Home

CONSPIRACY  
www.conspiracee.com 

Health v medicine  
www.cellsalts.net
 
www.soiltheory.com

 

Scientology 

Goals of Scientology   

Jan van Helsing excerpt  

Conspiracy against Scientology  

Under attack since 1950s   

The global enslavers 

Scientology infiltrated   
False teachings  
High prices  

Psychiatry 

Citizens Commission on Human Rights (CCHR) 

The Manufacture of Madness 

Purification rundown 

IRS [now] runs scientology 

sc-i-r-s-ology - govt took out  

Politics and tonescale   

Kinesology / e-meter 

Scientology and remote viewing 

 

 

 

 

HEALTH 

ILLUMINATI  

NEW WORLD ORDER 

FAKE MENTAL HEALTH / PSYCHO-POLITICS  

SCIENTOLOGY 

NESARA 

AUSTRALIA  

TERRORISM 

PROPAGANDA 

COVERT OPERATIONS 

SCIENCE   

HIDDEN TECHNOLOGY  

MONEY 

MEDIA  

ZIONISM 

RELIGION 

FURTHER READING  

LINKS

 

 

 

 

 

 

Up ] Disinformation ] Discrediting ] Scientology infiltrated ] Psychiatry ] CCHR ] The Purification Rundown ] [ Sci-integrity ] Definitions ] Kinesiology ] Political spectrum ] Remote viewing ]

 

Conspiracy against Scientology
http://www.hasi.ws 

Why infiltrate and discredit an organisation unless there's something to be kept hidden?

The last corporate entity to practice the subject of Scientology was the Church of Scientology of California. In the early 1980’s a group of conspirators took over the Church. The conspirators dismantled the Church of Scientology of California and replaced it with three new corporations

Church of Spiritual Technology - CST
Religious Technology Center - RTC
Church of Scientology International - CSI

The above three corporate entities market the "Scientology Religion".

The way this is accomplished is that CSI alters, deletes, and fabricates LRH issues such as LRH HCOBs, books, and tapes. RTC then approves these alterations, deletions, and fabrications made to LRH issues by CSI. CST then accepts the "based on the works of LRH" issues and archives them in underground storage vaults "for future generations."

The above three corporate entities are co-conspirators in a fraud being perpetrated on the paying Scientology public. The executives of these corporations and Church promo make the false statement to the paying Scientology public that what they are purchasing and receiving is "pure, unadulterated LRH technology". They make this fraudulent statement while knowing full well that they have made thousands of alterations, deletions, and fabrications to LRH issues.

This Scientology evaluation involves -

Ending an era of false Scientology 

False Scientology began in the 1980s and involved perverting and corrupting the true teachings of L. Ron Hubbard by -

Intentional misapplication of ethics or tech or policy that send a being down tone.
False Scientology is also called Reverse Scientology or Black Scientology.

The evaluation aims to re-establish true Scientology as taught by LRH.

Preliminary Statement 
http://www.scientologyintegrity.org/htmldocs/prelimstatement.shtml 

This statement is for telling you who we are and what this is all about. My name is Mike McClaughry and my wife’s name is Virginia. I joined staff at San Francisco Org in early 1969. My first post was Communication Course supervisor in the Public Division.

SFO was a big org with about 150 staff and about 200 public on lines at all times. SFO also had a lot of highly trained Tech staff - several Class 8, Class 7, Class 6 and Class 4 auditors. In the summer of 1969 LRH issued the Hubbard Standard Dianetics Course. I took that course along with 200 other students. I was the best Dianetic auditor from that course and I audited in the HGC.

I then became the supervisor of the HSDC course and was also the Case Supervisor for all Dianetic auditing, both student auditors and HGC auditors. I had about 200 students on course and about the same number of cases I was C/Sing for. I also did cramming on Dianetic auditors.

When I was on staff I worked in both orgs so I was there all day long 7 days a week. After several months of wearing several Tech Division hats, the Tech Sec had a meeting of all tech staff and said the rest of the tech staff had to give me a hand with all of these hats I was wearing. He told me I could have any post I wanted as a reward for my work. I said I wanted to be an HGC auditor, because I love to audit.

I became a Class 3 auditor and audited in the HGC for a year. At the time, HGC auditors were auditing 5 to 10 hours a week in the chair. I loved to audit so I stayed in session all day and I set a new HGC pattern by auditing 40 to 50 well done hours per week in the chair. Other HGC auditors then followed my example.

In 1971, the Hubbard Professional Course Supervisor Course came out and the ED of the org wanted me to take it. I wanted to keep auditing but when the ED said that the org would not be allowed to deliver courses without an HPCSC supervisor, I agreed to go.

I then supervised for the next 2 and ½ years. Every course in the org was put into one large room with myself as the supervisor. I had about 200 students on various courses. My academy produced over 400 Class 4 auditors per year. The ED told me that 90% of my course graduates resigned for another service. Years later my students would come up to me and say I was the best supervisor on the planet, and that included Flag supervisors.

In the Fall of 1973 I was asked to join the Intelligence unit of the Guardian’s Office. I said no to that, I love the tech and I want to stay in the tech division. They persisted and said I would be doing 4th dynamic auditing and that I could go up to OT 4 if I would join. So, I did.

While in training at the United States Guardian’s Office, I read LRH issues wherein he said not to do anything illegal. I found out this policy was being violated and asked the Deputy Guardian for Intelligence at USGO if we did illegal things. He said we cross the line on occasion but then we get back on the right side of the law. I did not report this any further up lines because I was afraid to.

In early 1974 I was solo auditing on the Clearing Course, OT 2 and OT 3. I solo audited 10 to 14 hours per day and was the top solo auditor on AOLA lines. I then went on post in the Intelligence unit at SFO. The post was backlogged, with programs and orders that were years old. All GO posts in the world were backlogged like that. My staff and I did the unheard of - we applied the backlog policy and handled the backlog. Within a year, we had the post in PT, no more undone programs or orders in our area. I also got a lot of products of handled attackers and my seniors said I was the best AG I in the country.

As an Intelligence officer, I committed crimes, such as using lock picks to get into government agency files on Scientology. Committing these crimes was making me physically ill - I didn’t like it, but I did not know how to gracefully extract myself from the GO and get back into tech where I really wanted to be.

In 1977 the FBI raided the USGO for infiltrating US government offices in Washington DC. I felt bad about that and looked at my failure to report the criminal activity further up lines than I did. I did promise myself I would never back down in applying KSW again, as I saw how much destruction can be caused by that. I have kept that promise to myself.

In 1979, I was asked to be the Security Officer at USGO. I took that post as a way of getting out of committing any more crimes. I held that post until the GO was disbanded in 1981. I was told I was in no trouble and that I could have any post I wanted in any org.

I then went to a meeting wherein I saw the new ED Int talking and when he finished, he and several other Sea Org members armed with wooden swords, marched out. They looked like “goose stepping” Nazis to me and I wanted no part of that so I left staff.

In June 1983, Virginia left the Sea Org to help her father plus raise her children outside the Sea Org. I then met and married Virginia and between us we had five children to raise. We basically spent the next seventeen years raising children and Virginia also did her OT levels up through and onto OT 7. By 1998, she had been on OT 7 for over eight years.

In 1998 Virginia was at Flag for a six-month sec check that is required of OT 7s. She had come across an HCOB - CS Series 73RB - that said if a person is doing well on OT 7, they should not be interrupted with sec checks or anything else. This made the 6-month sec checks for OT 7s out tech, if the OT 7 was doing well on the level. Virginia was doing well on the level according to her and her C/S and so she requested Flag to apply CS Series 73 RB and let her go home. Flag and RTC refused to apply the HCOB, to her or anyone else.

Then I got a telephone call from Virginia telling me that Flag and RTC were refusing to apply an HCOB. At the time, I did not know what RTC was or who David Miscavige is. Now in my mind, no one refuses to apply an LRH HCOB, regardless of post title. So, I backed Virginia on applying KSW to whomever was refusing to apply this HCOB. The details of her effort to get this HCOB followed can be found under "An OT 7’s Story."

Virginia was word cleared and checked out on every related issue on the subject of sec checking and passed every issue with full understanding. None of these other issues conflicted with CS Series 73, in fact they reinforced what it said - no interruptions of people doing well on OT 7, with sec checking or anything else. The Flag Qual Sec was impressed with Virginia’s understanding of all of the issues on sec checking and passed her and said she was right. Virginia then asked “so, why can’t we apply CS Series 73?” The answer was - “we can’t because RTC would pull our license to deliver Scientology if we do not do 6-month sec checks on people on OT 7.”

Virginia had a meeting with 3 other OT 7s wherein they discussed CS Series 73 and they decided the right thing to do was to get KSW applied. The Flag Ethics Officer was not at that meeting but she wrote a Knowledge Report about what happened there. The Flag Ethics Officer had interviewed all 4 OT 7s who were present at the meeting and then she invented a false story that conflicts with what the OT 7s told her. Thus started a black propaganda campaign on us that we opposed sec checking. The truth was they were applying KSW to an HCOB that says no sec checking of people on OT 7 if they are doing well on the level.

A Comm Ev was called and they violated policy in refusing to give us a copy of the Bill of Particulars and copies of the knowledge reports on us. The Comm Ev members wanted to know why we wanted copies and we said there are false reports in them that we need to correct. The Comm Ev members said they did not care about that, at which point we knew this was not a fact finding body, but just some people under orders to find us guilty based on false reports. At that point we refused to participate in the squirrel Comm Ev and asked for a new on-policy Comm Ev to be convened. That never happened.

We then found an earlier version of HCOB CS Series 73RB - it was CS Series 73RA. It was written when LRH was alive and was 12 pages long. CS Series 73RB was written after LRH’s death and was only 5 pages long. So, someone had whacked 7 pages out of an LRH issue. We then knew that a major squirrel was at work altering LRH issues and I started an investigation to find out who it was.

We then started finding lots of LRH issues that had been altered, including LRH books and tapes. We then decided to not participate in any further services because we did not want to be part of a squirrel group.

OSA tried to handle us but I only had one question for OSA - are you going to put the LRH issues back into their original form and Comm Ev the responsible squirrels or not? Their answer was no. At which point we started informing other Scientologists about the alterations to LRH issues and then they expelled us to keep us from alerting others about the squirrels.

That is the background on what this is all about. What follows is even more interesting.

I decided to apply the Data Series and do an Evaluation. I started an investigation into Church history to provide the data for the Evaluation. I had been working day and night on the time track of Church history when I decided to take a break and sleep in one morning. I was sleeping in our guest house and no one else was in the house except me. I was then bounced two feet up in the air by a force that hit me on the left shoulder. There was a Being in the room that had a spiritual strength that I have never even imagined could exist. It was Ron.

The first thing Ron said was that I had been sleeping long enough. He wanted me to get up and finish the time track I was working on. He was unhappy with the current Church management, especially for altering his issues. He said that we were responsible for handling the Church.

He was doing his part, and his part had a lot more to do with other factors, than the mere goings on of the Church on planet earth. Most of his time and efforts were spent doing that, but this was one cycle he was attending to, it was important, he was in a hurry, and he wanted to see some fast action to get this off-source management handled. He would enlist the help of some others, so we were not alone. He would do this and that to assist us, he would check up from time to time to see how we were doing, but mainly it was going to be up to us to handle this, as he had other matters to attend to.

And so, a new group was founded. It is an On-Source auditor association. I originally called it the Theta Group, but I have now renamed it - HASI.

An internet group was formed to investigate Church history and over 100 people joined. Its name is COS Investigations. I formed another internet group to analyze the data on the time track of Church history and it is called COS Evaluation. I ran these two groups on a policy of truth. The investigation was unbiased - we simply wanted to know the truth, regardless of how gruesome that truth may be. And so, if anyone could show something on the time track was not true, I changed it to reflect the truth.

Our time track showed that since its inception in 1950, Dianetics has been attacked. Thus it has an enemy. This enemy turns out to be the same people who are the source of Nazi mentality. They have a plan for world dominance that did not end with Hitler’s defeat. They continued their Nazi agenda covertly after WW II. They plan to take control of the planet by forming a One World government by 2015. They are the source of wars and other ills and so they have created a 4th dynamic engram.

The CIA was formed right after WW II out of fragments of the Nazi intelligence network. The head of the CIA was an American Nazi - Allen Dulles. Another Nazi Front Group that was formed right after WW II was the World Federation for Mental Health. It is the members of the WFMH who have been attacking Dianetics and Scientology for decades. The Nazi CIA then used Nazi psychiatrists for its research into mind control - MK Ultra. Thus the Global Enslavers have developed the technology to turn every human being into a robot by implanting a mind-controlling computer chip in their body, and its being done.

Since the Nazis plan to enslave all of mankind, we have named them Global Enslavers.
Scientology is for making Free Beings and that flies in the teeth of the Global Enslaver plan to enslave all human beings. Thus the Nazi Global Enslavers attack Scientology.

In addition, the US Intelligence community was in a Psychic Warfare arms race with Russia in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The Russians were researching using people with psychic powers as a weapon. Psychic Warfare has two main branches - Psychic Spying and Psychic Influencing. Machines were also developed for implanting thoughts into your enemy at a distance, using microwaves. The machines are called psychotronics machines and their waves can also cause illness and death and so they are classified as a biological warfare weapon.

The US intelligence community was way behind Russia in developing Psychic Warfare and to close the Psychic Warfare gap, they infiltrated their agents into AOLA to get their hands on the OT levels. Several of their agents became OTs at AOLA and then they met at Stanford Research Institute and developed Psychic Warfare capabilities for the USA, with CIA funding.

The CIA Scientology OTs at SRI were highly successful at conducting Psychic Spying. They also scientifically proved an OT can effect a magnetic field with his thought. The guidance system for a nuclear weapon is a magnetic field and so they concluded that a Scientology OT might affect the path of a nuclear weapon. This caused an alarm within the US intelligence community because they realized a Scientology OT could spy on the government and might also affect the path of nuclear weapons. Thus they decided that Scientology was a National Security Risk. This gave them another motive for preventing anyone going OT.

Thus a series of events were put into play to take over the Church and sabotage the tech so as to prevent anyone going OT. And, a group of conspirators have done exactly that.

The effort of the Global Enslavers to stop Scientology, has created a 3rd dynamic engram. The subject of Scientology, the Bridge to freedom, is being intentionally sabotaged. Our Evaluation found the top Church management guilty of:

Wilful destruction of the group
Wilful destruction of the technology
Wilful destruction of the end product

The Church statistic on producing OTs is zero. The REASON is - PRACTICING or TOLERATING MISAPPLICATION. In other words, the subject is not being correctly applied per the original LRH issues. Ron has given the HASI three responsibilities:

1. Ensure that actual OTs are produced.
2. Handle the 3rd dynamic engram - the Enslaver takeover of the Church.
3. Handle the 4th dynamic engram - the Enslaver plan for world dominance.

In order to obtain those three products we have created several web sites:

www.hasi.ws is our organization for producing the three products stated above
www.scientologyintegrity.org - presents the time track of Church history and the Evaluation
www.ronstech.org - exposes the intentional misapplication of LRH tech and corrects it
www.ronsorgusa.org - presents the only On-Source course for handling OT 3 to OT 8 case

One more web site will be added to educate Non-Scientologists on the 4th D engram.

Mike McClaughry is the author and editor for all web sites - unless otherwise noted. The above is just hitting on some of the highlights up to the takeover of the Church. After the take over of the Church - the story gets even more interesting. So, who we are is a group of On-Source auditors working directly with Ron to make OTs. Despite the efforts of the Enslavers to sabotage the Bridge, Ron is still putting it there. And that is what this is all about.

Golden Age of Squirreling - Documented
 http://www.scientologyintegrity.org/htmldocs/squirrel_documentation.shtml 

There are thousands of alterations to LRH (L. Ron Hubbard)  issues - this is no effort to document each one. The subject of Scientology, as given in LRH issues, has been replaced by a new subject called the "Scientology Religion".

The subject of Scientology and the "Scientology Religion" are NOT the same thing.

The subject of Scientology is contained in LRH issues only. The "Scientology Religion" has other authors than LRH, and their writings are presented under the legal title "based on the works of LRH."

In October 1993 a booklet was issued entitled Description of the Scientology Religion. This booklet was handed out at the IAS event to announce tax exemption. 

[When did scientology get tax exemption status?]

The booklet defines two words – Scientology, The Scientology religion

It defines Scientology as –

Scientology is an applied religious philosophy. Its goal is to bring an individual to an understanding of himself and his life as a spiritual being and in relationship to the universe as a whole.

It defines the Scientology religion as –

The Scientology religion is based exclusively upon L. Ron Hubbard’s research, writings and recorded lectures.

The key word in the definition of the "Scientology religion" is based upon.

And that is exactly what they have been doing – altering, deleting and fabricating LRH issues and obtaining a new copyright under the legal title "based on the works of LRH." In these new copyrighted works – CSI is the author, not LRH.  In other words – they have replaced LRH as Source! Scientology is the works of LRH where LRH is the author. The "Scientology religion" is based upon the works of LRH, where CSI is the author.

See the difference?

The last corporate entity to practice the subject of Scientology was the Church of Scientology of California. In the early 1980’s a group of conspirators took over the Church. The conspirators dismantled the Church of Scientology of California and replaced it with three new corporations –

Church of Spiritual Technology - CST
Religious Technology Center - RTC
Church of Scientology International - CSI

The above three corporate entities market the "Scientology Religion".

The way this is accomplished is that CSI alters, deletes, and fabricates LRH issues such as LRH HCOBs, books, and tapes. RTC then approves these alterations, deletions, and fabrications made to LRH issues by CSI. CST then accepts the "based on the works of LRH" issues and archives them in underground storage vaults "for future generations."

The above three corporate entities are co-conspirators in a fraud being perpetrated on the paying Scientology public. The executives of these corporations and Church promo make the false statement to the paying Scientology public that what they are purchasing and receiving is "pure, unadulterated LRH technology". They make this fraudulent statement while knowing full well that they have made thousands of alterations, deletions, and fabrications to LRH issues.

The public is in a condition of Confusion. They think they are in the Church of Scientology, receiving Scientology. They are actually in a new corporate structure that markets the "Scientology religion."

The formula for Confusion is – Find Out Where You Are

Alteration of Scientology Axiom 3:

Axiom 3 on page 148 in the LRH book Phoenix Lectures -

Space, Energy, Objects, Form and Time are the result of considerations made and/or agreed upon or not by the static, and are perceived solely because the static considers that it can perceive them.

Axiom 3 on page 73 in the 1988 squirrel CSI Book Scientology 0-8 –

Space, Energy, Objects, Form and Time are the result of considerations made and/or agreed upon by the static, and are perceived solely because the static considers that it can perceive them.

Fabrication of a false datum on Tone Arm Action:

The 1988 Church of Spiritual Technology squirrel version of the book E-Meter Essentials has added this false datum:

An acceptable minimum of Tone Arm motion is 2.5 divisions per hour of auditing.

That false datum does not appear in the original LRH book E-Meter Essentials or any other LRH issue. Some suppressive manufactured that false datum.
Here is a quote from HCOB 25 September 1963 Adequate Tone Arm Motion:

Amount Per Session ------- Session Rating

25 Divs -----------------------Excellent
20 Divs -----------------------Good
15 Divs -----------------------Acceptable
10 Divs -----------------------Poor
5 Divs ------------------------Unacceptable
0 Divs ------------------------Harmful

The above quote shows the amount of tone arm motion for a 2 ½ hour session.

The Church of Spiritual Technology datum says that 2.5 divisions per hour is an acceptable minimum. In other words that datum says that 6.25 divisions per 2 ½ hour session is an acceptable minimum. That datum is false, it takes 15 divisions of tone arm action per 2 ½ hour session to qualify as being acceptable.

(For further data on this suppressive datum - see the link ronstech.org)

Alteration of PDC tape 20:

LRH original PDC tape 20 -

Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is produced.
Did you ever read poor old George Orwell's 1984? Yes, yes, that's wonderful.
That would be--- could be the palest imagined shadow of what a world would be like under the rule of the secret use of Scientology with no remedy in existence.

L. Ron Hubbard library squirrel version of PDC tape 20 -
Therefore, we really do have the remedy before the assault weapon is produced.
The rest is Deleted.

Here is another section of the LRH original PDC tape 20 -

It's a very simple remedy. And that's-just make sure that the remedy is passed along. That's all. Don't horde it, don't hold it; and if you ever do use any Black Dianetics, use it on the guy who pulled Scientology out of sight and made it so it wasn't available. Because he's the boy who would be electing himself "The New Order." And we don't need any more new orders. All those orders, as far as I am concerned, have been filled.

Here is the L. Ron Hubbard library squirrel version of PDC tape 20 -

It's a very simple remedy. And that's-just make sure that the remedy is passed along. That's all. Don't hoard it and don't hold it.

More examples of alterations to LRH tapes:

Over 400 words have been deleted from the LRH tape Studying, Introduction.
Over 600 words have been deleted from the LRH tape Establishment Officer Tape # 1, ESTO’s Instant Hat.

Alteration of HCOB 1 July 1985 CS Series 73 RA:

Here is the end of the 12 page LRH original HCOB C/S Series 73RA-

Due to the tremendous number of technical advances which have been made in the past decade, and the nature of these advances, maintaining the No-Interference Area rules to ensure that pcs move rapidly up the Bridge becomes the responsibility of every org, every mission, every unit and every individual Scientologist on this planet.

It is not only a responsibility. It is a trust.

Here is the end of the 5 page squirrel HCOB 2 August 1990 CS Series 73RB –

DELETED – the above ending is DELETED – along with 7 other pages of the original.
Yet enforcement of the above HCOB was considered vital by LRH.
A study of the LRH original shows that OT 7 is being squirreled.
For a full report on the sabotaging of OT 7 – see An OT 7’s Story.

Fabrication of HCOB 18 June 1990 C/S Series 124:

This HCOB says it is a compilation – but when you look up the LRH references they supposedly compiled it from – you realize its not a compilation at all – they wrote the entire HCOB themselves.

Fabrication of off-source policies called "Scientology Policy Directives"

CSI has authored over a 100 "Scientology Policy Directives." There is no LRH policy that authorizes this type of issue. So orgs are being run on CSI squirrel policy.

Per HCO PL 5 March 1965 Policy: Source Of –

If it is not in an HCO Policy Letter, it is not policy.

Tech degrade

The LRH book Dianetics Today is no longer being printed and sold.

 Tech degrade -

Removal of data on GPMs from LRH tapes.

Per HCOPL 17 June 1970 Technical Degrades …

"…all the material of the Academy and SH courses IS in use."

Commentary:

The Goals Problem Mass is a mental mechanism that LRH gave many lectures on. It is vital case data for auditors, case supervisors, preclears and pre-OTs. The likely justifier for removing data on GPMs is that they are auditied a different way than the original process developed for auditing them. That justifier is invalid, here’s why:

It is vitally important for auditors and case supervisors to understand and recognize mental mechanisms. An auditor is defined as one who listens and computes. What he is computing is - what mental mechanism is currently manifesting in the preclear’s case. He then chooses the correct process to handle that mental mechanism.

Various processes have been developed down through the years to audit engrams. In 1950 they used a process called "repeater technique." Later a process called R3R was developed for running engrams.

Now – just because R3R was developed does not mean that "repeater technique" is no longer ever used. Worse yet, how crazy would it be to delete data about engrams from LRH lectures because a better technique called R3R was developed to run engrams? An auditor needs to understand the mental mechanism called an engram, regardless of what process he is using to run them. The same idea applies to GPMs.

It is insane and suppressive to delete data on GPMs from LRH lectures. It is a mental mechanism that auditors, case supervisors, preclears and pre OTs need to understand, in order to assist them in handling that type of case, regardless of what technique or process they are going to use to handle it.

Alteration of the Auditors’ Code:

Here is the LRH issue of HCOPL 14 October 1968R The Auditor’s Code

I promise to cooperate fully with the legal organizations of Dianetics and Scientology as developed by L. Ron Hubbard in safeguarding the ethical use and practice of the subject according to the basics of Standard Tech.

The 1988 L. Ron Hubbard Library squirrel version in Scientology 0-8

I promise to cooperate fully with the authorized organizations of Dianetics and Scientology in safeguarding the ethical use and practice of those subjects.

Alteration of PDC Tape Two E-Meter: DEMO 1 December 1952:

1986 LRH version

He's learned that if you're agreeing if you're going to do anything physically with the Mest universe...

1991 squirrel version

He's learned that if you're going to do anything physically with the MEST universe...

Alteration of the LRH Book New Slant On Life:


Here is the LRH original book -

The politician, the reporter, the psychiatrist with his electric shock machine, the drug manufacturer, …

Here is the CSI squirrel book -

The politician, the reporter, the medico, the drug manufacturer, …

Note: There are 87 times where they alter LRH’s words in the CSI squirrel book.

 Alteration of LRH book Introduction to Scientology Ethics:

1985 LRH version

No person under sentence or awaiting a Committee of Evidence may petition the Office of LRH.

1998 L. Ron Hubbard Library squirrel version (page 369)

No person under sentence or awaiting a Committee of Evidence may validly petition.

1975 LRH version –

12. Any other answer to a student’s demand for verbal technical or unusual solutions than the permitted:
"The material is in (HCO Bulletin, Policy Letter or tape)."
"What does your material state?"
"What word did you miss in the (Bulletin, Policy Letter or tape)?" and requests for unusual auditing solutions: "What did you actually do?"

1998 L. Ron Hubbard Library squirrel version

Deleted – all of the above is deleted in the squirrel version.

Note:
The alterations to this book are many and not limited to the above examples. This includes squirrel definitions in the Glossary which do not match Tech Dictionary definitions, such as the word Tone Scale.

Dianetics The Modern Science of Mental Health has also been re-written by CSI, along with 913 other titles listed in the Library of Congress records. CST is the owner of the copyrights for all of these re-writes.

In all of these re-written books – LRH is NOT the author. CSI is the author.

In order to make it appear to the public that LRH is the author, LRH’s name is made part of the copyrighted title, to deceive the public into thinking LRH wrote it:

SCIENTOLOGY: A NEW SLANT ON LIFE/L. RON HUBBARD

The above is the copyrighted TITLE of the book in Library of Congress records.

Notice that the book cover does not say BY L. Ron Hubbard.

In fact, none of the above re-writes are authored by LRH.

The issues are all "based on the works of LRH". The author is CSI.

In 1988 the Life Improvement Courses are released by CSI, making the bottom of the Bridge a minefield of squirrel alterations - all "Based On TheWorks of LRH."

For example -

Here is the original LRH PL 10 September 1982 –

This is called rip off. It is the exchange condition of robbers, tax men, governments and other criminal elements.

Here is the CSI squirrel Life Improvement Course "Dynamics of Money" page 45 –

This is called rip off. It is the exchange condition of robbers, most tax men, many governments and criminal elements.

Alteration of the LRH Book Self Analysis:

The original LRH book –

The technical name of the questioning process used in this volume is Dianetics Straight Wire with Validation MEST processing. This is actually not self-auditing. It is auditing done on the reader by the author. Actually, the reader is being audited by L. Ron Hubbard. Straight Wire processing is relatively safe on any case and is the most elementary process in Dianetics.

The 1989 squirrel version by L. Ron Hubbard Library –

Deleted – the above paragraph is deleted.

Note –
As usual, the alterations to the book are not limited to the above example, given here.

Alteration of the LRH book History of Man:

Comparison of the 1980 version to the 1988 squirrel version -

In the book are several points where the words "Scientology 8-8008" were changed to "Technique 80" or to "Technique 88" (page 11, 23, 87 of the 1988 issue)

The last 2 Pages about Scn 8-8008 are totally missing!

On page 130 is written:
"TECHNIQUE 88 is an E-meter technique. It can be run without an E-meter but this permits all manner of dodging and evading. And there are usually six or ten entirely different banks in any preclear beside his own lots of places to dodge into."

But the next sentence is missing: But SCIENTOLOGY 8-8008 solves all this for you.

Alteration of LRH tape lecture Study - Evaluation of Information:

1982 LRH version -

But of course, all GPMs are composed of words. They're actually not composed of English words; they're composed of significances which are connected to masses. These masses are very capable of pushing somebody's head off.

GPM words are the lions, the high voltage, the various other professional danger points with which you live in Scientology - the words, the words of the GPMs, and that sort of thing.

And when you start fooling around with GPMs, you know very well you can knock your head off; you know very well that this is not something to lightly fool with; you know very well what they can do to somebody. You see somebody around on crutches gimping around, he's got arthritus - arthitus, exclamation point, you see, and so on. What's the matter with him? Well, he's just all wound up in a GPM someplace; that's really all that is wrong with him. Even if it's an engram, why, it's held in place with a GPM.

1987 squirrel version -

Deleted – all the above has been deleted.

Note - The deletions and alterations to this tape are not limited to the above example.

Alteration of LRH SHSBC tape of 22 Jun 1961 Running CCHs:
Alteration of LRH SHSBC tape of 20 Feb 1962 What Is A Withhold:


over 1000 words deleted from each tape

Alteration of PDC tape 15:

The LRH orginal PDC Tape 15 The Logics: Infinity-Valued Logic 4 Dec 1952 –

You can get a much better fee- I tell you as auditors quite frankly- it's much easier to get a great deal of money out of somebody who's on a down spiral into becoming MEST than it is to get money out of somebody who is going on an up spiral toward becoming theta.

The 1991 squirrel version

Deleted – the above paragraph is deleted.

As you can see from the above documentation -

CST, RTC and CSI have conspired to destroy LRH original teachings through a constant campaign of alterations, deletions and fabrications of LRH issues.
CST, RTC and CSI have also conspired to commit felony fraud on the paying public by making the false statement that all of the subject has been made available in a "pure, unadulterated form."

MY EXPERIENCE AT SUNDAY SERVICE
15 Feb 00

I got a call from my local org recently about their Sunday Service, and found out some very interesting data.

As the 'service' got under way, we all stood, and there was a reading of the "Prayer for Total Freedom" contained at the back of the booklet. Now in my 15 years with Scientology, this was the first time I have EVER seen this "prayer". And based on all the books, PLs, Bulletins, etc. that I have read, and all the tapes I have listened to, this did NOT look like something Ron wrote. And again, there was no reference to the source of this 'prayer'.

Here is the actual text of the "Prayer for Total Freedom" contained in the booklet:

May the author of the universe enable all men to reach an understanding of their spiritual nature.

May awareness and understanding of life expand, so that all may come to know the author of the universe.

And may others also reach this understanding which brings Total Freedom.

At this time, we think of those whose liberty is threatened; of those who have suffered imprisonment for their beliefs; of those who are enslaved or martyred, and for all those who are brutalized, trapped or attacked.

We pray that human rights will be preserved so that all people may believe and worship freely, so that freedom will once again be seen in our land.

Freedom from war, and poverty, and want; freedom to be; freedom to do and freedom to have.

Freedom to use and understand man's potential - a potential that is God-given and Godlike.

And freedom to achieve that understanding and awareness that is Total Freedom.

May God let it be so.

(Thus endeth the reading of the holy words from the high-priests of the Church of Spiritual Technology.)

As the service progressed, there was a group process that was run on the 'congregation'. It did not have a title, it was simply being read out of the book by the 'minister'. It lasted about 15 or 20 min. At the end of the process, I asked the 'minister' for the source reference on that group process. He stumbled around looking through the 'sermon' for any reference to source, but after a minute or so, said that there wasn't one that he could find, and that we would find it after the 'sermon' was over.

We looked together for 5 min. or so for any references to the 'source' of the material contained in this book, including the group processes - there was none. The only 'source' reference that I could find on the little booklet (An Introduction to Church Services) was contained in VERY SMALL printing at the bottom of the back cover that said:

1999 L. Ron Hubbard Library All Rights Reserved

Note – L. Ron Hubbard Library is a front name for the Church of Spiritual Technology. CST claims to own the copyrights and trademarks of Dianetics and Scientology.

 

Suppressive Reasonableness

The following types of people have justifiers for the overt of altering LRH issues:

1. Those who are guilty of altering LRH issues.
2. Those who have a low confront of evil.
3. Those in fear of RTC = PTS.
4. Those who have some vested interest to protect, for example, a business.

All of the above types of people are reasonable about the High Crime (suppressive act) of altering LRH issues. Because they cannot confront the overt committed, they attempt to explain it all away instead of applying KSW and bringing the offenders to justice.

Here are some examples of justifiers given:

1. Mike and Virginia must have overts.

Fact – Even if Mike and Virginia were bank robbers it would not change the fact that the suppressive management is guilty of the High Crime of altering LRH issues.

2. Nothing important was changed.

Fact – To name just a few important changes - Axiom 3, GPM data, the false datum on tone arm action, and C/S Series 73. The statement that nothing important was changed is a lie.

3. We needed a new copyright for LRH issues that fell into the public domain.

Fact – This is a false solution for LRH issues falling into the public domain. The correct solution would be to get even more on-source so that people would gladly come to you because they are getting wonderful case gains from standard tech. Squirreling the tech sabotages case gain. Making copyrights more important than case gain is an altered importance.

Not to mention the fact that whatever LRH copyrights fell into the public domain, will remain in the public domain forever. No LRH copyrights were recovered by the false solution of altering LRH issues and then getting a new copyright on their squirrel issue.

Here is a quote from HCOPL 7 December 1969 The Ethics Officer, His Character

Reasonableness is suppressive since it lets oppression continue without action being taken. Suppressive reasonableness is a common trait. It comes from THE INABILITY TO CONFRONT EVIL.

End Phenomena for Auditing Overts

Altering LRH issues is a High Crime. It is an overt of magnitude. That’s the truth. When a person justifies an overt, this is what he is saying: "It wasn’t really an overt because of (whatever justifier)."

That statement is always a lie, no matter what justifier he has for it. Because the as-is-ness of any overt is that it IS an overt. The person is practicing alter-is-ness (lies) by saying it is not an overt.

The auditor’s job is to get the person to as-is the overt. That means getting the person to realize it IS an overt.


From LRH tape lecture - 2 July 1964 O/W Modernized and Reviewed:

"What overt have you committed?"

Think, think, think, think, think, think, think, think, think. "Well, I upset Joe."

"All right. Fine." You think you’ve gotten some place now. Of course you haven’t gotten anyplace: your tone arm hasn’t moved; there’s been no cognition – there’s been nothing like this.

Now, you think perhaps that his having told you, now, should somehow or another magically discharge this thing. No, why should it magically discharge it? He hasn’t answered the auditing question, for one thing. He doesn’t think it was an overt.

And you say, well, O/W doesn’t work because nothing happened. Man, you didn’t even get your big toenail wet on the side of the Pacific. The sixty-four dollar question now is "Well, why wasn’t it an overt?"

"Oh, well, it wasn’t an overt because Joe is a heel and because of this and because of that, and so forth, and he deserved it, and it’s the common thing to do in those circumstances; everybody expected me to do it, and of course it was natural that I would because I have a reactive bank, and it forced me to do it."

Now, a guy can go on for some time on the justification of this overt. And you start to get tone arm action, tone arm action, tone arm action.

Until you get the thing worn down and eventually, all of a sudden he says, "Well, even though it could have been explained, you know, that was one hell of a thing to do to Joe. I shouldn’t have done that to Joe. I’d completely forgotten. I had it completely in my choice whether I did it or didn’t do it. And I did it.

And you see it blow. You got one "done," see, one "done" off the pc.

Now there is the auditing of O/W.

----End of quote from the LRH tape ----


All those people who have justifiers for the suppressive act of altering LRH issues, need to be audited on their justifiers until they reach the end phenomena –

That altering LRH issues is an overt of magnitude – it is a suppressive act.

The as-is-ness of any overt is – that it IS an overt. That is the truth of it.

Barrier to Theta Clear and OT

OT is not a piece of paper that states you finished a grade chart action.

The four states attainable with Scientology tech are:

Clear = Tone 4
Theta Clear = Tone 8
Cleared Theta Clear (OT) = Tone 20
Free Spiritual Being = Tone 40

Not only do these states have a tone level but they have certain abilities. A piece of paper that says one has attained these states when one does not have the tone level and abilities of that state – is a false piece of paper.

Those attempting to reach Theta Clear and OT inside the Church cannot make it. The Exisiting Scene inside the Church is that a suppressive top management has altered LRH issues. Scientologists inside the Church have a responsibility to apply KSW and bring the offenders to justice. It is an overt of omission if they do not do that and that makes them also guilty of the suppressive act. Those who carry out an illegal order are just as guilty as those who gave it.

So, Scientologists inside the Church are committing a daily suppressive act of doing nothing about the fact that top management has altered LRH issues. The reason for this is they are afraid of RTC, and that means they are PTS to RTC. So, all attestations to OT inside the Church are false because a person who is at 1.0 (fear) on the tone scale and who is PTS, is doing the attesting.

Here is a quote from HCOB 23 December 1959 Responsibility

"If the definition of operating thetan is knowing and willing cause over all dynamics then we can see at once that responsibility must go hand in hand with making an operating thetan."

The Chart of Attitudes and the Chart of Human Evaluation state that courage and responsibility both exist above 4.0 on the tone scale. So, two of the traits of an OT are – courage and responsibility on all dynamics. Any attestations to OT inside the Church are false because the people doing the attesting – do not have the tone level, traits and abilities of an OT. The barrier to Theta Clear and OT inside the church is this:

You will have to have the courage level and responsibility level to apply KSW to RTC.

Not doing that – pins your tone level to 4.0 at best, so OT is out of your reach. And there is no way to fake or pretend your way around that. When you exhibit a high courage and responsibility level – then you can be an OT.

http://www.scientologyintegrity.org/htmldocs/estimatefreezone.shtml

Ideally, the end result of this deprogramming operation is to invalidate the subject to such a degree that the person stops practicing Scientology entirely. Failing that, then get the person off of the Bridge by getting him to practice some altered version of the subject. Two internet newsgroups serve as conduits towards this end: alt.religion.scientology and alt.clearing. technology. 

Alt.religion.scientology is a major conduit for the Enslaver black propaganda campaign against the subject of Scientology. It serves as a forum for hardcore critics of Scientology who work to invalidate the subject with the intention of getting Scientologists to drop out. If they do so, then they are successfully deprogrammed and are now off of the Bridge. 

Alt.clearing.technology acts as a deprogramming operation to get Scientologists off the Bridge by getting them to misapply the subject by practicing some altered version of it. And, here we have Problem-Reaction-Solution, again. But now it's applied to the subject. Outside of the Church, Enslaver deprogramming agents posing as "auditors" do this: 

1. Intentionally misapply the subject to sabotage case gain. 
2. Mislabel their misapplication as being Scientology when it really wasn't. 
3. Then announce it does not work. 
4. This justifies further "research" and new practices. 
5. This results in people being Off-Source and then they are off the Bridge to freedom.

Additional Links:

www.ronstech.org
www.ronsorgusa.org

www.scientologyintegrity.org