Einstein conspiracy

[ Scalar energy ] [ Morgan / Bearden ] [ Einstein conspiracy ] [ Scientific Dictatorship ] [ Bright skies ] [ Free energy ] [ Geo science ] [ The weather ] [ Suppressed archaeology ] [ Origins of oil ] [ True geology ]

The Einstein Conspiracy
by Roger Anderton 
http://www.jrbooksonline.com/PDF_Books/EinsteinConspiracy.pdf 

I have researched Relativity theory and written a book called The Relationship between light and gravity volume 1 available from Amazon. The book deals with my maths investigation of orthodox physics, this website goes beyond the book. There is now no need to look at the maths of orthodox physics to show it to be wrong, because its history can be show to be a myth. Also please note if you get the book, I have had troubles with publishers and different prints have different minor typographical errors.

1. Overall Introduction   [ec1.htm]
1.2 So, who was Roger Boscovich?
2.1 Suppressed Science : Introduction 
2.2 Indications of Conspiracy against Einstein
2.3 Climate of hatred at the time in Germany against Jews especially against Einstein 
2.4 Einstein’s lost theory 
2.5 The general public recognised Einstein as a great man, but physicists ridiculed him after 1925 
2.6 Light Speed
2.7 Aether
2.8 Unified Physics Theory
2.9 Conclusions on Einstein 
2.10 Temporocentric Delusion 
2.11 Chomsky 
2.12 Einstein subjected to anti Semitism from 1919 
2.13 Boscovich

2.14 Tesla   [ec2.htm]
2.15 References and Notes 
3. 1 The Revised Einstein versus the Original Einstein 
3.2 Einstein’s theories misunderstood 
4. Newton - Boscovich Research programme 
5.1 The Split between Classical (Newtonian) and Modern (QM) Physics 
5.2 Max Born on the Ether 
5.3 Ether as metaphor 
5.4 Maxwell supports Ether 
5.5 Occam’s Razor and the Ether 
5.6 Waves 
5.7 Quantum Tunnelling and Resonance 
6. Boscovich’s Theory the foundation of Quantum Theorising 

7. Musical Appreciation of the Universe     [ec2.htm]
8. The Founders of Modern Physics were working from a Unified Physics 
9. Logical Positivism and Scientism 
10.Feynman on the Corruption of Physics 
11.1 MOBILE PHONES CAUSE CANCER DUE TO ETHER 
11.2 How the Ether - Cancer Effect of Mobile Phones will be covered up in Experiments 
12. The Gravity Conspiracy 
13. Compartmentalisation methodology arising from Atom Bomb Development 
14. Hidden Science from Operation PAPERCLIP 
15.1 Modern Science as derived from an Ancient Wisdom, that was subsequently forgotten. 
15.2 Copernicus 
15.3 Galileo 
16. Serpents of Wisdom: Religious reasons behind the Suppression of Science 
17. Suppression of Ancient History

18. Conspiracy against Daniken   [ec2.htm]
19. Conspiracy against Spinoza 
20.1 Pole Shift 
20.2 Pole Shift and the Ether 
20.3 Einstein - Hapgood Conspiracy 
21.1 CHALLENGER EXPLOSION - EXAMPLE OF THE UFO CONSPIRACY IN OPERATION 
21.2 Introduction 
21.3 The Challenger Explosion 
21.4 Conclusion 
21.5 Footnote

22.1 The Temporocentric Delusion : The influence of Hoaxing in history   [ec2.htm]
22.2 Introduction 
22.3 The Ancient Greeks 
22.4 Columbus 
22.5 Ancient Greek maps 
22.6 The Ptolemy hoax 
22.7 What were the Medieval Science beliefs? 
22.8 Mandeville’s book 
22.9 Mandeville’s hoaxed life 
22.10 Mandeville’s Stories 
22.11 The Prester John Hoax 
22.12 Mandeville’s Message 
22.13 Mandeville’s evidence that the world can be circumnavigated 
22.14 The Mystery of Mandeville
22.15 Mounds in America 
22.16 Conclusion 
22.17 Further information 
22.18 References

1.1 Overall Introduction

Modern physics has been corrupted. The reasons for this are very complicated. This web site is devoted to some of the reasons for that corruption. History is a collection of people doing lots of strange things, forming into groups and trying to impose their will. There was a conspiracy set up against Einstein, by anti-Semites, and there was a corruption of science turning it into a religion by a strange philosophical movement. 

Physics was unified into one complete theory by a genius called Roger Boscovich (which is the Unified Theory that Einstein was looking for, and said to have never found). 
In the beginning of the 20th century, Modern Physics was based upon Boscovich, but the complete theory was rejected, leaving a disunited physics, with Boscovich and many other scientists such as Tesla deleted from mainstream physics history. 

It is not unusual for History to get distorted, In section 22, I give an example of where history (as presented to the general public) around Columbus, is also distorted. Denis Alexander in 'Rebuilding the Matrix' tells us:

"It is a well-known story that the sailors who sailed with Columbus on his epic voyages westward across the Atlantic were afraid to sail due to the possibility that they might fall off the edge of the flat earth. I have to admit that I believed this paradigmatic account concerning the convictions of medieval people until quite recently. The paradigm was enforced by occasional jocular allusions to ‘flat-earth societies’ in press, and by the use of the term ‘flat-earther’ as a form of abuse..... The problem with the ‘flat-earth’ paradigm is that it is certainly false. Historians have been telling us for some time that the commonly held belief that people in medieval times thought the earth was flat is without historical foundation..."

Despite the ‘true’ history being repeatedly told to us by scholars (in their books that are unread), the media persists in giving the delusion that medieval people were ‘flat-earthers’. The Media likes giving a distorted version of history. So, Mainstream Physics History (as presented by the media) being wrong along with everything else, should not be too surprising. The unfortunate thing is that this version of history is taught to science students. Many physicists in the 20th century have spent their time looking for a unified theory and failing, when such a theory was discovered in the 18th century and then promptly hidden by the distorted account of history, that they are taught. 

All these and other events lead to the modern world being a ‘mess’, with reality being very different from what we have been deceived into believing, creating the UFO Mystery. Clues to the real history of mankind gets covered up by the distorted accounts that are presented for such people as Columbus and Einstein. And when we look at the ‘proper physics’ as given to us by Boscovich, then things that were once thought impossible, suddenly become possible.

1.2 So, who was Roger Boscovich? 

Well see this article from New Scientist in 1958: 

New Scientist 6 March 1958

Roger Boscovich: a 20th century mind in the 18th century by Dr A L MacKay

Blurb: This year has brought the two hundredth anniversary of publication of his chief work. Some of his ideas were so advanced that it has been possible to appreciate them properly only in the past two decades.

On the rising ground behind the city of Zagreb in Yugoslavia, just where the trees begin, one can see a modern glass and concrete building in which research in physics and chemistry is carried on by the energetic post war generation of Yugoslavs. A notice board announces that this is the Boscovich Institute and in the garden in front there is a bronze statue, by Yugoslavia’s most celebrated sculptor Mestrovic, of a figure wearing priest's robes and deep in thought with his elbow on a globe. The inscription reads "Rugjer Josip Boskovic, 1711 - 87."

Most younger scientists have never met the name of Boscovich and only a few of the older school remember having heard of Boscovichian atoms. Yet, 60 years ago and for 150 years before that, Boscovich had been widely known as a natural philosopher and astronomer. Serious estimates by some historians of science put Boscovich among the dozen greatest scientists, the equal of Newton, Leibniz, Euler and Franklin. Certainly he was the greatest scientist of Yugoslav origin.

Boscovich’s principal work, his Theory of Natural Philosophy, was published 200 years ago last month. Unfortunately Branimir Truhelka, who had begun a definitive biography of Boscovich and was editing the collected works, died prematurely, but his sister has just published a short life from her brother’s notes.

What did Boscovich do, how did he come to be forgotten and how should his work be estimated today?

Born on 18 May, 1711, the son of a Serbian trader [ME - error in article S/B Croatian], in Dubrovnik, the then independent state of Ragusa (whose merchant adventurers gave us the word "argosy"). Boscovich went to Rome at the age of 14 to study mathematics, astronomy and theology at the Collegium Romanum. It was at this college that Matteo Ricci had in 1571 - 77 learnt the astronomy with which he tried to convert all China to the Jesuits.

In 1728 Boscovich finished his novitiate and became a Jesuit and in 1740 he succeeded his teacher Borgondio as professor of mathematics. From his first dissertation on sun spots, in 1736, until he left Rome in 1760, he published about 50 papers on astronomy, optics, mathematics, geodesy and the philosophy of science. He became the principal adviser on technical matters to the Holy See. He set up an observatory, advised on the draining of the Pontine marshes, saw to the repair of St Peter’s when the dome cracked, went on diplomatic missions, visited the site of Troy, made archaeological studies in Italy and measured the length of the 2 degrees of latitude along the meridian between Rome and Rimini.

As this is now the International Geophysical Year, Boscovich should be especially remembered for the latter task. He worked particularly for the production of accurate maps and surveying and was active in three directions, the invention of instruments (he invented a circular eye piece micrometer), the theory of instruments and observations and, most important, the international organisation of scientific enterprises.

He agitated for the accurate measurement of the length of a degree of latitude in various places and to this end approached the Royal Society, Maria Teresa and other authorities and intended to go to Brazil himself, but was persuaded to work in the Papal States instead.

The Royal Society later urged him to go to Pennsylvania but an arc there was measured by Mason and Dixon (of the line). The Royal Society then wished to send Boscovich to California to observe the transit of Venus in 1761, but he eventually went to Constantinople for the same purpose, although he arrived too late and became ill for some months.

The principal Academies of Science in Europe competed to make Boscovich a member, and in 1760 he visited England for several months, where he was made a Fellow of the Royal Society on 26 June. He dedicated a long Latin poem "On the defects of the Sun and Moon" to the Royal Society and this was printed in London by Andrew Millar. His supporters called it "Newton in the mouth of Virgil" but others said it was "uninstructive to an astronomer and unintelligible to anyone else."

Boscovich met many of the leading figures of the day, besides just scientists. He disputed with Dr Johnson. Boswell reports: "In a Latin conversation with Pere Boscovich at the house of Mrs Cholmondely, I heard him (Dr Johnson) maintain the superiority of Sir Isaac Newton over all foreign philosophers with a dignity and eloquence that surprised that learned foreigner." Boscovich was in Cambridge on Guy Fawkes night 1760 and was very displeased by the anti-Catholic nature of the festivities.

After working temporarily in Pavia and Milan there was a dispute with Lagrange, and trouble with the Austrian government, and on top of that the Jesuit Order was disbanded. Following this, in 1773 Boscovich obtained the Directorship of the "Optique Marine" in Paris and became a French citizen. He continued to write prolifically on astronomy and optics, making bitter enemies (D’Alembert and Laplace) and equally enthusiastic friends (Lalande), but in 1785 he retired to Bassano in Italy to see his works through the printers; but his health was broken and he died two years later in Milan at the age of 75. He is buried in the cemetery of Santa Maria Podone in Milan.

All the works mentioned were of solid, lasting value and contributed greatly to the science of the day, establishing Boscovich as a leading figure, but it is his general Theory of Natural Philosophy, published in Vienna in 1758, which is of greatest importance.

Important papers by L L Whyte have recently explained how Boscovich’s theory was 200 years ahead of its time and could not be properly appreciated until modern ideas on relativity and quantum theory had replaced the billiard-balls and elastic jellies of the last century.

Boscovich’s explanation is unusually clear and he says that it "does not go beyond the capacity ... of classes even far below the level of mediocrity." But he claims to "have advanced, in his kind of investigation, much further than Newton himself even thought open to his desires." Basically, Newton said in his Optics, that "to derive from the phenomena of Nature two or three general principles, and then to explain how the properties and actions of all corporate things follow from those principles, this would indeed be a mighty advance in philosophy, even if the causes of those principles had not at the time been discovered."

[NB Philosophy in those days meant what we call Physics. Philosophy has science split away from Physics, to mean something else in the modern context.]

Boscovich claimed to have done better than this by postulating one single law of forces. Boscovich did not consider masses and forces - his description was purely kinematic and related to the mutual accelerations of particles. His atoms were rather like what are now called nucleons (protons or neutrons) and the mass of any particle of matter was simply the number of these atoms in it.

Two atoms had a mutual acceleration given by the curve in the figure shown here (which comes from Boscovich’s book). "A" represents the centre of one atom and the ordinates show the acceleration of another atom with respect to the first at different distances. For very close approach the atoms experience a very strong repulsion so that matter cannot have an infinite density although the atoms occupy no space. 

The law of continuity prohibiting the occurrence of infinite accelerations is one of the foundations of the theory. At large distances the curve approximates to the inverse square law of Newtonian gravitation, but at the intermediate distances there are a number of stable inter - atomic distances (at F, K, O and S) which make the system remarkably like the quantum view of the atom held today.
From this model the basic properties of matter - density, volume, mass, mechanical strength, thermal properties (attributed to agitation of the particles) and gravitation are explained. Optical properties (due to the very rapid motion of particles) are also accounted for in terms of Newton’s showers of particles with alternate fits of reflexion and transmission. These follow plausibly from the wave packet nature of the Boscovichian atoms.

Unfortunately Boscovich seems to have few disciples to publicise his work. His thought was last influential when Maxwell and Kelvin were formulating their ideas of the atom before atoms and electrons were experimentally demonstrated (see "Atom" by Maxwell in the 9th edition of the Encyclopaedia Britannica), but since the rise of experimental nuclear physics older theories constructed on very slender evidence have been hardly more than historical interest.

The death of Boscovich’s biographer is a double lost because Boscovich’s life would provide a microcosm of European science at its most active period and because his work and thought are of importance in themselves.

[I am unable to copy the picture for:] Diagram of Boscovich’s "Theory of Natural Philosophy reduced to a single law of forces" showing the type of interaction between point atoms. There is a very large repulsion for close approach and approximation to the inverse square law at large distances with several stable inter - atomic distances in between.

[ It looks like a damped sine wave: a wave of large amplitude petering out to smaller amplitude.]

[Note along with everything else mentioned above that: Boscovich’s particles have a wave nature. So, much for the wave/duality problem of Quantum Theory, if you follow Boscovich’s theory.]

So, who was Boscovich? He was the greatest theoretical physicist of ALL TIME. And you never heard of him? Well now read some of the reasons why!

2.1 Suppressed Science : Introduction

The physics that was taught in the 20th century was supposedly based on Einstein. In fact this is not the case, there was a conspiracy against Einstein and his theory was replaced by the physics establishment in 1925/ 1926 by a false theory that is still called Einstein’s theory. The conspiracy started before World War II, and was maintained after the war because of Cold War tensions of wanting to keep atomic secrets from the Russians, and after that it evolved into a doctrine that prevents certain experimental research being carried out that can prove the 1925 theory as being wrong.

Changes in science are supposed to come about when an experiment shows a theory to be wrong. My investigation into the theoretical structure of 20th century physics reveals to me that it is wrong. I then looked for the experimental evidence to support my views, and I found that research into the experiments that would reveal 20th century physics to be wrong, have been suppressed.

Robert O Becker MD pioneering researcher in the field of biological electricity, twice nominated for Nobel Prize, has pointed out the harmful effects of the misuse of electromagnetism. He explains in his book Cross Currents that research into this is suppressed by a Conspiracy in science [1] :

The military organism was designed on the 10 mW standard and, once in place, it had to be defended against the possibility of non thermal bioeffects. The recognition and validation of these effects would mean the collapse of the total organism and the death of [the US defence doctrine] "command, control, communications, and intelligence". My work on electrical control systems and the bioeffects of electromagnetic fields involved me in this controversy early in the 1970s. It quickly became apparent to me that evidence for non thermal effects was viewed as a threat to national security. Safety was not a consideration, because the military mind-set of the time held that despite the lack of actual hostilities, we were in a state of war with the Soviet Union. It was believed that our ability to prevail in that conflict required the virtually unlimited use of electromagnetic energy for all four facets of the "command, control, communications, intelligence" doctrine. This led to the policy of denying any non thermal effects from any electromagnetic usage, whether military or civilian.

Becker then goes on to explain that researchers are not allowed funding for certain topics. This is very interesting, it is within this area of physics that my theorising has led me to become interested.

We have been greatly deceived. We have been led to believe that modern theory is supported by experiments, but we have not been told that the experiments that can disprove modern theory have been denied from being conducted.

This now requires a complete change in our mind-sets. What we have been led to believe about science has been a delusion. We are denied the experiments to prove modern theory wrong. It requires a complete break with the myths that we have been led to believe in the 20th century as regards Einstein and the development of modern physics theory. Bear in mind that having been denied experimental evidence in my theorising, by what has turned out to be a conspiracy, I have had to abandon theorising, and instead play the role of a detective in piecing together the clues left from history as to the real events at a scene of a crime. The relevant events start from 1925 which resulted in the physics community rejecting the physics that Einstein was advocating, in favour of another theory.

Consider the possibility that when Einstein in 1925/1926 said that Quantum Mechanics was wrong, that Einstein was correct. The physics community at the time did not believe him. The events leading from 1925/1926 left Einstein practically alone in his physics beliefs, and the rest of the physics community believing something else. Modern physics is based on the perspective that Einstein was wrong from 1925/1926, either implicitly or explicitly. To every side of an argument there are two sides. We have not been told Einstein’s side of events. I now reconstruct them:

History records sorry fates for heretics such as Socrates, Bruno and Galileo. These heretics upset the majority of people by telling them that their belief system is totally in error. Socrates was forced to drink poison. [2] Bruno was put on a bonfire [3] and Galileo was threaten with torture to recant. [4]

Whether people talk about science or religion, they are still talking about belief systems. When Einstein popped up, on the surface it appears that he was treated much more leniently than the heretics of the past. But when you care to look deeper into the subject, below the superficial surface presented to science students, you find a much more different picture.

On the surface it appears to be just democracy in operation, as the physicists take a vote as to which path theoretical physics should take, with Einstein’s approach losing the vote. It is presented to physics students as such. But when you care to really look. There is a completely different picture that emerges, which has all the hallmarks of a conspiracy.

What appears [to be] democracy can easily turn into conspiracy. Both activities involve groups of people -- if people engage in fair and open debate and reach a majority agreement without prejudice then it is called democracy. But if a group of people gang up and decide to persecute one individual because of prejudices, then it is conspiracy.

The political climate in Germany at that time, was a great deal of hatred being stirred up against Jews, by Hitler in particular, against Einstein. In 1925 it does not seem a very favourable time or environment to be voting on the direction in which to take physics. There was so much hatred being stirred up against Einstein, by so many prominent scientists wanting a different theory than Einstein, it is highly suggestive that may be the vote was not conducted fairly.

Well surely physics is a self correcting process, and if physics had become corrupted before World War II then after the war it would be corrected? You might naively think that, but consider the situation after World War II, it was the start of the Cold War, the fear of the Atomic Bomb. The conspiracy that corrupted physics before the war, became the reason for continuing the conspiracy after the war: America wanted Russia to have as few atomic physics secrets as possible. This then ties into the conspiracy of science that Dr. Becker is talking about. A pre-World War II conspiracy in physics becomes a self perpetuating conspiracy for other reasons after that war.

In 1925/1926 the science community rejected the path of physics that Einstein was advocating. Based on their beliefs from these events, the science community have put their interpretation onto history. Thus the history of 20th century science is itself a lie.

Scientists believe they follow Einstein’s physics, when really their understanding of Einstein’s physics is now all wrong, because of the events around 1925/ 1926. Through schooling and college and university, scientists are being trained in an incorrect interpretation of physics. They are being taught to think in an erroneous way, effectively conditioned to think in this way, to believe in it and be unable to think in other ways. It is near impossible for them after all this training to then abandon practically everything they have been taught and believe. Any perspective presented to them that conflicts with their conditioned beliefs, now seem nonsense to their false way of thinking.

In order to find that the Physics Establishment is into revising history of physics, you have to dig back to older texts on physics to find out what they are really doing.

In more modern revised versions of physics, you don't get any mention of revision to Einstein. Instead you get some fiction about them still following Einstein's 'original General Relativity.' But if you look at old books such as Britannica printed 1971 you find an account where it states that Einstein's General Relativity has been revised: -

... For, according to the Heisenberg relations [of Quantum theory], it is not possible to measure the position and momentum of a particle simultaneously and precisely. On the other hand, if the gravitational field of the body can be measured, the General Theory permits just that. Thus, the General Theory must be modified to make it consistent with quantum theory...... [5] 

The physics conspiracy works by being a battle over beliefs, where only one belief is allowed to be the physics establishment's belief system and the other is suppressed. Modern science can be demonstrated to be wrong, merely by looking at the relevant literature regarding its development.

However, Modern Physicists in general, do not believe that ‘they’ need to pay any attention to their history. For instance top Theoretician David Deutsch in his book The Fabric of Reality says:

...The reverence that philosophers show for the historical sources of ideas is very perverse, you know. In science we do not consider the discoverer of a theory to have any special insight into it. On the contrary, we hardly ever consult original sources. They invariably become obsolete, as the problem - situations that prompted them are transformed by the discoveries themselves. For example, most relativity theorists today understand Einstein’s theory better than he did. The founders of quantum theory made a complete mess of understanding their own theory. Such shaky beginnings are to be expected...... [6] 

Deutsch is telling us that he does not care about the history of his subject, and does not care what theory Einstein originally had because he believes Theorists now know better than Einstein. It is interesting to note that he also believes that the founders of Quantum theory did not understand their subject properly. Einstein said that Quantum Mechanics was wrong, and Deutsch saying this about Quantum Mechanics is in close agreement with Einstein upon that matter. Now if he looked at what Einstein was really saying, before it was altered to fit in with Quantum Mechanics, then he might deduce that the original theory was correct. But he does not pay attention to history, and Historians know that those who do not pay attention to history are doomed to repeat the mistakes of the past. 

A similar situation occurred after Newton. There was a fight between believers in the wave theory of light and the particle theory of light. The wave theory of light was suppressed for over a century. The reason given by Electromagnetic: History and Applications by Robert S Elliott :

... Although neither theory [wave and particle theories of light] were adequate, the esteem in which Newton was held by his contemporaries and followers was so great that the wave theory was rejected and allowed to remain unnourished for over a century. If the fact that Newton found the corpuscular hypothesis more acceptable retarded the growth of the theory of light, as some have claimed, the fault lay with those who blindly espoused all his views... [7]

History repeats itself, with the Establishment defending the founder of its mainstream theory, but having in this instance revised its founder Einstein, and disguised this by rewriting their officially cited history given to Physics students. For instance I was never told at University that the theory of Einstein I was being taught was a revision. This makes the defenders of Einstein think they are defending the 'original Einstein' when they are in fact defending a 'revised Einstein.' Similarly the opposition to Establishment physics are unaware of the revision to physics history. Thus the fight between the two factions: the Establishment and those opposed to Einstein’s theory, is really over a ‘strawman’ that NEVER existed.

It is diversion in physics that is being played out, that draws attention away from the real issues in physics, and ensures that physics cannot solve the UFO Mystery.

Scientists make claims such as saying their science is based on experiments changing their theories. However, if we merely look at the history of science, without considering the conspiracy now in science research (as pointed out by Dr Becker earlier), their claims are demonstrated as clearly false. Scientists like to speak in flattering terms of how perfect they are, but when a comparison is made with the historical record one finds that on numerous occasions ‘scientists say one thing and do the complete opposite’. The lies are clearly shown in the history of science. No matter how much scientists bodge their experiments and theories to uphold their erroneous beliefs, modern science fails the test of history. [8]

There are major inconsistencies in the history of science, as scientists have attempted to revise history so that it agrees with whatever is the prevalent set of mythologies that scientists like to claim is science.

Small conspiracies involving only a few people are easy to spot, because this small group is not able to cover its tracks very well and leaves big clues behind. However, when a conspiracy gets bigger then more people are involved and the misdemeanours are covered up by more people, leaving only small clues behind that they exist. The bigger the conspiracy the harder it is to detect.

Science is the quest for truth, but human interactions corrupt that process. Science is being pursued in an environment where people can place a greater value on emotions and other factors, than they do for scientific truth. No ‘real’ allowance for this is made in the scientific process.

2.2 Indications of Conspiracy against Einstein

There was a hate campaign set up against Einstein, and one of his theories was hidden. And from 1925 onwards he was ridiculed by the Science Community, which never abated. All of this indicates a vast Cover up in Science.

2.3 Climate of hatred at the time in Germany against Jews especially against Einstein

When Einstein became famous in 1919, Germany had just lost World War I , and the Germans were looking for someone to blame for losing that war. Einstein was an easy target for what became anti- Semitism. The Nazis built themselves up from a campaign of hate directed first at Einstein. It was not helped by Einstein who as a pacifist disliked [by] the Germans, his own people after World War I, because he viewed them as the aggressors who had started the war. [9] Certain people then perceived physics as being governed by a Jewish theory. [10] These people then attempted to steer physics away from the direction that Einstein was taking. When in 1925 / 1926 Heisenberg brought out a theory that Einstein disagreed with, these people would then have found have a theory to support against Einstein. The climate of anti-Jewish feeling in this conspiracy is one part of this corruption of modern physics.

Psychologists have addressed their problems with their theories in this period of history. There was a split between Freud’s psychology and Jung’s psychology starting from 1913, and both camps had different followers. [11] Freud was a Jew and Jung was a Christian. [12] As Nazism spread, Jewish analysts were systematically harassed, driven out of scientific and psychological associations, replaced by their Aryan counterparts and eventually forced to flee for their lives. Freud’s theories were seen as part of "Jewish science", which the Nazis were trying to get rid of. [13]

Jung was trying to create an Aryan version of psychology to replace Freud’s theories during this period. Adolf Guggenbuhl - Craig, a Jew and a renowned Jungian analyst said of Jung during this period : "Jung certainly was anti- Semitic. But everyone in Europe was anti-Semitic. The Jews were considered to be Christ killers. Europe was dominated by appeasers." [14] (Later Jung realised how he had been duped into following the Nazi movement.)

Psychologists have reassessed their science in the light of the Nazis trying to destroy Freud’s theories and replace it with something else. But physicists like to think that their science is immune to these historical events. Physicists seem to display an amazing naiveté. I propose that the Nazis movement had their first victory with trying to destroy "Jewish science" with Einstein. When Einstein stood practically alone in saying the 1925 theory was wrong, this was in the same atmosphere that later faced Freud.

The individual intentions of people is difficult to gauge. But there was this strong group of people that were opposed to Einstein because of racial hatred, and would not base their reasoning solely on the physics. Some physicists could have been voting from prejudices, while others could have been voting from trying to appease the racists. Many of the physicists voting against Einstein must have been trying to appease the anti-Semitism, the same situation as Freud faced. I have looked at the main players in the voting process, some were bullied to follow the majority, some were confused by the issues involved, and some were carried away with their own erroneous beliefs. It was just that the momentum propelling these main players was a background of hatred directed at Jews and Einstein in particular, that distorted the physics. Einstein’s version of physics was the first science that fell in this misguided attempt at appeasement.

2.4 Einstein’s lost theory

Einstein’s arguments against the 1925 theory have been portrayed as being only philosophical, and he did not have a contra theory to put in its place. But consider the following undated letter to Max Born around 1927, Einstein says:

........Last week I handed in a short paper to the Academy, in which I show that one can attribute quite definite movements to Schrodinger's wave mechanics, without any statistical interpretation. This will shortly be published in the minutes of the meetings.

Max Born says that he cannot remember what the theory was about, and says that it has disappeared without trace. [15] Now Heisenberg +co’s Quantum Mechanics is based on a statistical interpretation. Thus Einstein had a different theory to Quantum Mechanics. [16]

The conventional explanation that the physics establishment would like us to believe is that - Einstein rejected Quantum Mechanics purely for philosophical reasons. But from this single scrap of information above, we now know that Einstein had a different theory, and so that part of conventional belief is wrong. And Einstein's quantum theory mysteriously disappearing is very suggestive of something being covered up.

The people who want the history of science to reflect their beliefs have had a long period in which to cover their tracks. They appear to have been a bit lazy in places. Oh, well to err is to human.

2.5  The general public recognised Einstein as a great man, but physicists ridiculed him after 1925

Einstein said that the physicists who believed in the 1925 theory were wrong, eventually he made famous quotes like ‘God does not play dice with the universe.’ Bohr replied ‘Einstein don’t tell God what to do.’ There were many exchanges like this, which if you look at them carefully were making Einstein the ‘butt’ of a joke, and belittling him. Once you start doing that to a person it becomes easier to ignore what that person is saying, and that is what happened to Einstein. Eventually the majority of the physics community ignored what Einstein had to say.

Physics students were taught a reinterpretation of Einstein’s theory, and discouraged from following Einstein’s approach to physics. After Einstein rejected the new theory of 1925, the physics community reacted in rejecting Einstein as a ‘crank’. Einstein was aware of being viewed as an old fool. [17] In 1931 Einstein’s colleagues were no longer enthusiastic about his ideas. The older ones kept silent; the younger ones were beginning to make jokes about Einstein. [18] Despite the rejection of Einstein by the majority of the physicists, there were a number of good young physicists who sought out and appreciated proximity to him. But these young physicists had to ignore the widely accepted advice that for career reasons "it would be better not to work with Einstein." [19]

To the population at large, Einstein was still perceived as a genius, but to young people engaging in learning physics, the establishment was managing to indoctrinate into them the belief that Einstein was wrong in his beliefs from 1925 and those ideas from 1925 were not worth pursuing. This process of indoctrination has carried on into today with ever more elaborate advertising campaigns carried out by the many popular physics books claiming that Einstein’s ideas after 1925 are not worth pursuing.

All of this is so far very suggestive of a conspiracy, so I think I am justified from this evidence for reaching for the idea that there was a conspiracy against Einstein. What starts to make that suggestion a strong possibility is the activity of misquoting Einstein.

The establishment wants Einstein’s support for its belief system, because Einstein is perceived as a hero, so engages in misquoting him, and making this the common knowledge for what we believe Einstein said.

Everyone knows that Einstein said that the speed of light is constant, that the aether does not exists etc., it is common knowledge. Everybody is wrong. It takes a big shift in the way that we think to realise that Einstein did not say the things that he is deem to have said. This is a great psychological barrier to overcome. It means that most of what we think is Einstein’s physics is NOT his theory, but a revision.

Now let us look at some of the things that Einstein was really saying:

2.6 Light Speed

Einstein, in a book that he revised in 1952, Relativity: the special and general theory [20] on page 76 he makes his important statement - that in General relativity, the law of the constancy of the velocity of light in vacuo, which was a fundamental assumption in Special relativity, cannot claim any unlimited validity. And that Special relativity can only hold when there is no gravity affecting light paths. On page 93 he clarifies it further by saying that in General relativity the velocity of light depends on the coordinates of when a gravitational field is present. And that gravity defines the coordinates.

So, light speed is not constant !

2.7 Aether

If you read most any standard modern physics text book, then you find that it says something like Einstein disproved the ether (aether), when it talks about the Michelson Morley experiment.

However if you look at the book: Sidelights on Relativity - Einstein says he did not disprove the ether, just showed that one version of it was wrong. [21] Einstein has been frequently misrepresented by the physics establishment who want him to say what they want to believe, such as a belief that the ether does not exist, and they then revise their version of history accordingly.

What Einstein actually did was refine what could be meant by the ‘ether’ concept. But the Physics Establishment have redefined what Einstein meant by the words that he used, so that what Einstein said could fit in with their preconceived beliefs. So, we now have the situation today that physicists are taught that the ‘ether’ concept is nonsense, and we have another ‘ether’ concept being reinvented in Quantum Mechanics, but renames it as : quantum fluctuations of the false vacuum, zero-point energy, and other names.

Really the "ether" concept evolved in General relativity and became called "space-time." But that interpretation gets lost in confusion as people try to think from Quantum Mechanics, and reinterpret General relativity in the wrong way.

There has been a great deal of revisions as to what Einstein actually meant. It is one of the difficulties of science that when new abstract ideas appear, the necessary words to describe those ideas are not available. I have noticed in the context of Tesla that he was trying to describe his experiments, with a lack of a big enough vocabulary, and so was often using the same word in different sentences, but that word could take on different meanings. Einstein was trying to be much more precise with words that were available to him, but still his scientist contemporaries decided to reinterpret. ‘They’ did not want to accept Einstein’s theory in its original form, and altered it to suit their own tastes.

Now consider the absence of barking dog:

It is obvious why the physics establishment revised Einstein’s theory of physics. It is because they wanted to bring Einstein’s theory in line with the 1925 theory, which Einstein rejected.

The physics community proceeds in its enterprise by losing the original meaning attached to theories by the theories’ originators. It then professes that the theories’ originators are its heroes, and makes the claim of defending them. But what they are really do is defending its reinterpretation of those heroes. The people that it defends itself from can be people that have rediscovered the original meaning of their hero, but these people are labelled as cranks by some in the physics establishment, because they are unaware that they have a myth as to what their hero actually said.

There should be a clear record kept of how the physics community is deviating from the original meanings of its heroes. Because everyone is being left in a state of confusion as to what is real and what is myth.

The physics community wants the myth of their hero, and not the actual history. This is not made clear anywhere.

Where is it written that the physics community is no longer in Einstein’s original theory of physics? Everyone acts as if it is Einstein’s original theory. Everyone is taught that this is Einstein’s original theory. They misquote Einstein to maintain that belief. They never admit to it being revised.

Now the clincher that points it out as being a conspiracy for me. Sherlock Holmes pointed out in one case that the most significant clue was the dog that did not bark, when a crime was being committed. There is no ‘barking dog’ in this case, and that is most peculiar. Einstein has been revised, and no one jumps up and down saying I have proven Einstein wrong. No one gets the rewards and public recognition for making the next major advance in physics after Einstein. Einstein’s theory gets revised, but no one indicates where are the experiments that have disproved Einstein’s original theory. It can mean only one thing - ‘cover up.’

Alarm bells should be going off. We have been denied a highly significant theory from Einstein around 1927. We have been denied a theory that is contrary to modern theory. We have had experiments suppressed that can show modern theory to be wrong, because of national security considerations. In short we have been denied the ability to do proper scientific research. But I with by little stick can knock over this ‘can of worms.’

The conspiracy against Einstein has evolved into the conspiracy that exists in science in the present day. It takes a great leap in mind-set to realise that what we believed was Einstein’s theory is not the original theory as which he was advocating, and that we have been subjected to a very clever advertising campaign to accept a revised theory as the original. 

Becker explains how the conspiracy in science works in the present day: experimental research is suppressed which has national security implications. This is easily achieved by controlling the funding of research. If a scientist finds results that do not agree with the orthodoxy he is subjected to ridicule. The experts that the establishment want are essentially ‘yes men’ who do as they are told and have lost their sense of originality, if they had any, i.e. ‘dummies’. So, the system that is set up in the public science research sector is anti- "true scientific method" of free enterprise, and creates a deep prejudicial atmosphere against anyone of true original ideas. In other words it is an "anti- genius" atmosphere, which seeks to promote people of lesser intellect, who then masquerade and pretend to be clever.

The restrictions placed on public sector science prevents that sector from knowing what is the true theory of physics. As Professors Hawking and Penrose have described it, the fact that General relativity and Quantum Mechanics cannot be combined into a single theory, is a scandal. [22] The reason why it cannot be joined, is because the public science sector is refused permission to do experiments that would lead to such a theory. What the Black Ops science sector is involved in, who can say. (I suspect that ‘they’ have succeeded in deluding themselves.)

Every now and again, we hear of things like : ‘the speed of light has shown to be exceeded’ by some experiment or other. But when you check into these claims, you find that they are not in general being made by the orthodox science community funded from the public sector, but rather from maverick scientists with independent funding. And these mavericks find that their claims are placed under a long review by the orthodoxy, after which the orthodoxy then dismisses the mavericks’ claims as being invalid. (Exactly the same methodology as Dr. Becker describes the science conspiracy works from.)

W Macneile Dixon said:

Before you can examine things you must first become aware of them. [23]

We have not been aware of this ‘can of worms’. Physics has dominated our rational thoughts, and many of our beliefs are centered around it, such as a belief in temporocentrism. (See Box.) Physics being wrong means that these beliefs such as temporocentrism are delusions. For instance many of us believe that a theory that has been rejected could not then turn out to be right. Our delusional prejudices prevent many of us from seeing that much of our ‘common held beliefs’ are now wrong. We are as much in the dark as medieval man when faced with the Copernican theory. If Copernicus was correct, then nearly everything that medieval man believed was therefore wrong. Medieval science had been building upon one core central idea namely that the "earth was the centre of the universe". If you said this idea was wrong, then all the ideas that were developed from that idea were themselves wrong. It was too much a shock for medieval man. Is it too much of a shock for 21st century man to realise that the so-called rational scientific man of the 20th century, has built everything upon one ‘core central idea’ that is wrong and hence lived a life of delusions?

2.8 Unified Physics Theory

Einstein’s Unified Field Theory has connections to the 18th century Unified Physics of Roger Boscovich: a Scientist the equal of Newton, that the Science Establishment chooses to forget as part of its Cover Up.

I can partially reconstruct Einstein’s lost theory, or at least find something very similar to it. Taking the view that Einstein had been right and misinterpreted from 1925 onwards. I then looked at the similarities to what Einstein was saying with what Tesla was saying.

Tesla’s theories have been dismissed because they do not agree with the 1925 theory of Quantum Mechanics. Tesla was working from classical electromagnetic theory.

The orthodox version of history would have it - that Tesla was not working from any existing ‘complete’ theory of physics. But I found a quote from him mentioning a Roger Boscovich. Tesla said that Boscovich had found Einstein’s theory in the 18th century. I looked up Roger Boscovich. According to the orthodox version of history, as related in Charles Scribner’s Sons Dictionary of Scientific Biography:

Boskovic, Rudjer J. (b. Dubrovnik, Yugoslavia 18 May 1711; d. Milan, Italy 13 Feb. 1787) natural philosophy, maths, astronomy, physics, geodesy.... perhaps last polymath to figure in an important way in the history of science, and his career was in consequence something of an anachronism and presents something of an enigma.... [24]

Roger Boscovich is an anachronism, and need I remind you that anachronism means something that seems out of place in time. Boscovich’s theory of physics was too advanced for its 18th century setting. He was a man of mystery as much as Tesla was , because both had ideas that were far in advance of his time. Orthodox physics follows the method of Deutsch and ignores its true history, particularly when that history has people in it like Boscovich, who do not fit into their version of events.

According to what I have found out about Roger Boscovich - he was highly influential with his ideas. The great scientist Michael Faraday got his ideas about electromagnetic fields from Boscovich’s ideas, and this was then turned into maths by Clerk Maxwell for the equations of electromagnetism.

Boscovich had ideas about atoms, and this inspired researchers to look along those lines. Eventually Dalton got the credit for the modern idea of atoms. And Boscovich was ignored for any credit in the theoretical side by the orthodox version of the history of atomic physics, because Dalton + co. were deemed to have developed their theory of atoms based on experiments. While Boscovich was working out ideas about atoms beyond the experimental ability of his day to test them, hence deemed as speculating.

All of Boscovich’s ideas get deemed as speculation because they were beyond the ability of experiments to test in his day. But Boscovich’s ideas had a great influence in inspiring the experimenters to research along the lines that they did take.

So, he influenced the development of physics, but gets written out of physics history as others make the experimental discoveries.

Now Boscovich was a Jesuit mathematician priest, who was looking at the ideas of Newton and Leibntiz. Newton left at the end of his Principia and Optick books some queries that he did not know the answer to. Boscovich worked on Newton’s ideas and came up with a theory in [the] 1750’s where particles act in a non Euclidean universe.

Einstein’s 1915 theory was non Euclidean physics i.e. based on the idea that parallel lines do not exist - which translates to the idea that light rays bend under gravity

The 1925 theory of Quantum Mechanics is really about subatomic particle physics.

Boscovich’s 1750’s theory was thus combining these two theories ( non - Euclidean geometry and particles) into one theory. (Actually more accurately, we might say that the 1750’s theory was a prototype theory, i.e. it needed experimental work to fully develop it.)

Boscovich has been mostly ignored by Western science, although he is famous in his country. He has written a great deal about science, but it has not been translated into English.

I believe Boscovich is the ‘missing link’ in physics theory. Newton built on Galileo. But there is not supposed to be a link between Einstein’s 1915 theory and Newton, where Einstein was revolution in physics not evolution. Yet add Boscovich to the historical picture and there is a progression from the theoretical ideas of Newton as they turn into the theoretical ideas of Einstein. And not only that, in this scenario: theoretical physics is one complete framework theory and not the orthodox physics problem of being unable to combine Quantum Mechanics and General Relativity.

Lancelot Law Whyte has this to say about Roger Joseph Boscovich [25]:

....Boscovich was the true creator of fundamental atomic physics as we understand it, for he was the first to introduce a clear conception of structure into physics and chemistry. Since a hundred years or more had to pass before adequate atomic observations would become available, his doctrine was not a theory tested by experiment, but a programme for atomic physics suggesting a way in which a unified theory might one day be reached.

Boscovich's `new world' was an ideal atomic cosmogony, involving a new structural attitude to space and time. Moreover it was fundamental in the sense of being atomic and concerning itself with ultimate structure, Boscovich absorbed Descartes, Locke, Newton, and Leibniz, and fused what he needed into a unified structural interpretation of all known physical phenomena. He was the geometer of atomism, the Euclid of Democritus, thinking in terms of visual images of spatial patterns of particles

2.9 Conclusions on Einstein

I have read many books on the biographies of Einstein and in them it says that there was a Conspiracy against Einstein. (Just never explicitly said it in those words.) I checked the mathematics of Relativity, and checked with many respected authorities’ books on Relativity, and found that there are numerous different theories all claiming to be Einstein’s Relativity. I found that the reason for this is to be that in the 1920s Einstein said Quantum Mechanics was wrong. The Physics Community then took this to mean that they could then ignore Einstein, and proceed with believing in Quantum Mechanics regardless. Students were then taught to ignore General Relativity, being told that it was of little practical use, and to concentrate instead on Quantum Mechanics, which was said to be more practical.

After Einstein died, the Physics Community then took another look at General Relativity. In the 1960s there was an era called the Renaissance of General Relativity, [26] with the Physics Community suddenly paying attention to the theory. When they did this they did not have to worry about Einstein telling them that they were doing it wrong, and they proceeded to interpret General Relativity based on their beliefs acquired from Quantum Mechanics. This resulted in them rewriting and reinterpreting General Relativity to agree with their Beliefs in Quantum Mechanics - a theory that Einstein said was wrong. The result was that they rewrote (or reinvented) General Relativity, making it different from what Einstein originally intended it to be understood. So, from the original perspective, the Physics Community has misunderstood General Relativity.

But what adds to the confusion is that the rewrite of General Relativity from the 1960s is not very well advertised. General Relativity is taught to students, and the students are not told it has been a rewrite. Instead they are told that they are being taught Einstein’s General Relativity, leaving them to form a delusional belief that the theory is unaltered from when Einstein wrote it. Whereas the differences between Einstein’s General Relativity and the modified General Relativity, these students are taught is profound and deep.

Looking at the true theory of Einstein, I found that it sat within a whole tradition of physics that has been discredited and debunked. Einstein’s true General Relativity is part of the Ether theory tradition. The modified theory is not part of that tradition. And believers within the perspective of the modified theory, denounce and mock Ether theory, citing their belief in this matter as being: the Ether does not exist, because Einstein proved it did not exist. But that is a lie. Einstein’s true theory sits within the Ether theory tradition.

Checking the unfairly discredited Ether theory tradition, one of the great highlights is the work of Nikola Tesla. Conspiracy Theorists link Tesla in many ways with the UFO phenomenon. But from the Mainstream Physics community, there is a conceited belief that such physics is wrong, and dismiss all such links with a mocking laugh. Their laughter is unfounded. The physics that they believe in is unfounded, and is not as they claim it to be. It is not based on the true Einstein. Their physics is rather based upon their misunderstanding of Einstein. A misunderstanding of Einstein that filters out to all people. So, that when pro- Ether believers try to make their point of view expressed, they then are led to believe that Einstein is an ‘anti-Ether’ physicist, and then set about trying to attack his theories. The Physics Community which is then protected by several layers of wrongs, then responds by mocking these dissidents that try to prove Einstein wrong.

The true theory of Einstein sits within a physics tradition stretching back to Newton, and is linked by an 18th century genius called Roger Boscovich. Boscovich foresaw the improvements to Newton’s theory that would lead to Relativistic and Quantum ideas. The correct history of physics is thus roughly Newton to Boscovich to Einstein, with Einstein’s theorising not being as complete as Boscovich’s 18th century theory.

Whereas the mainstream physics history that is fostered upon us is that there was Newton theory, followed by Einstein’s revolution overturning Newton’s theory with no continuity between Newton and Einstein. i.e. Mainstream physics history overlooks the missing link between Einstein and Newton, that would show continuity of the framework physics theory, and so presents the fictitious ‘sudden break' in theorising. After this artificial mistaken history, the Physics Community decided to have a genuine physics revolution and broke with the Newton - Boscovich - Einstein physics tradition, when they decided to believe Quantum Mechanics, and called it a Quantum Revolution in physics.

The Physics Community not content with rewriting physics history, rewriting Einstein’ theory etc., to fit in with their beliefs that arise from their Quantum Revolution, then proceeds to rewrite all the other sciences to agree with its beliefs.

(Incidentally, many of the claims for the wonderfulness of the Quantum Revolution giving us computers etc., is entirely misplaced, and can really be traced back to geniuses like Tesla, who were not working from Quantum Mechanics.)

The only compatible event to this was the scenario that Galileo faced when he challenged medieval physics - where the Academics of his day had managed to either:

1. fit an observation into their religious Beliefs, or 
2. failing to fit an observation into their Beliefs they then ignored that observation.

Various methods were used to discredit any observation that did not fit with religious Beliefs. This is the same scenario as the Modern Physics Community is now engaged in, especially with respect to UFOs. The Physics Community by its influence persuades the other sciences to follow this same methodology, with the risk to its members that if they do not follow the Dogma of their science, then they lose respectability within their Peer group, to lose that and you become unemployable (i.e. with a ridiculed point of view one’s CV looks bad.)

This filtering of facts to believe only those that are convenient and tally with one’s existing Beliefs is called the Knowledge Filter. By the use of the Knowledge Filter, Academics are able to reject ideas that they consider to be wrong. And how they know that maverick ideas are wrong, is because they recognise that those ideas do not fit with what that they already believe in.

However, the real reason the maverick idea does not fit is because the existing Beliefs are wrong. When this is pointed out, Academics then face a ‘credibility gap,’ they cannot understand a claim that their existing Beliefs could be wrong, because those beliefs now seem to them to be Facts: checked by others. They exist in the belief that surely science is a building process where facts get fitted together, and question how can so many ‘seeming facts’ be wrong? And the answer is that what Science has been building upon is a misunderstanding of Einstein! And in order to make that misunderstanding of Einstein consistent, anything that does not agree with that misunderstanding gets rejected by this building process. If Science can be compared to building a gigantic structure, then the foundations of science are extremely shaky. Whenever there has been a problem with the structure of the building, the problem has stemmed from the foundations, but the foundations have always been assumed to be ‘sound’ no matter what happens, and so successive ‘bodges’ gets added to the structure and the work proceeds ever upwards. In other words, the physics structure is a vast collection of ‘fictions’ that have been added together, and that give the illusion of working together.

Mainstream Science thus chooses to Cover up UFOs and other anomalies. When faced with an anomaly, it chooses to ignore it or else generate an explanation that agrees with its misunderstanding of Einstein, in other words generate another fiction to add to its existing structure of fictional beliefs.

Reality is not as Mainstream Science would have us believe. When witnesses have reported incredible things, and were mocked by an Academia trained in the belief of an erroneous science, the question now is how much of what the witnesses said was really true?

2.10 Temporocentric Delusion

There is a common belief among some people that science is about replacing old scientific theories with new ones, and not about what I am saying here that the correct theory has been discarded. This sounds like a step backwards, when these people believe only in steps forward. This has been called the temporocentric delusion by Peter James and Nick Thorpe, and is a hangover from 19th century ideas of progress. It is the result of a misunderstanding of Darwinian evolution, which believes that progression is always upwards never backwards. (This has led to many misinterpretations of the archaeological evidence.) [B1]

Temporocentrism can be shown to be a delusion, for instance in the case of cosmology most of the possible universes were argued over by the ancient Greeks, and so our modern cosmologists can hardly be said to be covering new ground with their ideas, most of their time. The Greeks had five different cosmological theories: [B2]

(1) the universe is one and eternal (for example, Aristotle);

(2) the universe is one and created (Plato, at least on one construction of his views);

(3) the universe is one and alternately, and everlastingly, created and destroyed (Empedocles, again according to one interpretation);

(4) there are innumerable universes that exist in succession (a view attributed to Anaximander in Simplicius, for example)

(5) there are innumerable universes that exist co-existent (the atomists)

N.B. the word ‘world’ was most likely used to mean the same as the word ‘universe’, that we use now.

It is by common beliefs that are in fact delusions, that enables the science ‘cover up’ to be carried out. People through their misconceptions believe that certain ideas are obviously wrong, and are then blind to seeing them as possibilities to be investigated. The easiest way to cover up a ‘crime’ is to commit it in front of people’s eyes and to tell them with authority that it is not a ‘crime’. People’s willingness to comply will enable them to see what they want to see: the ultimate delusion, and they will then even assist with disposing of the evidence. People work to their optimum efficiency when engaged in a shared state of mass hypnotic delusions. It takes a great deal of effort to break through this ‘conditioning’. Medieval man faced the same problem with Copernicus, as we face today.

2.11 Chomsky

Noam Chomsky is a very respected Social and political critic, in the book The Chomsky Reader, James Peck says:

To confront a mind that radically alters our perception of the world is one of life’s most unsettling yet liberating experiences. Unsettling because it can undercut carefully constructed rationales, liberating because at last the obvious is seen for what it is. However troubling reality may be, human dignity is not affirmed in fleeing it. Rather, dignity lies in seeing reality for what it is - and acting responsibility in the face of it. [B3] 

Chomsky enlightens us about the nature of politics in a democracy. I hope to have enlightened the reader in similar manner about the nature of science practiced in a democracy. Showing that the Science Community has built itself on misunderstanding Einstein. Once the reader realises this, then he / she can know the truth of the ‘real’ physical reality that has been hidden. 

As to how the Science Community can foster a delusion of physical reality on us, it is the same methodology that Chomsky has highlighted in the content of how the truth is hidden in politics, where the only opinions in debate are controlled by an intelligentsia:

... these debates are shaped by a group he calls the "secular priesthood", the intellectuals, technocrats, and the propagandists whose task it is to make the actions of the state palatable, its lofty, transcendental ideals believable. [B4] 

It is this ‘secular priesthood' that tries to control the opinions that can be voiced in any debate, not just in political debates, and so in Science ‘they’ censor the truth from being told. Hence this is how the Science Community is forced to build upon a misunderstanding of Einstein. This 'secular priesthood’ has forced its interpretation of Einstein onto us as the object to be built upon, and it ties to the politics that demands: science must be of such a nature "to make the actions of the state palatable." Science is subservient to political demands, and the part of the intelligentsia paid for by the state, do as their pay- masters demand and alter science to fit those political demands.

2.12 Einstein subjected to anti Semitism from 1919

Dennis Overbye in his book Einstein in Love, says what happened to Einstein after he became a celebrity in 1919, he was not liked by everyone:

Not everybody was enraptured by this general trend of celebrity and idolatry. If you were a conservative, or a German physicist who had won the Nobel prize (as Einstein had not yet done) without having your face decorate magazine covers and being anointed a new Copernicus, there was something vaguely ominous about the brown - eyed face staring out from the newspapers and magazine covers. It was, after all a Jewish face. And the word "relatively" was being heard entirely too often these days in contexts that had nothing to do with moving trains and the speed of light. It was a joke, it was a code, a shorthand for a certain kind of corruption, a moral rot, "the purest subjective idealism", in the words of the London Times, substituting for the pillars of culture and knowledge. [ B5]

This was anti Semitism directed at Einstein, and he noticed:

Berlin, Albert had told Ehrenfest late in 1919, was rife with anti Semitism, adding that "political reaction is violent, at least among the intelligentsia." Soon he began to see it everywhere. [B6]

There was a large part of the population who were racists, and Einstein had presented himself as a prominent figure for these racists to direct their attention to. Einstein from 1919, he began to notice anti Semitism wherever he went in the world, by this racist faction.

Overbye reports that from 1919:

Albert’s relativity lectures at the University of Berlin had become a tourist attraction. [B7]

But there was a down side to this:

In February his students began to complain to university officials about the presence of these unregistered freeloading visitors and the ruckus they caused. Albert felt his classes should be open to anybody, but the university insisted on its rules. Representatives of the students’ committee disrupted the class on Feb. 12, and the issue was hashed out, with Albert agreeing to waive all fees and reconstitute the course as a set of public lectures. In the accounts of this incident nasty things were said, including an anti Semitic jab at Einstein in a Nazi newspaper. Albert supposedly referred to the protesters as "outcasts of mankind," and a left wing student newspaper, Vorwarts, made allusions to an "anti Semitic mob". [B8]

The Ministry of Education's put out a statement assuring people that the protests had been neither political nor anti Semitic in nature. It was all a misunderstanding. Einstein went along with this, more or less, in his own statement quoted in Vorwarts: "There can be no question of a scandal said to have taken place yesterday: nevertheless, a few remarks that were made testified to a certain animosity toward me. There were no anti Semitic utterances as such, but their undertone could be so interpreted." Albert quietly cancelled plans to teach the course again in the summer. [B9]

It was not just Einstein being affected from 1919 onwards in Germany:

..........things were getting out of hand throughout Germany. In early March of 1920 a Vorwarts article summed up the last two weeks’ worth of atrocities: A republican teacher horsewhipped by an army officer in Konigsberg; a Jewish student named Kahn shot and killed in Baden - Baden; Einstein the target of anti Semitic riots; troops busting up an amateur labour union theater in the Ruhr; a pacifist rally in Osnabruck invaded by thugs from the notorious Frei Korps Lichtschlag shouting insults at Jews and "vermin", and killing a young man who tried to stop them; and marines beating the speaker at a pacifist rally in Berlin almost to death. [B10]

It is not a climate to do physics, and we are expected to believe from mainstream history that the rebellion against Einstein in the 1920s had no anti Semitism overtones, and was decided purely on the physics issues. This sort of unpleasantness one never really escapes from. When Einstein was in America after WWII, he was caught in the McCarthyism attacks on Communists, and was suspected of being such, as were many other people. No way can physics be properly assimilated in such an atmosphere of deep racism, hence it became corrupted.

2.13 Boscovich

The following names include some of the most influential of those who used Boscovich's ideas , in most cases giving him credit were [B11] :

In Britain: Priestley, Young, Davy, Faraday, Clerk Maxwell, Kelvin, J. J. Thomson.

In France: Clairault, de Lalande, Laplace, Gay-Lussac, Ampere, Cauchy, Seguin, Saint-Venant.

Elsewhere: Fechner, Weber, Helmholtz, Hertz, Lorentz.

Finally, here are some of the tributes paid to Boscovich by British physicists:

Young (1807), while regarding Boscovich's theory as speculative said it `has prevailed very widely among algebraical philosophers' and `been considered by some candid judges as deserving the highest commendation'.

Faraday (1844): `the safest course appears to be to assume as little as possible, and that is why the atoms of Boscovich appear to me to have a great advantage over the more usual notion'.

Clerk Maxwell (1877): `the best thing we can do is to get rid of the rigid nucleus and substitute an atom of Boscovich'.

Kelvin (1889) considered `Hooke's exhibition of the forms of crystals by piles of globes, Navier's and Poisson's theory of the elasticity of solids, Maxwell's and Clausius's work in the kinetic theory of gases . . . all developments of Boscovich's theory pure and simple'. `He referred to the inevitable theory of Boscovich.' Kelvin's views changed often, but he wrote finally (1905): `My present assumption is Boscovichianism pure and simple.'

To which we may add the words of a fellow-Slav:

Mendeleeff (1870): `Boscovich together with Copernicus is the just pride of the Western Slavs'; he `is regarded as the founder of modern atomism'.

There is then a history of physics that connects all of these scientists, that forms an alternative physics.

H G Gill in his book on Roger Boscovich, during WWII (book published 1941) says [B12] :

This small volume contains a simple account of the remarkable way in which a theory proposed by Roger Boscovich two hundred years ago is now found to be in harmony with conclusions arrived at by methods of modern scientific research.

After WWII it was all change, the physics text books taught to Physics Students was rewritten, because of the A Bomb exploding physics was centered on new concepts. But the main originator of these ideas Boscovich was no longer mentioned (at least in the West). 

Boscovich was left to the philosophers, who had to think of a reason why the physicists were suddenly ignoring him after WWII. They came up with the following explanation:

Lancelot Whyte tells us that if we expect history to be simple, then we find anomalies like Roger Boscovich, and describes him as:

....a twentieth-century mind in the eighteenth century, and ... the creator of an idea-the point particle-so necessary that many scientists now find it unnecessary to think about it, allowing it to do its work unconsciously. .... [Boscovich is] an example of what we lack: simplicity and lucidity in fundamentals. Where the physics of our day is abstract and difficult, Boscovich’s atomism is simple and clear, but wrong. [B13] 

He does not offer any reasoning as to why Boscovich is ‘wrong’. I presume that he believes in the modern theory of Quantum Mechanics. It is made slightly clearer when Whyte goes on to say:

By an historical irony no sooner did the full significance of this principle [of Boscovich’s theory] become clear than it was proved to be inadequate by the success of the de Broglie- Schrodinger wave particle. [B14] 

What Whyte calls ‘de Broglie - Schrodinger wave particle’ he really means the standard version of Quantum Mechanics interpreted as per Bohr, Heisenberg etc.

So, Boscovich’s theory was abandoned in favour of Quantum Mechanics. It did not agree with Quantum Mechanics and was merely assumed wrong, because if you look there is no experiment that proves Boscovich wrong.

Now let me re-cap the situation - there was a physics tradition linking the ideas of Einstein with Newton, through Boscovich, which was thrown away after WWII, with no reasoning given. In Modern Physics we now have the anomaly that Quantum Mechanics does not combine with General Relativity, but Boscovich’s discarded theory links these ideas.

His theory is described as:

Boscovich presented a comprehensive theory of physics based on the principle that all phenomena arise from the spatial arrangements and relative displacements of identical point particles interacting by pairs under an oscillatory law determining their relative accelerations. This principle in his theory reduced to a Single law of the actions existing in nature. [B15] 

It was quite a thing to throw away. I have personally look at Boscovich’s theory and I am convinced that he was right. However, we live in a very sceptical society, and someone’s word is no longer considered worth anything. Which leaves us with the Physics Establishment managing to perform any action they choose without justification, such as throw away a theory that is comprehensive (i.e. unified) without giving an adequate reason. (A point that I wish to raise repeatedly - the Establishment likes to throw away ideas and evidence that does not fit in with its beliefs, without giving any adequate reason.)

And the theory of Boscovich connects to Ancient wisdom, because it is a Pythagorean theory of physics:

One half of Kepler's mind was Pythagorean; the whole of Boscovich's was, if we may credit to that school the great principle of blending number and nature. For Boscovich discarded `massy matter', and developed a vision of the entire cosmos as a changing tapestry of points, an open network. [B16] 

Do you realise the consequences of this? The theory discarded after WWII was based on Pythagorean ideas. A unified theory of physics based on Ancient ideas, was discarded; very suggestive of knowledge coming down to us from either a lost civilisation or Ancient Astronaut/ Aliens. But since such ideas do not fit in with the perspective of orthodoxy, then the orthodoxy throws away such evidence. (Or if one believes in deliberate conspiracy, then the orthodoxy might be destroying other such evidence as this on purpose.)

** Reproduced with permission **

[ einstein-conspiracy ]    [ einstein2 ]     [ einstein3 ]     [ einstein4 ]     [ einstein5 ]