[ Media ] [ Propaganda ] [ Fake terror ] [ Covert operations ] [ Corporations ] [ NESARA ] [ new world order ] [ Science ] [ Hidden technology ] [ Money ] [ Illuminati ] [ Feminism ] [ Fake mental health ] [ Scientology ] [ Religion ] [ Zionism ] [ The Galactic Federation ] [ A new paradigm ] [ Quotes ] [ Reading ] [ Links ]
"When you have ruled
out the impossible, then whatever remains, no matter how improbable, is the
Detective writer Arthur
author of the Sherlock Holmes series
Most people fail to use logical reasoning processes to
determine the truth of a matter
The reasoning process
We are all products of our cultural and social
conditioning to some extent and it is generally considered that progressive
changes in culture are the natural result of the evolution of our society. It
may come as a surprise to discover that the illuminati have had think tanks,
behavioural scientists and professional opinion makers working very hard to push
their agenda on to an unsuspecting world.
The very nature of our existence as a race has been played around with and
manipulated for a long time, possibly since ancient Egypt. (The illuminati are
probably a more recent manifestation of a force that has been operating for much
longer to control and manipulate.) The goal of the illuminati is to lead us down the road to a
totalitarian dictatorship under a one world government where personal liberties
are gone and every country and person is subject to their control.
probable that most ideas commonly held by society are nothing but a product of
these manipulations. We need to take back our thinking processes and stop
taking the word of "experts" and "reliable sources".
A rational approach to life is based on sound reasoning --
not emotional reactions or conditioned responses.
Most people have built in "slides" that short circuit the minds critical examination process
when it comes to certain sensitive topics. "Slides" is a CIA term for a conditioned type of response which dead-ends
a persons thinking, and terminates debate or examination of the topic.
For example, the mention of the word "conspiracy" usually solicits a
slide response with many people.
--Fritz Springmeier, author of The Top 13
Illuminati Bloodlines and de-programmer http://www.newworldpeace.com/911menu3.html
Sinbad's bullshit detector
Logic n. Science of Reasoning; proof, thinking, or inference [Concise
Logic allows us to analyse a piece of reasoning and determine whether it is
correct or not (valid or invalid).
The building blocks of a Logical argument are Propositions (Statements). A
Proposition can be Asserted (said to be True) or Denied (Said to
A sound argument is a valid argument whose premises are true. A sound
argument therefore arrives at a true conclusion. Be careful not to confuse
valid arguments with sound arguments.
The point of an argument is to give reasons in support of some conclusion. An
argument commits a fallacy when the reasons offered do not, in fact, support the
See website for a list of logical fallacies -http://www.think.i12.com/fallacies.html#PrejudicialLanguage
Logic of the mole
Implies a one dimensional linear approach to problem solving that rules out
other levels of intelligence. In the case of the mole for example, surface area,
Conspirators' Hierarchy: The story of the Committee of 300
By Dr John Coleman
Opinion-makers have played no-small-part in this war on the United States; we
need to examine the role of the Committee of 300 in bringing-about these
far-reaching changes and how the social-engineers have used
central-systems-analyses to keep public-opinion from expressing anything other
than the policies of the invisible government. How and where did it all begin?
From documents covering the First World War that I was able to gather and
examine in the War Office in Whitehall, London, it appears that the Royal
Institute for International Affairs was commissioned by the Committee of 300 to
do a study of manipulating war-information. This task was given to Lord
Northcliffe and Lord Rothmere and Arnold Toynbee, who was MI6's agent at the
RIIA. Lord Rothmere's family owned a newspaper which was used to support various
government positions, so it was thought that the paper could change
public-perceptions, especially among the ranks of growing opposition to the war.
The project was housed in Wellington House, named after the Duke of Wellesly.
American specialists drafted to help Lords Rothmere and Northcliffe included
Edward Bernays and Walter Lippmann. The group held "brain storming"
sessions to work-out techniques for mobilizing mass-support for the war,
especially among the working-class people whose sons were expected to go to the
slaughter-fields of Flanders in record-numbers.
Using Lord Rothmere's newspaper, new manipulative techniques were tried-out
and, after a period of about 6 months, it was apparent that they were a success.
What the researchers discovered was that only a very small group of people
understood the process of reasoning and the ability to observe the problem as
opposed to passing an opinion on it. This, said Lord Rothmere, was the way in
which 87% of the British public approached the war, and that the same principle
applied not only to the war, but to every conceivable problem in society in
In this manner, irrationality was elevated to a high level of
public-consciousness. The manipulators then played-upon this to undermine and
distract the public's grasp of reality governing any given situation and, the
more complex the problems of a modern industrial society became, the easier it
became to bring greater and greater distractions to bear, so that what we
ended-up-with was that the absolutely-inconsequential-opinions of masses of
people, created by skilled-manipulators, assumed the position of
Having literally stumbled upon so profound a conclusion, the manipulators put
it to one test after another during the war, so that in spite of hundreds of
thousands of the youth of Britain being slaughtered on the battlefields of
France, there was virtually no opposition to the bloody war. Records of the time
show that by 1917, just before the United States entered the war, 94% of the
British working-class bearing the brunt of the war did not have the faintest
idea what they were fighting for, other than the image created by the
media-manipulators that the Germans were a horrible race, bent upon destroying
their monarch and their country, and who had to be wiped off the face of the
Certainly nothing has changed because, in 1991, we had the exact same
situation created by the news-media which allowed President Bush to flagrantly
violate the Constitution in waging a war-of-genocide against the nation of Iraq
with the full consent of 87% of the American people.
On instructions from President Wilson, or rather Colonel House, the Creel
Commission was created and, as far as can be ascertained, the Creel Commission
was the first organization in the United States to use the RIIA techniques and
methodology for polling and mass-propaganda. The psychological-warfare
experiments perfected at Wellington House were used in the Second World War with
equal success, and have been in continuous use in the massive psychological-war
against the United States which began in 1946. The methods did not change, only
the target. Now it was not German worker-housing but the middle class of the
United States that became the focus of the attack.
As so often happens, the conspirators could not contain their glee. After WW
I, in 1922 to be precise, Lippmann detailed the work done by the RIIA in a book
he called "PUBLIC OPINION":
"Public opinion deals with indirect, unseen and puzzling facts, and
there is nothing obvious about them. The situations to which public opinion
refers are known only as opinions, pictures inside heads of human+beings,
pictures of themselves, of others, of their needs, purposes and relationships,
are their public-opinions. These pictures which are acted-upon by groups of
people, or by individuals acting in the name of groups are PUBLIC OPINION with
capital letters. The picture inside the head often misleads men in their
dealings with the world outside of their heads."
The Skill Of Lying, The
Art Of Deceit
by Fritz Springmeier
The Illuminati have refined the art of
deception far beyond what the common man has imagined. The very
life & liberty of humanity requires the unmasking of their
deceptions. That is what this book is about. Honesty is a
necessary ingredient for any society to function successfully.
Deception has become a national pastime, starting with our
business and political leaders and cascading down to the grass
roots. The deceptions of the Illuminati's mind-control may be
hidden, but in their wake they are leaving tidal waves of
distrust that are destroying America. While the CIA pretend to
have our nation's best interest at heart, anyone who has
seriously studied the consequences of deception on a society
will tell you that deception will seriously damage any society
until it collapses.
Lies seriously damage a community, because
trust and honesty are essential to communication and
productivity. Trust in some form is a foundation upon which
humans build relationships. When trust is shattered human
institutions collapse. If a person distrusts the words of
another person, he will have difficulty also trusting that the
person will treat him fairly, have his best interests at heart,
and refrain from harming him. With such fears, an atmosphere of
death is created that will eventually work to destroy or wear
down the cooperation that people need. The millions of victims
of total mind-control are stripped of all trust, and they
quietly spread their fears and distrust on a subconscious level
throughout society. One problem about lies is that one lie will
call for another and then another. It's hard to keep lies
single. They seem to want to breed more of their kind to protect
Soon the liar becomes a victim of his own lies,
trapped in a dishonest web that demands lots of energy to
protect his false fronts. This is the sad fate that the
intelligence agencies have painted themselves into. They must
maintain groups that oversee their double-agents' lies to insure
that the lies that they have disseminated don't contradict
themselves. Finally, they have put out so much disinformation,
they lose track of reality themselves. Far from saving this
nation, the intelligence agencies have spread the cancer of
deception into all walks of life, so that this cancer is
contaminating and killing anything of value in the United
States. The soon-to-come death of this nation's sovereignty, as
well as the destruction of this nation's morals are the results
of this cancer.
DECEPTION DIMINISHES POWER
Knowledge is power, and lies diminish the
knowledge of deceived dupes, and therefore diminishes the power
of the deceived. Deception obscures the alternatives that people
have. It also clouds up various objectives people would work
toward. Some people give up certain objectives due to their mis-perceptions
that the objective is undesirable or unattainable.
The War's On and the Front Line's Your Brain
"You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in
"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in
the major media." --William Colby, former CIA Director
ARE YOU A FREE THINKER OR ARE YOU SPOON FED YOUR OPINIONS BY THE POWERS
TAKE THE TEST.
1) Do you stand by your convictions, or do you routinely change your opinions
when you find out that most people think the opposite way?
2) Do you research things yourself, or do you trust others to do the work for
3) Do you fall for the statistics, "experts", and official opinions
quoted by others without checking these sources out?
4) Do you feel that you have to quote these same sources whenever you say
anything? Does it make you feel uncomfortable just to state an opinion simply
because you personally believe it?
5) Do you believe that the majority is always correct, and because of this,
it is advantageous to see how most people act before you make your decisions?
If you aren't in charge of your own thoughts and opinions, than someone
else is. You have an opinion you say?
How can you be sure it's really yours?
"The greatest trick the devil ever pulled was convincing
the world he didn't exist." Verbal Kint from The Usual Suspects
Does a person who is brain washed know that he is brainwashed?
No. That simple realization is the beginning of mental freedom.
Only a Fool Feels Secure in a Fool's Paradise
How are you being manipulated?
1) Pressure from above and below
This form of manipulation is based on a knowledge of human nature. It's a fact
that most people want to be on the winning side. If it can be made to seem that
"most people" support an idea, the vast percentage of a population
will jump on the bandwagon in spite of the population's original opinions.
First, you create the impression from above; someone in government or in the
media touts an idea. Then you push the idea from below: any demonstration or
grass roots activity that you can highlighted in the press can be used to give
the impression that the average person supports the idea. You've now
"sandwiched" the majority of the population. The average man looks
above him and sees support for the idea.. he looks below and sees support there
also. He will then ask himself, "Am I the only one who thinks this is
crazy?" and, because an impression of vast support has been created (by a
small number of people), the average citizen will then begin to change his
opinion. Manipulators know, that as far as control is concerned, it doesn't
matter what the truth is if you can create a belief in your target audience.
2) Through the creation of a false "prominence of being"
This is manipulation through exposure. The more a population is exposed to
something, the more that population will think that the thing is important or
prevalent. Unfortunately, what that population doesn't realize is that the
expressed idea or opinion isn't very important or prominent at all. That
impression is only being given to them through "control of exposure
time". The longer the exposure can be maintained, the more likely it is
that peoples' opinions will actually change. Why? Because people want to be on
the winning side.
3) By appeals to emotion in spite of a person's or organization's actions
Prominent psychologists (Kolberg among them) have suggested that only ten
percent of the population ever reason at the highest, or adult level. It's a sad
fact that most people decide what is true and what is not true by consciously or
unconsciously basing their opinions on what makes them feel good at the moment.
"It feels good, so it must be true." Psychologists have identified
this as one of the "cognitive distortions" (or thinking errors). If
you regularly engage in this cognitive distortion then you have opened yourself
up to being manipulated by those that will utilize this weakness. Those that are
most easily manipulated say, "I feel it so it must be so." Those that
reason at the adult level say, "I want to know the truth in spite of how I
may feel right now. If my emotions conflict with the truth, I will work on
lining my emotions up with what I now know is going on."
4) Through a belief in "collectivism"
This is the belief that individuals exist for the service of, or benefit of,
larger organizations. "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what
you can do for your country." This lie belittles the importance of the
individual and benefits those already in power and those who use institutions of
government and media for their own selfish purposes. Collectivism also creates
the illusion that the individual is obsolete as a power base, when in fact, a
society is only as strong as its individuals, and all great ideas, things, and
organizations are started and maintained by strong individuals. A belief in
collectivism also falsely promotes the idea that great things can't be done by
the common man; great things must always be done through existing institutions
and already powerful organizations. Again, this is a lie being sold to keep
those in power from being challenged. The destructiveness of collectivism
doesn't end there. It is also used to justify unjust laws in the guise of
"public safety" and lowers all of society to the lowest common
denominator. If someone abuses their free agency and commits a crime in one
location, because we are now mentally joined in a collective, laws must be
created that now "protect" (in reality "punish") everyone
everywhere. Even a child knows that it's wrong for one person to be punished for
the actions of another. But through the promotion of collectivism, even
intelligent individuals are fooled into believing that these same actions
performed through law and organizations are now right and justified.
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little
temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" --Ben Franklin
5) Through word manipulation and hypnotic speech
How you every noticed that many of those who promote being "open
minded" are only interested in having you be open minded to their ideas,
while they feel perfectly justified in maneuvering for a monopoly of opinion?
One of the ways they do this is through word manipulation. The idea is to
immediately label your opponent with an unsavory term, thereby letting people's
already negative feeling ties to that term do the work for you. Those who aren't
interested in fairness and the pursuit of truth use this tactic to slant an
argument in their favor by ensuring that the opposing side is never even
considered. Many of those who recognize the unfairness of stereotyping don't
realize that they are engaging in the exact tactic they profess to hate when
they simplify an opponent's opinions to unsavory sound bites and discounting
terminology. This tactic is hypnotic in that it drops people into feeling states
immediately and bypassed an individual's conscious reasoning abilities. If an
idea is right it will stand on its own; only questionable ideas need the support
of inflammatory speech patterns.
6) Through the use of the "sandwich smear"
This is also known as the "propaganda of the lump". This is the
technique of lumping legitimate groups with good ideas together with violent,
racist, or radical groups that have already been discounted. The legitimate
group suffers from the created association when no actual association exists.
This is a common tactic used by today's media. By mentioning a good group in the
same breath as a despicable one--or better yet, "sandwiched" in speech
or print between two despicable groups--the manipulators bamboozles the target
audience into associating the negative feeling it has for the bad group with the
group that is now being unfairly persecuted.
7) Through slant and omission.
These go hand in hand with creating a false prominence of being. Think of it
this way: if a baseball player strikes out 9 out of 10 times but I only
highlight and mention the time he got a hit, I will give the impression that he
is a better baseball player than he really is. People are manipulated constantly
with this technique and are often kept from more correct views of reality
because they have only been shown events and news stories that aren't typical of
what is generally happening.
See Greenops website for more manipulation tactics
Those who are intellectually honest spend their time and energy in the
pursuit of truth. Those who are easily manipulated, are in the pursuit of self
justification and short-term emotional pleasure. Are you intellectually honest?
Are you willing to forego short-term pleasure for long-term happiness?
GREENOPS SISTER WEBSITE
Books to Read
1) And Not a Shot is Fired -
by Jan Kozak
This is a heck of a book and is a must reading. This book details how the
communists took over Czechoslovakia at the end of WWII. That was then and this
is now, right? WRONG. The tactics they used are being used on you.
2) Masters of Deceit -
by J. Edgar Hoover
Many "communist tactics" are still being used today on unsuspecting
individuals and cultures. Read this book and learn what these tactics are.
Remember, the best way to defeat an enemy is to know that enemy.
3) The Law -
by Frederic Bastiat
This is the political education you never received in school. I challenge you to
quibble with Bastiat's reasoning. It's an exercise in futility because his
reasoning is rock solid.
4) Changing Commands -
by John F. McManus
This book gives you an alternative view of history since WWII. Read it and then
verify what it says through other sources. If what you find out doesn't make you
question what you've been taught, quick!, check your pulse.. you may be dead.
THE LAW OF HONESTY
This Awareness indicates the Law of Honesty is that Law which sees things
as they are, without an attempt to alter that which is seen, either for purposes
of advantage or out of fear.
little hard to believe?
How new beliefs have a ripple effect throughout a person's thinking as cognitions
are adjusted to fit the new information.
theory of cognitive dissonance
Cognitive Dissonance Theory, developed by Leon Festinger (1957), is concerned
with the relationships among cognitions. A cognition, for the purpose of this
theory, may be thought of as a "piece of knowledge". The knowledge may be
about an attitude, an emotion, a behavior, a value, and so on. For example, the
knowledge that you like the color red is a cognition; the knowledge that you
caught a touchdown pass is a cognition; the knowledge that the Supreme Court
outlawed school segregation is a cognition. People hold a multitude of
cognitions simultaneously, and these cognitions form irrelevant, consonant
dissonant [disagreeable] relationships with one another.
Cognitive Irrelevance probably describes the bulk of the relationships among
a personšs cognitions. Irrelevance simply means that the two cognitions have
nothing to do with each other. Two cognitions are consonant if one cognition
follows from, or fits with, the other. People like consonance among their
cognitions. We do not know whether this stems from the nature of the human
organism or whether it is learned during the process of socialization, but
people appear to prefer cognitions that fit together to those that do not. It is
this simple observation that gives the theory of cognitive dissonance its
Two cognitions are said to be dissonant if one cognition follows from the
opposite of another. What happens to people when they discover dissonant
cognitions? The answer to this question forms the basic postulate of Festingeršs
theory. A person who has dissonant or discrepant cognitions is said to be in a
state of psychological dissonance, which is experienced as unpleasant
psychological tension. This tension state has drive-like properties that are
much like those of hunger and thirst. When a person has been deprived of food
for several hours, he/she experiences unpleasant tension and is driven to reduce
the unpleasant tension state that results. Reducing the psychological sate of
dissonance is not as simple as eating or drinking however.
To understand the alternatives open to an individual in a state of
dissonance, we must first understand the factors that affect the magnitude of
dissonance arousal. First, in its simplest form, dissonance increases as the
degree of discrepancy among cognitions increases. Second, dissonance increases
as the number of discrepant cognitions increases. Third, dissonance is inversely
proportional to the number of consonant cognitions held by an individual.
Fourth, the relative weights given to the consonant and dissonant cognitions may
be adjusted by their importance in the mind of the individual.
If dissonance is experienced as an unpleasant drive state, the individual is
motivated to reduce it. Now that the factors that affect the magnitude of this
unpleasantness have been identified, it should be possible to predict what we
can do to reduce it:
1. Changing Cognitions
If two cognitions are discrepant, we can simply change one to make it
consistent with the other. Or we can change each cognition in the direction
of the other.
2. Adding Cognitions
If two cognitions cause a certain magnitude of dissonance, that magnitude
can be reduced by adding one or more consonant cognitions.
3. Altering importance
Since the discrepant and consonant cognitions must be weighed by
importance, it may be advantageous to alter the importance of the various
"There are no contradictions in reality, only confused facts and false
premises." --William R. Lynne, Pentagon Aliens.
"You may either consider this as fiction, fact, or a mixture of fact and
fiction. That decision is always up to the individual, for, to paraphrase
Aristotle, we are never lied to; we must first lie to ourselves before we can
accept a lie as the truth." --William R. Lynne, Pentagon Aliens.
"It is impossible to "believe" a lie. Why? Because, in order
to "believe" something, one must have some "means by which they
know it to be true". Since a lie is untrue, the means is non-existent, and
what is purported to be the means, is first a lie to oneself, an agreement with
the self to believe a lie." --William R. Lynne, Pentagon Aliens.
"How", you may ask, "...could the CIA (or its affiliates)
plant ancient 'Vimana' material in ancient Hindu or Sanskrit manuscripts?"
It should not amaze you to know that many of the 'interpreters' of such works
were often East Indians with Oxford or Cambridge degrees, who worked with
British intelligence and MI-5, and OSS in the WWII Asian Theater, and that
intelligence agencies hire many such scholars and finance their work. Their
interpretations are often a matter of ...interpretation." --William R.
Lynne, Pentagon Aliens.
"The [OSI] dupes are usually chosen by personality profile, epistemology
(must be Platonist), religiousity (also Platonist), as well as possibly
neurological abnormalities such as certain sleep disorders, any or all of which
may render them especially vulnerable to the 'manufacturing' process. p.17