[ Up ] [ euroamerican-mono ] [ euroamerican2 ] [ euroamerican3 ] [ euroamerican4 ] [ Dr Dennis Myers ]
Monomorphism is the cornerstone of Robert Koch's (1843-1910) and Louis
Pasteur's (1822-1895) Germ Theory of disease. This theory professes that
disease has a microbial cause that is "caught" from the outside;
"that there are differences among pathogenic bacteria (ones that can
make you ill), and each has a constant nature...each distinct bacterial form
corresponds to a specific disease and that the form of this microbe always
stays the same, monomorphism, and causes the same disease however
often the disease is transferred from one animal to another, the kind always
remains the same and never changes into other kinds". (Robert Koch,
1987, pg. 48)
In 1878 Robert Koch wrote Etiology of Wound Infections which was the
beginning of the Germ Theory of Disease. Where Pasteur's views were shaped by
the study of fermentation, Koch was affected by his contact with wounded
soldiers. He noted that the bodies of animals that die of artificially infected
wound diseases (pus from an infected animal injected into a healthy one)
invariably contained many bacteria...In each case a definite organism
corresponded to a distinct disease...and that for every individual, traumatic,
infective disease, a morphologically distinguishable microorganism could be
In 1880 Koch built on an essay of the relations between microbial diseases
and their causes from the work of Jacob Henle, his professor of anatomy. These
became known as the Koch-Henle Postulates.
The following are these postulates which revolutionized medical epidemiology
at the turn of the century, by laying out the standard proof of infectivity to
the present day. The postulates dictate that a microbe must be:
- found in an animal (or person) with the disease,
- isolated and grown in culture and
- injected into a healthy experimental animal, producing the disease in
question; and then recovered from the experimentally diseased animal and
shown to be the same pathogen as the original.
* * *
By the early twentieth century the whole landscape of medicine had changed.
Most of the common killer diseases, including smallpox, diphtheria, bubonic
plague, flu, whooping cough, yellow fever, and TB, were understood to be caused
by pathogens. Vaccines were devised against some, and by the 1950s antibiotics
could easily cure many others.
By the 1960s and 1970s the prevailing mood was one of optimism. At least in
the developed world, infectious diseases no longer seemed very threatening. Far
more scary were the diseases that the medical world said were not infectious:
heart disease, cancer, diabetes, and so on. That these diseases are now
considered to be "infectious", is what this web page is about.
Also, no one foresaw the devastation of AIDS, or the serial outbreaks of
deadly new infections such as Legionnaire's disease, Ebola and Marburg
hemorrhagic fevers, antibiotic-resistant tuberculosis, "flesh-eating"
staph infections, and Rift Valley fever.
"The infectious age is, we now know, far from over. Furthermore, it
appears that many diseases we didn't think were infectious may be cause by
infectious agents after all. These include stomach ulcers, heart disease. The
first cancer virus discovered in 1910 called the Rous sarcoma virus, certain
leukemias, lymphomas, nasopharyngeal cancer common in south China, cervical
cancer, stomach cancer, liver cancer, Kaposi's sarcoma with Herpes virus 8,
mammary-gland tumors in mice, childhood obsessive compulsive disorder,
Sydenhams's chorea which is a rare complication of streptococcal infection.
Streptococcal antibodies find their way into the brain and attack a region
called the basal ganglia, causing characteristic clumsiness along with
obsessions. Schizophrenia has long been considered to be possibly
"infectious" in nature."
The Atlantic Monthly,
A New Germ Theory
by Judith Hooper, February 1999, pg. 44.)
The catalogue of suspected chronic diseases caused by
"infection"/bacteria to David A Relman, an assistant professor of
medicine, microbiology, and immunology at Stanford University, now includes;
"sarcoidosis, various forms of inflammatory bowel disease, rhumatoid
arthritis, lupus, Wegener's granulomatosis, diabetes mellitus, primary biliary
cirrhosis, tropical sprue, and Kawasaki disease. Likely suspects include many
forms of heart disease, arteriosclerosis, Alzheimers's disease, most major
psychiatric diseases, Hashimoto's thyroiditis, cerebral palsy, polycystic
ovarian disease, and perhaps obesity and certain eating disorders. Multiple
sclerosis has been linked to the human herpes virus 6, the agent of Roseola
infantum, a very mild disease of childhood" (ibid.)
* * *
Where do these bacteria come from...?
To modern science, this is still an unanswered
* * *
Regarding stomach ulcers;
In 1981 Barry J. Marshall became interested in incidences of spiral bacteria
in the stomach lining. The bacteria were assumed to be irrelevant to ulcer
pathology, but Marshall and J. R. Warren noticed, serendipitously, that when one
patient was treated with tetracycline for unrelated reason, his pain vanished,
and in endoscopy, revealed the ulcer was gone.
An article by Marshall and Warren on their culturing of "unidentified
curved bacilli" appeared in the British medical journal,The Lancet
in 1984. No one listened until finally Marshall personally ingested a batch of
the spiral bacteria and came down with painful gastritis, thereby fulfilling all
of Koch's postulates.
There is now little doubt that Helicobacter pylori, found in the
stomachs of a third of adults in the United States, cause inflammation of the
stomach lining. In 20 percent of infected people it produces and ulcer. Nearly
everyone with a duodenal ulcer is infected. H. pylori infections can be
readily diagnosed with endoscopic biopsy tests, a blood test for antibodies, or
a breath test. In 90 percent of cases the infections can be cured in less than a
month with antibiotics.
* * *
Where do these bacteria come from?
You don't "catch" them, so infectious is
not the correct word.
* * *
It has recently been discovered that arteriosclerosis is also a bacterial
process. Notice I did not say, 'caused by bacteria'. The plaques of 99% of
patients with hardening of the arteries have the bacteria Chlamydia
pneumoniae in them.
According to The Atlantic Monthly, Feb. 1999, Chlamydia pneumoniae is
a newly discovered bacterium that causes pneumonia and bronchitis. The germ is a
relative of Chlamydia trachomatis, which cause trachoma, a leading cause
of blindness in parts of the Third World. C. trachomatisis perhaps more
familiar to us as a sexually transmitted disease that, left untreated in women,
can lead to scarring of the fallopian tubes.
Pekka Saikku and Maija Leinonen of Finland discovered the new type of
chlamydial infection in 1985 though its existence was not officially recognized
until 1989. Saikku and Leinonen found that 68 percent of Finnish patients who
had suffered heart attacks had high levels of antibodies to C. pneumoniae,
as did 50 percent of patients with coronary heart disease, in contrast to 17
percent of the healthy controls.
While examining coronary-artery tissues at autopsy in 1991, Allan Shor, a
pathologist in Johannesburg, saw "pear-shaped bodies" that looked like
nothing he had seen before. Cho-Chou Kuo, of the University of Washington School
of Public Health, found that the clogged arteries were full of C. pneumoniae.
Everywhere the bacterium lodges, it appears to precipitate the same grim
sequence of events: a chronic inflammation, followed by a buildup of plaque that
occludes the opening of the artery (or, in the case of venereal Chlamydia, a
buildup of scar tissue in the fallopian tube).
Recently a team of pathologists at MCP-Hahnemann School of Medicine, found
the same bacterium in the diseased section of the autopsied brains of seventeen
out of nineteen Alzheimer's patentsand in only one of nineteen controls.
Whether antibiotics help any of these diseases or not remains to be seen. The
first major clinical trial is under way in the United States, sponsored by the
National Institutes of Health and the Pfizer Corporation: 4000 heart patients at
twenty-seven clinical centers will be given either the antibiotic azithromycin
or a placebo and followed for four years to gauge whether the antibiotic affects
the incidence of further coronary events.
Whether the antibiotic helps coronary heart disease or not does not explain
where these bacteria come from and thereby how to effect a causal or real
cure. That this issue of Chlamydia in the tissues, is still being pursued
by the modern pharmaceutical firms as "infectious" in nature, amenable
to the treatment with antibiotics and/or vaccines, is an another example of how
entrenched Pasteur's and Koch's ideas are in the whole of medicine from the
profit orientation of the petro-chemical pharmaceutical companies on down.
The above reference to the article from The Atlantic Monthly, does add
to its credit,
"Even if heart patients can be shown to have antibodies to C.
pneumoniae, and even if colonies of the bacteria are found living and
breeding in diseased coronary arteries, is it certain that the germ caused the
damage? Perhaps it is there as an innocent bystander, as some critics have
As will be shown, the above bacteria, Chlamydia pneumoniae and Helicobacter
pylori come out the red blood cells themselves The blood is teaming
with microorganisms, especially if it sits on the microscope slide for a few
hours. You can watch this process under any microscope, anywhere, anytime.
* * *
This is a funny situation really. Modern, allopathicly trained physicians can't
see these things, literally. You can see all these organisms in the blood
with any microscope, so its not a matter of "seeing is believing".
More, it's a mater of "believing is seeing", so you can even dare
to take a look in the first place.
1. The blood is not sterile, as we were led to believe after the Second
World War with Hitler's ideology of the creation of a 'pure' blooded race.
2. The cell is not the smallest living thing.
3. Organisms come of the blood and tissues to decompose those tissues when
they can no longer live and support their own metabolism within the
environment they find themselves in, in their internal milieu.
4. These same organisms can also come out of the blood and regenerate new
tissues and organs; depends on which way we want to go. One needs a source of
Protits in the diet, organ meats provide these, organ specific Protits/Somatides.
(See Live Cell Therapy )
THE HISTORY OF THE PLEOMORPHISM/
WHY PLEOMORPHISM IS UNKNOWN TO MODERN MEDICINE
A dichotomy in medical speculation, an unresolved philosophical conflict, has
existed from ancient times to the present. This conflict is between two theories
known traditionally as Empiricism and Rationalism.
"While this conflict can be discerned in the earliest writings of the
Hippocratic Corpus, from the fifth century BC, the names Empirical and
Rationalist became current in Rome at the beginning of the Christian era -
designating groups of physicians competing with one another ideologically and
economically." (Divided Legacy, Harris Counter, pg. xv.)
The main form of medicine practiced today is of the Rationalist or Rationalist/Methodist
point of view. Rationalism involves a mechanistic or chemical understanding of
the human organism. It maintains that life itself can be explained by
physics and chemistry, or, more generally speaking, by mechanics. Rationalism
maintains that there is no essential difference between the structural chemistry
of life and that of inanimate nature.
This idea of the body viewed as a machine composed of many little machines is
contrary to the Empirical view that the laws governing the living
organism differ from those of lifeless matter. This concept is called Vitalism.
The person as a whole is something different from a collection of viscera;
the wholeness gives some extra, if undeniable, quality to the individual organs.
Today we pay for our knowledge of the parts in ignorance of the whole.
Vitalism maintains that;
"the organism is reactive, at all times coping with, and attempting to
overcome, the stresses which impinge upon it from outside. It behaves
purposively, the nature and form of its reaction being determined by the
specific environmental stress encountered. It responds to challenge, which no
aggregate or assembly of non-living substances can ever do". (Divided
Legacy, Harris Counter, pg. xvii.)
In 1946, the quantum physicist Erwin Schroedinger pointed out...
"that biological material has a totally different character from all
other states of matter density of life - that is, the information stored per
unit volume - and that of any inorganic system that has not been produced by
living forms...The silicon chip must use many orders of magnitude more atoms
to store the same amount of information as a gene."
This is vitalism, Quantum Vitalism.
According to Harris Coulter, no perfect Rationalist therapeutic doctrine has
ever been devised. Even Galen, who of all physicians in history worked hardest
at theoretical consistency, left a few loose ends. But the formulation which
emerged in the late nineteenth century - the specific bacterial
disease treated by the 'contrary' medicine - seemed to its
devotees an almost unblemished depiction of the Rationalistic reality. The above
is what is what 'modern', allopathic medicine has become.
The microbe and the Germ Theory of Disease became a new organizing principle
in medicine, bringing much scattered clinical data together into a series of new
specific entities with some cures, specific cures. The 'germ
theory' was bolstered by the doctrine of 'monomorphism' - meaning again that
microbial genera and species are fixed and eternal, that the form of each
microorganism associated with a specific disease always stays the same and
always causes that same disease.
"Monomorphism was above all, a practical response to an emergency
situation in bacteriology. This concept of disease, emerged in a context of
intense anxiety over the social depredations inflicted in every country in
Europe and the United States by a series of diseases whose very names -
tuberculosis, diphtheria, typhus, cholera--were chilling reminders of
human mortality," (Divided Legacy, Harris Coulter, pg. 37)
More to the point;
"involved in the concept of Pleomorphism was the role and importance
of the host organism - THE PATIENT! Microbes altered their forms
in response to the patient, in response to the diet, environmental
stresses the patient encountered, what poisons the patient consumed
etc.." (ibid.), Harris Coulter)
Such ideas have little to do with the doctor.
Pleomorphism meant that the host organism or patient was an active
participant in infection and disease - in contrast to Koch and Pasteur and
the monomorphists who held the microbe to be all-powerful, the host organism a
passive victim. Pleomorphism meant downgrading the microbe, since the host, by
resisting the latter's onslaught, could alter its characteristics and make it
return to a normal form as again. The patient had control over the bacteria,
not the other way around. The microbes are the result, not the cause of
Even the common "communicable" diseases, e.g. strep throat or
chickenpox, can not take hold, grow, if the internal milieu is not
conducive to their reproduction. As stated before, one third of people in Europe
did not get bubonic plague. In treating cancer with isopathic medicine, for
example, one does not attack the tumor at all, instead one changes the
environment, the internal milieu that caused the cancer in the first
What this all means then, this pleomorphism/monomorphism controversy, is that
at its most fundamental level it has socioeconomic dimensions that still effect
us profoundly today.
"Accepting Pleomorphism meant acknowledging the host organism's,
the patient's capacity to defend itself (him or her) against, and dominate,
Monomorphism, on the contrary, enhanced the role of the microbe in disease,
and consequently that of the physician who combats the microbe. This
is the principal reason for the instinctive hostility of the majority of
physicians to Pleomorphism and Whoistic/Alternative Medicine in general."(Ibid.
This gives the responsibility for health back to the
if they want it !
Pleomorphism has been a great threat to this "control" factor.
This control factor means;
"control of the disease with poisons that need monitored and
controlled, controlling therefore, the patient and their pocket book."(Ibid,
The phenomena are forced into categories which can be manipulated to make a
living from the practice of medicine. The monomorphists have identified their
doctrine with science itself, as science itself, that Monomorphism is a law of
nature, which it is not. This viewpoint has, through the years, taken on such an
aspect of truth that to question it now seems a scientific sacrilege.
The followers of Koch proclaimed Monomorphism with 'religious fanaticism',
stated Max Gruber in 1885. F. Loehnis stated in 1922 that the intransigence and
verbal violence displayed by the various factions in this conflict resembled
certain historic theological quarrels.
This battle has been going on for a long time!
For all these reasons, Monomorphism was at first excessively rigid, even
dogmatic. Rene Dubious states that Koch and Pasteur;
"overestablished" the doctrine of the specificity of disease causes
and that blind acceptance by several generations of bacteriologist of the dogma
of constancy of cell forms and immutability of cultural characteristics
discouraged for many years the study of the problems of morphology, inheritance,
and variation in bacteria.
"Upon clear contemplation, not only the cancer problem but the entire
pathology, as taught by school medicine, have become unsustainable. In any
case, it is extremely revealing of the insight that Prof. Sauerbruch, in
following a series of cancer patients he treated isopathically (with
pleomorphic medicines) in his hospital at the Charite and who, subsequently,
in the closing years of his life again and again had pointed out that:
"IF ENDERELEIN, AND NASSONS ET AL, ARE CORRECT, THEN WE CAN THROW
OUT OUR ENTIRE LITERATURE".
(Blutuntersuchung im Dunkelfeld, nach Prof. Dr. Günther Enderlein,
pg. 77, 1993, Compiled by Dr. med. Maria M-Bleker)
The consequences of this are profound.
* * *
Also, there are many problems that monomorphism has not been able to explain.
Bacterial resistance to antibiotics is one that is becoming quite
critical in today's world. The bacteria don't 'mutate' into a drug resistant
form, they just change, evolve, de-volve. There is a big difference between the
two forms of change. Mutation occurs rarely, Pleomorphism occurs all the time.
Another problem has been microbiology's inability to classify microorganisms
in proper families and the like, genera and species because the organisms do
change form. Despite the inability of a century of bacteriological research to
define the boundaries of these supposed genera and species, the suggestion is
never heard that the search for them should be abandoned. The monomorphist
conviction that genera and species do exist somewhere still retains a peculiarly
In school we only cultured bacteria on very particular growth media.
For example, all the strep "germs" in hospital microbiology labs
anywhere are grown on blood agar (sterile human or rabbit blood mixed with
agar). Therefore all the germs grow the same way, all streptococcal bacteria
look like little round balls in strings, if they are grown on blood agar,
at a very specific pH's, pH 7.6 - 7.8, and temperatures. Change any of these
conditions, the pH etc. and the germs change form.
According to Enderlein's formulations, the protits which are used as medicine
actually are grown on a culture medium composed of a broth made of asparagus
In medical school
we never grew anything on an asparagus/agar broth so,
we never saw protits!!!
What you see
is determined by how you look at something.
Is this science?
* * *
The thing is, that to classify all the different forms that bacteria can and
do assume, in the terms of contemporary microbiology would be a taxicological
(taxonomy- the science of classification) nightmare. We knew in school that
syphilis microbes could grow as fungal forms, on old culture plates.
These plates were just ignored and thrown away.
To say that the above syphilis organism began as a protit, somewhere,
sometime, in some other generation even, and then went through all the stages
that it would take to end up on an old culture plate in some microbiology lab,
would require an impossible classification system, if done in the mono-morphistic
This begs a quantum system of classification, like the
definition of vitalism given by Schroedinger above.
(As an aside, when these organisms do change form, for example when the
protit changes into a virus, well, it just changes, instantaneously - as
if it made a quantum jump. You have to watch awhile though, through the
microscope, to see this.)
"If Pleomorphism were correct, scientific investigation of bacteria
would be an impossibility. One grasps one's head to make sure it is still
on the shoulders. The whole structure of our science threatens to
collapse." (F. Loehnis, 1922)
Winogradsky in (1930) called pleomorphism;
"chaotic...truly, the whole of a researcher's lifetime would hardly be
sufficient to follow directly all of the transformations indicated by [Felix
Hans Zinsser in 1932 stated that;
"If the pleomorphic surmise is a correct one, the entire structure
of our attitude toward the biology of disease must be changed...If these
conclusions are correct, this will bring about a revolution in biology...At
the present time it is dangerous for the progress of bacteriology to accept
this work until it has been satisfactorily demonstrated...Nothing short of
absolute proof should be accepted or we may risk making research more
difficult than it already is."
To this end, the French microscopist and bacteriologist, Gaston Naessens has
described the whole cycle of the Somatid/Protit, maintaining that all bacteria
are derived from a single Somatid/Protit.
"Naessens demonstrates and describes each such stage, with return to
the starting point, thus meeting an earlier objection as to the idea of a
bacterial life cycle. In effect this view rejects all bacterial
classification. The French have a proclivity for Pleomorphism, are more
radical, and also more theoretical, and contend that the whole of the earth's
microbial life constitutes a single collection of genetic material,
"GENOME", (the self reproducing portion of a cell), adequate to
supply every microbial genus and species." (Divided Legacy, Harris
Coulter, pg. 197)
Sonea and Panisset, representing the French view, maintain that;
"each microorganism has access to this genome (genetic pool) and borrows
from it genes as needed - employing conjugation, transformation, transduction,
and other mechanisms of gene transfer which are still incompletely known.
Genes are relinquished when environmental circumstances no longer require
their use for survival."(Ibid pg. 196)
The German view represented by Günther Enderlein is not much different.
Enderlein finds that all microorganisms originate from a Protit that, in its
culminant and most degenerative phase, turns into the fungus Mucor racemosis.
In going from the original Protit to the fungal form, all known bacteria are
manifested, if the conditions for their manifestation, are right. This
fungus then, Mucor racemosis, is the end, of the beginning. After it has
decayed all the organic matter present it disintegrates back into the Protit it
* * *
Of all the impediments to the acceptance of Pleomorphism: Rationalism vs.
Empiricism; the need for Magic Bullets, specific cures and
disease entities in the face of the epidemic type diseases prevalent at the end
of the last century; the "control" factor consisting of the
contradiction between the patient healing his or herself and the doctor doing
the job with allopathic, potentially dangerous drugs; the religious
fanaticism and intransigence of the monomorphists; the inability of
modern science to classify microorganisms into families etc. and the
other inconsistencies contained in the monomorphist 'science' including drug
resistance; of all these impediments I feel the most important one is the so
called "complexity" factor.
"The phenomena are forced into categories which can be manipulated and
named, to make a living from the practice of medicine, as easily as possible."
It isn't complex.
You just need to know more than one form of medicine.
Here is what life is, physical life, and where the power which
"animates" it comes from. The Protits of Enderlein are the smallest of
living things but there is some point in space and time where even these were
begotten from something or 'somewhere' else. Even if the cell were the smallest
living thing then where did the first cells come from? This question has never
The first individual to actually catch a glimpse of this occurrence was Anton
Leeuwenhoek who lived in the 17th century. He had ground glass to create the
first microscope. In observing some rainwater he collected, he made note that
there were teeny creatures moving about. Wondering where they came from, he did
an experiment. He collected clean fresh rainwater and sealed it in pipettes. At
first, nothing was in the water. Hours and a few days later, nothing still was
in the water. But on the fourth day, all of a sudden, little teeny creatures (Protits)
appeared. Where did they come from? Was it spontaneous generation? What the germ
theory failed to explain then, and fails to explain to this day, is the
question; from where exactly do germs come? Where and what is the
Leeuwenhoek took his research to Robert Boyle, the father of chemistry as we
know it, and to Sir Isaac Newton who wrote many of the principles of physics.
They did not believe that life could beget from light or in their way of
thinking, from nothing. This was a time when the church played a big role in
every major decision that was made. To have life you must have procreation, a
mother-father union, sex. Since there was no mother or father that created
Leeuwenhoek's teeny creatures, his observations were surely flawed,and they were
dismissed. Since they had no concrete evidence to answer the question, they left
it unanswered and it remains unanswered to this day. In any textbook of science,
medicine or biology, there is no explanation of where the cell, life, comes
from and this is where a new paradigm unfolds.
This new paradigm is Wholistic, pleomorphic and ever changing. It is Holographic.
The mother-father microbe is of course the Protit, which is physical. It
is asexual, polypotent (can turn into any life form) and immortal. Every speck
of Life from the Protit on up is a holographic projection into this time and
space of a Power which is not physical, a Power that manifests as life.
A Power is the ability to accomplish something, in this case Life. What
follows is not about what this Life manifesting Power is, it is about where it
comes from and how It gets into this three dimensional, material world we find
our selves in.
From Do No Harm, Writers and Research, by Charlie Pixley; Gaston
Naessens has made the following observations concerning his Somatid/Protit:
"Composition of the Somatid: It is probably the link between
energy and matter. Energy can take many forms. The Somatid may be the link
between the biological sciences and the physical sciences."
According to George Merkel Protits are;
"composed of tiny, pyramid shaped crystals of ATP, adenosine
triphosphate, the chemical fuel that powers the machines of our bodies. ATP is
the energy molecule of the body, the muscles 'burn' ATP when they contract.
These crystals are what spawned in the oceans of all worlds to transduce Life
down from the bi-directional electromagnetic wave structure in the scalar
potential of vacuum". (Genesis II, George Merkel, pg. ii)
These Protits are the physical elements that transduce the energy called Life
from the infinite, scalar potential of vacuum, down into this three demensional,
physical world where they physically manifest, pop into existence, protits, for
ever, always moving, always, an infinite source of new Protits/Somatides. Where
do they come from, what Power keeps creating them, what energy keeps them
moving, for ever? We are immersed in a sea of infininite energy called here the
scalar potential of vacuum, a Power that is beyond our...it can't even be
discussed. This scalar potential of vacuum is the electromagnetic
potential of vacuum which is;
"the ZERO POINT ENERGY, the energy of nothingness, of vacuum, of chaos.
This is the energy that holds all this corporeal existence together. It is
Free Energy and it is infinite." (Tapping The Zero Point Potential,
Moray B. King, pg. iii)
This energy of nothingness is completly random energy, incoherent. The
energy of vacuum is totally chaotic, unorginized, unmanifest. There are no
harmonics or chords in it's chaos. Quantum theory predicts a whole spectrum of
virtual particles spanning every possible wavelength which is then, by
definition, infinite. The higher the wave length the more energy conatined in
it. Calculating it this way, by adding up all the energy of these virtual
particles, the total energy comes out to be 'infinite' or at least, the
calculated energy is roughly 120 orders of magnitude larger than the energy
contained in all the matter in the universe. That means you take all the energy
contained in all the matter in the universe and add 120 zeros to it to get the
total vacuum energy!
To cohere this energy is to organize it into harmonics which manifest as
everything we know and see. This of course includes Life which is what we
are talking about here. Out of this sea of infinite energy comes the Protit/Somatid
which manifests all physical life.
In the last two chapters of Misner, Thorne and Wheeler's Gravitation
is the statement that in quantum mechanics there existed an all-pervading energy
imbedded in the fabric of space consisting of fluctuations of electricity. The
term for this energy, the zero-point energy, came from the equations of
quantum mechanics in the 1930s. Zero-point refers to the fact that these
fluctuations persist even at zero degrees Kelvin (the point, temperature at
which all molecular motion stops) and therefore are not thermal in nature. (C.
Misner, K. Thorne and J. Wheeler, Gravitation, W.H.Freeman and Co., 1970)
In the 1930's Dirac derived the idea that space, vacuum consisted of a
virtual sea of fluctuating energy that could manifest electron-positron pairs.
The random electrodynamics theory of Boyer mathematically describes how the
zero-point energy oscillates in its interaction with matter. In this theory
Heisenberg's Uncertainty Principle allows the Zero-point energy to produce Brownian
motion, relevant here as the motion of the Protit has been ascribed to
Wheeler's Geometrodynamics showed that the energy density of this
"nothingness", of space, vacuum, was enormous, 1093 grams/cm². The
energy density of one cubic centimeter, 1 cm², of matter, contains energy on
the order of 1016 grams/cm², that from Einstein's equation, E = MC². According
to this calculation, there are 77 orders of magnitude more energy contained in 1
cm² of vacuum than in 1 cm² of matter. That means there are 1, with 77 zeros
after it, times more energy in vacuum than in matter. It takes more energy to
hold matter together than the amount of energy contained in the matter itself.
That only makes sense.
"Quantum mechanics showed that this energy was constantly interacting
with matter and the elementary particles in what is called vacuum
polarization. Quantum electrodynamics shows all particles are intertwined in
a vacuum polarization interaction with the zero-point potential and shows how
the interaction yields the mass of an elementary particle." (B. Toben, J.
Sarfatti, F. Wolf, Space-Time and Beyond, E. P. Dutton, New York, 1975)
Concerning this Power of Creation that we have been talking about, since 1991
some very startling discoveries have been made in the fields of astrophysics and
cosmology. According to the Big Bang Theory the universe was, at the moment of
creation, all clumped together in one 'place'. From there it exploded outward
and has been expanding ever since. A basic premise of this idea was though, that
one day all the gravity of everything in the universe would start to pull all
the expanding stars back together. The expansion would stop and then the
universe would start to contract, ending in a giant crunch.
Discoveries in this decade though have shown that the above idea is not
happening. In fact the expansion of the universe is actually accelerating
with time! In the beginning the universe was expanding much slower than now
so that distant supernovae (stars that explode) appear to be 25% fainter than
expected, assuming that the universe had been expanding at the same rate since
"...an explanation of the unexpected faintness of distant supernovae
is that they are farther away than their red shifts suggest." (
"Surveying Space-Time with Supernovae," by Craig J. Hogan et al;
SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, pg. 51 January 1999.)
Red shifts show how far away stars are and if they are further away than
expected they must be expanding away faster than expected. What strange force is
pushing the universe apart?
"According to Einstein's theory, the expansion (of the universe) can
speed up if an exotic form of energy fills empty space everywhere. This
strange "vacuum energy" is embodied in Einstein's equations as the
so called cosmological constant. Unlike ordinary forms of matter and
energy the vacuum energy adds gravity that is repulsive (antigravity)
and can drive the universe apart at ever increasing speeds (Surveying
Space-Time Supernovae," by Craig J. Hogan et al; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, Pg.
51 January 1999; and "Cosmological Antigravity," by Lawrence M.
Krauss, pg. 52).
The energy associated with this energy does not depend on position or time
(or temperature as above), hence the name "cosmological constant".
IT IS EVERYWHERE/ALWAYS.
The force caused by the constant operates even in the complete absence of
mater or radiation (vacuum energy). Therefore, its source must be a curious
energy that resides in empty space, even the space in front of our noses. The
cosmological constant, like the ether, endows the void with an almost
"Physicists Paul A. M. Dirac and later Richard Feynman, Julian S.
Schwinger and Shinichiro Tomonaga showed that empty space was more complicated
that anyone had previously imagined. Elementary particles, it turned out,
can spontaneously pop out of nothingness and disappear again."(Exploiting
Zero-Point Energy, by Philip Yam; SCIENTIFIC AMERICAN, December 1997.)
"The aggregate energy represented by these 'virtual' particles,
like other forms of energy, could exert a gravitational force, which could be
either attractive or repulsive depending on physical principles that are not
We live in a sea of infinite energy. Where there is energy, there is gravity
but it turns out that the gravity associated with this energy that is pushing
the universe apart is, by nature repulsive.
It is not heavy, it is Light.
It creates life too.
* * *
This energy is
is pushing the universe apart at an ever increasing rate,
always creating new space, time, matter and energy to fill the resulting
animate and inanimate comes from it.
It is conscious; knows what It is doing, where It is going.
It is alive,
never dies and is always creating...
universes never ending, worlds without end. Amen.
* * *
This is the same
'POWER' or FORCE that animates the PROTIT,
that keeps it alive forever.
* * *
This puts a rather more optimistic philosophical slant on our existence than
the one of being ending in a big crunch.
Where does this energy come from, where is this sea of infinite
energy? It does not come from 'this world', this three dimensional existence we
live in. Recent experiments have shown that the brightness of the zero-point
energy is independent of the existence of reflectors and absorbers. This shows
that zero-point energy does not arise from an electromagnetic propagation in our
three dimensional space. It comes from and returns to the fourth dimension
and beyond, all mathematically known and proven with science's giant
cyclotrons and computers. These machines are proving the existence of
"Spirit", other dimensions, the undeniably indefinable...
Computers can 'think' in 12 dimensions where we can't and by being
able to do this, all 'anomalies' in Einstein's equations were resolved. These
anomalies were a big problem for Einstein as many of his equations ended with a
final answer of zero or infinity, that was the anomaly. These were not
satisfactory answers but with the advent of computers that could 'think' in
twelve dimensions, this problem was solved. This was a big problem for Einstein.
According to current science we live in a ten or twelve-dimensional existence;
"This zero-point energy pops into this third dimension in the from of
the electron-positron pairs or tachyons (super fast subatomic particles) which
sustain and nourish us." (Genesis II, George Merkel.) These are,
"scalar waves with opposite oscillation and spin that braid into one
single photon, quantum. The photon is an intermediate between particle
matter and Free Energy and then pairs of photons braid into the electron
and electrons braid into protons and neutrons."
* * *
This energy starts out as LIGHT;
"Luminous quanta of divine intelligence thrilling out in infinite
vibrations of accordance breaking joyously into the rhythm of greater and
higher waves of illumination intensifying towards the growing light of a
self-existent Knowledge spontaneously awaking to Itself as the SUN OF TRUTH
receiving the world from the murky depth of an obscure physical bondage into
the enlightened height of spiritual freedom by the transforming radiation of
ITS glorious Arc-Light."
(Siva Kalpa; September 19, 1966, published by The Foundation of
Revelation, 59 Scott Street, San Francisco, CA.)
Out of "no where", and under the direction of divine intelligence
it organizes. This appears to be contrary to the second law of thermodynamics
which states that everything is falling apart. Yet, if the universe is
expanding at an accelerating rate due to the continuous formation of 'new'
space and matter then perhaps even this second law must be questioned. Life is
created. It is happening all the time and is continuous. Life is everywhere.
It is pushing the universe apart at a faster and faster rate. Suns form, all
the elements, all the time. Protits form in the oceans of our bodies all the
time, new life. In new worlds, the primordial soup of those oceans form and as
"Luminous quanta of divine intelligence" interact with those oceans,
they begin to live. This is a nature of Life too isn't it, to continually
birth itself and to never die. Remember Antoine Béchamp's statement;
"Nothing is the prey of death; on the contrary, experience daily proves
that everything is the prey of life, that is to say, of what can be
nourished and what can be consumed."
In this world Protits form, are created continuously, in the body or in
oceans. (Genesis II, George Merkel, Ibid);
"The hydroxyl (OH ions from water) groups and the protons fill the
inner membrane matrix of the Protit as it is formed so as to provide an
electrochemical gradient that allows the storage of energy. Its like a drop
of water forms with an electrically charged membrane around it, a condenser.
This electrical charge creates a magnetic field with the net effect that the
condenser membrane of the Protit is being charged with glowing energy. This
energy can be used in several ways. It is first stacked up as an ATP
reservoir of energy in the chlorophyll of plants and then as the
mitochondria in animals, it can be used to induce birth (reproduction) and
it is used to disassemble the genetic material of anything that tries to
destroy it (the beginning of our immune systems). These Protits in fact
enzymatically devour bacteria, viruses or any chemical that may jeopardize
the genetic process of mammals, they differentiate into the cells,
lymphocytes etc., that do this job." This energy is transmuting all the
pollutants in our bodies, is transmuting our bodies, from the inside
So, these 'created' Protits evolve too, guided by an 'internal'
Intelligence or Will...they become whatever they are needed to turn into.
These original Protits differentiate first into chlorophyll (the ATP energy
source for plants) and then into mitochondria (the ATP energy source for
mammals) and then into cells and then, as per George Merkel;
"...in a foreword direction, they synthesize all living organs, things.
These original Protits are stored in the tails of sperm (which are a
separate life form from the heads of sperm) and from them all the old things
our bodies ever were can be cultured, by genetically growing them in the
reverse direction". Isn't that strange. In reverse synthesis one can
grow old and even meet our million old ancestors."
Blue green algae and chlorophyll have been grown from shark testes by
reverse synthesis. In this manner we can and will recreate or remember our old
immune systems, which will reconstruct and start over if you will, that which
we lost by growing up in this polluted world we live in. Old organs, our
embryonic organs can and will be regenerated from these primordial Protits.
You have to pay taxes and die, who says so.
Remember, in utero, while an embryo, our bodies were first one celled
things like algae, amoebas, and then fishes, then frogs, then animal. Ontogeny
recapitulates Phylogeny, the Biogenic Law of Genetics. Our embryonic
development (ontogeny) travels through the ancestral forms (phenotypes), as if
to say millions of years ago our heritage was evolving in salt water. In the
womb the fetus recapitulates, goes through, all the past forms it ever had.
This study of Life is fun, exciting, not dead like medical school. Without
the Protit/Somatid life is atheistic, dust to dust. With the Protit/Somatid,
as a transducer of energy from "beyond"... the ying and yang of
religion and science become the complements they are, not opposites.
The concept of opposites is an illusion. There are no opposites, only compliments,
as you can't have one without the other.
Scientists have broken matter down into smaller and smaller pieces, the
atom, the proton, neutron, electron, then quarks, antiparticles, etc.. In
today's giant cyclotrons, what they have found though is that as they break
these 'pieces' of matter down further and further, the pieces just finally
disappear, "pop in and out of existence" as stated above. The
particles enter the fourth dimension, just as they are supposed to, according
to these now corrected 'twelve' dimensional formulas of Einstein.
What is even more fascinating is that when these particles disappear and
get into this fourth dimension, which is a supra-physical, mental dimension,
the scientists find that whether these particles even exist in this dimension
or not is controlled by the thought of the observers, by the thought of the
Quantum theory demands the inclusion of the psyche since the observer
effect of any phenomenon will instantaneously alter its state. Einstein,
Rosen, and Podolsky postulated this and supported it with flawless
mathematical proof, it was called the ERP Effect.
The process of observing and being observed become one. The process of
observing does not just effect the results of the experiment, as per the
Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle, it determines them. The observer and that
observed have become One. This is Wholistic.
Electro-Acupuncture and the Rife Microscope
Electro-acupuncture and the concept of the Rife Microscope and Generator best
objectify all the different forms of what are now called Vibrational Medicine
from Michael Gerber’s book by the same name.
These vibrational techniques include such, unfortunately ‘specialized’
branches of medicine as; radionics, electroacupuncture, Biotensor, pendulums,
Bioresonance testing, kinesic pulse testing (RAC), Applied Kinesiology, Contact
Reflexology, Homeopathy, Herbal medicine, vitamin therapy and on to regular,
modern allopathic medicine - in more or less descending order of
* * *
EAV OR Electro Acupuncture According to Voll
EAV began in France in the 1940s with a doctor named Roger de la Feu. Dr. de
la Feu began experiments with skin conductivity and found there are points on
the body more electrically conductive than others. These points, for the most
part, turned out to be acupuncture points. In 1953 a German medical doctor named
Reinhold Voll became intrigued with de la Feu’s research and explained it.
All the acupuncture points are connected by lines of force, like wires, that
are called meridians. Voll and his colleagues mapped the correlation between
conductive points on the skin and internal organs, organ systems and bodily
Their starting point was their knowledge of Traditional Chinese Medicine,
specifically acupuncture. Acupuncture has developed over the last 5000 years.
During this period of time, specific points on the body were mapped as being
responsive to disease and therapy. Groups of acupuncture points are connected
along fourteen major pathways called meridians. With the exception of the
Governing and Conception Meridians, each of these meridians begins and ends on a
finger or toe. Each meridian is connected to one major organ from which it
drives its name, such as the Liver Meridian and the Stomach Meridian.
The Heart Meridian, for example, ends on the tip of your middle finger, at an
exact point beside the finger nail. If you inject a radioactive dye in this
exact point it will trace a line to the heart. If you miss that point by a
fraction of an inch, the dye will go no where. For every organ there is a point
on the end of one of the fingers or toes. Is this any different than reflexology
or iridology? This is Wholistic Medicine, the “Whole” being more than the
sum of its parts.
These points at the end of the meridians give off a current of a very
particular frequency, impedance and amplitude, depending on the organ involved.
Everything vibrates at a particular, very precise, frequency.
If you hold an electrode, a metal contact point, not a needle, on the point
at the end of the Heart Meridian or any meridian, it will give off a signal that
is either low (a degenerative condition or low energy condition of that organ)
or it will be normal or it will be high (an inflammatory condition). This can be
done for all the organs of the body and more, in a very short time.
Then, if you find an organ that has a low energy, for example, you can insert
a medicine contained in a vial into that circuit which consists of the patient,
the medicine and the machine. If the medicine vibrates at the same frequency as
the weak signal being tested, synchronizes, harmonizes, literally,
electronically, with the low signal from the weak organ, the amplitude or
strength of the signal will get higher as the two frequencies will superimpose
and add together. Then you know that what is in the vial is the right medicine
for that organ, for that patient.
All these ‘Vibrational Testing Techniques” are similar and are based on
the idea of the tester (person and machine - EAV machine, pendulum whatever)
coming into resonance with the test subject. The tester must thus be highly
sensitive, must be very good at maintaining a neutral state and must be able to
register the vibrational changes of the test person. Radionics is the most
sophisticated of these techniques.
E.A.V. and the rest have the additional advantage of being highly sensitive.
E.A.V. for example, can detect extremely small amounts of any type of chemical
in a patient; DDT, mercury intoxication, any chemical. Also, extremely sensitive
allergy testing can be done. Fine-materials testing as this is called cannot be
performed on many people, since they have masking disorders such as amalgam
intoxication, dental foci or toxic blockages. For the same reason, these
patients cannot usually be treated homeopathically or isopathically, their
blockades have to be broken up and detoxified first.
The Rife Microscope and Generator
Royal Raymond Rife with his microscope and generator provide another striking
example of ‘vibrational medicine’and ‘pleomorphism’. All the different
microorganisms and forms they come in also vibrate at a very precise, distinct
frequencies. Royal Raymond Rife invented a microscope in the 1930s that could
magnify up to 60,000 diameters, at a time when the best existing light
microscopes could magnify only 1000 - 2000 diameters. Light microscopes are no
better today. The electron microscope can magnify to 100,000 to 1,000,000
diameters and had not been invented yet.
Most of Royal Rife’s books were burned by the powers that be so exactly how
to build this microscope is unclear. Yet, still to this day, if any doctor is
caught possessing one of these microscopes he or she will go to jail and the
microscope will be confiscated. I include this in some detail as an example of
the types of sophisticated research that were done before the 1930s.
This microscope illuminated the specimen by a narrow, polarized light beam,
composed of a single frequency of monochromatic (one color) light which caused
the specimen to vibrate, to glow. This microscope could project a beam of pure
color, a beam so finely tuned that it was composed of only a single frequency of
light. These tunable frequencies went all the way from the infrared to the
A monochromatic beam of light, corresponding exactly to the frequency of the
organism (for Dr. Rife found that each disease organism responds to and has a
definite and distinct wave length, a fact supported by British medical research
workers) is then sent up through the specimen, thus enabling the observer to
view the organism stained in its true chemical color and revealing its own
individual structure in a field which is brilliant with light.
Because these objects glowed with their characteristic chemical colors they
could be seen at much lower magnification than if they didn’t. Therefore,
Royal Rife was ‘seeing’ viruses in the 1930s and that was just considered
impossible. Still, today, viruses can only be seen with the electron microscope.
Royal R. Rife’s discovery of the frequency characteristics of organisms led
him to believe that each individual type of microorganism should have a resonant
frequency that would be detrimental to it.
His first attempts to electronically destroy them consisted of unsuccessful
tests with infrared and ulta-violet rays. These frequencies only caused surface
damage so next he tried audio and radio frequency waves which penetrated deeper.
He thought that somewhere in the spectrum a harmonic or resonant frequency would
resonate with the vibratroy rates of disease organisms. He believed that if such
a frequency could be found and applied, the rays would be fatal to the disease
organisms but not to the normal cells that didn’t vibrate at the frequency
being sent into the patient. This proved to be exactly right.
“When radio frequencies and audio frequencies were transmitted through a
large rare gas filled ray tube, the destruction of the organisms by rays and
frequencies is described as being similar to the phenomenon of the combination
of transmitted potential electronic energy and the coordinative resonance of
critical frequencies or their harmonics. This is electromagnetic electrocution
where a potential energy level is reached that is lethal to the microorganism.
This is likened to fragile glass which is shattered by a sustained note of
music tuned to a resonant pitch or where a potential energy charge is built up
to exceed that level of energy which the microorganism can cope with and still
live. This was called the M.O.R or Mortal Oscillatory Rate.”
Using the glass as an example, it is the frequency of the glass (organism)
harmonizing and resonating with the frequency being beamed into it that shatters
it. Because both vibrate together, the glass (organism) can pick up that
particular frequency and literally shake itself apart. Tuning forks will respond
only to their specific frequency, one across the room exciting another only if
they are tuned to the same frequency or some harmonic thereof.
Another way the precise frequency or mortal oscillatory rate for any
particular organism can be found is by isolating and seeing the offending
organism under the Rife (or any) microscope and then zapping it with frequency
after frequency until the right one is found.
“When the mortal oscillatory rate or potential energy level is lethally
reached, the organism appears to blow up and disintegrate in the field and
form, at times, a group of agglutinophilic clumped masses or electrostatic
The first radio type frequency instrument was designed and built in 1920.
Development of the Rife Ray to the point where it could be used on human beings
was a proven fact back in 1934. Tubercular and cancer patients were treated in
private practice and recovered. Most cases responded within a period of one to
two months in which time the diseases were rendered 'noninfectious'.
“Rife’s first human clinical work on cancer was completed under the
supervision of Dr. Milbank Johnson, M.D., Chairman of the Special Medical
Research Committee of the University of Southern California which included Dr.
George Dock, Professor of the Theory and Practice of Medicine, Medical
Department, Tulane University of Louisiana, New Orleans; Dr. Charles Fisher,
M.D. of the Children's Hospital in New York; Dr. Wayland Morrison, M.D., Chief
Surgeon of the Santa Fe Railway; Dr. Karl Meyer, M.D., Director of the George
Williams Hooper Foundation; Dr. Arthur I. Kendall, Professor of Bacteriology
at Northwestern University Medical School in Chicago. The research was
conducted at the Scripps Castle which was rented over the summer of 1934 for
cancer and T.B. cases. Fourteen out of sixteen were cured in seven days, Rife
There are Rife generators readily available today that generate these
frequencies. You simply hold an electrode in each hand and as the signal passes
through your body, you feel nothing. However, without knowing what the exact
frequency of the organism that you are trying to destroy is, for which you need
the microscope, these Rife generators are worthless.
* * *
Pendulums, Contact Reflexology, Applied Kenesthesiology, Radionics,
Electroacupuncture and may others techniques, are all based on the idea of the
tester or the test coming into resonance with the test subject.
* * *
Electro-acupuncture and the Rife Microscope were chosen to represent these
vibrational qualities as these are two quite objective forms of Vibrational