Health v medicine  


Goals of the Illuminati 

Pike's plan for 3 world wars 


Rewriting history 

The grand deception - Manipulating US into war - CFR  

World peace, 1814-1914   

Global Strategic Project 

Letter to 'Sheople' from NWO 

The Secret Covenant 

The secret behind secret societies 

Collectivism vs individualism 

Communism & the Illuminati 

Communism & capitalism  


Why not world government? 

Purpose behind UN 

UN destroys rights 

UN 50 years on  

IMF - created by UN 

EU exposed 

Skull & Bones 

Chronology of ruling class conspiracy 








Up ] CFR ] Global strategy ] Three world wars ] Illuminati2 ] EU exposed ] [ UN ] Communism ] Secret societies ]

UN2 ]

UN Declaration of Rights Destroys Rights  
A Miasmia of Corruption: The United Nations at 50

Enslavement of the American people in a UNITED NATIONS' "One World Government. -- Myron C. Fagan

UN one world government agent (Icke)  
UN Building houses World Bank and freemasonry (Icke)
UN hand in glove with CFR
UN collectivist (loss of sovereignty) organisation  

What is the purpose of the United Nations?

What is the purpose of the United Nations? Where did it come from and where is it going?
Is the United Nations a vehicle for a One-World Government? What are the Militias raving about?

First, take into consideration the MASONIC MOTTO : ORDO AB CHAO or "Order out of Chaos". If indeed there was a global conspiracy to create a one-world government, then there would have to be WORLD WARS in order to create a NEED FOR PEACE. Once those World Wars have been fought, then it would be alot easier to bring in a One-world Governing Body to Unite the Nations of the World.

Who do you think financed the World Wars?
Who do you think created the United Nations?

Thankfully, we have authors with VERY HIGH CREDENTIALS Like Antony Sutton, who
worked as a fellow researcher at the HOOVER INSTITUTE, who have written a number of
incredible books over the last 20 or 30 years exposing the WALL STREET BANKERS as the source of financing for the build-up of the Soviet Union from 1917 through the 1970's and beyond as well as the financing of the HITLER war machine in NAZI Germany. Sutton explains that the reasoning behind this lunacy is at the root "Hegelion Philosophy". The "Group", otherwise known as "Skull and Bones" the super secret society from Yale, all have taken time studying over in Germany under Hegelian philosophers. The Hegelian Philosophy asserts a thesis and antithesis.

Create CONFLICT, create PROFIT, and come up with a synthesis. Have you ever noticed that our society is becoming more of a SYNTHESIS of SOCIALISM, COMMUNISM, and an
OBSCURED form of CAPITALISM. Well the United Nations was the Synthesis / Solution to
the World Wars.

Sutton has written extensively on these issues in his volumous books including "Western
Technology and Soviet Economic Development 1917-1971 (3 Volumes). "Wall Street and the rise of Hitler", "Wall Street and FDR", "National Suicide: Military Aid to the Soviet Union", "Trilaterals over Washington", "Gold vs. Paper", "Energy : The Created Crises", "Wall Street and the Bolshevic Revolution", "America's Secret Establishment : An Introduction to the Order of Skull and Bones", (The 1st book to officially expose this secret banking fraternity) in 1984, and "The Two Faces of George Bush", which goes into  George Bush and his Father's background with Brown Brothers and Harriman Bankers and the Morgan Stanley Bank.

From "America's secret establishment : An Introduction to the Order of skull and bones",
"The FIRST chairman of an influencial but almost unknown organization established in 1910 was also a member of the Order. In 1920 Theodore Marburg founded the American Society for the Judicial Settlement of International Disputes, but Marburg was only the President. The FIRST Chairman was member William Howard Taft. (1878 Initiated into Skull and Bones). (Taft's father Alfonso Taft was one of the two original founders of Skull and Bones in 1832). The Society was the forerunner to the League to enforce the Peace , which developed into the League of Nations concept and ultimately into the United Nations." ..."In United Nations we find, for example, that Archibald McLeash (Initiated into Skull and Bones in 1915) was the brains behind the UNESCO organization."

The FREEMASONS have been trying to create a One-World Government for a very long
time. Even going back as recently in history as 1917, they attempted to create an international congress of Unified Nations. This is NOT a recent plan. That is what must be understood. Centralization of control is always sought by people exercising control. The Secret Societies under the control of Freemasonry have worked long and hard for their plans and are not about to give up. We are in the New World Order, where LINES and BORDERS are being chipped away in favor of GLOBALIZATION and TRADE BARRIERS are slowly coming down as well.

This Economic hegemony is meant to create an ARTIFICIAL DEPENDENCE of one Nation
upon another. This will ultimately lead to a domino effect if the boat is rocked at all, thus causing economic emergencies of a global proportion which it will be claimed only the United Nations can or will be permitted to solve.

Just like the Central Federal Government, Taxes and like means of support will have to be
EXTRACTED from the American People in order to support the MONSTROUS CREATION.   There have been reports of Torture at the hands of U.N. Troops, while they are supposed to be "Peacekeepers". WHAT A LIE! Would you consider TWIRLING A SOMALI CHILD OVER AN OPEN FIRE LIKE A ROAST PIG, A "HUMANITARIAN EFFORT".
   These pictures are real and were taken in Somalia.

Read Here About This Situation and other U.N. Atrocities.
MSNBC Report of Abuse of Somalis by U.N. Peacekeepers!! "Disturbing the Peace"
November 1995 Readers Digest Report Report on U.N. Abuses
Soldiers who held boy over fire go free - By Robert Fox

We can bear a lot of knowledge of what goes on in other countries and not do anything about it. We are very good at that here in America sitting on our comfortable couches and watching T.V. But what are we going to do when this problem is in our own backyard? And at this point, who in the world will care? They'll just sit back and say, "Well they allowed it to happen to other countries so they deserve it.

Did you know that several weeks prior to the bombing in Oklahoma the Legislature had passed a resolution calling for the withdrawal of the U.S. from the U.N. and calling for the end of our participation in New World Order Operations.  Currently, there are United Nations troops here in America and they have been involved in house to house search and siezure of weapons in housing projects in several states.

Here are some more related articles :
An Examination of the Unconstitutional U.N. Charter - By Judge J.J. Boesel - Click Here!!

See http://www.freedomdomain.com/un.html for a list of related books and videos.



'Hope of the wicked' 
Geoff Metcalf interviews globalism expert and author Ted Flynn

The most recent Labor Day-weekend meeting at the United Nations -- with 168 world leaders all in one place -- was the largest gathering of its kind in world history. Yet, very little in-depth news coverage accompanied the historic meeting, even though its over-arching purpose was to help further a globalist agenda that many see as dangerous to America's and other nations' sovereignty.

Ted Flynn has written "Hope of the Wicked: The Master Plan to Rule the World", which details many of the agendas of the "globalist community." It explores the convergence, on a global basis, of multinational corporations, foundations and the political and sociological instruments that would form a one-world government designed to bring about a New World Order. With 550 pages of text, 82 photographs and 1,200 footnotes, Flynn's book provides a strong historical basis to show that there is a global elite working to end the sovereignty of nations and to place every person on earth under the authority of the United Nations.

By Geoff Metcalf

Question: Is there a conspiracy to rule the world?

Answer: In my opinion it is not a conspiracy. When you defuse this question, the rest just seems to fall into place.

Q: Do you say it is not a conspiracy because it is out in the open for everyone to see?

A: The answer is yes and no.

Q: What are you -- a politician?

A: Sometimes. My favorite color is plaid. I live in Washington, D.C. As I said, once you deal with your first question, things fall more neatly into place. Letís look at it because then you will understand the social, the political, the economic, the financial and a lot of other structures.

Q: Let me just note this is a big book -- over 500 pages. There is no way we can or want to cover everything in the book. However, I do want to give our readers an overview of what you do include.

A: True. If we took a cross-country ride starting in Boston and ending up in Seattle, we wouldnít have been able to even touch all the minutiae. But when you understand the general overview, everything falls more neatly into place. The word conspiracy in Latin is "conspirae" and that means to "breathe together."

In life, there are associations -- there are 60,000 associations in the Council of Associations in D.C. -- from Neighborhood Watch to whatever. Then there are cartels -- like OPEC -- where you see what they can do with oil so that they can control and set the price. Seven Merchants of Grain -- a very, very powerful organization -- they are a cartel but we donít hear much about them.

Then you get into the concept of what is a conspiracy and you look at things that are easier to understand when you see that it is a shared system or ideology. There are people who share the same ideals. Thatís what we saw played out in Florida to where there was a battle -- literally for the soul of America -- which played out in Palm Beach but took place in a lot of other places. There were not people really conspiring on a ballot level, but what we saw were some people wanting to push an agenda forward as the way they saw the world should work.

Q: Not unlike the Chinese and their plans for hegemony?

A: Same thing. Everybody has a bit of an agenda. Now you have people who are maybe on the left who would say the people on the right are "extreme" -- a constitutionalist, a John Birch Society member -- where they will marginalize you for your view. Thatís actually their strategy.

Q: Rather like how we attempt to marginalize those on the left for their socialist-fascist agenda?

A: Actually the extreme left and the extreme right are very, very similar because what they are really after is control. The point of this book is it is not about left or right. Because whether you have a Democrat or a Republican in office, by and large the New World Order will continue to emerge. They each have an agenda and that agenda is about control. It goes back more to human nature.

Q: There is little argument among most people that there is some group of controllers, some global collection of folks who are trying to move us in one direction toward one-world government. The names we keep hearing are the Bilderbergers, the Trilateralists, the Council on Foreign Relations -- and a lot of these people are the same people. Can you explain who the players are and who really is trying to orchestrate this globalist agenda?

A: We are now going to another level of an organization -- beyond the Palm Beach voter. There is no doubt when you look at the formation of the Council on Foreign Relations -- which at the turn of the century was a by-product of a group of people in England at something called the Tavistock Institute, which was part of the Royalists Institute of Foreign Affairs.

This is a very important connection. They realized it was very important to control America. They had to export and form, in essence, clubs. Because when you are at the very, very elite level, when you are at the banking level, the height of manufacturing, it doesnít take anyone to be in the world too long or to be too old to realize that money makes the world go 'round, and money is the root of all evil.

Q: Rothchild hit the nail on the head. He didnít care who runs the country.

A: He just said whoever prints the money will control it. So now youíre back to the issue of control. Neither left nor right is relevant. Itís a very important point in this -- because the Tavistock Institute said in the 1890s it was very important for the American people to 'think' they were electing a president. And, therefore, it was very good to have balance of power shift left and right, right and left, left and right -- whatever.

Q: Perception versus reality!

A: Because it doesnít make a difference really who we get. Now does it make a difference on certain issues? Certainly, yes. But with Bush, weíre going to get more corporatization -- weíre going to get much more government largess going to corporations. And with Gore we would have had a much more socialistic agenda. The global elite really donít care. We voted for who was put in front of us. Take a look at that. The Council on Foreign Relations, Bilderbergers, Club of Rome, Trilateral -- the same names go in and out -- itís a revolving door. Correct?

Q: Absolutely. I was really disappointed a few years ago when I was in London. Dr. John Coleman is a big proponent of the Committee of 300 as the supreme controllers and he had mentioned to me "The Fabian Society." I was driving down the street and saw this little single door: "The Fabian Society."

A: I went to the London School of Economics. I saw a lot about it.

Q: It is a tiny, apparently insignificant nothing that allegedly wields a whole lot of power.

A: I never understood this when I was there but the symbol of the school is a turtle. This is very, very important. The communists believe that the way to change society is through an in-your-face revolution.

Q: "... through the barrel of a gun."

A: Correct. The socialists believe that is very wrong. They have a great difference of opinion on implementing policy. Therefore they have the thing of the turtle.

Q: The old joke or axiom was, "The difference between a communist and a socialist is a communist is a socialist in a hurry."

A: The socialists believe the best way to change a culture, a civilization, a way of thinking, is to infiltrate and begin to move as a member of the aristocracy, as a member of that group and infiltrate from within and use those principles. That was perfected by a man in Italy named Antonio Gramsci. The concept of infiltrating and changing from within is the socialist mentality to get where you want to go.

Q: That infiltrating of societies is really kind of a prelude to the application of incrementalism, right?

A: Right. You know: Inch-by-inch, everything is a cinch. There is an agenda here because there is a way of thinking. If we were to go to a very, very elite level -- which would be the spiritual level because all physical law is subordinate to that -- when Christ was being tempted Satan himself came to visit him and he said, "All of the power in the world is mine to give you."

Now this book intentionally did not get into the spiritual aspects of this because, by and large, I donít think most people pay attention to that and most people kinda glaze over. But there is spiritual reality. I find that many of the believing people can really grab this material. Because they understand the principle that we are spiritual beings. If you take a look at: Is there a God? I believe the answer is yes. What is His form of government? Throughout the world His form of government is the Church -- through good people.

Q: Is there a Satan?

A: I think the answer is yes. What are Satanís instruments for implementation in governments? Nobody can answer these questions until you can begin to come to those -- thatís what we explore in this book. All of the different entities -- that I do not believe are satanic by any stretch -- have an agenda that is not necessarily that of God.

Q: When you talk about the intrusion of the United Nations agenda, a lot of people tend to say, "Hey, the United Nations -- it doesnít affect me --- I donít care." However, they donít realize how insidious the tentacles are -- and how far-reaching they are. Right now, they are talking about a global tax, a global court -- they are trying to put together a global army -- none of that stuff is coincidental.

A: Thatís exactly right. If you look at the charter of the United Nations -- and you had a lobotomy -- you would say, "Gee that looks really great." A lot of it even looks good on paper -- itís like communism." The 18-year-old goes off to college and suddenly takes a course on communism and they think we should all be communists because it works on paper. However, it just doesnít work in the marketplace. It just doesnít work out there.

Q: And a lot of these same allegedly intelligent people when faced with the reality that it has never worked anywhere keep saying, "Yeah, but thatís just because they havenít done it right yet."

A: Exactly right. I remember the first time I went into Eastern Europe, I was in school as an undergraduate in Europe. I went into Czechoslovakia and I said, "Oh my God! How did they buy this lie?" Then from 1990 to 1994, I was going into the Soviet Union on business -- these were Third-World nations with armies. They were Fourth-World nations the way they lived -- no toilets or indoor plumbing -- it was unbelievable the way they were living in parts of Ukraine and Russia. It looked good on paper.

This is what the United Nations is -- they are selling the people of the world a bill of goods. We already just got a World Court -- Clinton put us into the Hague for a World Court. Weíre marching down a path of globalization, one-world government, a New-World order. Itís not emerging -- itís actually here with a vengeance already. Due to the incrementalism of year-by-year, decade-now-after-decade, we donít even know that weíre numb anymore. We have been sold a bill of goods so strenuously, so stridently, so perfectly -- we are dealing here on a level of unadulterated genius.

Q: Ted, can you talk briefly to the symbiotic connection between the "New-Age" movement, environmentalism, and the Gaia religion thing they are peddling?

A: They are all tied in.

Q: Thatís why I lumped them together in one question.

A: I have to tell you -- the reason I did the book is Iíve been studying this, observing, watching it. But it wasnít one of these fascinations where Iíd turn on the light and read every night about things happening in stealth and as you say "bump in the night." It was just something that I observed from travelling, from watching, from reading. And you see things year after year and you begin to put things together.

Several years ago, my daughter had a thesis that they had to deliver at the school she was at. She chose "Germany, 1900 to 1939" -- the day Hitler marched into Poland -- and "The United States from 1960 to 1997." When I saw a series of tapes (which is why she did this subject) the similarities between Germany and the United States were so parallel, it was absolutely frightening. Thatís when I decided I needed to do the book.

Q: And a lot of that isnít by accident. Iíve done the exercise and I keep threatening Iíll write the piece and havenít done it yet. But if you take the U.S. Declaration of Independence -- in which they list all the grievances the founders had against King George and make a parallel list of the grievances we have against our federal government -- you find yourself scratching your head and asking, "When are they going to ride?"

A: Civilizations go in cycles. There is a lot of research here. This book has 1,200 footnotes and several thousand total quotes. This is really where the world leaders -- the prime ministers, the secretaries of treasury, the secretaries of state of the world -- really want to bring the world. The heads of government, philanthropy, business, on a global basis, wish to bring it -- and this is in their words.

Q: The reality check is, as insidious as this is, as ubiquitous as it is, the ability to arrest it, to stop it, to unplug it is just about insurmountable, isnít it?

A: Well, it is insurmountable because this is going to run a path and if there is one single point in the book that is probably the most fascinating, it is really the part that you just addressed about the New-Age movement. The point about Germany is that New Age, environmentalism, and, in essence, Gaia, is that civilization began to do what is right in their own eyes.

Q: Slow down a tad. You know what I was talking about, and I know what Iím asking, but some readers are going to ask, "What the heck is 'Gaia'?" Gaia is the earth ...

A: The mother goddess ...

Q: The earth as mother goddess. That is the focus, the nexus of this new-world religion.

A: And what happened is a lot of this country began to move into New Age and environmentalism where earth becomes supreme. I think we should respect the earth and all of its minerals and be good stewards of it. But itís another thing to really bow down and worship it versus man being given dominion of it. There comes responsibility with that -- there comes respect -- but they bring it to another level.

This concept here is so fascinating that it makes your head spin. You used the word "insurmountable." Let's take a look at 22 great civilizations as traced by a litany of the great historians of the world. This was broken down on one page in what I call the "Three-Legged Stool" and America's empire collapses from within.

Every civilization with no exception -- the Mesopotamians, Greeks, Romans, French, British, Spain -- the first step is bondage. But we wonít elaborate on this.

Q: No need. Weíve done plenty of shows and interviews on the Federal Reserve and the Internal Revenue Service.

A: Yeah, but the point is, in bondage, the people are subject to an authority other than themselves. The next phase -- and the immigrant classes can really understand this -- is they come to a spiritual faith where they develop an identity through faith in God and come to have a purpose. The next is courage. They develop a sense of where they need to go to further themselves as a race -- they venture out, breaking away from the shackles of their bondage. The next is freedom -- they gain freedom and self rule -- hard work and a sense of fulfillment bring an identity to the civilization.

Q: Then they flush it away?

A: Exactly right. Well not quite yet, but weíre getting there. Then laws are made to govern themselves. Now as a result of the hard work and freedom -- think about the United States at the turn of the century. Then we come into abundance. Hard work, identity, self-gratification and accomplishment bear fruit. Risk over generations becomes worthwhile. Now we are on the decline. Thatís the zenith of the culture -- the abundance. Think of the Sun Kings of France, the Victorian Age in England, maybe the height of the Roman Empire around the year 200.

Q: Then what happens?

A: Then you go into selfishness. Human nature forgets that it is God who grants favors and the lack of cooperation and aiding others less fortunate sets in as creature comforts are sought. Now think of things like television, the inane, the callous, the stupidity, the banal -- night after night you are just fed absolute trash.

Q: What does that breed?

A: Apathy. Now youíve got a cynical approach that sets in and the effort seems worthless. Take a look at kids. Thatís what you see kids shooting kids about. They see no sense of identity and purpose -- no struggle, nothing worthwhile, nothing greater than themselves. In abundance there is no spiritual development -- thus, they lose their vision of the higher good. They become a spiritual wasteland.

Q: OK, so what is the last phase?

A: In the last phase, we have now come full circle. We have come to dependence. Tell me if this doesnít sound like today? Laws cripple initiative. Answers are looked for in all the wrong places. There is no sense of purpose in life as ease of lifestyle is sought and the civilization is conquered from without or decays from within. They are back to walking the road of bondage but they may not even realize it.

Q: As evidenced by these technological efforts to undermine privacy through computer chips and satellites. I did a story a few weeks ago where they are now talking about putting digital tracking devices on product.

A: Yeah, I actually have that in the book. Itís, in essence, a form of GPS which is so, so cheap. And youíll know actually by who bought that -- theyíve got to track the credit card to every single product bought.

Q: It costs about a buck a unit now. When they get it down to a penny a unit -- and that will happen -- these digital tags will replace the bar code.

A: Yeah, and if you think the government and entities have any sort of statistical profiles on any person, wait until you see where that stuff is going to take us. After the book came out, I was ashamed I couldnít get this in it, but I saw a quote in the Washington Times where the head of what was called the Privacy Council in Canada quit. Maybe he was a little bit of an historian to boot because he said, "I can no longer go ahead with what the government of Canada is doing." This is the president of the Privacy Council of the great country of Canada, and he said, "We have 1,200 bits of information on every living Canadian. This can be no good in the long term."

Q: It doesnít take long to see how easy that is for a government today.

A: FICA, Medicare, Medicaid, State, Federal, your credit cards, your banks, your purchases. Anybody who thinks the junk mail coming to your home is junk needs to understand it really isnít -- it is extremely targeted information.

Q: What do they call that?

A: It is called data mining.

Q: Please explain what FEMA is. What is their authority and what is their job?

A: The Federal Emergency Management Agency is probably going to be the enforcement arm of the New-World Order. Very few people could tell you that it is actually a cabinet position. By and large, a great percentage of their budget is "black ops." Itís really not on the books. You only hear of them a little bit when there are disasters. But there is a great agenda to gather information for the government in stealth.

Q: I found it significant when Rep. Henry Gonzalez, D-Texas, clarified the question of the existence of civilian detention camps. In an interview a few years ago, he said, "the truth is yes -- you do have these standby provisions, and the plans are here ... whereby you could, in the name of stopping terrorism ... evoke the military and arrest Americans and put them in detention camps." They do exist.

A: They do. There are actually three levels of information on people. I believe it is Red, Green and Blue. And they keep data on different citizens. However to a person who has been studying this that is almost on an elementary level. The government has been doing that for years. When you look at a person's buying patterns -- or looking at "Carnivore" and the FBI or CIA and different agencies who gather information on an individual through either their e-mail and where theyíre leaving "cookies" and buying patterns and what they subscribe to -- itís actually pretty simple stuff today.

Q: And this isnít something that just happened with "Carnivore." Go back and look at "Echelon" -- that thing has been around 50 years.

A: Actually it is illegal in the United States to gather information.

Q: Ted, thatís why and how the UK-USA treaty came about. Governments knew it was illegal so they said, "OK guys -- England, Canada, Australia, New Zealand -- we will spy on your subjects, you spy on our citizens, and weíll then get together and trade information. But we wonít be breaking the law (wink-wink/nod-nod).

A: Thatís right with contracts. In fact I put a picture in of the Northern England Echelon farm. I was even surprised 60-Minutes did a study on Echelon not too long ago. The data is beamed from England to New Zealand and then is brought in here through a contractor -- which means it is all done off-budget.

Q: I wrote a piece on Echelon for WorldNetDaily in April of '98 and it sparked over 500 e-mails in two days.

A: This book was designed really as a bit of an overview. There are 24 chapters and each one is maybe a spoke. Weíve got stuff on the world court, FEMA, privacy, the United Nations, Gaia, the feminist movement, radical feminism, radical environmentalism, the Heritage sites, biospheres, etc. What it shows is that we are very far down the path of this New-World Order / one-world government / globalization -- treaties, tariffs -- President Clinton alone had put troops in 13 foreign nations and dispersed the U.S. military to 13 nations without a single vote from Congress.

Q: Letís revisit your three-legged stool.

A: The goal of the New-World Order is to cripple the strength of the United States -- economically, politically, socially, and financially.

Q: Why? Why is that a goal?

A: We are the 900-pound gorilla and the sole remaining superpower. The goal of the one-world government people, the global elite, is to have a ruling class, a military class, and a working class. This is the Utopia of Plato. This gets into the political philosophy of why the global elite -- the illumined ones -- are trying to transform society. Because they believe theyíve got a better way to make civilization better.

They have to bring us down militarily. That has happened. They have to ruin our schools to dumb us down. That has happened. These are not arguable points. They are non-negotiable in terms of what has happened decade-by-decade -- probably since the 1950s, after World War II.

A: What do you see the next phase objective to be?

Q: I believe the next phase is to destroy us economically. Itís going to be the last phase. I believe we are literally in the middle of that now.

Q: I was recently speaking with Joan Veon and she said much of the bad economic groundwork is already completed. Joan tells us soon there will be three global currencies. There will be a Dollar, a Euro and a Yen. Which is a short step away from getting to one global currency.

A: Now youíre talking to what Stalin said. He said the way to control was to break up into regions. Now he had quite a long stretch -- from St. Petersburg to Vladivostok -- which is 13 time zones. Think about it! Itís like from Boston to Perth Australia. He realized the way to control was through regions. What did the United Nations do? They busted up the world into what they call ten regions. The United States has ten regions. That is, in essence, the goal of the Trilateral Commission. From Canada to Terra del Feugo: one region -- "The Americas."

Q: Weíve already seen the start of that through NAFTA. Veon talks about the "American States" thing that sucks in 32 countries which will be "The America."

A: Thatís back into the bigger agenda. All the way from Argentina to Canada. Thatís one sphere. The next is from Ireland to the Urals. The rest is the Asian Theater. Now you have your "Trilateral." Whatís happening? January 1, 2002, the Euro (European currency unit) begins to go in force and it will be traded over a three-year period commensurate with the currency of the existing country that is a member of the common market. But, in three years, the other currency -- not the ECU -- will be phased out. The Lira, the Franc, the Pound -- everything will be phased out. That is going to happen -- not without some difficulty -- but year-by-year, decade-by-decade.

Q: Again, through incrementalism, they are achieving their objectives. 


Hope of the Wicked (book)
by Ted Flynn


- What is the greatest deception in modern history?
- Is there a conspiracy to rule the world?
- What is the plan to bring America into a one world order?
- Hundreds of quotes from world leaders
- The utopian dream of the United Nations
- The long tentacles of the United Nations in your life
- World taxes and a world court for world citizens
- What is the Federal Reserve and who owns it?
- The links of world businesses, foundations and governments
- What are the Bilderbergers, Council on Foreign Relations and Trilateral Commission?
- What are the authority and mission of FEMA?
- What is the role of the new age movement and environmentalism in a world religion?
- The erosion of rights, freedom and national sovereignty
- The need to create chaos to usher in a new world order
- The subversion of the Constitution by Executive Order
- What is the real agenda of secret societies?
- Technologyís theft of privacy: chips, satellites and tracking
- Is artificial weather modification real?
- Who was the most influential woman of the 20th century?
- Who are the world players trying to bring change?
- Pulling the plug on the world economyónearer than you may think
- How will the global eliteís plans affect you and your family in the near future?

"We are grateful to The Washington Post, The New York Times, Time magazine, and other great publications whose directors have attended our meetings and respected their promise of discretion for almost forty years. It would have been impossible for us to develop our plan for the world if we had been subject to the bright lights of publicity during those years. But the world is now more sophisticated and prepared to march towards a world government. The supernational sovereignty of an intellectual elite and world bankers is surely preferable to the national auto-determination practiced in past centuries." -- David Rockefeller, at a 1991 Bilderberger meeting

From the days of SpartacusóWeishaupt to those of Karl Marx, to those of Trotsky, Bela Kun, Rosa Luxembourg, and Emma Goldman, this world-wide conspiracy for the overthrow of civilization and for the reconstitution of society on the basis of arrested development, of envious malevolence and impossible equality, has been steadily growing. It played a definitely recognizable role in the tragedy of the French Revolution. It has been the mainspring of every subversive movement during the nineteenth century, and now at last this band of extraordinary personalities from the underworld of the great cities of Europe and America have gripped the Russian people by the hair of their heads, and have become practically the undisputed masters of that enormous empire. - Winston Churchill, Illustrated Sunday Herald, February 8, 1920

We operate here under directives which emanate from the White House. The substance of the directives under which we operate are that we shall use our grant making power to alter life in the U.S. so that we can comfortably be merged with the Soviet Union. - Rowan Gaither, head of the Ford Foundation, in 1954, to Sen. Norman Dodd of the Reece Committee

This regionalization is in keeping with the Tri-Lateral Plan which calls for a gradual convergence of East and West, ultimately leading toward the goal of one world government. National sovereignty is no longer a viable concept.
- Zbigniew Brzezinski, National Security Advisor to President Jimmy Carter

The U.N. is aspiring to establish itself as the central authority of a new international order of global laws and global governance. The American people will never accept the claims of the United Nations to be the sole source of legitimacy on the use of force in the world. The United Nations that seeks to impose its presumed authority on the American people without their consent begs for confrontation. As matters now stand, many Americans sense that the U.N. has greater ambitions than simply being an efficient deliverer of humanitarian aid, and a more effective peacekeeper, a better weapons inspector, and a more effective tool of great power diplomacy. A U.N. that insists on trying to impose its utopian vision of international law on Americans and the world will collapse under its own weight. - Sen. Jesse Helms, to the U.N. National Security Council on January 20, 2000

It is the sacred principles enshrined in the United Nations Charter to which the American people will henceforth pledge their allegiance. - President George Bush, addressing the General Assembly of the U.N., February 1, 1992

Nationhood as we know it will be obsolete; all states will recognize a single, global authority. National sovereignty wasnít such a great idea after all. - Strobe Talbott, former Deputy Secretary of State and Clintonís Oxford roommate, in Time, July 1992

What is new is the belief that a perfect secular order will emerge from the forcible overthrow of traditional authority. - Dr. James H. Billington, Rhodes Scholar and Librarian of Congress, from his Fire in the Minds of Men

But I am seeing more and more that the War on Drugs is an excuse to roust people, steal their property, and profit from the forfeitures and seizures. - Ira Glasser, Executive Director of ACLU

Further global progress is now possible only through a quest for universal consensus in the movement towards a New World Order. - Mikhail Gorbachev, in an address to the United Nations, December 1988

The creation of an authoritative world order is the ultimate aim toward which we must strive. - Winston Churchill, after World War II




I. The Master Plan Takes Shape in Stealth

1. The Chronological History of the New World Order

2. Masters of the Universe, Loyal to None

3. Hope of the Wicked

4. The Wise Menóthe Illumined Ones

5. Deep Roots of the Illuminati in America: The Council on Foreign Relations

6. Entrenched in the System

7. Out of Chaos Will Come Order: Freemasonry

8. Peterís Keys and the Order

II. Interlocking Network of Politics, Finance, and Philanthropy

9. Joined at the Hip: The World Economy Interconnected and Interdependent

10. The New World Order: Globalism

11. Follow the Money

12. Nothing Federal and No Reserves


III. Manipulation and Abuse of Technology

13. You Can Run, but You Canít Hide

14. Your Life as an Open Secret: Electronic Bondage

15. Angels and Weather Modification

IV. The United Nations Plan to Rule the World and Enslave Mankind

16. The Three-Legged Stool and the American Empireís Collapse from Within

17. Roots of Feminism and the Most Influential Woman of the 20th Century

18. The Earth as Mother Goddess: Environmentalism

19. Tentacles Reaching Far, Wide and Deep: The United Nations

20. Democracy to Dictatorship

21. Dictatorship to Martial Law

22. ďStroke of the Pen, Law of the LandóKinda CoolĒ

23. The Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA)

24. World Army, World Taxes, World Order







A war rages today for the heart, mind and soul of man. It has boiled below the surface, hidden and in stealth, for several generations. At stake is nothing less than the complete indoctrination of America and the world into an utterly alien manner of thinking and living. This book ties together various knowledge and documentation to illustrate, without the shadow of a doubt, that there has been an agenda behind the scenes to control world events, and ultimately mankind itself. It provides sure evidence that a global structure exists that few could imagine, a structure commonly called the ďshadow government.Ē

This book is not a walk in the park on a sunny spring day. It will rattle you to the core of your existence because many of your previous beliefs will need to be rethought. It will question many areas where you thought you were intellectually and emotionally safe. It will also cause you to question the news and other information in a much more penetrating way. At first blush, it could cause you to think that the material is borne from the tree of a right wing radical, an extremist, a Constitutionalist, a member of a militia, the John Birch Society, the Christian Coalition, or other groups that would be considered right of center. However, I am none of the above, not even a member of the National Rifle Association. I am merely a scribe who has read for nearly twenty-five years on this subject, seen that clear patterns exist, and gradually patched together a quilt from disparate information. I am not alone. It is not a question of being a Democrat, Republican or member of the Reform party. It is much deeper than that because the stench is institutional and has existed for generations. People from all different political and sociological backgrounds are seeing that the material presented in this book is not as far-fetched as one would think. When you are finished, there will be absolutely no doubt that it is true. Your perception of reality will be altered. Those who will gain the most will be those who drop the baggage they carry from preconceived notions. Most of what you think about the world is really from the news you read, but most every news organization is controlled by a global elite that has been conditioning you without your even knowing it. When someone can do that, it is genius, and we are dealing with pure unadulterated genius with this group. This group has no affections or ideologies; it is solely about control.

There is a plan for a One World Order, a New World Order, a new way of thinking. It is not emerging; it is here now, and with a vengeance. A paradigm shift has occurred wherein everything that you were ever taught about government can no longer explain what is really happening behind the scenes. Americaís demise is the result of an orchestrated effort designed to force us to approach the negotiating table as an equal to everyone in the world. It is an insidious plot hatched in sophisticated clubs and restaurants where the general public never pokes its eyes or ears. There is a group of global elitists who plan to rule the world on the terms that they have legislated into existence. Who are they? Where do they work? What are their professions? What is their nationality? They are an elite group of bankers, philanthropists, and senior level policy wonks who have signed on to the theory that the world needs rehabilitation because it doesnít work the way they perceive it should work. It springs from a Hegelian doctrine that believes man is best when he serves the State. They seek to impose an impossible utopia. No sense of the Divine will be allowed, in fact it must be forcefully eradicated if a New World is to emerge, because people must have nothing independent of that world to believe in. It operates so quietly you donít even know it exists. This secrecy and camouflage represent its closest proximity to perfection, for barely anyone knows it is there.

The One World Order and One World religion, both of the same beast, will be required thinking; conformity will be mandatory. Those considered politically incorrect will be marginalized out of the circle of influence and will lose their ability to exist in the public marketplace. Independent thought, and those who embrace it, will be cast out of accepted society. And donít think that you will be able to sit by and watch idly as a neutral without opinion, for no fence sitting will be possible. You will be either in or out.

Is this about a conspiracy view of history? Not to be coy, but the answer is yes and no. Why would part of the answer be no? Because the overwhelming majority of the people desiring and working toward a New World Order is doing so from a humanistic agenda. In their hearts, these people believe they are doing a service for humanity and the world, and to a limited extent they are. To the elitists, it is often about doing what is right in their eyes. But who will truly rule the New World? Under what administrative umbrella? Under what moral or spiritual principles? What will be the guidelines? What is the rulerís name? What will be his title? Among this elite group these questions are never asked, for pride and ambition rule their hearts.

The other part of the answer is yes. To fully comprehend the magnitude of this answer and to agree with this yes is probably rooted in grace. Some seem to get it and others donít. The Latin root of conspiracy is conspirare, which means ďto breathe together.Ē Are there people who conspire for the same purpose and intended goal? The answer is absolutely yes. Here a distinction must be made that is possibly the most critical issue in reviewing this material. What are the differences between an association, a cartel, and a conspiracy? These three concepts have vastly different implications if you are to subscribe to the theories presented in this book. Not to give away the plot so early, but a conspiracy is done in private with the intent of shielding truth from others. For someone to think that this doesnít happen, one would have to be naÔve.

As the author, I would ask one special favor so that you would fully grasp the material presented: Stay with the book and read it all the way to the end. The material is very dense and somewhat complicated, and it builds upon each previous chapter. But by the end, the conclusions presented are bulletproof. It is a little like untangling a large, knotted ball of threads in order to weave together a shirt. If you wish to skip a part because the information doesnít particularly interest you, grab the essence of what is being said and move on. It was an enormous task to piece together very fragmented information and get it to flow. By the end of the book, you will see that One World government is going to be a reality because the plan is so close to completion. Your comfort zone will be disturbed. There is a Master Plan for the conquest of the world, but few are even aware that it existsóeven on the most senior corporate and governmental levels.

Although this is not considered a spiritual book, it could be thought by many to be profoundly so. It is prophetic in the sense that there is a strong base of physical evidence, which pieced together, will point to the fulfillment of the general confluence of events. The thinking person would realize that the world is at war, with opposing forces seeking dominion and control. Is there a God? Does Satan exist? If you believe the answer to either question is yes, then you could safely assume that there is a battle for controlóspiritual and physical. This is fairly elemental logic, but it requires honesty. In this sense, the book could be thought to be spiritual, however, the material is not presented as such. If you are to see the validity and the strength of the plans of the architects themselves, you will see the plan at first on an intellectual level that will then drift into the spiritual, this because of the implications of the period of history we are in. Since we are principally a society numb to eternal truths, noise, entertainment, sports, and other distractions cause us to have a difficult time with truth or hard thinking. Such honesty and effort are anathema to our culture, especially in the last generation or two. Creature comforts in their many forms have dulled us to any sense of the virtuous and righteous. Although any historian will tell you this has often been the case, as people are the same in history due to human nature, we are clearly different from previous generations in many ways. For instance, the threat of nuclear devastation that could wipe out civilization for the next 1,000 years is a reality, and this makes us very different no matter how you slice it up.

This book covers a lot of ground: the role of a Master Plan originating in Bavaria, Germany, with the help of secret societies; the United Nations agenda on many fronts; the Federal Reserve, which is really owned by private banks; New Age mysticism; philanthropy and foundations; the role of the World Bank, the International Finance Corporation, international banks, transnational corporations; the Euro currency; why there is so much movement of the military around the world; the intentional ďdumbing downĒ of U.S. education over several generations; environmentalism; the role of treaties like NAFTA and GATT; and the ever critical issue of eliminating national sovereignty globally in order to have a world without borders. These are only a few of the issues discussed. Each chapter covers a significant area, each a primary focus of the One World agenda. The puzzle is assembled piece by piece, and by the end you will be able to see an image of what has been built in stealth. Each piece looks simple and innocuous by itself. It could appear to be merely the convergence of time and circumstance that has built the New World, and to a certain extent this is true. But there are powerful forces and people behind many political and social events, and they are shaping the destiny of the world. The people are the ďwise menĒ or the ďillumined onesĒ who desire to govern the world as they see fit. We are talking about premeditated and coordinated plans that are laying waste to America and to the world.

One reads this information with a growing sense of futility. Is it a fait accompli? Up against so many past generations of rot from within, can the tide be turned around? Again, the answer is yes and no. It depends on how you view the world. The changes in our midst have been ongoing for many years, but times of crisis speed the rate of change. Our world is now at the dawn of the 21st century and poised for cataclysmic changes. A New Era awaits us which I believe we will see.

Soundly interconnected and interdependent, we are joined at the hip in a global economy. A major crisis, planned or by chance, could usher in the New World that has been the goal of the global elite for so long. It is within their grasp, and so little remains, short of Divine intervention, that could thwart their victory. It is up to people like you to stop the erosion of rights and freedom. A major ingredient of the remedy to halt this downward slide will be your hunger for knowledge and the truth, to know not just what the battle is for, but what it is against. Most important is your willingness to be involved in lifting off the mask, and exposing the hidden and menacing face, of the New World Order. As Edmund Burke said, ďAll that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.Ē


Annan prepares for privatisation of UN

By Joe Lauria in New York and Fraser Nelson
12 February 2006

Pressure from US forces Secretary General to put reforms in place

THE United Nations has drawn up plans to privatise the bulk of its staff at its New York headquarters or have their work done more cheaply overseas. The move is in response to mounting demands for reform from the United States, its biggest paymaster.

The Business has learned that Kofi Annan, the UN secretary general, has commissioned a study into the outsourcing of the department for General Assembly and Conference Management, the main UN decision-making body whose officials issue about 200 documents a day in six languages.

The move comes as the UN grapples with the oil-for-food scandal in which officials have been accused of taking bribes from Saddam Hussein's regime.

Annan will report by the end of February on management reforms to the General Assembly. According to an internal UN document previewing Annan's report obtained by The Business, he will include "proposals to outsource or off-shore select administrative processes" -- suggesting its New York headquarters may shed staff.

Annan is reviewing the study conducted for the UN by US consulting firms Epstein & Fass Associates and Faulkner & Associates. Their preliminary study, which The Business has seen, makes no firm recommendations. But it examines three privatisation possibilities, from the most conservative to the most radical:

* Maintain the status quo of in-house operations, but save money and create efficiency through greater use of technology and eliminating more than 200 jobs through attrition by 2009;

* Retain a core of in-house functions while outsourcing some operations, along the lines of a similar exercise by the World Bank and IMF;

* Spin off the General Assembly department entirely as a for-profit, private company or an independent unit with some control by the secretariat.

The study gives frank assessments of the risks with privatisation, especially guarding privileged information and interrupting projects if new contractors are hired. It concedes privatisation may not save money. "Outsourcing does not guarantee reduced cost", which "depends on market factors, and also... on how outsourcing is managed", it says.

The Bush administration has made an overhaul of management a centrepiece of its UN reform programme. John Bolton, US ambassador to the UN, once said that if the New York headquarters lost 10 of its 38 floors, "it wouldn't make a bit of difference". He is leading an effort to move the UN towards the efficiency of a private company, including transforming the deputy secretary general into a chief operating officer and demanding that tasks are done by merit, not geography.

Christopher Burnham, a former Bush State Department chief financial officer, was named UN undersecretary general in charge of management last June and declared the UN needed to "refocus on those areas where we have a competitive advantage".

Rick Grenell, spokesman for the US mission, told The Business the Bush administration had no position on outsourcing. "Our position is that the UN needs to function better," Grenell said. "We need to look at all ways to make that better. No one is talking about cutting jobs or turning out lights. Talking about outsourcing is way ahead of the game."

But there has been growing pressure from Washington on the UN to cut costs. The US pays 22% of the UN's general budget. France pays 6.4%, the UK 5.5%, China 1.53% and Russia 1.2%. All five can wield a veto on war-making decisions.

Congressman Henry Hyde's proposed UN Reform Act of 2005 would withhold 50% of US dues unless at least 32 of 39 proposed reforms are adopted -- a clear indication of pressure intended to break the deadlock.

Some staff fear privatisation would cause a cultural shift at the organisation where international civil servants have been chosen through competitive exams for more than 60 years.


Coruscating criticism of the free market ideology of the IMF
April 27, 2001, BBC News

GREG PALAST: Protesters say that what we have here is a conspiracy - the World Bank, IMF and World Trade Organisation don't help the poor of the world, they crush them. Well, the bosses are here today, let's ask them. Joseph Stiglitz was chief economist of the World Bank - he should know. He was in the meetings when the World Bank and IMF met to decide the fate of nations. JOSEPH STIGLITZ: They were making the countries worse off. They'll take a strong position on petty larceny and petty theft, but on grand larceny, they'll look the other way. PALAST: The insider says there's a "one-size-fits-all" plan. Every nation gets the same exact four-step programme to the free market paradise. Step one - freedom for hot money. Step two - freedom to increase prices. Step three - free trade for all. Step four, where it all begins, freedom to privatise everything. Insiders saw how it worked in Russia. JOSEPH STIGLITZ: That was the extreme case. You turned over these assets to these oligarchs at a time when the government didn't have enough money to pay pensions to old people. It turned over billions of dollars to a few oligarchs for a fraction of the value of those assets. When it comes to corruption in Russia, they were willing to turn the other way. The IMF and the US Treasury actually almost encouraged it.

Note: To watch the eight-minute video of this BBC clip, click here. For a powerful summary of John Perkins book describing this process in detail, click here. Perkins say he was hired to use the big international banks' money to corrupt dictators and enrich the coffers of the biggest multinational corporations.