GW / Climate change hoax





Health v medicine


Climate change hoax  



Nobody does it better than America   

MH17 coverup  



The Fake Arab Spring

Time for a Truth War  

Massacre of Taliban POWs  

Myths for Iraq war 

Are sanctions justified?


Saddam Hussein 

Gassing of Kurds 

Who set light to the oil wells?  

Kosovo deception 

Elite sets stage for WW3  

Pre-emptive action

Why Hiroshima was bombed  



Fake terror 

Thank a vet?

Al-Qaeda - fictional terror group 

Defaming Islam 

Fake terror - the road to dictatorship 

Fabricating an enemy  

Inside Indonesia's war on terror 

War on terror a hoax   

911 - White collar terrorism 

911 Training drills 

Bird flu hoax 

Osama bin Laden  

War Propaganda 

WMD found in Iraq 

Bali bombing - JI   

School of Americas 


Covert operations 

Pearl Harbor

Operation Paperclip

Psyops & psywars 

Secret Team: CIA & Allies in Control of US & World   

CIA & agencies

Operation Mongoose

Operation Cyclone

Bay of Pigs

Gulf of Tonkin

Operation Northwoods






Corporations - pathological pursuit of power  

The science of exploitation

Economic Hitman



US government is a corporation 

Australia government is a corporation 




Water agenda  

Sandy Hook massacre hoax 

Boston Bombing 

Operation Mockingbird  

50 false news stories     




US History  

Guggenheim Foundation  

US is a corporation  

American Union  



Australian government  - legally invalid 

Constitution defunct 

What next? The issues  

United People Power  

  The Lima Declaration  

PM's powers 

Government tyranny 

"National security" 

Trial by jury 

One Nation 

Harold Holt's murder [external link] 

Port Arthur massacre  

  Port Arthur (v2) 

  Why not gun control? 


  Manchurian candidate

  Dr Peters / Dr Mullins 

Save Australia Alliance - Tony Pitt 


Foreign debt 

Bracket creep 

Stamp duty on houses  

Fascism in Australia (CEC)  

Illegal taxation  

The Hilton bombing - a case of political terrorism? 

Jean-Paul Turcaud / Telfer 

Andrew Wilkie  

Principality of Camside 

Principality of Rangeview  

Fortress Australia 







Free energy  

Scientific dictatorship  

Scalar energy  

What is scalar electromagnetics? 

12 things about about scalar weapons  

Brave new world of scalar electromagnetics 

Universal Seduction extracts 
Pine Gap 

Hurricane Andrew  

Forbidden Archaeology   

Geo science 

Origins of oil 
The fake oil crisis 
Oil con job 
Nuclear energy myths 

True geology 




Goals of the Illuminati 

Pike's plan for 3 world wars 


Rewriting history 

The grand deception - Manipulating US into war - CFR  

World peace, 1814-1914   

Global Strategic Project 

Letter to 'Sheople' from NWO 

The Secret Covenant 

The secret behind secret societies 

Collectivism vs individualism 

Communism & the Illuminati 

Communism & capitalism  


Why not world government? 

Purpose behind UN 

UN destroys rights 

UN 50 years on  

IMF - created by UN 

EU exposed 

Skull & Bones 

Chronology of ruling class conspiracy 


New world order 

NWO - fact or fantasy? 

Deskilling trades 

Role of secret societies 

Unveiling the mystery religion 

Environmental scam - Greenpeace, ozone hole 

Shadow government

Secret budget 


Economic sanctions - Operation Population Control  

Concentration centres in US 

Widening gap between rich and poor   

Weather control  

Hurricane Andrew 1992   


Underground bases  

AIDS - Made in the USA  

Population control 




Our patriarchal society   

Patriarchy - the root cause of society's ills  

Is feminism a nwo plot?  

Patriarchy: the development of a "war system" 

Capitalism: the latest stage of patriarchy  

Patriarchy and bureaucracy  

Islam's shariah law and treatment of women 

Islam and patriarchy 

Other islam issues  


Fake mental health 


Silent weapons for quiet wars  

Tavistock/social engineering 

Mind control 

Hegelian dialectic  

Two steps forward, one back 

Thesis, anti-thesis & synthesis 


Order out of chaos  



Compounds & boxcars 

The Alaska Mental Health Bill 




Hidden technology 
Hollow earth theory 

The truth about hemp 
Ether - scalar technology 
Time travel 
Crop circles  
Mars & moon  
Coverups uncovered 





How to collapse an economy 


Fed-up with the Fed 

Beast from Jeckyll Island 

The Bankers Manifesto of 1892 


Fractional reserve banking 

Fiat money 

16th amendment not ratified - income tax illegal  

Money myth   

Gold Standard 

Usury / interest 

Fall of civilisations    

Hidden taxation  

Social credit 





The Bible exposed  

Biblical contradictions  

The Jesus myth 

US Govt's agenda  

The most evil people in the world 

Fake apocalypse 

Billy Graham   

Clarifying what is proof  

Council of Nicea 325 AD      

Reincarnation & karma  




Universal laws  





The Galactic Federation 

A new paradigm 






[ GW / Climate change hoax ] Propaganda ] Fake terror ] Covert operations ] Water agenda ] Corporations ] Sandy Hook massacre & gunlaws ] NESARA ] new world order ] Science ] Money ] Hidden technology ] Illuminati ] Feminism ] Fake mental health ] Scientology ] Sovereignty ] Religion ] Zionism ] The Galactic Federation ] A new paradigm ] Quotes ] Reading ] Links ]



Climate Change skepticism

The Australian Climate Sceptics - Exposing the flaws in the greatest hoax inflicted on the human race.

"All Scientists are Sceptics" -- Professor Bob Carter

"Whenever someone asserts that a scientific question is “settled,” they tell me immediately that they don’t understand the first thing about science. Science is never settled."  --  Dr David Deming

"Perhaps the most frustrating aspect of the science of climate change is the lack of any real substance in attempts to justify the hypothesis" -- Professor Stewart Franks





Why the campaign against Tony Abbott
Why he had to be removed

Lord Monckton explains how Canada and Australia were the only two countries left that stood in the way of December 2015 Paris treaty on global warming


'The Greenhouse Conspiracy' (Transcript) 

from Channel 4 (UK) programme broadcast in 1990   
[full transcript can also be found in google newsgroups]

A collection of 14 scientists qualified in weather analysis, say that there is no science behind global warming. 

PROF. RICHARD LINDZEN (Professor of Dynamic Meteorology, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Boston, USA): "The notion that a warming is catastrophic is drilled into people, to the point where it seems surprising that anyone would question it, and yet underlying it is very little evidence at all. In fact, there is ample evidence to the contrary."

PROF. REGINALD NEWELL (Professor of Meteorology, MIT, Boston, USA):  "There is no evidence at all. "




The Corbett Report 
The IPCC Exposed 
Corbett Report 282 

How climate change fraud is perpetrated and 

listen to interview with climatologist Dr Timothy Ball  (Aug 2009)
[at 33.30 on youtube video] 

Commissions of Enquiry (supposedly independent) and Terms of Reference- 

"My [Timothy Ball's] experience having chaired commissions of enquiry for government or being on commissions of enquiry for government, is that there are certain things politicians love, enquiries being one of them, deficits are another. ... If there's a problem or a conflict develops and its causing a lot of difficulty for the politicians, they can say "we will appoint a commission of enquiry, it will be independent", and that takes the heat off the issue. ("Oh yeah, the government is reacting, they're finally appointing a commission of enquiry" and if they don't then "Oh you're afraid, you're hiding something"). OK, so they appoint a commission of enquiry but then, what people don't realise, is they control the outcome of that commission of enquiry. Now first of all they've got the advantage now, because if the media comes and asks what's going on, "Can't talk about it, have to wait for the commission of enquiry."

"What people don't realise is that a lot of the outcome is controlled by terms of enquiry which -

(1) Stops a hot topic from being discussed ("can't talk about it, have to wait for the outcome of the commission of enquiry") which is usually 2, 3 or 4 years and by that time all the political heat is off. 

(2) But more important is they control it by "terms of reference". An example I like to use is the Warren Commission enquiring into Kennedy's assassination, and Judge Warren was asked about something afterwards and asked why didn't you look into it, "Oh, it wasn't in my terms of reference". He'd been limited by those that wrote the terms of reference and that was my experience. One of the first cases I'd been asked to look at and the ministry said will you look at this, I said "well sure" but couldn't work with the terms of reference, couldn't provide a proper answer with restrictions of terms of reference. The Ministry said "sorry, that's what you've got to work with", so Tim Ball dropped the job.

An investigation becomes limited by those who write the terms of reference." This had been Tim Ball's experience, that the terms of reference can become meaningless, and so limiting that he was unable to work with them. 

[36.25] "When they set up the IPCC Maurice Strong wrote the terms of reference. The 1st term of reference was the definition of climate change, and he limited it deliberately to human causes of climate change, which effectively eliminated all the natural causes and natural variability which is why you don't see them looking at things like the sun and a whole heap of other issues. 

"Limited further in another term of reference - he set it up into 3 working groups. There was the technical group 1 the working group which wrote the science report which was 600 of the 2500 people. The other 1900 were working groups 2 and 3. Now they were inconsequential because they had to accept the findings of working group 1 which were already limited by their terms of reference. So whatever their finding was, then working groups 2 and 3 said, right if you're telling us it is going to warm, then we're taking this as fact, we now look at the implications of that. And that's where you hear all these stories, the ice is going to melt, the sea levels are going to rise. So really the majority of the report and handing to the 1900 other scientists is accepting without question the findings of the 1st group.

Now Strong restricted it even more because they then said this report is not to be used for policy, but then they set up the summary for policy makers - an absolute contradiction of that. The summary for policy makers is written by a completely separate group and then they write it independent of the science report. The science report is finished and set aside. The summary for policy makers is written and given out to the media, eg the last report, the 4th assessment report came out in 2007, the summary for policy makers was written in April, the science report wasn't released until November. But the rules, the terms of reference that Strong wrote said that the summary for policy makers goes back to the science report people and says "make sure your science report agrees with what we've put in the summary". So its like the executive of a company writing the summary of a report and then telling the employees to find the facts to agree with the summary. Its the most unbelievable process you can imagine. So its in those terms of reference through the IPCC that not only have you effectively eliminated most of the major causes of climate change, the natural variability and of course if you think about it, unless you know how much natural variability there is, how much natural climate change there is, and what are the fundamental causes of that, you can't possibly identify that fractional part which may be due to humans. But that's precisely what they're doing and so that's why things appear so illogical and why so much is left out of the IPCC report, which has become the authority." [40.00] 




"There is only one agenda - control of our environment, control of our economy and control of our property rights."

The UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change's own figures expose its fraud at the core of unfounded climate alarm and government restrictions and taxes.

 CSIROh! - Climate of Deception? or First Steps to Freedom?

Malcolm Roberts joins us to share the submission of a report he has compiled on the CSIRO and its involvement in the Climate Change debate. This report was prepared at the invitation of Steve Austin, host on ABC-Radio 612 Brisbane. Steve Austin invited a management consultant’s review of CSIRO’s document entitled "The Science of Tackling Climate Change."

My brief from Steve Austin is to, quote: “Please read through the Australian scientific paper and identify where you believe the CSIRO data has been falsified or is wrong.”

Together we look at the falsities, misrepresentations, consequences and some solutions that Australians are confronted with as a result of Scientific corruption. For further information including appendices are available at Malcolm's website: 

* * *

Climate of Deception? … or first step to freedom?

Management consultant’s report on CSIRO document prepared at request of ABC-Radio’s Steve Austin

* * * 

Listen to Malcolm Roberts interviews on Fairdinkum radio  

Save podcasts to your computer into MP3 files which makes it easier to stop, start and replay.





Scientific Facts - In A Nutshell

Did you know?
Carbon dioxide (CO2) levels in the air are less than 0.04%;
Annually, all human activity produces 3% of Earth's CO2, Nature 97%, 32 times more;
Driven by temperature, oceans release and absorb CO2. Oceans contain in dissolved form, fifty times the CO2 contained in Earth's entire atmosphere;
Nature alone controls the air's CO2 levels. Total human production is one quarter of just the variation in Nature's production. Despite continuous human CO2 production, every year during the southern hemisphere winter Nature reduces Earth's global CO2 levels;
The absorption of human and industrial CO2 into oceans and plants is the same as for CO2 produced by Nature;
Residence time for CO2 is only 5 to 7 years. It is then recycled back into sinks such as plants, oceans and soils. Some studies show recycle time is only 12 months;
UN IPCC data on the air's carbon dioxide (CO2) levels show carbon dioxide is a consequence of temperature, not a cause. This is true for every period in Earth's history and over every duration;
Carbon dioxide is a natural trace gas essential for all life on Earth. With Nature annually producing 97% of all CO2, CO2 is obviously not a pollutant;
There has been no increase in global atmospheric temperature since 1998. 'Global warming' is not happening;
Climate varies naturally with inherent variation in Nature's cooling-warming-cooling cycles. Accurate temperature measurements by satellite and weather balloons show no net warming. El Nino and solar activity explain temperature variation;
The UN's climate body downplays satellite and weather balloon data and prefers ground-based temperature measurements known to be corrupted;
Ocean temperatures have been flat or slightly cooling since 2003;
Oceans are alkaline. Earth's oceans thrived for extensive periods with the air's CO2 20 times that of today. Anyway, when oceans warm they release CO2 into the atmosphere;
Australia's sea levels during the last 15 years have risen only 0.3 mm per year. In 100 years that will be just over one inch. The most extensive study measuring Pacific island sea levels shows no rise since measurements began in 1992. Sea level projections by the government and its taxpayer funded Climate Commission rely on unvalidated computer models themselves relying on temperature guesses proven wrong;
There has been no increase in storm activity or strength. In falsely claiming increased storms, the UN IPCC's chairman contradicted and overrode the IPCC's storm expert, Chris Landsea. In protest, Landsea resigned from the UN IPCC;

Facts on CO2

A four-page summary of facts on CO2 is available here.
A four-page summary of facts on CO2 with supporting material and references is available here.
A four-page summary of facts on CO2 with supporting material and references plus intriguing questions is available here.






The 10 most respected climate change skeptics - 

"The media portrays climate scientists as having delivered a final verdict on global warming.

They haven’t.

There remain some holdouts who say this consensus is little more than conformity to a politically correct idea. Perhaps even more surprising is that a few of these global-warming sceptics are actually respected!

No matter where you stand on this debate, you should know who the major sceptics are and what they think.

Physicist Freeman Dyson has been a giant in his field for decades. But the British-born, Princeton-based professor has gained notoriety for his 'heretical' views on climate change. While he does acknowledge the mechanism by which man-made greenhouse gasses can influence the climate, he claims current models are way too simplistic to capture what's really going on in the real world. In March, he was featured in the NYT Magazine for his controversial views.

Bjorn Lomborg is a Danish-based scientist, famous for his book The sceptical Environmentalist. Like Dyson, he's not an outright denier, but rather he thinks the current approach to global warming is misguided and that the costs of drastic, short-term action are too high. Instead, he thinks we should focus on becoming more adaptable, while putting more effort into such real-world tragedies as AIDS and malaria.

Myron Ebell may be enemy #1 to the current climate change community. Ebell works for the free-market thinktank Competitive Enterprise Institute and, according to his own bio, has been called a climate 'criminal' and a leading pusher of misleading ideas.

Japanese scientist Kiminori Itoh is the author of Lies and Traps in the Global Warming Affair. Like many others, Itoh does not reject the notion of global warming entirely, but instead claims that the causes are far more complex than the anti-carbon crowd would have you believe. You can read an introduction to his views here at Climate Science.

Ivar Giaever, a Nobel Prize winner in physics, isn't a thought leader, per se, in the climate sceptics scene -- but the mere fact that he has come out as being a sceptic and has a Nobel Prize makes him important. His big beef is that climate change orthodoxy has become a 'new religion' for scientists, and that the data isn't nearly as compelling as it should be to get this kind of conformity.

Will Happer is another, highly-respected physicist out of Princeton who compares the anti-CO2 crowd to the prohibitionists prior to the passage of the 18th Amendment. While he does acknowledge long-term warming, he thinks the influence of CO2 is vastly overstated, and that the benefits of a modest reduction in it will be negligible.

In testimony to Congress, he used the following analogy what he means:

The earth's climate really is strongly affected by the greenhouse effect, although the physics is not the same as that which makes real, glassed-in greenhouses work. Without greenhouse warming, the earth would be much too cold to sustain its current abundance of life. However, at least 90% of greenhouse warming is due to water vapor and clouds. Carbon dioxide is a bit player. There is little argument in the scientific community that a direct effect of doubling the CO2 concentration will be a small increase of the earth's temperature -- on the order of one degree. Additional increments of CO2 will cause relatively less direct warming because we already have so much CO2 in the atmosphere that it has blocked most of the infrared radiation that it can. It is like putting an additional ski hat on your head when you already have a nice warm one below it, but your are only wearing a windbreaker. To really get warmer, you need to add a warmer jacket. The IPCC thinks that this extra jacket is water vapor and clouds.

Alan Carlin is an EPA economist who wrote a paper calling global warming a 'hoax.' It's not really important what he said or what he believed or even whether his argument makes any sense at all. What's important is that he's become a right-wing celebrity over the belief that he was censored by the EPA for being a heretic (hence getting to appear on Glenn Beck)

Patrick Michaels is a CATO scholar and a GMU professor who's widely quoted as a global warming sceptic. His basic belief is that we're in a long-term warming trend and that Carbon Dioxoide has got little to do with it, as each additional greenhouse gas molecule has less and less of an effect."




Jesse Ventura on global warming 

"Hidden power, secrets, coverups, corruption think you know the whole story? 
...Think again!! I've been governor, a Navy seal, a fighter ... I've heard things that will blow your mind, 
and now I think its time you get the whole story."

Global warming, the most serious threat to our planet or a plot to cheat, extort and control you 
and everyone else. ... "The greatest control over mankind that we've ever seen."

Follow the money trail - "the only green here is cold, hard cash".

see also Jesse Ventura video on HAARP (being used for weather manipulation 
amongst other things) 




Rising sea levels

The Tidal Reference Frame for Queensland can be found at:

Paragraph on page 4:

"Sea Level Rise Because the sea level rise is very low, averaging 0.0003 metres per annum* for the Australian continent (Mitchell, 2002), the 15 to 19 years of readings available from Queensland tidal stations is not sufficient to calculate a reasonable estimate of sea level change. Accordingly an adjustment of 0.0003 metres per annum is made to the mean sea level within the tidal reference frame. The allowance is been calculated from the central date of the observation period at each station to the central date of the tidal datum epoch (31 December 2001)."

* * *

* 0.0003 metres per annum = 0.03cm or 0.3mm per annum

Fmr. Thatcher advisor Lord Monckton to pursue fraud charges against Climategate scientists: Will present to police the case for 'numerous specific instances of scientific or economic fraud' Visit Site 

Monckton: 'I have begun drafting a memorandum for prosecuting establish...the existence of numerous specific instances of scientific or economic fraud in relation to the official 'global warming' storyline...they will act, for that is what the law requires them to do'



Lord Monckton: Shut Down The UN, Arrest The Warmist Criminals
Anti-climate cult crusader calls for world to rise up against communistic killers behind global warming fraud
Paul Joseph Watson
Saturday, November 28, 2009

Appearing on The Alex Jones Show yesterday, Lord Christopher Monckton went further than ever before in his vehement opposition to the elitists running the climate change scam, calling for the UN to be shut down and for fraudulent peddlers of global warming propaganda like Al Gore to be arrested and criminally prosecuted.

Monckton said that those who are threatening to shut down economies, bankrupt nations, and deepen the problems of the third world by implementing draconian policies in the name of global warming should be indicted, prosecuted and imprisoned “for a very long time”.

“The fraudsters and racketeers from Al Gore to the people at the University of East Anglia who have been making their fortune at the expense of taxpayers and the little guy,” should be criminally charged, said Monckton, in response to the climategate scandal.

“We the people have got to rise up worldwide, found a party in every country which stands for freedom and make sure we fight this bureaucratic communistic world government monster to a standstill – they shall not pass,” he added.

Monckton said that the United Nations should be “closed down,” adding that he talked to a senior UN ambassador in Canada who told him that he no longer saw any purpose in the UN and it exists “only to enrich itself at the expense of the nations it claims to serve, it’s time it was brought to an end.”

“We would all save billions if we shut down the UN and just about all of its hideous bureaucracy,” said Monckton.

Lord Monckton emphasized how the emails released as a result of climategate prove that global warming alarmism was still prevalent in public but behind closed doors, warmist scientist are admitting that the “deniers” as they label people like Monckton are correct.

“Publicly they’re saying the science is settled, we’re all doomed unless you close down the economies of the west, whereas privately they’re saying to each other ‘we’ve got it wrong, none of this adds up and it’s a travesty that we can’t explain it’.”

Monckton also slammed Obama’s science czar John P. Holdren, who in his 1977 book Ecoscience called for draconian population measures to be enforced by a “planetary regime” in the name of saving the earth, as an “openly admitted communist”.

Monckton pointed out how Holdren had been once of the most prominent alarmists in the 70’s warning about the onset of rapid “global cooling”.

“Now with seamless mendacity he says that what we’re now facing is global warming,” said Monckton.

“How can anyone like Holdren stand up with a straight face and expect anyone to believe it,” he added.

Monckton said that the agenda behind the global warming movement was to set up a communistic world government which will be run by people who “do not care how many people they kill with their policies” and that their goal is to “do away with democracy forever by stealth using the excuse to save the planet.”

Monckton said that the people running the scam had a “deliberate desire to control population by killing people in large numbers deliberately if necessary.”

The former advisor to Margaret Thatcher said that the warmists were sounding more and more desperate and knew that they had been rumbled as a result of climategate, which would only make it more urgent for them to try and force through a binding treaty in Copenhagen.

Monckton said that the answer to combating the move towards neo-feudalism and global government was to form a worldwide “freedom party” that would operate nationally in every country in order to defend freedom, democracy and prosperity while routing out every aspect of the communistic takeover.

“Every time these people try to take it away, we in the freedom party will stop them, and I think now is the time,” said Monckton.

* * *

Lord Monckton on climate change at youtube --many videos 






Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide
Global Warming: The Cold, Hard Facts?

By Timothy Ball
Monday, February 5, 2007

Global Warming, as we think we know it, doesn't exist. And I am not the only one trying to make people open up their eyes and see the truth. But few listen, despite the fact that I was one of the first Canadian Ph.Ds. in Climatology and I have an extensive background in climatology, especially the reconstruction of past climates and the impact of climate change on human history and the human condition. Few listen, even though I have a Ph.D, (Doctor of Science) from the University of London, England and was a climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. For some reason (actually for many), the World is not listening. Here is why.

What would happen if tomorrow we were told that, after all, the Earth is flat? It would probably be the most important piece of news in the media and would generate a lot of debate. So why is it that when scientists who have studied the Global Warming phenomenon for years say that humans are not the cause nobody listens? Why does no one acknowledge that the Emperor has no clothes on?

Believe it or not, Global Warming is not due to human contribution of Carbon Dioxide (CO2). This in fact is the greatest deception in the history of science. We are wasting time, energy and trillions of dollars while creating unnecessary fear and consternation over an issue with no scientific justification. For example, Environment Canada brags about spending $3.7 billion in the last five years dealing with climate change almost all on propaganda trying to defend an indefensible scientific position while at the same time closing weather stations and failing to meet legislated pollution targets.

No sensible person seeks conflict, especially with governments, but if we don't pursue the truth, we are lost as individuals and as a society. That is why I insist on saying that there is no evidence that we are, or could ever cause global climate change. And, recently, Yuri A. Izrael, Vice President of the United Nations sponsored Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) confirmed this statement. So how has the world come to believe that something is wrong?

Maybe for the same reason we believed, 30 years ago, that global cooling was the biggest threat: a matter of faith. "It is a cold fact: the Global Cooling presents humankind with the most important social, political, and adaptive challenge we have had to deal with for ten thousand years. Your stake in the decisions we make concerning it is of ultimate importance; the survival of ourselves, our children, our species," wrote Lowell Ponte in 1976.

I was as opposed to the threats of impending doom global cooling engendered as I am to the threats made about Global Warming. Let me stress I am not denying the phenomenon has occurred. The world has warmed since 1680, the nadir of a cool period called the Little Ice Age (LIA) that has generally continued to the present. These climate changes are well within natural variability and explained quite easily by changes in the sun. But there is nothing unusual going on.

Since I obtained my doctorate in climatology from the University of London, Queen Mary College, England my career has spanned two climate cycles. Temperatures declined from 1940 to 1980 and in the early 1970's global cooling became the consensus. This proves that consensus is not a scientific fact. By the 1990's temperatures appeared to have reversed and Global Warming became the consensus. It appears I'll witness another cycle before retiring, as the major mechanisms and the global temperature trends now indicate a cooling.

No doubt passive acceptance yields less stress, fewer personal attacks and makes career progress easier. What I have experienced in my personal life during the last years makes me understand why most people choose not to speak out; job security and fear of reprisals. Even in University, where free speech and challenge to prevailing wisdoms are supposedly encouraged, academics remain silent.

I once received a three page letter that my lawyer defined as libellous, from an academic colleague, saying I had no right to say what I was saying, especially in public lectures. Sadly, my experience is that universities are the most dogmatic and oppressive places in our society. This becomes progressively worse as they receive more and more funding from governments that demand a particular viewpoint.

In another instance, I was accused by Canadian environmentalist David Suzuki of being paid by oil companies. That is a lie. Apparently he thinks if the fossil fuel companies pay you have an agenda. So if Greenpeace, Sierra Club or governments pay there is no agenda and only truth and enlightenment?

Personal attacks are difficult and shouldn't occur in a debate in a civilized society. I can only consider them from what they imply. They usually indicate a person or group is losing the debate. In this case, they also indicate how political the entire Global Warming debate has become. Both underline the lack of or even contradictory nature of the evidence.

I am not alone in this journey against the prevalent myth. Several well-known names have also raised their voices. Michael Crichton, the scientist, writer and filmmaker is one of them. In his latest book, "State of Fear" he takes time to explain, often in surprising detail, the flawed science behind Global Warming and other imagined environmental crises.

Another cry in the wildenerness is Richard Lindzen's. He is an atmospheric physicist and a professor of meteorology at MIT, renowned for his research in dynamic meteorology - especially atmospheric waves. He is also a member of the National Academy of Sciences and has held positions at the University of Chicago, Harvard University and MIT. Linzen frequently speaks out against the notion that significant Global Warming is caused by humans. Yet nobody seems to listen.

I think it may be because most people don't understand the scientific method which Thomas Kuhn so skilfully and briefly set out in his book "The Structure of Scientific Revolutions." A scientist makes certain assumptions and then produces a theory which is only as valid as the assumptions. The theory of Global Warming assumes that CO2 is an atmospheric greenhouse gas and as it increases temperatures rise. It was then theorized that since humans were producing more CO2 than before, the temperature would inevitably rise. The theory was accepted before testing had started, and effectively became a law.

As Lindzen said many years ago: "the consensus was reached before the research had even begun." Now, any scientist who dares to question the prevailing wisdom is marginalized and called a sceptic, when in fact they are simply being good scientists. This has reached frightening levels with these scientists now being called climate change denier with all the holocaust connotations of that word. The normal scientific method is effectively being thwarted.

Meanwhile, politicians are being listened to, even though most of them have no knowledge or understanding of science, especially the science of climate and climate change. Hence, they are in no position to question a policy on climate change when it threatens the entire planet. Moreover, using fear and creating hysteria makes it very difficult to make calm rational decisions about issues needing attention.

Until you have challenged the prevailing wisdom you have no idea how nasty people can be. Until you have re-examined any issue in an attempt to find out all the information, you cannot know how much misinformation exists in the supposed age of information.

I was greatly influenced several years ago by Aaron Wildavsky's book "Yes, but is it true?" The author taught political science at a New York University and realized how science was being influenced by and apparently misused by politics. He gave his graduate students an assignment to pursue the science behind a policy generated by a highly publicised environmental concern. To his and their surprise they found there was little scientific evidence, consensus and justification for the policy. You only realize the extent to which Wildavsky's findings occur when you ask the question he posed. Wildavsky's students did it in the safety of academia and with the excuse that it was an assignment. I have learned it is a difficult question to ask in the real world, however I firmly believe it is the most important question to ask if we are to advance in the right direction.

*  *  *

Dr. Tim Ball, Chairman of the Natural Resources Stewardship Project, is a Victoria-based environmental consultant and former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg. He can be reached at

Scientists threatened for 'climate denial'
By Tom Harper, Sunday Telegraph
Last Updated: 12:24am GMT 11/03/2007

Scientists who questioned mankind's impact on climate change have received death threats and claim to have been shunned by the scientific community.

They say the debate on global warming has been "hijacked" by a powerful alliance of politicians, scientists and environmentalists who have stifled all questioning about the true environmental impact of carbon dioxide emissions.

Timothy Ball, a former climatology professor at the University of Winnipeg in Canada, has received five deaths threats by email since raising concerns about the degree to which man was affecting climate change.

One of the emails warned that, if he continued to speak out, he would not live to see further global warming.

"Western governments have pumped billions of dollars into careers and institutes and they feel threatened," said the professor.

"I can tolerate being called a sceptic because all scientists should be sceptics, but then they started calling us deniers, with all the connotations of the Holocaust. That is an obscenity. It has got really nasty and personal."

Last week, Professor Ball appeared in The Great Global Warming Swindle, a Channel 4 documentary in which several scientists claimed the theory of man-made global warming had become a "religion", forcing alternative explanations to be ignored.

Richard Lindzen, the professor of Atmospheric Science at Massachusetts Institute of Technology - who also appeared on the documentary - recently claimed: "Scientists who dissent from the alarmism have seen their funds disappear, their work derided, and themselves labelled as industry stooges.

"Consequently, lies about climate change gain credence even when they fly in the face of the science."

Dr Myles Allen, from Oxford University, agreed. He said: "The Green movement has hijacked the issue of climate change. It is ludicrous to suggest the only way to deal with the problem is to start micro managing everyone, which is what environmentalists seem to want to do."

Nigel Calder, a former editor of New Scientist, said: "Governments are trying to achieve unanimity by stifling any scientist who disagrees. Einstein could not have got funding under the present system."


The Birth of the 'Global Warming' Hoax

Nov. 27, 2009 (EIRNS)—EIR published in its June 8, 2007 issue, this groundbreaking article exposing how the fraudulent "global warming" propaganda drive, now causing such an uproar around the Copenhagen Summit, was initiated by Malthusian fanatics. The article revealed the stated intention of these fanatics: to prevent Third World development, because, they claimed, the additional people this development would produce, would pose a threat to the environment. A PDF version of this article, suitable for printing, can be seen here.


Clandestine Weather Modification Hammering the Earth

Capt. D.A. Wheeler

Whether you want to believe it or not, there exists ample evidence of massive tampering with the natural weather patterns on planet earth by the military/industrial complex to further their own evil agendas. This includes precipitation deluge/ denail to either create too much rain or destroy crops through droughts. Either method is obviously catastrophic.

There is no credible proof global warming is causing this as thousands of highly intelligent, scientists with common sense have proven time and again. I have checked solar flare data, and it is not a factor. So one can deduce that it is most likely manmade in origin and its effects have been deadly. Watch this fall when the hurricane season starts, I find it amazing the "experts" are already calling this season a whopper before it even starts, when computer models can't even predict a hailstorm let alone a Cat 5 hurricane until its on top of you. Even with favorable conditions for hurricanes the models are sketchy at best.

Please check out the following sites for more info.:

I hope you find the above data informative, as the earth's weather patterns are a "chaotic" system that will seek its own equilibrium if left alone. But if you introduce large changes in that system, other parts of the world will "equalise" that disturbance with often catastrophic effects. By the way, have you noticed the earthquakes in California, and up the west coast? Not all of these are natural in origin, as the USGS does not report all earthquakes for some strange reason.

The Russians have had Tesla/Scalar weapons for decades. Prove me wrong!

God Bless,


Publications by Dr John Coleman
The following titles are available from 

ELF, Scalar Waves, Weather Modifications. Top Secret Report SCELF 1201.
This is a continuation of Dr. Coleman’s work on Russia’s weather modifications and scalar wave weapons of war which he began in 1969. His first work was published in 1984. Dr. Coleman owes much of his knowledge of this comprehensive subject to the late Professor Gurvich of Russia’s Lebedev Institute of Moscow who provided a great deal of material on Russia’s capability in these fields.

Global Warming: Fact or Fiction?
It seems like we have heard this refrain before. Yes indeed, three times before, dressed up in other slogans with different players, but the same familiar message. In this latest version we see many of the slogans used by the anti-nuclear power station environmentalists of the 60s and 70s reappearing. This work lays bare the “Cold Facts” about “Global Warming.” It is not to be missed.

El Niño is Man Made.
One of the many masterly investigative reports for which Dr. Coleman is well known. It reveals that a US Government agency commissioned a prestigious "think tank" to come up with El Niño. Explains how it is part of the Club of Rome's genocidal Global 2000 program. Once you read this well-researched report, you will have no doubt that the title is justified.

The Environmentalist Cult. (3 parts)
This could be the subject of a great book as it is packed with information reaching far beyond limits indicated by the title.

Metaphysics, Mind Control, ELF Transmissions & Weather Modifications.
Dr. Coleman was the FIRST to deal comprehensively with this new and hitherto unexplored development. Written ten years before HAARP, this monograph was one of more than 500 "FIRST" reports by Dr. Coleman. Our weather and our minds are being controlled and Dr. Coleman exposed it first in 1969, updated it in 1972, and again in 1984 and 1991. The original information is as current now as when it was first written almost 34 years ago!

Climate change science being stifled by NSW Labor bureaucrats

"SENIOR bureaucrats in the state government's environment department have routinely stopped publishing scientific papers which challenge the federal government's claims of sea level rises threatening Australia's coastline, a former senior public servant said yesterday.

Doug Lord helped prepare six scientific papers which examined 120 years of tidal data from a gauge at Fort Denison in Sydney Harbour.

The tide data revealed sea levels were rising at a rate of about 1mm a year or less - and the rise was not accelerating but was constant.

"The tidal data we found would mean sea levels would rise by about 100mm by the end of the century," Mr Lord said yesterday.

"However the (federal) government benchmark which drives their climate change policy is that sea levels are expected to rise by 900mm by the end of the century and the rate of rise is accelerating."

Mr Lord, who has 35 years experience in coastal engineering, said senior bureaucrats within the then Department of Environment Climate Change and Water had rejected or stopped publication of five papers between late 2009 and September this year." 

Tasmanian Sea Levels: The `Isle of the Dead' Revisited

by   John L. Daly
2nd February 2003


"Pugh et al. reported at both at the lecture and in their paper at how well their scenario fitted the IPCC claim of 10-20 cm global sea level rise during the 20th century.  However, that IPCC claim is contradicted by tide gauge data from around the Australian coast that observed sea level rise has been less than a tenth of that claimed by the IPCC [13]."

Garnaut Review 2011

In November 2010, Ross Garnaut was commissioned by the Australian Government to provide an independent update to his 2008 Climate Change Review. Professor Garnaut's book, The Garnaut Review 2011: Australia in the Global Response to Climate Change, is the final report of the update. 


Professor Garnaut  - 


Professor Garnaut strongly objected to our mentioning in this report that he also serves as director of the Ok Tedi gold and copper mine in western PNG, which we described as infamous for its environmental record. 


Professor Garnaut is also an eminent Australian economist, perhaps best known as the head of the Rudd government's Climate Change Review Panel recommending serious reduction targets for greenhouse gas emissions.


KERRY O’BRIEN, PRESENTER: Last Thursday we presented a story highlighting concerns in some quarters over the practice by Australian mining companies in Papua New Guinea of just discharging mine waste and chemically processed tailings deep into the ocean.

A significant element of those expressed concerns related to the so-called deep sea tailings 'placement' by one of the world's biggest gold mines, located on Lihir Island off Papua New Guinea's north coast.

Until this week when it merged with another Australian mining company, Newcrest, the mine was operated by Lihir Gold Limited whose founding chairman over 15 years has been Professor Ross Garnaut.







The Australian Climate Sceptics
Exposing the flaws in the greatest hoax inflicted on the human race. 


Global Warming is a Fraud 


Axe the tax - beat the deceit



Malcolm Robert's website 


Listen to Malcolm Roberts interviews on Fairdinkum radio  




The UN IPCC's Artful Bias on Climate Change 
United Nations IPCC scientists blame human interference, not natural variation, for causing our changing climate, and manipulate the data to suit their arguments.


Scalar Electromagnetic Weapons and their Terrorist Use:  
Immediate Strategic Aspects of the Asymmetric War on the U.S. 
© T. E. Bearden
Oct. 13, 2004
Link to document at

"Prior to 1990, our weather over North America was being steadily engineered by the KGB ¾ particularly beginning on July 4, 1976 ¾ using giant strategic scalar interferometers on site in Russia. "

Scalar Wars -- The Brave New World of Scalar Electromagnetics
by Bill Morgan


Fred Singer