29/99]
Spirituality
in the White House
They
Want Your Children!
Clinton
Resigns! [10/8/98]
Clinton's
Vision for the 21st. Century
Foreign
Policy [6/27/99]
The
Environment
Health
Care
Political
Reform
Crime
[8/18/98]
Gun
Control in America [6/6/98]
Drugs [7/8/98]
The
Clinton Economy
EO#13083
"Federalism"
Taxes [6/2/98]
Manufactured
Prosperity [10/9/96]
Welfare:
Is it Biblical?
Goals
2000
- Redefining
our values [8/18/98]
- Americans
Go To War for Their Schools [10/24/97]
- Mikhail
Gorbachev's New World Order [07/18/97]
- The
Illuminati[07/19/97]
- The
Skull & Bones Society[07/19/97]
- The
Bilderbergers[07/19/97]
- Bilderbergers
Planned Kosovo War in 1996 [5/7/99]
- The
Trilateral Commission [11/24/97]
- The
Council on Foreign Relations [11/23/97]
The
United Nations [6/27/99]
Technology [1/21/01]
- Banks
to Profile Customers! [3/19/99]
- Monitoring
Americans by I.D. and Federal Database [7/20/98]
- Big
Brother Wants to Watch You! National ID Cards [7/21/98]

See also http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Council_Foreign_Relations.htm
|