[ Science ] [ Illuminati ] [ NESARA ] [ new world order ] [ Hidden technology ] [ Money ] [ Scientology ] [ Fake mental health ] [ Media ] [ Propaganda ] [ Fake terror ] [ Covert operations ] [ Religion ] [ Zionism ] [ Reading ] [ Links ]

The reasoning process

We are all products of our cultural and social conditioning to some extent and it is generally considered that progressive changes in culture are the natural result of the evolution of our society. It may come as a surprise to discover that the illuminati have had think tanks, behavioural scientists and professional opinion makers working very hard to push their agenda on to an unsuspecting world. 

The very nature of our existence as a race has been played around with and manipulated for a long time, possibly since ancient Egypt. (The illuminati are probably a more recent manifestation of a force that has been operating for much longer to control and manipulate.) The goal of the illuminati is to lead us down the road to a totalitarian dictatorship under a one world government where personal liberties are gone and every country and person is subject to their control. 

Its entirely probable that most ideas commonly held by society are nothing but a product of these manipulations.  We need to take back our thinking processes and stop taking the word of "experts" and "reliable sources".

A rational approach to life is based on sound reasoning -- not emotional reactions or conditioned responses. 

Logic

Sinbad's bullshit detector
http://www.think.i12.com/fallacies.html#PrejudicialLanguage

Logic n. Science of Reasoning; proof, thinking, or inference [Concise OED].

Logic allows us to analyse a piece of reasoning and determine whether it is correct or not (valid or invalid).

The building blocks of a Logical argument are Propositions (Statements). A Proposition can be Asserted (said to be True) or Denied (Said to be False).

A sound argument is a valid argument whose premises are true. A sound argument therefore arrives at a true conclusion. Be careful not to confuse valid arguments with sound arguments.

The point of an argument is to give reasons in support of some conclusion. An argument commits a fallacy when the reasons offered do not, in fact, support the conclusion.

See website for a list of logical fallacies -http://www.think.i12.com/fallacies.html#PrejudicialLanguage

Logic of the mole 

Implies a one dimensional linear approach to problem solving that rules out other levels of intelligence. In the case of the mole for example, surface area, volume etc.

Conspirators' Hierarchy: The story of the Committee of 300
By Dr John Coleman

Opinion-makers have played no-small-part in this war on the United States; we need to examine the role of the Committee of 300 in bringing-about these far-reaching changes and how the social-engineers have used central-systems-analyses to keep public-opinion from expressing anything other than the policies of the invisible government. How and where did it all begin?

From documents covering the First World War that I was able to gather and examine in the War Office in Whitehall, London, it appears that the Royal Institute for International Affairs was commissioned by the Committee of 300 to do a study of manipulating war-information. This task was given to Lord Northcliffe and Lord Rothmere and Arnold Toynbee, who was MI6's agent at the RIIA. Lord Rothmere's family owned a newspaper which was used to support various government positions, so it was thought that the paper could change public-perceptions, especially among the ranks of growing opposition to the war.

The project was housed in Wellington House, named after the Duke of Wellesly. American specialists drafted to help Lords Rothmere and Northcliffe included Edward Bernays and Walter Lippmann. The group held "brain storming" sessions to work-out techniques for mobilizing mass-support for the war, especially among the working-class people whose sons were expected to go to the slaughter-fields of Flanders in record-numbers.

Using Lord Rothmere's newspaper, new manipulative techniques were tried-out and, after a period of about 6 months, it was apparent that they were a success. What the researchers discovered was that only a very small group of people understood the process of reasoning and the ability to observe the problem as opposed to passing an opinion on it. This, said Lord Rothmere, was the way in which 87% of the British public approached the war, and that the same principle applied not only to the war, but to every conceivable problem in society in general.

In this manner, irrationality was elevated to a high level of public-consciousness. The manipulators then played-upon this to undermine and distract the public's grasp of reality governing any given situation and, the more complex the problems of a modern industrial society became, the easier it became to bring greater and greater distractions to bear, so that what we ended-up-with was that the absolutely-inconsequential-opinions of masses of people, created by skilled-manipulators, assumed the position of scientific-fact.

Having literally stumbled upon so profound a conclusion, the manipulators put it to one test after another during the war, so that in spite of hundreds of thousands of the youth of Britain being slaughtered on the battlefields of France, there was virtually no opposition to the bloody war. Records of the time show that by 1917, just before the United States entered the war, 94% of the British working-class bearing the brunt of the war did not have the faintest idea what they were fighting for, other than the image created by the media-manipulators that the Germans were a horrible race, bent upon destroying their monarch and their country, and who had to be wiped off the face of the earth.

Certainly nothing has changed because, in 1991, we had the exact same situation created by the news-media which allowed President Bush to flagrantly violate the Constitution in waging a war-of-genocide against the nation of Iraq with the full consent of 87% of the American people.

On instructions from President Wilson, or rather Colonel House, the Creel Commission was created and, as far as can be ascertained, the Creel Commission was the first organization in the United States to use the RIIA techniques and methodology for polling and mass-propaganda. The psychological-warfare experiments perfected at Wellington House were used in the Second World War with equal success, and have been in continuous use in the massive psychological-war against the United States which began in 1946. The methods did not change, only the target. Now it was not German worker-housing but the middle class of the United States that became the focus of the attack.

As so often happens, the conspirators could not contain their glee. After WW I, in 1922 to be precise, Lippmann detailed the work done by the RIIA in a book he called "PUBLIC OPINION":

"Public opinion deals with indirect, unseen and puzzling facts, and there is nothing obvious about them. The situations to which public opinion refers are known only as opinions, pictures inside heads of human+beings, pictures of themselves, of others, of their needs, purposes and relationships, are their public-opinions. These pictures which are acted-upon by groups of people, or by individuals acting in the name of groups are PUBLIC OPINION with capital letters. The picture inside the head often misleads men in their dealings with the world outside of their heads."

The Skill Of Lying, The Art Of Deceit 
by Fritz Springmeier

11-16-00
http://www.rense.com/general5/dis1.htm

The Illuminati have refined the art of deception far beyond what the common man has imagined. The very life & liberty of humanity requires the unmasking of their deceptions. That is what this book is about. Honesty is a necessary ingredient for any society to function successfully. Deception has become a national pastime, starting with our business and political leaders and cascading down to the grass roots. The deceptions of the Illuminati's mind-control may be hidden, but in their wake they are leaving tidal waves of distrust that are destroying America. While the CIA pretend to have our nation's best interest at heart, anyone who has seriously studied the consequences of deception on a society will tell you that deception will seriously damage any society until it collapses. 

Lies seriously damage a community, because trust and honesty are essential to communication and productivity. Trust in some form is a foundation upon which humans build relationships. When trust is shattered human institutions collapse. If a person distrusts the words of another person, he will have difficulty also trusting that the person will treat him fairly, have his best interests at heart, and refrain from harming him. With such fears, an atmosphere of death is created that will eventually work to destroy or wear down the cooperation that people need. The millions of victims of total mind-control are stripped of all trust, and they quietly spread their fears and distrust on a subconscious level throughout society. One problem about lies is that one lie will call for another and then another. It's hard to keep lies single. They seem to want to breed more of their kind to protect themselves. 

Soon the liar becomes a victim of his own lies, trapped in a dishonest web that demands lots of energy to protect his false fronts. This is the sad fate that the intelligence agencies have painted themselves into. They must maintain groups that oversee their double-agents' lies to insure that the lies that they have disseminated don't contradict themselves. Finally, they have put out so much disinformation, they lose track of reality themselves. Far from saving this nation, the intelligence agencies have spread the cancer of deception into all walks of life, so that this cancer is contaminating and killing anything of value in the United States. The soon-to-come death of this nation's sovereignty, as well as the destruction of this nation's morals are the results of this cancer. 

DECEPTION DIMINISHES POWER

Knowledge is power, and lies diminish the knowledge of deceived dupes, and therefore diminishes the power of the deceived. Deception obscures the alternatives that people have. It also clouds up various objectives people would work toward. Some people give up certain objectives due to their mis-perceptions that the objective is undesirable or unattainable.

The War's On and the Front Line's Your Brain
http://members.aol.com/opsgreen/

"You may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you" 
--Leon Trotsky

"The Central Intelligence Agency owns everyone of any significance in the major media."  --William Colby, former CIA Director

ARE YOU A FREE THINKER OR ARE YOU SPOON FED YOUR OPINIONS BY THE POWERS THAT BE? 

TAKE THE TEST.

1)  Do you stand by your convictions, or do you routinely change your opinions when you find out that most people think the opposite way?

2)  Do you research things yourself, or do you trust others to do the work for you?

3)  Do you fall for the statistics, "experts", and official opinions quoted by others without checking these sources out?

4)  Do you feel that you have to quote these same sources whenever you say anything? Does it make you feel uncomfortable just to state an opinion simply because you personally believe it?

5)  Do you believe that the majority is always correct, and because of this, it is advantageous to see how most people act before you make your decisions?

Only a Fool Feels Secure in a Fool's Paradise

How are you being manipulated?

1)  Pressure from above and below

This form of manipulation is based on a knowledge of human nature. It's a fact that most people want to be on the winning side. If it can be made to seem that "most people" support an idea, the vast percentage of a population will jump on the bandwagon in spite of the population's original opinions. First, you create the impression from above; someone in government or in the media touts an idea. Then you push the idea from below: any demonstration or grass roots activity that you can highlighted in the press can be used to give the impression that the average person supports the idea. You've now "sandwiched" the majority of the population. The average man looks above him and sees support for the idea.. he looks below and sees support there also. He will then ask himself, "Am I the only one who thinks this is crazy?" and, because an impression of vast support has been created (by a small number of people), the average citizen will then begin to change his opinion. Manipulators know, that as far as control is concerned, it doesn't matter what the truth is if you can create a belief in your target audience.

2)  Through the creation of a false "prominence of being"

This is manipulation through exposure. The more a population is exposed to something, the more that population will think that the thing is important or prevalent. Unfortunately, what that population doesn't realize is that the expressed idea or opinion isn't very important or prominent at all. That impression is only being given to them through "control of exposure time". The longer the exposure can be maintained, the more likely it is that peoples' opinions will actually change. Why? Because people want to be on the winning side.

3)  By appeals to emotion in spite of a person's or organization's actions

Prominent psychologists (Kolberg among them) have suggested that only ten percent of the population ever reason at the highest, or adult level. It's a sad fact that most people decide what is true and what is not true by consciously or unconsciously basing their opinions on what makes them feel good at the moment. "It feels good, so it must be true." Psychologists have identified this as one of the "cognitive distortions" (or thinking errors). If you regularly engage in this cognitive distortion then you have opened yourself up to being manipulated by those that will utilize this weakness. Those that are most easily manipulated say, "I feel it so it must be so." Those that reason at the adult level say, "I want to know the truth in spite of how I may feel right now. If my emotions conflict with the truth, I will work on lining my emotions up with what I now know is going on."

4)  Through a belief in "collectivism"

This is the belief that individuals exist for the service of, or benefit of, larger organizations. "Ask not what your country can do for you, ask what you can do for your country." This lie belittles the importance of the individual and benefits those already in power and those who use institutions of government and media for their own selfish purposes. Collectivism also creates the illusion that the individual is obsolete as a power base, when in fact, a society is only as strong as its individuals, and all great ideas, things, and organizations are started and maintained by strong individuals. A belief in collectivism also falsely promotes the idea that great things can't be done by the common man; great things must always be done through existing institutions and already powerful organizations. Again, this is a lie being sold to keep those in power from being challenged. The destructiveness of collectivism doesn't end there. It is also used to justify unjust laws in the guise of "public safety" and lowers all of society to the lowest common denominator. If someone abuses their free agency and commits a crime in one location, because we are now mentally joined in a collective, laws must be created that now "protect" (in reality "punish") everyone everywhere. Even a child knows that it's wrong for one person to be punished for the actions of another. But through the promotion of collectivism, even intelligent individuals are fooled into believing that these same actions performed through law and organizations are now right and justified.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety" --Ben Franklin

5)  Through word manipulation and hypnotic speech

How you every noticed that many of those who promote being "open minded" are only interested in having you be open minded to their ideas, while they feel perfectly justified in maneuvering for a monopoly of opinion? One of the ways they do this is through word manipulation. The idea is to immediately label your opponent with an unsavory term, thereby letting people's already negative feeling ties to that term do the work for you. Those who aren't interested in fairness and the pursuit of truth use this tactic to slant an argument in their favor by ensuring that the opposing side is never even considered. Many of those who recognize the unfairness of stereotyping don't realize that they are engaging in the exact tactic they profess to hate when they simplify an opponent's opinions to unsavory sound bites and discounting terminology. This tactic is hypnotic in that it drops people into feeling states immediately and bypassed an individual's conscious reasoning abilities. If an idea is right it will stand on its own; only questionable ideas need the support of inflammatory speech patterns.

6)  Through the use of the "sandwich smear"

This is also known as the "propaganda of the lump". This is the technique of lumping legitimate groups with good ideas together with violent, racist, or radical groups that have already been discounted. The legitimate group suffers from the created association when no actual association exists. This is a common tactic used by today's media. By mentioning a good group in the same breath as a despicable one--or better yet, "sandwiched" in speech or print between two despicable groups--the manipulators bamboozles the target audience into associating the negative feeling it has for the bad group with the group that is now being unfairly persecuted.

7)  Through slant and omission.

These go hand in hand with creating a false prominence of being. Think of it this way: if a baseball player strikes out 9 out of 10 times but I only highlight and mention the time he got a hit, I will give the impression that he is a better baseball player than he really is. People are manipulated constantly with this technique and are often kept from more correct views of reality because they have only been shown events and news stories that aren't typical of what is generally happening.

See Greenops website for more manipulation tactics
http://members.aol.com/opsgreen/manipulation2.html 

Those who are intellectually honest spend their time and energy in the pursuit of truth. Those who are easily manipulated, are in the pursuit of self justification and short-term emotional pleasure. Are you intellectually honest? Are you willing to forego short-term pleasure for long-term happiness?

GREENOPS SISTER WEBSITE
The Reinforcement's Gazette

Books to Read

 1)  And Not a Shot is Fired - 
    by Jan Kozak
This is a heck of a book and is a must reading. This book details how the communists took over Czechoslovakia at the end of WWII. That was then and this is now, right? WRONG. The tactics they used are being used on you.

2)  Masters of Deceit - 
    by J. Edgar Hoover
Many "communist tactics" are still being used today on unsuspecting individuals and cultures. Read this book and learn what these tactics are. Remember, the best way to defeat an enemy is to know that enemy.

3)  The Law - 
    by Frederic Bastiat
This is the political education you never received in school. I challenge you to quibble with Bastiat's reasoning. It's an exercise in futility because his reasoning is rock solid.