[ MH17 ] [ The Fake Arab Spring ] [ Syria ] [ Ukraine ] [ Afghanistan ] [ Iraq myths ] [ Sanctions ] [ Intelligence ] [ Saddam demonised ] [ Gassing of Kurds ] [ Oil wells ] [ Desert Storm ] [ Kosovo ] [ BOBCU (Battle of Bagdad coverup) ]
The causes of the crash of MH17 crash are "classified".
Ukraine, Netherlands, Australia and Belgium signed a
"On August 8, Ukraine, the Netherlands, Australia and Belgium signed
a non-disclosure agreement pertaining to data obtained during the investigation
into the causes of the crash of Malaysian Airlines MH17
In the framework of the 4-country agreement signed on 8 August between
Ukraine, the Netherlands, Belgium and Australia, information on the
progress and results of the investigation of the disaster will remain classified.
This was confirmed at a briefing in Kiev under the auspices of the office of the
Prosecutor General Yuri Boychenko. In his words, the results of the
investigation will be published once completed only if a consensus
agreement of all parties that have signed the agreement prevails.
Any one of the signatories has the right to veto the publication of the
results of the investigation without explanation.
Following the signing of this agreement, the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine ratified
the agreement and allowed for the participation of Malaysian staff to
participate in the investigation.
International experts admit that for the survey of the wreck Malaysian Boeing
777 will take several weeks.
The second phase will involve searches pertaining to the remains of the victims
of the crash of flight MH17.
Thus, it is safe to assume the results of the investigation are actually
classified and the final expert opinion will not be released.
(or only after a few years, when the political causes of the disaster will lose
The conclusion is simple
- the intermediate results of the investigation directly
prove the innocence of Russia and/or the Donesk militia."
Comment: Imagine if Russia were involved. Would the West
support such a veto?! All evidence points to Kiev's involvement, and yet, if
this report is true, they have the authority to block the release of conclusions
if they don't like the results! How's that for transparency?